Correction to: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2023)
Anzeige
The original article contains a numerical error in Table 2. Corrected Table 2 provided:
Parameter | Advancement Group Average Change (43 patients) | Setback Group Average Change (56 patients) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
CCL | −0,565 | −0,091 | 0,298289 |
CCR | 0,581 | 0,225 | 0,367259 |
ABL | −0,598 | −4,241 | 0,011326 |
ABR | −5,765 | −3,754 | 0,169629 |
EDL | −0,026 | −0,105 | 0,74881 |
EDR | −0,120 | 0,252 | 0,295643 |
FDL | 0,044 | 0,023 | 0,963936 |
FDR | −0,333 | 0,720 | 0,005795 |
Also, because of the numerical error, there has been a misinterpretation of the results. Hence, in the Abstract and Results section, the results are as following:
In Abstract:
Results: CT condylar position measurements indicated significant postoperative changes in AB angle bilaterally (p = <0,001). In mandibular advancement and setback comparison, values were significantly lower in ABL angle values in setback group (p = 0,011326), and significantly lower in FDR in advancement group (p=0,005795). There were no statistically significant changes found in BSSO and bimaxillary group comparison.
Anzeige
In Results:
There was also a difference in FDR value changes – in advancement group, the values were significantly lower (p = 0,005795) (Table 2).
In Discussion:
In this study, the results showed significant changes in pre- and postoperative values in AB angle, which represents condylar rotation in the transversal axis. This change was even more apparent in mandibular setback group, where the values showed a significant decrease, indicating medial condylar rotation. Lower FDR values in advancement group indicate a more posterior postoperative condylar position in comparison to the setback group.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.