Introduction
No., year, first author | Anatomical markers, method | Sample size |
---|---|---|
[12] 1985 Lovejoy, Meindl et al. | Marker Mk: pubic symphyseal face, auricular surface, proximal femur, dental wear, suture closure | 261 |
Summary age by multifactorial aging method: single factor Mk analysis | ||
[13] 1993 Bedford, Russel et al. | Marker Mk: auricular surface, proximal femur, clavicula | 55 |
Summary age by multifactorial aging method vs. single indicator, blinded test | ||
[14] 1996 Lucy, Aykroyd et al. | Marker Mk: periodontal recession, translucency, root roughness multiple linear legression vs. Bayesian prediction using stochastic independence conditional on age (Eq. 8) assumption, prior: age proportion in sample | 71 |
[15] 2002 Boldsen, Milner et al., | Marker Mk: pubic symphysis, iliac portion of the sacroiliac joint, suture segments | 92f, 94m |
Bayesian approach: transition analysis, prior estimation: continuation ratio, Eq. 8 with dependency corrected prediction intervals | ||
[16] 2005 Braga, Heuze et al. | Marker Mk: left permanent mandibular teeth (except 3rd molar) | 668f, 456m |
Correspondence analysis and linear regression (CAR) vs. Bayesian prediction with uniform priors, with joint probability age-conditional distribution via dental mineralization sequence | ||
[17] 2007 Bhat, Kamath | Marker Mk: 3rd molar mandibular root development, wrist: fusion ossification centers | 346f, 389m |
[18] 2010 Thevissen, Fieuws et al. | Marker Mk: 3rd molar development stage | 910, 16 y–22 y |
Bayesian ordinary regress. vs. regression analysis, uniform prior | ||
[19] 2010 Langley-Shirley, Jantz | Marker Mk: ephyseal union of medial clavicula | 1289 |
Test of scoring system and transition analysis, prior: fitted Gompertz hazard model | ||
[20] 2011 Bassed, Briggs et al. | Marker Mk: 3rd molar development, clavicular epiphysis, spheno-occipital synchondrosis | 184f, 421m |
Multiple linear regression with scoring system | ||
[21] 2015 Tangmose, Thevissen et al. | Marker Mk: 3rd molar mineralization | 854 |
Transition analysis with continuation ratio, with Eq. 8 and ad hoc dependency corrected prediction intervals, uniform prior | ||
[22] 2016 Fieuws, Willems et al. | Marker Mk: 3rd molar development (K = 4) | 3200m |
Transition analysis with Eq. 8 and dependency corrected prediction intervals, uniform prior | ||
[5] 2016 Schmidt, Schramm et al. | Marker Mk: left hand bones, 3rd molar | 307, 10 y–29 y |
Multiple linear regression model | ||
[23] 2016 Cameriere, Pacifici et al. | Marker Mk: sum of open apices of 7 left permanent mandibular teeth | 2630, 4 y–17 y |
Linear regression vs. normal Bayesian calibration with uniform prior | ||
[24] 2016 Sironi, Pinchi et al. | Marker Mk: clavicular epiphysis development | 380 |
Bayesian network, transition analysis with continuation ratio, skew-normal distributions as priors | ||
[25] 2018 Sironi, Taroni et al. | Marker Mk: 3rd molar mineralization | 1143 |
Bayesian network, transition analysis with continuation ratio, skew-normal distributions as priors | ||
[26] 2018 Sironi, Pinchi et al. | Marker Mk: pulp chamber volume | 286 |
Bayesian network, transition analysis with continuation ratio, normal and uniform distributions as priors | ||
[6] 2018 Kumagai, Willems et al. | Marker Mk: development teeth, cervical vertebrae, craniofacial growth, hand bones, wrist bones | 135f, 121m |
Transition analysis with continuation ratio and Eq. 8 | ||
[27] 2019 Konigsberg, Frankenberg et al. | Marker Mk: 3rd molar root apex completion | 1184m |
Transition analysis with probit regression, Laplace‑, normal‑, uniform distribution as prior | ||
[28] 2020 De Tobel, Fieuws et al. | Marker Mk: 3rd molar development, left wrist, clavicula development Transition analysis with continuation ratio and with Eq. 8 and dependency corrected prediction intervals | 160f, 138m |