Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2015

01.07.2015 | Original article

Dimensional accuracy of jaw scans performed on alginate impressions or stone models

A practice-oriented study

verfasst von: A.B. Vogel, F. Kilic, F. Schmidt, S. Rübel, B.G. Lapatki

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Digital jaw models offer more extensive possibilities for analysis than casts and make it easier to share and archive relevant information. The aim of this study was to compare the dimensional accuracy of scans performed on alginate impressions and on stone models to reference scans performed on underlying resin models.

Methods

Precision spheres 5 mm in diameter were occlusally fitted to the sites of the first premolars and first molars on a pair of jaw models fabricated from resin. A structured-light scanner was used for digitization. Once the two reference models had been scanned, alginate impressions were taken and scanned after no later than 1 h. A third series of scans was performed on type III stone models derived from the impressions. All scans were analyzed by performing five repeated measurements to determine the distances between the various sphere centers.

Results

Compared to the reference scans, the stone-model scans were larger by a mean of 73.6 µm (maxilla) or 65.2 µm (mandible). The impression scans were only larger by 7.7 µm (maxilla) or smaller by 0.7 µm (mandible). Median standard deviations over the five repeated measurements of 1.0 µm for the reference scans, 2.35 µm for the impression scans, and 2.0 µm for the stone-model scans indicate that the values measured in this study were adequately reproducible.

Conclusion

Alginate impressions can be suitably digitized by structured-light scanning and offer considerably better dimensional accuracy than stone models. Apparently, however, both impression scans and stone-model scans can offer adequate precision for orthodontic purposes. The main issue of impression scans (which is incomplete representation of model surfaces) is being systematically explored in a follow-up study.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B (2009) The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 79:30–36PubMedCrossRef Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B (2009) The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 79:30–36PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P (2007) Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 29:517–522PubMedCrossRef Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P (2007) Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 29:517–522PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Biffar R, Bitschnau U (1991) Dimensionsverhalten von Alginat-Abformungen nach Tauchdesinfektion mit Impresept. ZWR 100:864–867PubMed Biffar R, Bitschnau U (1991) Dimensionsverhalten von Alginat-Abformungen nach Tauchdesinfektion mit Impresept. ZWR 100:864–867PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Boldt F, Weinzierl C, Hertrich K et al (2009) Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. J Orofac Orthop 70:247–263PubMedCrossRef Boldt F, Weinzierl C, Hertrich K et al (2009) Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. J Orofac Orthop 70:247–263PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C et al (2010) Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 32:589–595PubMedCrossRef Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C et al (2010) Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 32:589–595PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Braumann B, Rosenhayn S, Bourauel C et al (2001) Two- or three-dimensional cast analysis in patients with cleft lip and palate? J Orofac Orthop 62:451–465PubMedCrossRef Braumann B, Rosenhayn S, Bourauel C et al (2001) Two- or three-dimensional cast analysis in patients with cleft lip and palate? J Orofac Orthop 62:451–465PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Breuckmann GmbH Automatisierte 3D-Digitalisierung kleiner Gegenstände. http://www.aicon3d.de/fileadmin/user_upload/produkte/de/breuckmann_Scanner/01_PDF_IuT/d-STATION_de.pdf. (Accessed: 02. September 2013) Breuckmann GmbH Automatisierte 3D-Digitalisierung kleiner Gegenstände. http://​www.​aicon3d.​de/​fileadmin/​user_​upload/​produkte/​de/​breuckmann_​Scanner/​01_​PDF_​IuT/​d-STATION_​de.​pdf.​ (Accessed: 02. September 2013)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Lowe AA, Almeida FR de et al (2008) Three-dimensional computer-assisted study model analysis of long-term oral-appliance wear. Part 1: methodology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:393–407PubMedCrossRef Chen H, Lowe AA, Almeida FR de et al (2008) Three-dimensional computer-assisted study model analysis of long-term oral-appliance wear. Part 1: methodology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:393–407PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Deutsch AS et al (1995) Dimensional accuracy of three different alginate impression materials. J Posthodont 4:195–199CrossRef Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Deutsch AS et al (1995) Dimensional accuracy of three different alginate impression materials. J Posthodont 4:195–199CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalstra M, Melsen B (2009) From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 36:36–41PubMedCrossRef Dalstra M, Melsen B (2009) From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 36:36–41PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges J et al (2003) Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 82:438–442PubMedCrossRef DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges J et al (2003) Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 82:438–442PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehrensberger C (2013) CAD/CAM mit immer schärferen Konturen. ZM 10:60–64 Ehrensberger C (2013) CAD/CAM mit immer schärferen Konturen. ZM 10:60–64
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Eugene WS, Noel EH (1956) A study of the accuracy of hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent 6:80–86CrossRef Eugene WS, Noel EH (1956) A study of the accuracy of hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent 6:80–86CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gracco A, Buranello M, Cozzani M et al (2007) Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod 8:252–259PubMed Gracco A, Buranello M, Cozzani M et al (2007) Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod 8:252–259PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Grouven U, Bender R, Ziegler A et al (2007) Vergleich von Messmethoden. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132:e69PubMedCrossRef Grouven U, Bender R, Ziegler A et al (2007) Vergleich von Messmethoden. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132:e69PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gühring J (2002) 3D-Erfassung und Objektrekonstruktion mittels Streifenprojektion. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Kommission beim Verlag C.H. Beck, München, pp 1–166 Gühring J (2002) 3D-Erfassung und Objektrekonstruktion mittels Streifenprojektion. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Kommission beim Verlag C.H. Beck, München, pp 1–166
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayasaki H, Martins RP, Gandini LG et al (2005) A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:128–132PubMedCrossRef Hayasaki H, Martins RP, Gandini LG et al (2005) A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:128–132PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamani KD (2002) The effect of pouring time and storage condition on the accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Saudi Dent J 14:126–130 Jamani KD (2002) The effect of pouring time and storage condition on the accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Saudi Dent J 14:126–130
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS et al (2009) Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:16.e1PubMedCrossRef Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS et al (2009) Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:16.e1PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M et al (2013) A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater 29:e1–e10PubMedCrossRef Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M et al (2013) A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater 29:e1–e10PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer SID (2010) Retrospektive methodische Studie zum Vergleich von digitaler und manueller Modellanalyse in der Kieferorthopädie. Zahnmed Diss, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Meyer SID (2010) Retrospektive methodische Studie zum Vergleich von digitaler und manueller Modellanalyse in der Kieferorthopädie. Zahnmed Diss, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:346–352PubMedCrossRef Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:346–352PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Müller-Hartwich R, Präger TM, Jost-Brinkmann PG (2007) SureSmile—CAD/CAM system for orthodontic treatment planning, simulation and fabrication of customized archwires. Int J Comput Dent 10:53–62PubMed Müller-Hartwich R, Präger TM, Jost-Brinkmann PG (2007) SureSmile—CAD/CAM system for orthodontic treatment planning, simulation and fabrication of customized archwires. Int J Comput Dent 10:53–62PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D et al (2009) Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 25:97–103PubMed Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D et al (2009) Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 25:97–103PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pauls AH (2010) Therapeutic accuracy of individualized brackets in lingual orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 71:348–361PubMedCrossRef Pauls AH (2010) Therapeutic accuracy of individualized brackets in lingual orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 71:348–361PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaas S (2006) Untersuchungen zur extraoralen mechanischen Digitalisierung von Modellen und Abformungen. Med Dent Diss, Technische Universität Dresden Quaas S (2006) Untersuchungen zur extraoralen mechanischen Digitalisierung von Modellen und Abformungen. Med Dent Diss, Technische Universität Dresden
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Quimby ML, Vig KWL, Rashid RG et al (2004) The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 74:298–303PubMed Quimby ML, Vig KWL, Rashid RG et al (2004) The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 74:298–303PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Radeke J, Wense C von der, Neubeck H von et al (2014) Comparability in the acquisition of metrical values on dental plaster casts and 3D-scans. J Orofac Orthop 75:264–274PubMedCrossRef Radeke J, Wense C von der, Neubeck H von et al (2014) Comparability in the acquisition of metrical values on dental plaster casts and 3D-scans. J Orofac Orthop 75:264–274PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y et al (2008) A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res 11:90–95PubMedCrossRef Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y et al (2008) A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res 11:90–95PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A et al (2005) An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 75:300–304PubMed Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A et al (2005) An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 75:300–304PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M et al (2003) Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:101–105PubMedCrossRef Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M et al (2003) Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:101–105PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Schenk H, Fuchs G, Wiemann C et al (1986) Kieferorthopädische Modellanalyse mit Hilfe verschiedener Verfahren der Koordinatenmeßtechnik. Fortschr Kieferorthop 47:67–75PubMedCrossRef Schenk H, Fuchs G, Wiemann C et al (1986) Kieferorthopädische Modellanalyse mit Hilfe verschiedener Verfahren der Koordinatenmeßtechnik. Fortschr Kieferorthop 47:67–75PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C et al (2011) Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 72:111–124PubMedCrossRef Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C et al (2011) Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 72:111–124PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:662–669CrossRef Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:662–669CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Veenema AC, Katsaros C, Boxum SC et al (2009) Index of complexity, outcome and need scored on plaster and digital models. Eur J Orthod 31:281–286PubMedCrossRef Veenema AC, Katsaros C, Boxum SC et al (2009) Index of complexity, outcome and need scored on plaster and digital models. Eur J Orthod 31:281–286PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H et al (2009) Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 23:288–295PubMedCrossRef Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H et al (2009) Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 23:288–295PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Whetten JL, Williamson PC, Heo G et al (2006) Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:485–491PubMedCrossRef Whetten JL, Williamson PC, Heo G et al (2006) Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:485–491PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiora G (2001) Optische 3D-Messtechnik. Präzise Gestaltvermessung mit einem erweiterten Streifenprojektionsverfahren. Nat Diss, RKU Heidelberg, pp 1–10 Wiora G (2001) Optische 3D-Messtechnik. Präzise Gestaltvermessung mit einem erweiterten Streifenprojektionsverfahren. Nat Diss, RKU Heidelberg, pp 1–10
Metadaten
Titel
Dimensional accuracy of jaw scans performed on alginate impressions or stone models
A practice-oriented study
verfasst von
A.B. Vogel
F. Kilic
F. Schmidt
S. Rübel
B.G. Lapatki
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0296-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Informationen

Mitteilungen 4/15

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.