Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cardiology and Therapy 2/2024

Open Access 27.03.2024 | Case Report

Emergent Coronary Thrombectomy for Acute Myocardial Infarction Immediately Following Craniotomy with Tumor Resection

verfasst von: Curtis R. Ginder, Giselle A. Suero-Abreu, Saad S. Ghumman, Brian A. Bergmark, Omar Arnaout, Robert P. Giugliano

Erschienen in: Cardiology and Therapy | Ausgabe 2/2024

Abstract

The management of perioperative acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following oncologic neurosurgery requires balancing competing risks of myocardial ischemia and postoperative bleeding. There are limited human data to establish the safest timing of antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy following neurosurgical procedures. For patients with malignancy experiencing AMI in the acute postoperative period, staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with upfront coronary aspiration thrombectomy followed by delayed completion PCI may offer an opportunity for myocardial salvage while minimizing postoperative bleeding risks. CYP2C19 genotyping and platelet aggregation studies can help confirm adequate platelet inhibition once antiplatelet therapy is resumed.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40119-024-00356-7.
Key Summary Points
Perioperative myocardial infarction is a challenging complication following oncologic neurosurgical procedures.
There are limited human data to guide timing of therapeutic anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication for patients experiencing an acute thrombotic event early after brain tumor resection.
Staged percutaneous coronary intervention with temporizing aspiration thrombectomy may provide myocardial salvage while minimizing risks of postoperative bleeding.
CYP2C19 genotyping and platelet aggregation testing may enable targeted antiplatelet therapy selection in patients with competing bleeding and thrombosis risk factors.

Introduction

Perioperative myocardial infarction is an important complication associated with an increased mortality risk following noncardiac surgery [1]. The risk of perioperative cardiac events is more significant for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures who have chronic antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy interrupted perioperatively [2]. Utilizing postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels, a prospective cohort study identified perioperative myocardial injury in 20.5% of patients undergoing elective neurosurgery [3]. Patients undergoing oncologic surgery may face even greater perioperative risks, with one population-based study identifying a more than twofold increase in the incidence of arterial thromboembolism and myocardial infarction in the first 6 months following a new diagnosis of cancer [4].
We present the management of a patient who suffered an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction immediately following craniotomy with tumor resection and who was managed with a staged coronary interventional procedure to achieve myocardial salvage while minimizing intraparenchymal brain hemorrhage. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to manuscript preparation.

Case Presentation

The patient is a 70-year-old man, non-smoker, with a history of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed 10 years ago treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin and etoposide, lobectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant carboplatin and pemetrexed followed by a 5-year course of adjuvant erlotinib. He had a prior anterior myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiac arrest treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) to the proximal and mid-left anterior descending (LAD) artery 3 years ago at an outside institution. He completed a course of dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor and had since been on aspirin monotherapy. After several months of increasing forgetfulness, he presented to the hospital and cross-sectional imaging revealed a 5 cm by 7 cm frontal lobe mass with surrounding edema concerning recurrent metastatic disease from lung cancer (Fig. 1). A pre-operative medical evaluation revealed no symptoms at a moderate level of functional capacity and a normal transthoracic echocardiogram. Aspirin was held for 5 days before the planned craniotomy, and he received no other antiplatelet or anticoagulation medications in the preoperative period. A stereotactic left frontal craniotomy with gross total resection of the tumor lasted 5 h and concluded with adequate hemostasis and without intraoperative complication. Postoperative imaging revealed expected postsurgical changes without postoperative bleeding (Fig. 1).
Two hours postoperatively, the patient developed substernal chest discomfort. Serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained and demonstrated an evolving anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (Fig. 2). A bedside ultrasound revealed new anterior and septal hypokinesis with moderately reduced left ventricular function. He began to develop an increasing burden of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia prompting the addition of intravenously administered lidocaine.

Treatment Plan/Decision-Making

A prompt multidisciplinary conversation was held between the critical care, neurosurgical, and cardiovascular medicine teams. It was concluded that the risk of mortality from an acute anterior wall myocardial infarction with increasing ventricular ectopy outweighed the risks of postoperative bleeding associated with single antiplatelet therapy and the use of heparin during coronary angiography. It was considered that intravenous unfractionated heparin and aspirin therapy offered the lowest risk of operative site bleeding, with a preference to avoid P2Y12 inhibitor therapy for at least 10 days following the craniotomy.
A 600-mg aspirin suppository was immediately administered and coronary angiography via femoral artery access was performed with the goal of deferring stent placement, if possible. Diagnostic angiography revealed a dual-LAD system with an acute thrombotic occlusion of the lateral branch of the LAD at the origin of a previously placed stent in the proximal segment of the vessel with extension into the septal branch of the LAD (Fig. 3). After a discussion between the interventional cardiology, cardiac intensive care unit, and neurosurgical teams, there was a consensus to proceed with PCI. A lower-than-normal activated clotting time (ACT) target of 150–200 s was planned to balance the competing risks of catheter or wire-related thrombosis and intracerebral hemorrhage. The lesion was crossed with a guidewire and was dilated with a 2.5-mm balloon. Aspiration thrombectomy was then performed using the Indigo CAT Rx catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, CA) with subsequent dilation with a 3.0-mm non-compliant (NC) balloon resulting in resolution of the thrombus within the prior LAD stent (Fig. 4). Considering high risk of intraparenchymal brain hemorrhage associated with P2Y12 inhibitor use in the immediate postoperative setting, no further intervention was performed with a plan for a staged completion of LAD PCI. The time from wire insertion in the LAD to equipment removal was 36 min, and actual ACT values ranged from 142 to 166 s.
Figure 3 Cine (MP4 8325 kb)
Figure 4 Cine (MP4 4098 kb)

Hospital Course

The patient returned to the cardiac intensive care unit for close neurologic and cardiac monitoring. Aspirin 81 mg daily monotherapy was continued. Interval cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) head imaging was performed every 8 h for the first day to screen for subclinical or preclinical bleeding that would require surgical evacuation. These studies demonstrated minimal bleeding in the surgical bed that remained stable on daily follow-up imaging over the next 2 days. He had no focal deficits on neurologic examination.
CYP2C19 genetic testing revealed a *1/*2 genotype which is an “intermediate metabolizer” phenotype. Baseline platelet aggregation studies were obtained on aspirin but before initiation of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. On day 10 postoperatively, clopidogrel 75 mg daily was initiated without a loading dose. To confirm adequate platelet inhibition prior to staged completion PCI, repeat platelet aggregation studies were performed after 5 days of clopidogrel 75 mg daily.
With adequate platelet inhibition confirmed (73% inhibition of platelet aggregation using ADP 20 μmol/L, Table 1), he underwent repeat coronary angiography with PCI on postoperative day 15. The previously placed LAD stent had remained patent following the initial aspiration thrombectomy and balloon dilation intervention (Fig. 5). There was TIMI 3 flow in the LAD. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed underexpanded proximal and distal stents within the LAD as well as significant atherosclerosis in the intervening segments between the stents (Fig. 6). A 3.5 × 28 mm DES was placed to the mid-LAD and post-dilated with a 3.5-mm NC distally and a 4.0-mm NC at high pressure proximally. Post-intervention IVUS revealed a well-expanded and apposed stent without edge dissection (Fig. 7). There was TIMI 3 flow and no residual stenosis (Fig. 8). He was discharged home on postoperative day 17 and completed cardiac rehabilitation as an outpatient. The final pathology from the tumor resection revealed metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.
Table 1
Baseline and follow-up platelet aggregation studies
 
Baseline
Reference range
Follow-up*
Inhibition of baseline aggregation
Adenosine diphosphate (5 μM)
70
60–94%
18
74%
Adenosine diphosphate (20 μM)
77
65–97%
21
73%
Epinephrine
51
60–95%
9
82%
Collagen (0.19 mg/ml)
83
65–94%
17
80%
Collagen (0.38 mg/ml)
79
55–90%
65
18%
Arachidonic acid
5
64–91%
2
60%
Ristocetin (low)
1
0–4%
2
− 100%
Ristocetin (high)
86
60–100%
78
9%
Baseline platelet aggregation was normal in response to low and high dose adenosine diphosphate, low and high dose collagen, and low and high dose ristocetin with reduced response to arachidonic acid, consistent with aspirin effect. Follow-up platelet aggregation was reduced in response to low and high dose adenosine diphosphate, arachidonic acid, low dose collagen, and epinephrine, consistent with platelet inhibition due to aspirin and clopidogrel. Percentage inhibition of baseline aggregation was calculated as (Baseline aggregation % − Follow-up aggregation %)/Baseline aggregation %
*Follow-up study obtained after 5 daily doses of clopidogrel
Figure 5 Cine (MP4 5283 kb)
Figure 8 Cine (MP4 4907 kb)

Discussion and Clinical Implications

We describe a clinical scenario of a postoperative ST-elevation myocardial infarction 2 h following craniotomy with tumor resection treated with aspiration thrombectomy and balloon dilation followed by a staged completion PCI 15 days later following the gradual introduction of P2Y12 inhibitor. To our knowledge, this staged approach has not been previously described, and it may provide temporizing therapy to patients with postoperative acute coronary syndrome at a high risk of bleeding until definitive revascularization can be completed.
Clopidogrel was selected as the preferred P2Y12 agent in this case to minimize the risk of intracranial bleeding [5]. The risk of bleeding was balanced against the risk of stent thrombosis which is associated with carriage of a reduced-function CYP2C19 allele [6]. CYP2C19 genetic testing was performed before the initiation of clopidogrel, identifying an intermediate metabolizer phenotype. Follow-up platelet aggregation studies were then performed to determine if sufficient platelet inhibition could be achieved with clopidogrel and aspirin therapy prior to proceeding with staged PCI. While CYP2C19 genotyping is not routinely performed in all patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI, selective testing—as performed in this case—may allow better risk quantification and stratification when competing risks are present.
There are conflicting data on the risks of postoperative intracranial bleeding in patients who continue aspirin in the perioperative period. One multicenter retrospective study reported a 2.6-fold increase in the rates of postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing open craniotomy for the repair of unruptured aneurysms who continued to take aspirin perioperatively [2]. A smaller single-center retrospective study showed no difference in bleeding complications for patients undergoing craniotomy with tumor resection who continued aspirin perioperatively [7].
The management of patients who do experience cardiovascular complications following neurosurgical procedures requires individualized risk–benefit analysis. There are limited human data for patients experiencing an acute thrombotic event to guide the safest timing of therapeutic anticoagulation resumption or initiation. An experimental animal model examining rats undergoing craniotomy and corticectomy identified a 30% rate of intracerebral hemorrhage in rats receiving therapeutic heparin (1.5–3 times control-activated partial thromboplastin time) on postoperative day 1 compared to a rate of 80% in rats receiving supratherapeutic (> 3 times control) doses of heparin [8]. A prior review of perioperative anticoagulation management in neurosurgery concluded that therapeutic anticoagulation can be initiated 3–5 days following neurosurgery in patients at the highest risk of thromboembolic events [9].
Patients with cancer face an elevated risk of developing cardiovascular complications, including higher morbidity and mortality associated with coronary artery disease [1012]. Specifically, managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with cancer and in the perioperative setting presents unique challenges due to their multiple comorbidities and increased bleeding risk. Additionally, the prognosis of these patients when undergoing invasive procedures for ACS is influenced by factors such as cancer type, staging, time since diagnosis, and ongoing oncological treatment [1315]. Growing evidence shows that patients with cancer have worse in-hospital outcomes post-PCI with increased rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, 90-day readmission, and bleeding complications [11, 13, 1618]. Long-term data showed a twofold higher rate of MI and repeat vascularization and a nearly threefold higher rate of stent thrombosis over 5 years post-PCI in patients with cancer [19].
The decision to pursue conservative medical management or an invasive strategy for patients with cancer and ACS is complex. It requires an individualized approach weighing the inherent risks of coronary revascularization procedures and the use of antiplatelets, guided by genetic testing when feasible. In 2016, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) issued a consensus document addressing special considerations of cardio-oncology patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, with respect to thrombocytopenia, coagulopathies, bleeding tendencies, vascular access complications, and increased stent thrombosis risk [20]. However, the management of ACS in this high-risk population needs more specific evidence-based guidelines calling for multidisciplinary collaboration and further research efforts to improve outcomes in cardio-oncology patients.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Bergmark has received institutional research grant support through Brigham and Women’s Hospital from Pfizer, Ionis, AstraZeneca, Philips, Abbott Vascular, SpectraWAVE, and Inari. Dr. Bergmark reports consulting fees from Abiomed, Abbott Vascular, Bain Life Sciences, Endovascular Engineering, Terumo, and SpectraWAVE. Dr. Giugliano receives clinical trial and research support from Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Ionis; honoraria for lectures or the continuing medical education program from Amgen, Centrix, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Medical Education Resources, Medscape, Menarini, Merck, Pfizer, SAJA Pharmaceuticals, Servier, Shanghai Medical Telescope, and Voxmedia; and is a consultant for Amarin, Amgen, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Caladrius, CryoLife, CSL Behring, CVS Caremark, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, Gilead, Hen-grui, Inari, Janssen, Novartis, Paratek, Pfizer, PhaseBio Pharmaceuticals, and Samsung. Dr. Giugliano is an Editor-in-Chief of Cardiology and Therapy. Dr. Giugliano was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Dr. Curtis Ginder, Dr. Giselle Suero-Abreu, Dr. Saad Ghumman, and Dr. Omar Arnaout have no disclosures.

Ethical Approval

The patient presented in this case report granted written informed consent and permission for publication of his clinical course.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​4.​0/​.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Puelacher C, Lurati Buse G, Seeberger D, et al. Perioperative myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: incidence, mortality, and characterization. Circulation. 2018;137:1221–32.CrossRefPubMed Puelacher C, Lurati Buse G, Seeberger D, et al. Perioperative myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: incidence, mortality, and characterization. Circulation. 2018;137:1221–32.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Saka E, Canbaz M, Abdullah T, et al. Perioperative myocardial injury after elective neurosurgery: incidence, risk factors, and effects on mortality. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45:2151–9.CrossRefPubMed Saka E, Canbaz M, Abdullah T, et al. Perioperative myocardial injury after elective neurosurgery: incidence, risk factors, and effects on mortality. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45:2151–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57.CrossRefPubMed Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Cytochrome P-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:354–62.CrossRefPubMed Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Cytochrome P-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:354–62.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahman M, Donnangelo LL, Neal D, Mogali K, Decker M, Ahmed MM. Effects of perioperative acetyl salicylic acid on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. World Neurosurgery. 2015;84:41–7.CrossRefPubMed Rahman M, Donnangelo LL, Neal D, Mogali K, Decker M, Ahmed MM. Effects of perioperative acetyl salicylic acid on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. World Neurosurgery. 2015;84:41–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Laohaprasit V, Mayberg MR. Risks of anticoagulation therapy after experimental corticectomy in the rat. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:625–9.CrossRefPubMed Laohaprasit V, Mayberg MR. Risks of anticoagulation therapy after experimental corticectomy in the rat. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:625–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bharadwaj A, Potts J, Mohamed MO, et al. Acute myocardial infarction treatments and outcomes in 6.5 million patients with a current or historical diagnosis of cancer in the USA. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:2183–93.CrossRefPubMed Bharadwaj A, Potts J, Mohamed MO, et al. Acute myocardial infarction treatments and outcomes in 6.5 million patients with a current or historical diagnosis of cancer in the USA. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:2183–93.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Landes U, Kornowski R, Bental T, et al. Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in cancer survivors. Coron Artery Dis. 2017;28:5–10.CrossRefPubMed Landes U, Kornowski R, Bental T, et al. Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in cancer survivors. Coron Artery Dis. 2017;28:5–10.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakatsuma K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, et al. Influence of a history of cancer on long-term cardiovascular outcomes after coronary stent implantation (an Observation from Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2). Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018;4:200–7.PubMed Nakatsuma K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, et al. Influence of a history of cancer on long-term cardiovascular outcomes after coronary stent implantation (an Observation from Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2). Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018;4:200–7.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Potts JE, Iliescu CA, Lopez Mattei JC, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in cancer patients: a report of the prevalence and outcomes in the United States. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1790–800.CrossRefPubMed Potts JE, Iliescu CA, Lopez Mattei JC, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in cancer patients: a report of the prevalence and outcomes in the United States. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1790–800.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Roule V, Verdier L, Blanchart K, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic impact of cancer among patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roule V, Verdier L, Blanchart K, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic impact of cancer among patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueki Y, Vögeli B, Karagiannis A, et al. Ischemia and bleeding in cancer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC CardioOncol. 2019;1:145–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ueki Y, Vögeli B, Karagiannis A, et al. Ischemia and bleeding in cancer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC CardioOncol. 2019;1:145–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwok CS, Wong CW, Kontopantelis E, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer and readmissions within 90 days for acute myocardial infarction and bleeding in the USA. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1019–34.CrossRefPubMed Kwok CS, Wong CW, Kontopantelis E, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer and readmissions within 90 days for acute myocardial infarction and bleeding in the USA. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1019–34.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabata N, Sueta D, Yamamoto E, et al. Outcome of current and history of cancer on the risk of cardiovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a Kumamoto University Malignancy and Atherosclerosis (KUMA) study. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018;4:290–300.CrossRefPubMed Tabata N, Sueta D, Yamamoto E, et al. Outcome of current and history of cancer on the risk of cardiovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a Kumamoto University Malignancy and Atherosclerosis (KUMA) study. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018;4:290–300.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo W, Fan X, Lewis BR, et al. Cancer patients have a higher risk of thrombotic and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:1094–105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guo W, Fan X, Lewis BR, et al. Cancer patients have a higher risk of thrombotic and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:1094–105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Iliescu CA, Grines CL, Herrmann J, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement: evaluation, management, and special considerations of cardio-oncology patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:E202–23.CrossRefPubMed Iliescu CA, Grines CL, Herrmann J, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement: evaluation, management, and special considerations of cardio-oncology patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:E202–23.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Emergent Coronary Thrombectomy for Acute Myocardial Infarction Immediately Following Craniotomy with Tumor Resection
verfasst von
Curtis R. Ginder
Giselle A. Suero-Abreu
Saad S. Ghumman
Brian A. Bergmark
Omar Arnaout
Robert P. Giugliano
Publikationsdatum
27.03.2024
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Cardiology and Therapy / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 2193-8261
Elektronische ISSN: 2193-6544
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-024-00356-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Cardiology and Therapy 2/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.