Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Dysphagia
Erschienen in: Dysphagia 2/2023

12.07.2021 | Review

A Tutorial on Diagnostic Benefit and Radiation Risk in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies

verfasst von: Harry R. Ingleby, Heather S. Bonilha, Catriona M. Steele

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is a key tool in assessing swallowing function. As with any diagnostic procedure, the probable benefits of the study must be weighed against possible risks. The probable benefit of VFSS is an accurate assessment of swallowing function, enabling patient management decisions potentially leading to improved patient health status and quality of life. A possible (though highly unlikely) risk in VFSS is carcinogenesis, arising from the use of ionizing radiation. Clinicians performing videofluoroscopic swallowing studies should be familiar with both sides of the risk benefit equation in order to determine whether the study is medically justified. The intent of this article is to provide the necessary background for conversations about benefit and risk in videofluoroscopic swallowing studies.
Literatur
1.
Martin-Harris B, Canon CL, Bonilha HS, Murray J, Davidson K, Lefton-Greif MA. Best practices in modified barium swallow studies. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2020;29:1078–93.CrossRef
2.
Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. 2nd ed. Australia: Pro-Ed, Inc.; 1993.
3.
Martin-Harris B, Logemann JA, McMahon S, Schleicher M, Sandidge J. Clinical utility of the modified barium swallow. Dysphagia. 2000;15:136–41.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Steele CM. Adult videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation. In: Suiter DM, Gosa MM, editors. Assessing and Treating Dysphagia: A Lifespan Perspective. 1st ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc; 2019. p. 73–90.
6.
NCRP (1990) Report 107: Implementation of the Principle of As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) for Medical and Dental Personnel. Bethesda, MD.
7.
Huda W. Radiation risks: What is to be done? Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:124–7.CrossRef
8.
Siegel JA, McCollough CH, Orton CG. Advocating for use of the ALARA principle in the context of medical imaging fails to recognize that the risk is hypothetical and so serves to reinforce patients’ fears of radiation. Med Phys. 2017;44:3–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Death of the ALARA radiation protection principle as used in the medical sector. Dose-Response. 2020;18:155932582092164.CrossRef
10.
11.
Spiegel PK. The first clinical X-Ray made in America–100 years. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:241–3.CrossRef
12.
Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2019) Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
13.
Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: A review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology. 2010;254:326–41.PubMedCrossRef
14.
ICRP (2007) Publication 103: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 37.
15.
National Research Council of the National Academies (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2.
16.
Morishima Y, Chida K, Watanabe H. Estimation of the dose of radiation received by patient and physician during a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Dysphagia. 2016;31:574–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol. 2007;80:639–47.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Martin CJ, Harrison JD, Rehani MM. Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: Past, present, and future. Phys Medica. 2020;79:87–92.CrossRef
19.
Mettler FA, Mahesh M, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Chambers CE, Elee JG, Frush DP, et al. Patient exposure from radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures in the United States: Procedure volume and effective dose for the period 2006–2016. Radiology. 2020;295:418–27.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Durand DJ, Dixon RL, Morin RL. Utilization strategies for cumulative dose estimates: A review and rational assessment. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9:480–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Mc Laughlin JP. Some characteristics and effects of natural radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015;167:2–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
U.S. National Research Council (2002) Code of Federal Regulations Title 20 Standards for Protection Against Radiation. United States.
23.
Bonilha HS, Blair J, Carnes B, Huda W, Humphries K, McGrattan K, et al. Preliminary investigation of the effect of pulse rate on judgments of swallowing impairment and treatment recommendations. Dysphagia. 2013;28:528–38.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Kendrick DE, Miller CP, Moorehead PA, Kim AH, Baele HR, Wong VL, et al. Comparative occupational radiation exposure between fixed and mobile imaging systems. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:190–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Cabrera FJ, Shin RH, Waisanen KM, Nguyen G, Wang C, Scales CD, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure from fixed table fluoroscopy to a portable C-Arm during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2017;31:835–40.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Nickoloff EL. AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems. Radiographics. 2011;31:591–602.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Krohmer JS. Radiography and fluoroscopy, 1920 to the present. Radiographics. 1989;9:1129–53.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Van Lysel MS. The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Fluoroscopy: Optical coupling and the video system. Radiographics. 2000;20:1769–86.PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
Grollman JH. Radiation reduction by means of low pulse rate fluoroscopy during cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography. Am J Roentgenol. 1974;121:636–41.CrossRef
31.
Xue P, Wilson DL. Effects of motion blurring in X-Ray fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 1998;25:587–99.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Goode AR, Snyder C, Snyder A, Collins P, DeLorenzo M, Lin P. Signal and contrast to noise ratio evaluation of fluoroscopic loops for interventional fluoroscope quality control. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20:172–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Aufrichtig R, Xue P, Thomas CW, Gilmore GC, Wilson DL. Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 1994;21:245–56.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Jones AK, Balter S, Rauch P, Wagner LK. Medical imaging using ionizing radiation: Optimization of dose and image quality in fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 2013;41:014301.CrossRef
35.
Schueler BA. The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents General overview of fluoroscopic imaging. Radiographics. 2000;20:1115–26.PubMedCrossRef
36.
American College of Radiology (2018) ACR–AAPM Technical Standard for Management of the Use of Radiation in Fluoroscopic Procedures. Reston, VA.
37.
38.
Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB, Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G, et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:S263–73.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Fletcher DW, Miller DL, Balter S, Taylor MA. Comparison of four techniques to estimate radiation dose to skin during angiographic and interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:391–7.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Bonilha HS, Wilmskoetter J, Tipnis SV, Horn J, Martin-Harris B, Huda W. Relationships between radiation exposure dose, time, and projection in videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2019;28:1053–9.CrossRef
41.
NCRP (1968) Report 33: Medical X-Ray and Gamma Ray Protection for Energies up to 10 MeV: Equipment Design and Use. Bethesda, MD.
42.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1975) Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 100. United States.
43.
Im HW, Kim SY, Oh B-M, Han TR, Seo HG. Radiation dose during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies and associated factors in pediatric patients. Dysphagia. 2020;35:84–9.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Sung KH, Jung Y-J, Cha H, Chung CY, Lee K, Park MS. Effect of metallic tools on scattered radiation dose during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgery. J Radiat Res. 2019;60:1–6.PubMedCrossRef
45.
IAEA. 10 Pearls - Radiation protection of patients in fluoroscopy. IAEA.
46.
IAEA. 10 Pearls - Radiation protection of staff in fluoroscopy. IAEA.
47.
Christodoulou EG, Goodsitt MM, Larson SC, Darner KL, Satti J, Chan H-P. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter. Med Phys. 2003;30:1033–8.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Pasciak AS, Jones AK. Time to take the gloves off: the use of radiation reduction gloves can greatly increase patient dose. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:351–9.PubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
Kendall KA, McKenzie S, Leonard RJ, Gonçalves MI, Walker A. Timing of events in normal swallowing: A videofluoroscopic study. Dysphagia. 2000;15:74–83.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Balter S. Fluoroscopic frame rates: Not only dose. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:W234–6.CrossRef
56.
57.
Vose A, Humbert I. Hidden in plain sight: A descriptive review of laryngeal vestibule closure. Dysphagia. 2019;34:281–9.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Herzberg EG, Brates D, Molfenter SM. Physiological compensation for advanced bolus location at swallow onset: A retrospective analysis in healthy seniors. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2019;62:4351–5.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Daniels SK, Schroeder MF, DeGeorge PC, Corey DM, Rosenbek JC. Effects of verbal cue on bolus flow during swallowing. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2007;16:140–7.CrossRef
60.
Nagy A, Leigh C, Hori SF, Molfenter SM, Shariff T, Steele CM. Timing differences between cued and noncued swallows in healthy young adults. Dysphagia. 2013;28:428–34.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Macrae P, Anderson C, Humbert I. Mechanisms of airway protection during chin-down swallowing. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2014;57:1251–8.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Burns CL, Keir B, Ward EC, Hill AJ, Farrell A, Phillips N, et al. A dynamic image quality evaluation of videofluoroscopy images: Considerations for telepractice applications. Dysphagia. 2015;30:473–81.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Martin-Harris B, Brodsky MB, Michel Y, Castell DO, Schleicher M, Sandidge J, et al. MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment—MBSImp: Establishing a standard. Dysphagia. 2008;23:392–405.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Jordan Hazelwood R, Armeson KE, Hill EG, Bonilha HS, Martin-Harris B. Identification of swallowing tasks from a modified barium swallow study that optimize the detection of physiological impairment. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2017;60:1855–63.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Bonilha HS, Wilmskoetter J, Tipnis SV, Martin-Harris B, Huda W. Effective dose per unit kerma-area product conversion factors in adults undergoing modified barium swallow studies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;176:269–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
NCRP (2009) Report 160: Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. Bethesda, MD.
67.
Baikie G, South M, Reddihough D, Cook D, Cameron D, Olinsky A, et al. Agreement of aspiration tests using barium videofluoroscopy, salivagram, and milk scan in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:86–93.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Weir KA, McMahon SM, Long G, Bunch JA, Pandeya N, Coakley KS, et al. Radiation doses to children during modified barium swallow studies. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:283–90.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Hersh C, Wentland C, Sally S, de Stadler M, Hardy S, Fracchia MS, et al. Radiation exposure from videofluoroscopic swallow studies in children with a type 1 laryngeal cleft and pharyngeal dysphagia: A retrospective review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;89:92–6.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Sulieman A, Elhag B, Alkhorayef M, Babikir E, Theodorou K, Kappas C, et al. Estimation of effective dose and radiation risk in pediatric barium studies procedures. Appl Radiat Isot. 2018;138:40–4.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Ko EJ, Sung IY, Choi KH, Kwon YG, Yoon J, Kim T. Radiation exposure during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies in young children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;121:1–5.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Bonilha HS, Tipnis SV, Martin-Harris B, Lefton-Greif MA, Nietert P (2020) R01DK122975 NIH/NIDDK: Excess Radiation Exposure in Infants and Children from Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies.
73.
Bonilha HS, Huda W, Wilmskoetter J, Martin-Harris B, Tipnis SV. Radiation risks to adult patients undergoing modified barium swallow studies. Dysphagia. 2019;34:922–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
American Cancer Society (2020) Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. Atlanta, GA
75.
Hayes A, Alspaugh JM, Bartelt D, Campion MB, Eng J, Gayler BW, et al. Radiation safety for the speech-language pathologist. Dysphagia. 2009;24:274–9.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Crawley MT, Savage P, Oakley F. Patient and operator dose during fluoroscopic examination of swallow mechanism. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:654–6.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Bonilha HS, Humphries K, Blair J, Hill EG, McGrattan K, Carnes B, et al. Radiation exposure time during MBSS: Influence of swallowing impairment severity, medical diagnosis, clinician experience, and standardized protocol use. Dysphagia. 2013;28:77–85.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Patel T, Clemmens C, Bradburn K, Beckstrand M, McGhee H, McKelvey K, et al. Effect of a standardized fluoroscopic procedural approach on fluoroscopy time during infant modified barium swallow studies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;138:110396.PubMedCrossRef
79.
McGrattan KE, McGhee HC, McKelvey KL, Clemmens CS, Hill EG, DeToma A, et al. Capturing infant swallow impairment on videofluoroscopy: timing matters. Pediatr Radiol. 2020;50:199–206.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Riley A, Miles A, Steele CM. An exploratory study of hyoid visibility, position, and swallowing-related displacement in a pediatric population. Dysphagia. 2019;34:248–56.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Riley A, Miles A, Steele CM. Correction to: An exploratory study of hyoid visibility, position, and swallowing-related displacement in a pediatric population. Dysphagia. 2020;35:1004–5.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Mulheren RW, Azola A, González-Fernández M. Do ratings of swallowing function differ by videofluoroscopic rate? An exploratory analysis in patients after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100:1085–90.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Cohen MD. Can we use pulsed fluoroscopy to decrease the radiation dose during video fluoroscopic feeding studies in children? Clin Radiol. 2009;64:70–3.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Hernanz-Schulman M, Goske MJ, Bercha IH, Strauss KJ. Pause and pulse: Ten steps that help manage radiation dose during pediatric fluoroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;97:475–81.CrossRef
85.
American College of Radiology (2018) ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Adolescents and Women with Ionizing Radiation. Reston, VA.
86.
Detorie N, Mahesh M, Schueler BA. Reducing occupational exposure from fluoroscopy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:335–7.PubMedCrossRef
87.
NCRP (2013) Report 174: Preconception and Prenatal Radiation Exposure: Health Effects and Proactive Guidance. Bethesda, MD.
88.
89.
90.
Ghatan CE, Fassiotto M, Jacobsen JP, Sze DY, Kothary N. Occupational radiation exposure during pregnancy: A survey of attitudes and practices among interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:1013–20.PubMedCrossRef
91.
92.
Metadaten
Titel
A Tutorial on Diagnostic Benefit and Radiation Risk in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies
verfasst von
Harry R. Ingleby
Heather S. Bonilha
Catriona M. Steele
Publikationsdatum
12.07.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Dysphagia / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10335-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Dysphagia 2/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Retraction Note

Retraction Note: Neuromuscular Specializations of the Human Hypopharyngeal Muscles

Clinical Conundrum

Clinical Conundrum: Dysphagia Associated with Sleep Disorders

Original Article

Relationship Between Pharyngeal Residues Assessed by Bolus Residue Scale or Normalized Residue Ratio SCALE and Risk of Aspiration in Head and Neck Cancer Who Underwent Videofluoroscopy

Original Article

Trans-Adaptation and Analysis of Psychometric Properties of Hindi Version of Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10H)

Original Article

Predictors of Peak Expiratory Cough Flow in Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Original Article

Speech and Swallowing Rehabilitation Potentially Decreases Body Weight Loss and Improves Survival in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Hörschwäche erhöht Demenzrisiko unabhängig von Beta-Amyloid

29.05.2024 Hörstörungen Nachrichten

Hört jemand im Alter schlecht, nimmt das Hirn- und Hippocampusvolumen besonders schnell ab, was auch mit einem beschleunigten kognitiven Abbau einhergeht. Und diese Prozesse scheinen sich unabhängig von der Amyloidablagerung zu ereignen.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise