Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Oral Radiology 1/2024

29.09.2023 | Original Article

Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf morphology between adolescents and adults with different vertical patterns using CBCT

verfasst von: Xiaoxu Fang, Hong Ding, Cunhui Fan, Lei Pang, Tao Xu, Jialin Liu, Chunmiao Jiang

Erschienen in: Oral Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

This retrospective study aimed to analyze the anatomical structure of the mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) in adolescents and adults with different vertical patterns to determine the optimal location for miniscrew insertion in orthodontic treatment.

Methods

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 230 patients were utilized for measurements. The morphology and thickness of alveolar bone at the MBS were measured. Two-way ANOVA and regression analysis were conducted to analyze the influencing factors on alveolar bone and cortical bone thickness.

Results

Age had a significant effect on alveolar bone thickness (level I: F = 62.449, level II: F = 18.86, p < 0.001), cortical bone thickness (level II: F = 18.86, p < 0.001), alveolar bone tilt (F = 6.267, p = 0.013), and second molar tilt (F = 6.693, p = 0.01). Different vertical patterns also influenced alveolar bone thickness (level I: F = 20.950, level II: F = 28.470, p < 0.001), cortical bone thickness (level I: F = 23.911, level II: F = 23.370, p < 0.001), and alveolar bone tilt (F = 27.046, p < 0.001). As age increased, the alveolar bone thickness at level I decreased by 0.096 mm and at level II decreased by 0.073 mm. Conversely, the thickness of alveolar bone at level I and level II increased by 0.06 mm and 0.075 mm, respectively. The cortical bone thickness at level I and level II increased by 0.024 mm and 0.29 mm, respectively. However, the alveolar bone thickness decreased by 0.931 mm and 1.545 mm at level I and level II, and the cortical bone thickness decreased by 0.542 mm and 0.640 mm at level I and level II, respectively.

Conclusion

Age, different vertical patterns, alveolar bone inclination, and different shapes of MBS significantly affected the thickness of alveolar bone and cortical bone in the MBS area. Notably, only alveolar bone thickness and cortical bone thickness at level II were affected by age and different vertical patterns simultaneously. These findings can provide valuable insights for orthodontic practitioners in selecting the most suitable location for miniscrew insertion during treatment planning.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung EH, Kim SJ, Chun YS, Park YC, Yu HS, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of whole maxillary dentition according to force application points. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45(1):20–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sung EH, Kim SJ, Chun YS, Park YC, Yu HS, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of whole maxillary dentition according to force application points. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45(1):20–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung KR, Kim SH, Choo H, Kook YA, Cope JB. Distalization of the mandibular dentition with mini-implants to correct a Class III malocclusion with a midline deviation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(1):135–46.PubMedCrossRef Chung KR, Kim SH, Choo H, Kook YA, Cope JB. Distalization of the mandibular dentition with mini-implants to correct a Class III malocclusion with a midline deviation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(1):135–46.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishimura M, Sannohe M, Nagasaka H, Igarashi K, Sugawara J. Nonextraction treatment with temporary skeletal anchorage devices to correct a Class II Division 2 malocclusion with excessive gingival display. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145(1):85–94.CrossRef Nishimura M, Sannohe M, Nagasaka H, Igarashi K, Sugawara J. Nonextraction treatment with temporary skeletal anchorage devices to correct a Class II Division 2 malocclusion with excessive gingival display. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145(1):85–94.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146(5):594–602.CrossRef Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146(5):594–602.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jing Y, Han X, Guo Y, Li J, Bai D. Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular denti tion distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(6):877–87.CrossRef Jing Y, Han X, Guo Y, Li J, Bai D. Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular denti tion distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(6):877–87.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Maeda A, Sakoguchi Y, Miyawaki S. Patient with oligodontia treated with a miniscrew for unilateral mesial movement of the maxillary molars and alignment of an impacted third molar. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(3):430–40.CrossRef Maeda A, Sakoguchi Y, Miyawaki S. Patient with oligodontia treated with a miniscrew for unilateral mesial movement of the maxillary molars and alignment of an impacted third molar. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(3):430–40.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;153(4):505–11.CrossRef Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;153(4):505–11.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM, Spinuzza P, Caprioglio A, Perillo L, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(5):745–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM, Spinuzza P, Caprioglio A, Perillo L, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(5):745–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen K, Cao Y. Class III malocclusion treated with distalization of the mandibular dentition with miniscrew anchorage: a 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(6):1043–53.CrossRef Chen K, Cao Y. Class III malocclusion treated with distalization of the mandibular dentition with miniscrew anchorage: a 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(6):1043–53.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosein YK, Smith A, Dunning CE, Tassi A. Insertion torques of self-drilling mini-implants in simulated mandibular bone: assessment of potentia l for implant fracture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(3):e57-64.PubMedCrossRef Hosein YK, Smith A, Dunning CE, Tassi A. Insertion torques of self-drilling mini-implants in simulated mandibular bone: assessment of potentia l for implant fracture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(3):e57-64.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Y, Xu Z, Tan L, Tan L, Zhao Z, Yang P, Li Y, Tang T, Zhao L. Orthodontic mini-implant stability under continuous or intermittent loading: a histomorphometric and biomechanical analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):163–72.PubMedCrossRef Wu Y, Xu Z, Tan L, Tan L, Zhao Z, Yang P, Li Y, Tang T, Zhao L. Orthodontic mini-implant stability under continuous or intermittent loading: a histomorphometric and biomechanical analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):163–72.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi J, Ge M, Li M, Li C, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Z. Comparison of the success rate between self-drilling and self-tapping miniscrews: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(3):287–93.PubMed Yi J, Ge M, Li M, Li C, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Z. Comparison of the success rate between self-drilling and self-tapping miniscrews: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(3):287–93.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):825–9.PubMedCrossRef Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):825–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon CH, Park HK, Nam JS, Im JS, Baek SH. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138(1):51–7.CrossRef Moon CH, Park HK, Nam JS, Im JS, Baek SH. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138(1):51–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jing Z, Wu Y, Jiang W, Zhao L, Jing D, Zhang N, Cao X, Xu Z, Zhao Z. Factors affecting the clinical success rate of miniscrew implants for orthodontic treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4):835–41.PubMedCrossRef Jing Z, Wu Y, Jiang W, Zhao L, Jing D, Zhang N, Cao X, Xu Z, Zhao Z. Factors affecting the clinical success rate of miniscrew implants for orthodontic treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4):835–41.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage system s. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):768–75.PubMedCrossRef Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage system s. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):768–75.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang C, Liu SS, Roberts WE. Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mu cosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(6):905–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chang C, Liu SS, Roberts WE. Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mu cosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(6):905–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(2):190–6.CrossRef Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(2):190–6.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Tadinada A, Yadav S. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2021;159(1):59–70.CrossRef Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Tadinada A, Yadav S. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2021;159(1):59–70.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Aleluia RB, Duplat CB, Crusoé-Rebello I, Neves FS. Assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic anchorage: influence of side, gender and skeletal patterns. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(Suppl 1):83–91.PubMedCrossRef Aleluia RB, Duplat CB, Crusoé-Rebello I, Neves FS. Assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic anchorage: influence of side, gender and skeletal patterns. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(Suppl 1):83–91.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas EOA, Lopes de Lima R, Nojima LI. Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2020;158(3):349–56.CrossRef Vargas EOA, Lopes de Lima R, Nojima LI. Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2020;158(3):349–56.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2007;132(4):550–60.CrossRef Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2007;132(4):550–60.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2005;128(6):803–11.CrossRef Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2005;128(6):803–11.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2010;137(4 Suppl):S100–8.CrossRef Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2010;137(4 Suppl):S100–8.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(2):228–31.PubMed Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(2):228–31.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2011;140(5):734–44.CrossRef Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2011;140(5):734–44.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat. 2008;10(4):226–30.CrossRef Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat. 2008;10(4):226–30.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med. 2009;108(3):430–6.CrossRef Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med. 2009;108(3):430–6.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Horn AJ. Facial height index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102(2):180–6.CrossRef Horn AJ. Facial height index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102(2):180–6.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(1):15–23.PubMedCrossRef Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(1):15–23.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat MartínezPérez JA, Pérez Martin PS. Intraclass correlation coefficient. Med Fam-semergen. 2023;49(3):101907.CrossRef MartínezPérez JA, Pérez Martin PS. Intraclass correlation coefficient. Med Fam-semergen. 2023;49(3):101907.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruquet M, Saliba-Serre B, Tardivo D, Foti B. Estimation of age using alveolar bone loss: forensic and anthropological applications. J Forens Sci. 2015;60(5):1305–9.CrossRef Ruquet M, Saliba-Serre B, Tardivo D, Foti B. Estimation of age using alveolar bone loss: forensic and anthropological applications. J Forens Sci. 2015;60(5):1305–9.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Custodio W, Gomes SG, Faot F, Garcia RC, Del Bel Cury AA. Occlusal force, electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles and mandibular flexure of subjects with different facial types. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):343–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Custodio W, Gomes SG, Faot F, Garcia RC, Del Bel Cury AA. Occlusal force, electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles and mandibular flexure of subjects with different facial types. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):343–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu YJ, Lu SN, Xia WQ, Zhang T, Shi H, Gao MQ. A study on the thickness of buccal bone in the mandible of different vertical facial type in adults using cone-beam CT. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015;24(3):335–7.PubMed Gu YJ, Lu SN, Xia WQ, Zhang T, Shi H, Gao MQ. A study on the thickness of buccal bone in the mandible of different vertical facial type in adults using cone-beam CT. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015;24(3):335–7.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Escobar-Correa N, Ramírez-Bustamante MA, Sánchez-Uribe LA, Upegui-Zea JC, Vergara-Villarreal P, Ramírez-Ossa DM. Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. 2021;51(1):23–31.PubMedCrossRef Escobar-Correa N, Ramírez-Bustamante MA, Sánchez-Uribe LA, Upegui-Zea JC, Vergara-Villarreal P, Ramírez-Ossa DM. Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. 2021;51(1):23–31.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang R, Chen X, Huang X. The cone-beam CT study on the slope of oblique plane at the mandibular buccal shelf area in 200 cases. Chin J Orthod. 2020;27(3):121–4. Zhang R, Chen X, Huang X. The cone-beam CT study on the slope of oblique plane at the mandibular buccal shelf area in 200 cases. Chin J Orthod. 2020;27(3):121–4.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen PJ, Lin JJ, Wong YK. Bone thickness of the buccal shelf for orthodontic implant placement. In: Annual meeting of Taiwan Association of Orthodontists; 2009. Chen PJ, Lin JJ, Wong YK. Bone thickness of the buccal shelf for orthodontic implant placement. In: Annual meeting of Taiwan Association of Orthodontists; 2009.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zambrano-De la Peña LS, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA, Ruiz-Mora GA, Arriola-Guillén LE, Guerrero ME. Bucco alveolar bone thickness of mandibular impacted third molars with different inclinations: a CBCT study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42(9):1051–6.PubMedCrossRef Zambrano-De la Peña LS, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA, Ruiz-Mora GA, Arriola-Guillén LE, Guerrero ME. Bucco alveolar bone thickness of mandibular impacted third molars with different inclinations: a CBCT study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42(9):1051–6.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):779–84.PubMed Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):779–84.PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossi M, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Perri A, Gracco A. Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement. Int Orthod. 2017;15(4):610–24.PubMed Rossi M, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Perri A, Gracco A. Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement. Int Orthod. 2017;15(4):610–24.PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(6):721.e7-12.CrossRef Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(6):721.e7-12.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(3):491–500.PubMedCrossRef Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(3):491–500.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(4):495–503.CrossRef Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(4):495–503.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(1):109–14.PubMedCrossRef Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(1):109–14.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf morphology between adolescents and adults with different vertical patterns using CBCT
verfasst von
Xiaoxu Fang
Hong Ding
Cunhui Fan
Lei Pang
Tao Xu
Jialin Liu
Chunmiao Jiang
Publikationsdatum
29.09.2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Oral Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00710-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Oral Radiology 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.