Inflammatory plays a key role in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). Colchicine as an anti-inflammatory treatment for CAD has attracted much attention, its efficacy and safety are controversial and deserved further exploration.
Methods and results
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine for patients with CAD, relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from January 1992 to May 2022. Fourteen eligible trials of colchicine therapy include populations with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (N = 2), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (N = 5), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (N = 7), and involve a total of 13,235 patients which include 6654 subjects in colchicine group and 6581 subjects in the respective control arms. The outcome was reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), as the relative measure of association. Overall, the incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.54–0.77, p < 0.01), new ACS (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57–0.81, p < 0.01), coronary revascularization (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53–0.78, p < 0.01), and stroke (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.32–0.82, p < 0.01), were lower in the colchicine group than in the placebo arm. We did not find a significant reduction in the incidence of atrial fibrillation (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68–1.04, p = 0.11), all-cause mortality (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.83–1.35, p = 0.83), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.52–1.15, p = 0.21). However, we found that colchicine did increase non-cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.04–2.01, p = 0.03). Although the incidence of gastrointestinal events in the colchicine treatment group was higher than that in the placebo arms (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.39–3.12, p < 0.01), the symptoms disappeared rapidly after drug withdrawal and could be tolerated by most patients. Colchicine did not increase the incidence of infections (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.82–2.46, p = 0.22), pneumonia (OR 1.55; 95% CI 0.58–4.18, p = 0.39), cancers (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.79–1.22, p = 0.88), bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.41–3.14, p = 0.80).
Conclusions
Colchicine is an effective, relatively safe drug that could be considered for the treatment of CAD. However, we need to pay attention to the increasing occurrence of non-cardiovascular mortality and infection especially pneumonia possibly caused by colchicine.
Graphical abstract
Efficacy and safety of colchicine for patients with CAD. CAD coronary artery disease; RCTs randomized controlled trials; OR odds ratio; MACEs major adverse cardiovascular events; ACS acute coronary syndrome; NNT number needed to treat; NNH number needed to harm
×
Anzeige
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.
Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.
Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.
Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.
Update Kardiologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.