Introduction
Very preterm birth increases risk for perinatal brain injury [
1]. With improvements in neonatal care, severe cerebral lesions, such as intraventricular hemorrhages and cystic periventricular leukomalacia, are more seldom observed, and focus has shifted to more subtle white matter injury (WMI) [
2]. White matter is particularly vulnerable to injury caused by perinatal complications such as infection, inflammation, peri- or intraventricular hemorrhage, and hypoxia–ischemia, especially in very preterm infants [
3,
4]. Several studies have investigated brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in preterm infants, revealing dilated lateral ventricles, atrophy of peritrigonal white matter, and thinning of the corpus callosum related to WMI [
5‐
7]. Further, diffuse and extensive high signal intensities in periventricular white matter are reported secondary to WMI and preceding white matter loss [
8].
Ophthalmological problems are common in children born very preterm [
9,
10] and may have different underlying mechanisms. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) can result in various visual dysfunctions and is an important cause of childhood blindness [
11]. Disturbance of the cerebral visual pathways due to WMI may cause various degrees of cerebral visual impairment in very preterm infants [
9].
Structural brain MRI findings at term have been shown to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in children born very preterm [
12‐
14]. Perinatal diffuse WMI and long-term outcome in early adolescence have been investigated in few studies. A previous study has shown that neonatal brain MRI pathologies in infants with birth weights <2000g persist into childhood and adolescence [
15]. Some other studies have reported a reduction of especially the posterior part of the corpus callosum in adolescents born preterm [
16‐
18]. The clinical significance of long-term MRI findings, and the question if brain growth and maturation can reduce the extent of WMI merits further investigation.
The aim of the present study was to describe structural brain MRI findings in 12-year-old children born very preterm compared to full-term controls and their association with concurrent ophthalmological outcomes. The hypothesis was that children born very preterm would have more abnormal structural brain MRI findings at 12-year follow-up as compared with controls. In addition, we hypothesized that abnormal MRI findings would associate with adverse ophthalmological outcomes in children born very preterm.
Discussion
This study evaluated structural brain MRI findings, in relation with concurrent ophthalmological findings in 12-year-old children born very preterm without severe cases of cystic white matter lesions or hemorrhagic parenchymal infarction. This included a new parameter for evaluation of posterior white matter reduction, the “posterior ventricle index.” More subtle abnormalities at brain MRI as well as ophthalmological deficiencies were found in children born very preterm compared to full-term controls, as hypothesized. Increased posterior ventricle index was found to increase risk for reduced visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and decreased peritrigonal white matter thickness associated with impaired visual acuity in children born very preterm. Decreased chiasma thickness was found to increase risk for reduced stereo acuity.
Enlargement of the lateral ventricles may represent white matter reduction secondary to injury. To focus especially on the occipital tracts including the optic radiation, we also evaluated the occipital horns with the posterior ventricle index defined as the maximum width of the occipital horns related to the maximal internal diameter of skull. In addition, we assessed peritrigonal white matter thickness. In the present study, children born preterm had an increased Evans index and posterior ventricle index compared to the children born at term, which is in line with previous studies [
5,
17,
23,
24]. Skranes et al. found a dilatation of the ventricle system in 82% of adolescents born ≤1500g in 1986–1988 compared to 21% of controls at the age of 15 years. Further, ventricular enlargement was mainly seen as a focal enlargement of the occipital horns, which is consistent with our findings of an increased Posterior ventricle index [
17,
24]. Griffiths et al. found ventricular dilatation in 72% among 11-year-old children born extremely preterm and in 45% among 19-year-old young adults born very preterm [
5]. Aukland et al. assessed ventricle size and reported no significant group difference between 19-year-old young adults born with birth weight <2000g also in the late 1980s and controls regarding the frontal horns, while the occipital horns were wider among preterm born identifying the posterior region as especially vulnerable [
23]. However, in this context, it should be mentioned that children born in the 1980s were born before the introduction of prenatal steroid treatment.
In our study, there was no significant difference in the corpus callosum area between children born very preterm and control children born at term. Posterior corpus callosum area was larger in controls than in children born very preterm, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. In children born very preterm, lower gestational age was associated with a smaller total corpus callosum area. Several previous studies have found evidence for thinning of the corpus callosum associated to preterm birth, representing a reduction in the commissural tract [
16,
17,
23‐
25]. Especially, the posterior part of the corpus callosum seems to be affected and vulnerable for injury. Skranes et al. found thinning of the corpus callosum in 47% of 15-year-olds born ≤1500g compared to 6% of controls, reporting that mostly the posterior part was affected [
17,
24]. Nosarti et al. assessed the corpus callosum size quantitatively mid-sagittal [
16], similar to our measurement. They reported reduced total mid-sagittal corpus callosum area mainly due to the reduction of the posterior and mid-posterior quarters in 14–15-year-old adolescents born <33 weeks of gestation. These findings, in turn, were found to associate with adverse verbal skills in boys [
16]. Aukland et al. found a reduction of the posterior third subregion of the corpus callosum adjusted with the size of the forebrain in young adults born with low birth weight [
25]. The total corpus callosum area did not differ between the groups when adjusted for brain volumes. Our study strengthens previous findings regarding the occipital region being a vulnerable site with high risk for WMI in children born very preterm.
By analyzing ophthalmological outcome, we wanted to relate the structural MRI findings to the optic radiation connecting the lateral geniculate nucleus to the primary visual cortex. Visual impairment in children born preterm may be a consequence of abnormalities in the anterior visual pathway, from the eye (like ROP) to the brainstem, as well as of a disturbance of the posterior visual pathway, resulting in cerebral visual impairment [
26,
27]. In the present study, children born very preterm had more often strabismus and adverse stereo acuity compared to full-term controls who all had normal stereo acuity. These findings are in line with a previous study reporting strabismus in 7% and subnormal stereo acuity in 22% of adolescents at the age of 15 years born with very low birth weight (≤1500 g) compared to 2%, respectively, 5% of the controls. Further, 9 of 17 (53%) study children with MRI abnormalities had visual dysfunction compared to 10 of 40 (25%) study children without abnormal MR findings [
28]. In comparison, another study found strabismus among 16% of preterm born children at the age of 10 years [
29]. Further, in a Swedish national cohort of extremely preterm infants, major eye and visual problems were found in 38% of 6.5-year-old children born extremely preterm compared with 6% of a matched control group [
9]. The authors found associations between gestational age and visual problems and strabismus, respectively. Those associations disappeared when adjusted for treated ROP, indicating that treatment-requiring ROP is a strong risk factor for visual impairment. In contrast, we found associations between posterior ventricle index and visual acuity as well as with contrast sensitivity. We also found associations between white matter thickness and visual acuity, although none of the preterm born children was treated for ROP and only one child had ROP≥3.
These associations suggest that visual impairment might be a consequence of brain abnormalities in the posterior visual tract, as visualized by the posterior ventricle index and peritrigonal white matter thickness. In addition, the fact that no children treated for ROP and only one child with ROP≥3 was included in our study further supports that visual disturbances may be due to lesions of the posterior visual pathway rather than due to retinal sequelae due to ROP [
27]. For a complete clinical picture of visual impairment in preterm born children, further knowledge about lesions in the posterior visual tracts is important.
A major strength of our study was its quantitative study design of the radiologic parameters, in order to improve reproducibility. Aukland et al. showed an overestimation of ventricular size and only moderate inter-observer agreement in a subjective evaluation [
30]. Similarly, Kulkarni et al. reported that measurement of the ventricle size with a frontal and occipital horn ratio was superior to subjective assessment and inter-observer reliability was lower in subjective assessment [
31]. In our study, a moderate to good agreement was found between the two independent observers for the quantitative evaluations of the Evan’s index, posterior ventricle index, corpus callosum, and posterior corpus callosum. On the other hand, the peritrigonal white matter thickness showed poor reproducibility. Another possible limitation of this study was its moderate follow-up rate. However, apart from treated ROP, there were no differences between participating children and those who withdrew regarding perinatal characteristics. It is unlikely that the results of the evaluated cohort are caused by selection bias, and we believe that our results are generalizable to other very preterm populations in high-income countries.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.