nach oben

wissen kompakt

Erschienen in:

01.02.2014 | Zahnärztliche Fortbildung

Klinischer Erfolg endodontischer Maßnahmen im Milchgebiss

verfasst von: Dr. A. Üsküdar, R. Frankenberger, N. Krämer

Erschienen in: wissen kompakt | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die DAJ-Studie 2009 evaluierte ein differenziertes Bild der Zahngesundheit bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Während die meisten Jugendlichen aufgrund des stetigen „caries decline“ heute kariesfrei sind, weisen 46,1 % der Schulanfänger Karieserfahrung an Milchzähnen auf. Gleichzeitig zeichnet sich eine immer stärkere Polarisierung der Karies ab. Meist werden die betroffenen Kinder relativ spät einem Zahnarzt vorgestellt, sodass Milchzahnkaries oft bereits mit einer Pulpitis vorliegt. Zur Vermeidung eines vorzeitigen Milchzahnverlusts mit Folgeschäden ist häufig eine endodontische Therapie durchzuführen. Im Rahmen einer systematischen Literaturrecherche wird hier der klinische Erfolg unterschiedlicher endodontischer Maßnahmen im Milchgebiss bewertet. Hierzu wurden ausschließlich kontrollierte oder randomisiert kontrollierte klinische Studien mit einer Mindestbeobachtungszeit von 6 Monaten herangezogen. Fazit ist, dass bei Einhaltung eines entsprechenden Durchführungsprotokolls der endodontischen Maßnahmen sehr hohe Erfolgsraten erreichbar sind.

Pieper K (2010) Epidemiologische Begleituntersuchungen zur Gruppenprophylaxe 2009. Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Jugendzahnpflege (DAJ), Bonn

Wyne AH (1999) Early childhood caries: nomenclature and case definition. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 27:313–315PubMedCrossRef

Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB (2003) Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 25:29–36PubMed

Duggal MS, Nooh A, High A (2002) Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paediatr Dent 3:111–114PubMed

Goodman JR (1985) Endodontic treatment for children. Br Dent J 158:363–366PubMedCrossRef

Paras LG, Rapp R, Piesco NP et al (1993) An investigation of accessory foramina in furcation areas of human primary molars: Part 1. SEM observations of frequency, size and location of accessory foramina in the internal and external furcation areas. J Clin Pediatr Dent 17:65–69PubMed

Heinrich-Weltzien R, Kühnisch J (2007) Milchzahnendodontie. Zahnmedizin Up2date 2:145–168CrossRef

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) (2008) Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 30:170–174

Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ (1993) A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 13:378–383PubMed

10.

Fuks AB (2008) Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives. J Endod 34:S18–S24PubMedCrossRef

11.

Guelmann M, Bookmyer KL, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F (2004) Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic) 71:209–211

12.

Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB et al (2006) Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 16(Suppl 1):15–23PubMedCrossRef

13.

Orhan AI, Oz FT, Orhan K (2010) Pulp exposure occurrence and outcomes after 1- or 2-visit indirect pulp therapy vs complete caries removal in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent 32:347–355PubMed

14.

Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P (2000) Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 22:278–286PubMed

15.

Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nor JE (2002) Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent 24:241–248PubMed

16.

Thompson V, Craig RG, Curro FA et al (2008) Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review. J Am Dent Assoc 139:705–712PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

17.

Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Innes N, Clarkson J (2006) Complete or ultraconservative removal of decayed tissue in unfilled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD003808

18.

Ribeiro CC, Baratieri LN, Perdigao J et al (1999) A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth. Quintessence Int 30:591–599PubMed

19.

Pinto AS, Araujo FB de, Franzon R et al (2006) Clinical and microbiological effect of calcium hydroxide protection in indirect pulp capping in primary teeth. Am J Dent 19:382–386PubMed

20.

Oliveira EF, Carminatti G, Fontanella V, Maltz M (2006) The monitoring of deep caries lesions after incomplete dentine caries removal: results after 14–18 months. Clin Oral Investig 10:134–139PubMedCrossRef

21.

Marchi JJ, Araujo FB de, Froner AM et al (2006) Indirect pulp capping in the primary dentition: a 4 year follow-up study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31:68–71PubMed

22.

Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Garcia-Godoy F, Lindquist R (1994) Growth inhibition of glass ionomer cements on mutans streptococci. Pediatr Dent 16:346–349PubMed

23.

Foley J, Evans D, Blackwell A (2004) Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br Dent J 197:697–701PubMedCrossRef

24.

Duque C, Negrini TC, Hebling J, Spolidorio DM (2005) Inhibitory activity of glass-ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria. Oper Dent 30:636–640PubMed

25.

Duque C, Negrini TC, Sacono NT et al (2009) Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal. Clin Oral Investig 13:465–471PubMedCrossRef

26.

Vij R, Coll JA, Shelton P, Farooq NS (2004) Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy. Pediatr Dent 26:214–220PubMed

27.

Menezes JP, Rosenblatt A, Medeiros E (2006) Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements. J Dent Child (Chic) 73:91–97

28.

Souza EM de, Cefaly DF, Terada RS et al (2003) Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass lonomer cements. Oral Health Prev Dent 1:201–207PubMed

29.

Davidovich E, Weiss E, Fuks AB, Beyth N (2007) Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 138:1347–1352PubMedCrossRef

30.

Coll JA (2008) Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date? Pediatr Dent 30:230–236PubMed

31.

Agamy HA, Bakry NS, Mounir MM, Avery DR (2004) Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 26:302–309PubMed

32.

Kopel HM (1992) Considerations for the direct pulp capping procedure in primary teeth: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child 59:141–149PubMed

33.

Maroto M, Barberia E, Vera V, Garcia-Godoy F (2007) Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp dressing agent in pulpotomy treatment of primary molars: 42-month clinical study. Am J Dent 20:283–286PubMed

34.

Tuna D, Olmez A (2008) Clinical long-term evaluation of MTA as a direct pulp capping material in primary teeth. Int Endod J 41:273–278PubMedCrossRef

35.

Caicedo R, Abbott PV, Alongi DJ, Alarcon MY (2006) Clinical, radiographic and histological analysis of the effects of mineral trioxide aggregate used in direct pulp capping and pulpotomies of primary teeth. Aust Dent J 51:297–305PubMedCrossRef

36.

Robertson A, Andreasen FM, Andreasen JO, Noren JG (2000) Long-term prognosis of crown-fractured permanent incisors. The effect of stage of root development and associated luxation injury. Int J Paediatr Dent 10:191–199PubMedCrossRef

37.

Blanco LP de (1996) Treatment of crown fractures with pulp exposure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:564–568PubMedCrossRef

38.

Krämer N (2013) Klinischer Erfolg endodontischer Maßnahmen im Milchgebiss. Oralprophylaxe Kinderzahnheilkd 35:60–63

39.

Krämer N, Üsküdar A, Kühnisch J, Frankenberger R (2013) Clinical outcome of endodontic treatment in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent (im Druck)

40.

Burnett S, Walker J (2002) Comparison of ferric sulfate, formocresol, and a combination of ferric sulfate/formocresol in primary tooth vital pulpotomies: a retrospective radiographic survey. ASDC J Dent Child 69:44–48, 12PubMed

41.

Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N et al (2005) Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques – randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res 84:1144–1148PubMedCrossRef

42.

Ibricevic H, Al-Jame Q (2003) Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 4:28–32PubMed

43.

Loh A, O’Hoy P, Tran X et al (2004) Evidence-based assessment: evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy. Pediatr Dent 26:401–409PubMed

44.

Markovic D, Zivojinovic V, Vucetic M (2005) Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 6:133–138PubMed

45.

Ng FK, Messer LB (2008) Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: a narrative review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9:4–11PubMedCrossRef

46.

Ng FK, Messer LB (2008) Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: an evidence-based assessment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9:58–73PubMedCrossRef

47.

Smith NL, Seale NS, Nunn ME (2000) Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 22:192–199PubMed

48.

Garrocho-Rangel A, Flores H, Silva-Herzog D et al (2009) Efficacy of EMD versus calcium hydroxide in direct pulp capping of primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:733–738PubMedCrossRef

49.

Sabbarini J, Mohamed A, Wahba N et al (2008) Comparison of enamel matrix derivative versus formocresol as pulpotomy agents in the primary dentition. J Endod 34:284–287PubMedCrossRef

50.

Mack RB, Dean JA (1993) Electrosurgical pulpotomy: a retrospective human study. ASDC J Dent Child 60:107–114PubMed

51.

Dean JA, Mack RB, Fulkerson BT, Sanders BJ (2002) Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 12:177–182PubMedCrossRef

52.

Elliott RD, Roberts MW, Burkes J, Phillips C (1999) Evaluation of the carbon dioxide laser on vital human primary pulp tissue. Pediatr Dent 21:327–331PubMed

53.

Liu JF (2006) Effects of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary molars. J Endod 32:404–407PubMedCrossRef

54.

Gruythuysen RJ, Weerheijm KL (1997) Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity-sealing material after two years. ASDC J Dent Child 64:251–253PubMed

55.

Heilig J, Yates J, Siskin M et al (1984) Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy for primary teeth: a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 108:775–778PubMed

56.

Kalaskar RR, Damle SG (2004) Comparative evaluation of lyophilized freeze dried platelet derived preparation with calcium hydroxide as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 22:24–29PubMed

57.

Moretti AB, Sakai VT, Oliveira TM et al (2008) The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. Int Endod J 41:547–555PubMedCrossRef

58.

Percinoto C, Castro AM de, Pinto LM (2006) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies employing calcium hydroxide and trioxide mineral aggregate. Gen Dent 54:258–261PubMed

59.

Sasaki H, Ogawa T, Koreeda M et al (2002) Electrocoagulation extends the indication of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in the primary dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26:275–277PubMed

60.

Schroder U (1978) A 2-year follow-up of primary molars, pulpotomized with a gentle technique and capped with calcium hydroxide. Scand J Dent Res 86:273–278PubMed

61.

Shumayrikh NM, Adenubi JO (1999) Clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde with calcium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde with zinc oxide eugenol in pulpotomy of primary molars. Endod Dent Traumatol 15:259–264PubMedCrossRef

62.

Sonmez D, Sari S, Cetinbas T (2008) A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. J Endod 34:950–955PubMedCrossRef

63.

Tunc ES, Saroglu I, Sari S, Gunhan O (2006) The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102:e22–e26PubMedCrossRef

64.

Waterhouse PJ, Nunn JH, Whitworth JM (2000) An investigation of the relative efficacy of Buckley’s Formocresol and calcium hydroxide in primary molar vital pulp therapy. Br Dent J 188:32–36PubMed

65.

Zurn D, Seale NS (2008) Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 30:34–41PubMed

66.

Duggal M, Al Ansary M (2006) Mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molar pulpotomies. Evid Based Dent 7:35–36PubMedCrossRef

67.

Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks AB (2001) Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent 23:15–18PubMed

68.

Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB (2005) Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent 27:129–136PubMed

69.

Roberts HW, Toth JM, Berzins DW, Charlton DG (2008) Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 24:149–164PubMedCrossRef

70.

Aeinehchi M, Dadvand S, Fayazi S, Bayat-Movahed S (2007) Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int Endod J 40:261–267PubMedCrossRef

71.

Ansari G, Ranjpour M (2010) Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up. Int Endod J 43:413–418PubMedCrossRef

72.

Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A (2005) Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 29:307–311PubMed

73.

Noorollahian H (2008) Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars. Br Dent J 204:E20PubMedCrossRef

74.

Zealand CM, Briskie DM, Botero TM et al (2010) Comparing gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized human primary molars. Pediatr Dent 32:393–399PubMed

75.

Peng L, Ye L, Guo X et al (2007) Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 40:751–757PubMedCrossRef

76.

Guelmann M, Fair J, Turner C, Courts FJ (2002) The success of emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 24:217–220PubMed

77.

Guelmann M, Fair J, Bimstein E (2005) Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 27:478–481PubMed

78.

Rimondini L, Baroni C (1995) Morphologic criteria for root canal treatment of primary molars undergoing resorption. Endod Dent Traumatol 11:136–141PubMedCrossRef

79.

Bodur H, Odabas M, Tulunoglu O, Tinaz AC (2008) Accuracy of two different apex locators in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Clin Oral Investig 12:137–141PubMedCrossRef

80.

Nelson-Filho P, Lucisano MP, Leonardo MR et al (2010) Electronic working length determination in primary teeth by ProPex and Digital Signal Processing. Aust Endod J 36:105–108PubMedCrossRef

81.

Sreeja R, Minal C, Madhuri T et al (2009) A scanning electron microscopic study of the patterns of external root resorption under different conditions. J Appl Oral Sci 17:481–486PubMedCrossRef

82.

Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P et al (2008) Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int Endod J 41:317–321PubMedCrossRef

83.

Tosun G, Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU et al (2008) Accuracy of two electronic apex locators in primary teeth with and without apical resorption: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 41:436–441PubMedCrossRef

84.

Angwaravong O, Panitvisai P (2009) Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in primary teeth with root resorption. Int Endod J 42:115–121PubMedCrossRef

85.

Ghaemmaghami S, Eberle J, Duperon D (2008) Evaluation of the Root ZX apex locator in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 30:496–498PubMed

86.

Kielbassa AM, Muller U, Munz I, Monting JS (2003) Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:94–100PubMedCrossRef

87.

Mente J, Seidel J, Buchalla W, Koch MJ (2002) Electronic determination of root canal length in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Int Endod J 35:447–452PubMedCrossRef

88.

Mello-Moura AC, Moura-Netto C, Araki AT et al (2010) Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth. Int Endod J 43:142–147PubMedCrossRef

89.

Kleier DJ, Averbach RE, Mehdipour O (2008) The sodium hypochlorite accident: experience of diplomates of the American Board of Endodontics. J Endod 34:1346–1350PubMedCrossRef

90.

Mehdipour O, Kleier DJ, Averbach RE (2007) Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents. Compend Contin Educ Dent 28:544–546, 548, 550PubMed

91.

Chawla HS, Mani SA, Tewari A, Goyal A (1998) Calcium hydroxide as a root canal filling material in primary teeth – a pilot study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 16:90–92PubMed

92.

Holan G, Fuks AB (1993) A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI paste in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 15:403–407PubMed

93.

Mendoza AM, Reina JE, Garcia-Godoy F (2010) Evolution and prognosis of necrotic primary teeth after pulpectomy. Am J Dent 23:265–268PubMed

94.

Ozalp N, Saroglu I, Sonmez H (2005) Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent 18:347–350PubMed

95.

Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F (1999) Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 23:289–294PubMed

96.

Nakornchai S, Banditsing P, Visetratana N (2010) Clinical evaluation of 3Mix and Vitapex as treatment options for pulpally involved primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 20:214–221PubMedCrossRef

97.

Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M (2004) Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 14:417–424PubMedCrossRef

98.

Primosch RE, Ahmadi A, Setzer B, Guelmann M (2005) A retrospective assessment of zinc oxide-eugenol pulpectomies in vital maxillary primary incisors successfully restored with composite resin crowns. Pediatr Dent 27:470–477PubMed

99.

Sari S, Okte Z (2008) Success rate of Sealapex in root canal treatment for primary teeth: 3-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:e93–e96PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Klinischer Erfolg endodontischer Maßnahmen im Milchgebiss
verfasst von: Dr. A. Üsküdar
R. Frankenberger
N. Krämer
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: wissen kompakt / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1863-2637
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-3816
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-013-0196-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Klinischer Erfolg endodontischer Maßnahmen im Milchgebiss

Zusammenfassung

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Füllungstherapie im Milchgebiss

Behandlungskonzepte bei Strukturanomalien des Zahnschmelzes und des Dentins

Frühkindliche Karies

Wertschätzung der ersten Dentition

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter