Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Original article

Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. A.G. Čelar, M. Schedlberger, P. Dörfler, M.H. Bertl

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Meta-analysis of differences between conventional and self-ligating brackets concerning pain during tooth movement, number of patient visits, total treatment duration, and ligation times.

Materials and methods

Online search in Medline, Embase, and Central focused on randomized clinical trials and controlled clinical studies published between 1996 and 2012.

Results

Four studies on pain met our inclusion criteria, two on the number of appointments, two on overall treatment time but none on ligation times. Pain levels did not differ significantly between patients treated with conventional or self-ligating brackets after 4 h, 24 h, 3 and 7 days. The number of appointments and total treatment times revealed no significant differences between self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Conclusion

The lack of significant overall effects apparent in this meta-analysis contradicts evidence-based statements on the advantages of self-ligating brackets over conventional ones regarding discomfort during initial orthodontic therapy, number of appointments, and total treatment time. Due to the limited number of studies included, further randomized controlled clinical trials are required to deliver more data and to substantiate evidence-based conclusions on differences between the two bracket types considering orthodontic pain, number of visits, treatment, and ligation times.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11:36–42 Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11:36–42
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartzela T, Turp JC, Motschall E et al (2009) Medication effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:16–26PubMedCrossRef Bartzela T, Turp JC, Motschall E et al (2009) Medication effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:16–26PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger J, Byloff FK (2001) The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. J Clin Orthod 35:304–308PubMed Berger J, Byloff FK (2001) The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. J Clin Orthod 35:304–308PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S (2002) Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci 110:92–98PubMedCrossRef Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S (2002) Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci 110:92–98PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE et al (2010) Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:726. e1–e726. e18 (discussion 726–727)PubMedCrossRef Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE et al (2010) Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:726. e1–e726. e18 (discussion 726–727)PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRef DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat DiBiase AT, Nasr IH, Scott P et al (2011) Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e111–e116PubMedCrossRef DiBiase AT, Nasr IH, Scott P et al (2011) Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e111–e116PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Doll GM, Zentner A, Klages U et al (2000) Relationship between patient discomfort, appliance acceptance and compliance in orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop 61:398–413PubMedCrossRef Doll GM, Zentner A, Klages U et al (2000) Relationship between patient discomfort, appliance acceptance and compliance in orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop 61:398–413PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC (2001) Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 4:228–234PubMedCrossRef Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC (2001) Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 4:228–234PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eltz M, Ibel G (2007) Passive und aktive selbstligierende Brackets im klinischen Alltag. Kieferorthopädie 21:203–210 Eltz M, Ibel G (2007) Passive und aktive selbstligierende Brackets im klinischen Alltag. Kieferorthopädie 21:203–210
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandes LM, Ogaard B, Skoglund L (1998) Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire. A randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop 59:331–339PubMedCrossRef Fernandes LM, Ogaard B, Skoglund L (1998) Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire. A randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop 59:331–339PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Lee RT (2010) Randomized clinical trial of orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:738–742PubMedCrossRef Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Lee RT (2010) Randomized clinical trial of orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:738–742PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming PS, Dibiase AT, Sarri G et al (2009) Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod 79:46–50PubMedCrossRef Fleming PS, Dibiase AT, Sarri G et al (2009) Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod 79:46–50PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming PS, Johal A (2010) Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 80:575–584PubMedCrossRef Fleming PS, Johal A (2010) Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 80:575–584PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuck LM, Wilmes B, Gürler G et al (2007) Frictional behavior of self ligating brackets in comparison to conventional brackets. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 39:6–17CrossRef Fuck LM, Wilmes B, Gürler G et al (2007) Frictional behavior of self ligating brackets in comparison to conventional brackets. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 39:6–17CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton R, Goonewardene MS, Murray K (2008) Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets. Aust Orthod J 24:102–109PubMed Hamilton R, Goonewardene MS, Murray K (2008) Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets. Aust Orthod J 24:102–109PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Harradine NW (2001) Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 4:220–227PubMedCrossRef Harradine NW (2001) Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 4:220–227PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Green S, Collaboration C (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley Online Library Higgins JPT, Green S, Collaboration C (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley Online Library
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jäger A, Braumann B, Kim C et al (2001) Skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in patients with angle class III malocclusion. A meta-analysis. J Orofac Orthop 62:275–284PubMedCrossRef Jäger A, Braumann B, Kim C et al (2001) Skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in patients with angle class III malocclusion. A meta-analysis. J Orofac Orthop 62:275–284PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang LQ, Dai J, Liu JL (2009) Comparative study on pain experience with fixed orthodontic treatment of Damon 3Mx™ self-ligating and conventional Mbt™ appliance. J Xi’an Jiaotong University (Medical Sciences) 30:648–650 Jiang LQ, Dai J, Liu JL (2009) Comparative study on pain experience with fixed orthodontic treatment of Damon 3Mx™ self-ligating and conventional Mbt™ appliance. J Xi’an Jiaotong University (Medical Sciences) 30:648–650
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaklamanos EG, Athanasiou AE (2011) Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:145–146 (author reply 146–147)PubMedCrossRef Kaklamanos EG, Athanasiou AE (2011) Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:145–146 (author reply 146–147)PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Krishnan V (2007) Orthodontic pain: from causes to management — a review. Eur J Orthod 29:170–179PubMedCrossRef Krishnan V (2007) Orthodontic pain: from causes to management — a review. Eur J Orthod 29:170–179PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamara JAJ, Bagramian RA (1999) Prospective survey of percutaneous injuries in orthodontic assistants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:72–76PubMedCrossRef McNamara JAJ, Bagramian RA (1999) Prospective survey of percutaneous injuries in orthodontic assistants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:72–76PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles P, Weyant R (2010) Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient? Aust Orthod J 26:21–26PubMed Miles P, Weyant R (2010) Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient? Aust Orthod J 26:21–26PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L (2006) A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 76:480–485PubMed Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L (2006) A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 76:480–485PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Paduano S, Cioffi I, Iodice G et al (2008) Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems. Prog Orthod 9:74–80PubMed Paduano S, Cioffi I, Iodice G et al (2008) Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems. Prog Orthod 9:74–80PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T (2006) Failure rate of self-ligating and edgewise brackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer: a prospective in vivo study. Angle Orthod 76:119–122PubMed Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T (2006) Failure rate of self-ligating and edgewise brackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer: a prospective in vivo study. Angle Orthod 76:119–122PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B (1998) Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 20:283–291PubMedCrossRef Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B (1998) Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 20:283–291PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pramanik K, Das U, Adhikari B et al (2008) RhCl3-assisted C–H and C–S bond scissions: isomeric self-association of organorhodium(III) thiolato complex. synthesis, structure, and electrochemistry. Inorg Chem 47:429–438PubMedCrossRef Pramanik K, Das U, Adhikari B et al (2008) RhCl3-assisted C–H and C–S bond scissions: isomeric self-association of organorhodium(III) thiolato complex. synthesis, structure, and electrochemistry. Inorg Chem 47:429–438PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Pringle AM, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ et al (2009) Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:160–167PubMedCrossRef Pringle AM, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ et al (2009) Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:160–167PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH (1997) A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Br J Orthod 24:309–317PubMedCrossRef Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH (1997) A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Br J Orthod 24:309–317PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG (2007) Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:216–222PubMedCrossRef Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG (2007) Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:216–222PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheurer PA, Firestone AR, Burgin WB (1996) Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod 18:349–357PubMed Scheurer PA, Firestone AR, Burgin WB (1996) Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod 18:349–357PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott P, Sherriff M, Dibiase AT et al (2008) Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 30:227–232PubMedCrossRef Scott P, Sherriff M, Dibiase AT et al (2008) Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 30:227–232PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A (1998) Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:684–691PubMedCrossRef Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A (1998) Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:684–691PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Shivapuja PK, Berger J (1994) A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:472–480PubMedCrossRef Shivapuja PK, Berger J (1994) A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:472–480PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Tecco S, D’Attilio M, Tete S et al (2009) Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 31:380–384PubMedCrossRef Tecco S, D’Attilio M, Tete S et al (2009) Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 31:380–384PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas S, Sherriff M, Birnie D (1998) A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. Eur J Orthod 20:589–596PubMedCrossRef Thomas S, Sherriff M, Birnie D (1998) A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. Eur J Orthod 20:589–596PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP (2002) Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:472–482PubMedCrossRef Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP (2002) Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:472–482PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ (2007) Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:395–399PubMedCrossRef Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ (2007) Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:395–399PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Ukra A, Bennani F, Farella M (2011) Psychological aspects of orthodontics in clinical practice. Part one: treatment-specific variables. Prog Orthod 12:143–148PubMedCrossRef Ukra A, Bennani F, Farella M (2011) Psychological aspects of orthodontics in clinical practice. Part one: treatment-specific variables. Prog Orthod 12:143–148PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Leeuwen EJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Von den Hoff JW et al (2010) Rate of orthodontic tooth movement after changing the force magnitude: an experimental study in beagle dogs. Orthod Craniofac Res 13:238–245CrossRef Van Leeuwen EJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Von den Hoff JW et al (2010) Rate of orthodontic tooth movement after changing the force magnitude: an experimental study in beagle dogs. Orthod Craniofac Res 13:238–245CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiaoting L, Yin T, Yangxi C (2010) Interventions for pain during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 80:925–932PubMedCrossRef Xiaoting L, Yin T, Yangxi C (2010) Interventions for pain during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 80:925–932PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi M, Takizawa T, Nakajima R et al (2009) The Damon system and release of substance P in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement in adults. World J Orthod 10:141–146PubMed Yamaguchi M, Takizawa T, Nakajima R et al (2009) The Damon system and release of substance P in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement in adults. World J Orthod 10:141–146PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Yorita R, Sameshima GT (2007) A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. IADR 85th General Session and Exhibition, Abstract 1918 Yorita R, Sameshima GT (2007) A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. IADR 85th General Session and Exhibition, Abstract 1918
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu YL (2009) Tolerance comparison between patients with self-ligating brackets and conventional straight wire brackets during initial alignment. J Clin Rehab Tissue Eng Res 13:4893–4896 Zhu YL (2009) Tolerance comparison between patients with self-ligating brackets and conventional straight wire brackets during initial alignment. J Clin Rehab Tissue Eng Res 13:4893–4896
Metadaten
Titel
Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. A.G. Čelar
M. Schedlberger
P. Dörfler
M.H. Bertl
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0116-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Informationen

DGKFO-Mitteilungen

Letter to the editor

Letter to the editor

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.