1 Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with increased risk of stroke and congestive heart failure [
1]. Mounting evidence suggests that dysregulation of the cardiac autonomic axis plays an integral role in arrhythmogenesis [
2].
OSA is a highly prevalent sleep disorder characterised by upper airway collapse during sleep and is found in up to 63% of AF patients [
3]. Attempting to breathe against an obstructed upper airway results in intermittent hypoxia, intra-thoracic pressure swings and activation of the autonomic nervous system; these acute perturbations are thought to trigger and maintain episodes of AF [
4,
5], and may lead to long-term atrial remodelling [
5,
6].
Understanding the influence of OSA on autonomic function in patients with AF may inform treatment strategies that mitigate pro-arrhythmic autonomic influences. Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects beat-to-beat variation in heartbeat intervals influenced by the combined effects of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system [
7]. The study of HRV provides a non-invasive method to assess cardiac autonomic function [
7]. We aimed to assess whether in a paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) cohort the presence of OSA is associated with altered autonomic function. We hypothesised that PAF patients with OSA will show altered HRV parameters indicative of the influence of OSA on cardiac autonomic function.
4 Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare HRV parameters in PAF patients with and without OSA. We found some evidence that PAF patients with OSA showed increased cardiac parasympathetic modulation (HF-nu) and blunted cardiac sympathetic modulation (LF-nu and LF/HF ratio) compared to PAF patients without OSA. The pathophysiological mechanism behind this finding needs further investigation but may provide future avenues for anti-arrhythmic therapeutic research. That these findings were limited to non-REM sleep is not surprising, given that REM sleep is a time of cardiovascular instability which may potentially mask differences in HRV between the groups.
Overall HRV (HRVi and total power) did not differ between PAF patients with and without OSA. Reduced overall HRV reflects a less adaptable ANS and is a strong independent predictor of mortality, in particular after myocardial infarction [
14‐
22] and congestive heart failure [
23‐
27]. Similarly, studies in AF patients show an association between depressed overall HRV and adverse outcome [
28‐
33]. According to the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing Electrophysiology, a triangular index < 15 indicates a severely depressed sinus node activation. In our entire cohort of AF patients, the triangular index was, perhaps not surprisingly, well below this critical number (during non-REM and REM sleep), although it was similar between PAF patients with and without OSA.
Experimental studies indicate changes in the ANS and play a critical role in facilitating arrhythmic events and that concomitant modifiable risk factors such as OSA may further trigger AF [
5]. Our short-term HRV analysis indicates there were no differences in overall HRV in PAF patients with and without OSA in any of the sleep stages. These results are in line with our recent systematic review that revealed nocturnal short-term measures of overall HRV were similar between patients with and without OSA [
34] and therefore may extend to patient populations with PAF.
OSA events are well known to precipitate acute autonomic responses. For example, the initial apnoeic period is characterised by vagally-driven bradycardia, followed by a sympathetically-driven surge in heart rate and blood pressure with an accompanying arousal at the conclusion of the apnoeic event [
35]. In this study, we deliberately excluded OSA events and the immediate post-apnoeic period (15 s) from the analysis in order to exclude the acute autonomic perturbations that accompany these events. This was done in order to compare chronic autonomic changes between the groups during a period of “steady state” sinus rhythm. Accordingly, we used short-term measures of HRV with a 2-min epoch. This was designed to maximise the availability of steady state ECG available for analysis, due to the frequency of excluded arrhythmic and respiratory events.
Additionally, particular anti-arrhythmic medications including Flecainide (class 1c) and β-blockers (class 11) are known to impact HRV through their effect on the ANS. For example, Flecainide has been shown to reduce HRV time–domain parameters [
36]. In our study, the use of anti-arrhythmic medications in each individual class was not significantly different between the two groups, though the dosage and administration times were not measured. Furthermore, certain co-morbidities including acute myocardial infarction, diabetic neuropathy, heart transplantation and tetraplegia are known to significantly alter the function of the autonomic nervous system and hence HRV[
36]. In our study, we corrected for the effect of age, sex and BMI. Most measured co-morbidities were not significantly different between groups, with the exception of hypertension, thyroid disease and peripheral vascular disease (see Table
2). Little is known about the influence of these particular conditions on HRV. However, one study demonstrated an increase in time domain and frequency domain–HRV parameters in AF patients with hypertension compared to patients with hypertension alone [
37].
Several physiological studies demonstrated the importance of the autonomic nervous system in mediating sleep apnoea–induced AF. For example, vagal activation during the intra-thoracic pressure changes caused by acute apnoeic events shortens the atrial effective refractory period, thus increasing AF inducibility [
38]. In a dog-model, Ghias et al. showed that after ablation of cardiac parasympathetic innervation, there was a significant decrease in apnoea-induced AF. This also occurred with sympatho-vagal blockade [
39]. Similarly, Linz et al. showed in a pig model that the application of negative tracheal pressure induced AF via a shortening of the atrial refractory period and that this effect was negated by parasympathetic deactivation, either in the form of atropine administration or vagotomy [
38]. During an acute obstructive apnoea, the profound vagal activation followed by combined sympathetic activation is thought to trigger and maintain AF. Experimental studies in chronic intermitted hypoxia show AF vulnerability and depends principally on parasympathetic activation; furthermore, parasympathetic activation has been identified as the major pro-arrhythmogenic mechanism in the rodent model [
40]. Our data are line with this body of work, where PAF patients with OSA show increased parasympathetic modulation compared to PAF patients without OSA.
In addition to a major parasympathetic component, the sympathetic nervous system is also likely to contribute to AF promotion. However, in our study of PAF patients, we did not see elevated sympathetic modulation. Rather, our results suggest a blunted cardiac sympathetic modulation in PAF patients with OSA compared to PAF patients without OSA. This is somewhat surprising given that elevated sympathetic activity is well documented in OSA [
34] and chronic intermittent hypoxia [
41,
42]. However, one study in rats exposed to chronic intermittent hypoxia demonstrated elevated AF vulnerability that was accompanied by an elevated cholinergic response and damped beta-adrenergic response of the atrial myocardium [
40]. It is possible that sympathetic activation maybe less important compared to parasympathetic activation in promoting AF due to elevated spatial dispersion of atrial refractoriness during parasympathetic activation [
43]. Furthermore, the blunted sympathetic modulation in PAF patients with OSA in our study maybe associated with a ceiling effect driven by higher intrinsic adrenergic tone [
40].
4.1 Arrhythmia analysis
The study methodology provided an opportunity to compare the presence of nocturnal arrhythmia between AF patients with and without OSA, although this was not a primary aim of the study. On patient recall at interview, the patients in the OSA group reported a higher incidence of “high burden” AF, defined as ≥ 10 episodes in the past 12 months (8/36 patients (22%) vs 23/62 patients (37.1%),
p = 0.039. On the sleep study night, there was no significant difference in % AF beats between the OSA and no-OSA groups, although the trend towards increased %AF beats in the OSA group was noted (2.9 ± 16.6 vs 8.1 ± 26.4%,
p = 0.283. On subgroup analysis, however, the patients with severe OSA (AHI > 30/h) had more AF beats and more ventricular ectopic beats, but not supraventricular ectopic beats on nocturnal polysomnography. Similarly, PAF patients with severe OSA had a higher % AF beats than patients with no OSA or moderate OSA (mean difference 19.8 ± 7.3%,
p = 0.040; 22.7 ± 8.3%,
p = 0.036, respectively, Fig.
2). These findings of higher AF burden according to OSA severity are consistent with the findings of Mehra et al. [
44], showing that nocturnal arrhythmia including AF and VEBs were more common in patients with severe sleep-disordered breathing, also using a cut-off of AHI > 30/h. To our knowledge, our study is the first to replicate this finding in a cohort of patients with PAF with and without OSA.
4.2 Limitations
Although this study provides some novel insights into the HRV profile of those with OSA and PAF, there are limitations to the study. Twenty-four hour Holter recording is ideal for HRV analysis, accounting for both diurnal and nocturnal variability [
7]. For this study, HRV parameters were derived from nocturnal polysomnograpy and thus are subject to all the usual autonomic perturbations of sleep, which may explain the selective differences seen across time and frequency-domain measures. Furthermore, we were unable to control for differences in undiagnosed conduction disturbances between the two groups, including, for example, the presence of sinus nodal disease which has a high prevalence in AF patients [
45]. However, we analysed only periods of sinus rhythm in order to minimise the contribution of AV nodal dysfunction. Our study contained some patients who had undergone previous PVI: patients had, on average, undergone 0.4 ± 0.6 previous PVI procedures. Since PVI may cause neuronal damage to the intrinsic cardiac nervous system [
46], caution must be used when extrapolating the results to other groups. Although we excluded periods of arrhythmia, it is possible that autonomic disturbances related to the arrhythmia may have preceded or persisted beyond these events. It is also possible that HRV parameters may have been impacted by autonomic disruptions from acute obstructive respiratory events in the OSA group. We attempted to allow for this by excluding ECG trace during and immediately following sleep apnoea events from the analysis; however, we excluded a post-event period of 15 s, and it is possible autonomic disturbance may persist beyond this interval. In addition, some sub-criterion respiratory events are likely to have remained in the analysis.
4.3 Clinical implications
There is mounting evidence that the perturbations during OSA have a profound influence on the myocardium [
6]. Atrial remodelling leading to changes to the electrical conduction and ANS activation is thought to trigger and maintain AF [
6]. Our work shows altered autonomic function in PAF patients with co-morbid OSA which we believe supports previous observations that progression of AF is promoted by the presence of modifiable risk factors such as OSA [
5,
6]. Treatment of OSA may modulate autonomic function and protect the atrial myocardium from pro-arryhthmic autonomic influences from OSA. Therefore, future studies should look to replicate our findings in a larger cohort and determine the effect of OSA therapy on modulation of the ANS and whether indeed such interventions may mitigate arrhythmogenesis in PAF.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.