Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Oral Radiology 2/2022

10.07.2021 | Original Article

A comparative study on cephalometric differences in maxillofacial morphology between skeletal Class III cases with and without acromegaly: a pilot study

verfasst von: Atsushi Tanaka, Noriaki Shoji, Ikuho Kojima, Akira Kumasaka, Maya Sakamoto, Kiyo Sasaki, Tomohiro Fukunaga, Itaru Mizoguchi, Teiji Tominaga, Masahiro Iikubo

Erschienen in: Oral Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The most typical maxillofacial feature of patients with acromegaly is mandibular protrusion. This study aimed to determine differences in maxillofacial morphology between skeletal Class III patients with and without acromegaly using cephalometric analysis.

Methods

Cephalograms of 37 patients with acromegaly (Acro), 37 age-matched non-acromegalic patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion (C-III), and 37 age-matched Class I malocclusion patients (C-I; control) were retrospectively collected. The skeletal and dental morphology of each group was analyzed using cephalometric analysis, which included linear and angular measurements and facial profilograms. In addition, we analyzed diagnostic performance and cutoff values for discriminating acromegaly from skeletal Class III malocclusion using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The mandibular ramus height was larger in the Acro group than in the other groups. The increase in L1/MP in the Acro group, which represented labial inclination of the mandibular central incisors, was the most characteristic feature in this study. ROC curve analysis indicated that a cutoff value of 88.4° for L1/MP had the highest diagnostic performance in discriminating acromegaly from non-acromegalic Class III malocclusion.

Conclusions

Acromegaly was characterized by a greater degree of bimaxillary prognathism than was non-acromegalic Class III malocclusion. Focusing on labial inclination of the mandibular central incisors would be the most useful way to differentiate acromegaly from non-acromegalic Class III malocclusion.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Künzler A, Farmand M. Typical changes in the viscerocranium in acromegaly. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 1991;19:332–40.CrossRef Künzler A, Farmand M. Typical changes in the viscerocranium in acromegaly. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 1991;19:332–40.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright AD, Hill DM, Lowy C, Fraser TR. Mortality in acromegaly. Q J Med. 1970;39:1–16.PubMed Wright AD, Hill DM, Lowy C, Fraser TR. Mortality in acromegaly. Q J Med. 1970;39:1–16.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zahr R, Fleseriu M. Updates in diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. Eur Endocrinol. 2018;14:57–61.CrossRef Zahr R, Fleseriu M. Updates in diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. Eur Endocrinol. 2018;14:57–61.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashyap RR, Babu GS, Shetty SR. Dental patient with acromegaly: a case report. J Oral Sci. 2011;53:133–6.CrossRef Kashyap RR, Babu GS, Shetty SR. Dental patient with acromegaly: a case report. J Oral Sci. 2011;53:133–6.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dostálová S, Sonka K, Smahel Z, Weiss V, Marek J. Cephalometric assessment of cranial abnormalities in patients with acromegaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31:80–7.CrossRef Dostálová S, Sonka K, Smahel Z, Weiss V, Marek J. Cephalometric assessment of cranial abnormalities in patients with acromegaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31:80–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebner FH, Kürschner V, Dietz K, Bültmann E, Nägele T, Honegger J. Craniometric changes in patients with acromegaly from a surgical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29:E3.CrossRef Ebner FH, Kürschner V, Dietz K, Bültmann E, Nägele T, Honegger J. Craniometric changes in patients with acromegaly from a surgical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29:E3.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Seiryu M, Ida H, Mayama A, Sasaki S, Sasaki S, Deguchi T, et al. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients: a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2020;90:3–12.CrossRef Seiryu M, Ida H, Mayama A, Sasaki S, Sasaki S, Deguchi T, et al. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients: a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2020;90:3–12.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements: 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthop. 1971;60:505–17.CrossRef Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements: 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthop. 1971;60:505–17.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Freundlich T, Arueste D, Manríquez G, Díaz A. Cephalometric comparison between an acromegalic patient and his twin brother. Odontoestomatologia. 2019;21:81–8.CrossRef Freundlich T, Arueste D, Manríquez G, Díaz A. Cephalometric comparison between an acromegalic patient and his twin brother. Odontoestomatologia. 2019;21:81–8.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Atreja G, Atreja SH, Jain N, Sukhija U. Oral manifestations in growth hormone disorders. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:381–3.CrossRef Atreja G, Atreja SH, Jain N, Sukhija U. Oral manifestations in growth hormone disorders. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:381–3.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Spalj S, Mestrovic S, Lapter Varga M, Slaj M. Skeletal components of class III malocclusions and compensation mechanisms. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:629–37.CrossRef Spalj S, Mestrovic S, Lapter Varga M, Slaj M. Skeletal components of class III malocclusions and compensation mechanisms. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:629–37.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Janson G, de Souza JE, Alves Fde A, Andrade P Jr, Nakamura A, de Freitas MR, et al. Extreme dentoalveolar compensation in the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:787–94.CrossRef Janson G, de Souza JE, Alves Fde A, Andrade P Jr, Nakamura A, de Freitas MR, et al. Extreme dentoalveolar compensation in the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:787–94.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:145–61.CrossRef Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:145–61.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A comparative study on cephalometric differences in maxillofacial morphology between skeletal Class III cases with and without acromegaly: a pilot study
verfasst von
Atsushi Tanaka
Noriaki Shoji
Ikuho Kojima
Akira Kumasaka
Maya Sakamoto
Kiyo Sasaki
Tomohiro Fukunaga
Itaru Mizoguchi
Teiji Tominaga
Masahiro Iikubo
Publikationsdatum
10.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Oral Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-021-00548-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Oral Radiology 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.