nach oben

05.05.2024 | Original Article

Evaluation of early bacterial adhesion on CAD/CAM dental materials: an in situ study

verfasst von: Stefan Vulović, Aleksandar Todorović, Boško Toljić, Nataša Nikolić-Jakoba, Tamara Vlajić Tovilović, Aleksandra Milić-Lemić

Erschienen in: Odontology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine if there are differences in early bacterial adhesion among CAD/CAM dental materials after 24 h exposure in the oral environment. One hundred twenty specimens were prepared according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and divided into six groups: RBC (resin-based composite), PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate), PEEK (polyether ether ketone), ZP (zirconia polished), ZG (zirconia glazed), and cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCr alloy). Twenty healthy participants were instructed to carry an intraoral device with six specimens, one per group, for 24 h. Thereafter, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses enabled quantification and 2D view of biofilm formed on the specimens’ surfaces. Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc analysis were used for inter-group comparison and data were presented as median (minimum–maximum). RBC specimens accumulated less bacteria, in comparison with ZG (p = 0.017) and PEEK specimens (p = 0.030), that dominated with the highest amount of adhered bacterial biofilm. PMMA, CoCr, and ZP specimens adhered more bacteria than RBC (p > 0.05), and less than ZG (p > 0.05) and PEEK (p > 0.05). The bacterial number varied considerably among participants. The obtained results enable a closer view into the susceptibility of CAD/CAM materials to microorganisms during the presence in the oral environment, which can be beneficial for a proper selection of these materials for a variety of dental restorations.

Al-Ahmad A, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Fackler A, Follo M, Hellwig E, Bächle M, Hannig C, Han JS, Wolkewitz M, Kohal R. In vivo study of the initial bacterial adhesion on different implant materials. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(9):1139–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.04.011.CrossRefPubMed

Figuero E, Nóbrega DF, García-Gargallo M, Tenuta LM, Herrera D, Carvalho JC. Mechanical and chemical plaque control in the simultaneous management of gingivitis and caries: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(18):S116–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12674.CrossRefPubMed

Lee BC, Jung GY, Kim DJ, Han JS. Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011;3(2):81–4. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wassmann T, Kreis S, Behr M, Buergers R. The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants. Int J Implant Dent. 2017;3(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0093-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Al-Radha ASD, Dymock D, Younes C, O’Sullivan D. Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion. J Dent. 2012;40(2):146–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.006.CrossRefPubMed

Bollen CM, Papaioanno W, van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(3):201–11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x.CrossRefPubMed

Gharechahi M, Moosavi H, Forghani M. Effect of surface roughness and materials composition on biofilm formation. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2012;3(4A):541–6. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2012.324056.CrossRef

Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Bürgers R, Handel G. Surface properties and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental resin polymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(7):2619–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3352-7.CrossRefPubMed

Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb01765.x.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Zhang X, Wang L, Levänen E. Superhydrophobic surfaces for the reduction of bacterial adhesion. RSC Adv. 2013;3(30):12003–20. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra4049h.CrossRef

11.

Kilian M, Chapple IL, Hannig M, Marsh PD, Meuric V, Pedersen AM, Tonetti MS, Wade WG, Zaura E. The oral microbiome-an update for oral healthcare professionals. Br Dent J. 2016;221(10):657–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.865.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Lin NJ. Biofilm over teeth and restorations: what do we need to know? Dent Mater. 2017;33(6):667–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.003.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity-a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(2):123–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0243-3.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Sang T, Ye Z, Fischer NG, Skoe EP, Echeverría C, Wu J, Aparicio C. Physical-chemical interactions between dental materials surface, salivary pellicle and Streptococcus gordonii. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;190:110938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110938.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Vacca Smith AM, Bowen WH. In situ studies of pellicle formation on hydroxyapatite discs. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45(4):277–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(99)00141-7.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Marsh PD, Do T, Beighton D, Devine DA. Influence of saliva on the oral microbiota. Periodontol 2000. 2016;70(1):80–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12098.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Marsh PD, Zaura E. Dental biofilm: ecological interactions in health and disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(18):S12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12679.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ Jr, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS. Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(7):471–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2381.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Kreth J, Merritt J, Pfeifer CS, Khajotia S, Ferracane JL. Interaction between the oral microbiome and dental composite biomaterials: where we are and where we should go. J Dent Res. 2020;99(10):1140–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520927690.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Göcke R, Gerath F, von Schwanewede H. Quantitative determination of salivary components in the pellicle on PMMA denture base material. Clin Oral Investig. 2002;6(4):227–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0176-1.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(2):68–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Song F, Koo H, Ren D. Effects of material properties on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. J Dent Res. 2015;94(8):1027–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515587690.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Jaeggi M, Gyr S, Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Zitzmann NU, Fischer J, Rohr N. Influence of different zirconia surface treatments on biofilm formation in vitro and in situ. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(4):424–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13902.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Zaugg LK, Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Braissant O, Hauser-Gerspach I, Waltimo T, Zitzmann NU. Determinants of biofilm formation and cleanability of titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(4):469–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12821.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Silva TSO, Freitas AR, Pinheiro MLL, do Nascimento C, Watanabe E, Albuquerque RF. Oral biofilm formation on different materials for dental implants. J Vis Exp. 2018;24(136):57756. https://doi.org/10.3791/57756.CrossRef

26.

Zeller B, Stöckli S, Zaugg LK, Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Hauser-Gerspach I, Waltimo T, Zitzmann NU. Biofilm formation on metal alloys, zirconia and polyetherketoneketone as implant materials in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;31(11):1078–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13654.CrossRef

27.

Günther M, Karygianni L, Argyropoulou A, Anderson AC, Hellwig E, Skaltsounis AL, Wittmer A, Vach K, Al-Ahmad A. The antimicrobial effect of Rosmarinus officinalis extracts on oral initial adhesion ex vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(6):4369–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04400-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972;43(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Vulović S, Todorović A, Stančić I, Popovac A, Stašić JN, Vencl A, Milić-Lemić A. Study on the surface properties of different commercially available CAD/CAM materials for implant-supported restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(7):1132–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12958.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Brajović G, Popović B, Puletić M, Kostić M, Milašin J. Estimation of total bacteria by real-time PCR in patients with periodontal disease. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2016;144(1–2):10–4. https://doi.org/10.2298/sarh1602010b.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Sotozono M, Kuriki N, Asahi Y, Noiri Y, Hayashi M, Motooka D, Nakamura S, Yamaguchi M, Iida T, Ebisu S. Impact of sleep on the microbiome of oral biofilms. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0259850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259850.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Dige I, Raarup MK, Nyengaard JR, Kilian M, Nyvad B. Actinomyces naeslundii in initial dental biofilm formation. Microbiology (Reading). 2009;155(7):2116–26. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.027706-0.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Periasamy S, Kolenbrander PE. Central role of the early colonizer Veillonella sp. in establishing multispecies biofilm communities with initial, middle, and late colonizers of enamel. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(12):2965–72. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01631-09.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Kommerein N, Doll K, Stumpp NS, Stiesch M. Development and characterization of an oral multispecies biofilm implant flow chamber model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0196967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196967.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Park JH, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS, Lee SY. A periodontitis-associated multispecies model of an oral biofilm. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014;44(2):79–84. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.2.79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Thurnheer T, Belibasakis GN. Streptococcus oralis maintains homeostasis in oral biofilms by antagonizing the cariogenic pathogen Streptococcus mutans. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2018;33(3):234–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/omi.12216.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Guggenheim B, Giertsen E, Schüpbach P, Shapiro S. Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res. 2001;80(1):363–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800011201.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Quirynen M. The clinical meaning of the surface roughness and the surface free energy of intra-oral hard substrata on the microbiology of the supra- and subgingival plaque: results of in vitro and in vivo experiments. J Dent. 1994;22(1):S13–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90165-1.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Kvich L, Crone S, Christensen MH, Lima R, Alhede M, Alhede M, Staerk D, Bjarnsholt T. Investigation of the mechanism and chemistry underlying Staphylococcus aureus’ ability to inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth in vitro. J Bacteriol. 2022;204(11):e0017422. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00174-22.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Carrassi A, Santarelli G, Abati S. Early plaque colonization on human cementum. J Clin Periodontol. 1989;16(4):265–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1989.tb01652.x.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Vulović S, Nikolić-Jakoba N, Radunović M, Petrović S, Popovac A, Todorović M, Milić-Lemić A. Biofilm formation on the surfaces of CAD/CAM dental polymers. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(9):2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15092140.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Vulović S, Popovac A, Radunović M, Petrović S, Todorović M, Milić-Lemić A. Microbial adhesion and viability on novel CAD/CAM framework materials for implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci. 2023;131(1):e12911. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12911.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol. 2004;75(2):292–6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.292.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Hahnel S, Wieser A, Lang R, Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(11):1297–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12454.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Engel AS, Kranz HT, Schneider M, Tietze JP, Piwowarcyk A, Kuzius T, Arnold W, Naumova EA. Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01147-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Carlén A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials. 2001;22(5):481–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00204-0.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Hu H, Burrow MF, Leung WK. Evaluation of 12-hour in situ bacterial colonization on smooth restorative material surfaces. J Dent. 2022;119:104071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104071.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Zee KY, Samaranayake LP, Attström R. Scanning electron microscopy of microbial colonization of “rapid” and “slow” dental-plaque formers in vivo. Arch Oral Biol. 1997;42(10–11):735–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(97)00059-9.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P. Developmental regulation of microbial biofilms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002;13(3):228–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00318-x.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Del Rey YC, Parize H, Pedrazzi V, Dos Reis AC, Nascimento C. Clinical and in situ oral biofilm formation on dental implant abutment materials: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022;37(4):639–52. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9352.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Claydon NC. Current concepts in toothbrushing and interdental cleaning. Periodontol. 2000;2008(48):10–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00273.x.CrossRef

52.

Ioannidis A, Thurnheer T, Hofer D, Sahrmann P, Guggenheim B, Schmidlin PR. Mechanical and hydrodynamic homecare devices to clean rough implant surfaces-an in vitro polyspecies biofilm study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(5):523–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12436.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluation of early bacterial adhesion on CAD/CAM dental materials: an in situ study
verfasst von: Stefan Vulović
Aleksandar Todorović
Boško Toljić
Nataša Nikolić-Jakoba
Tamara Vlajić Tovilović
Aleksandra Milić-Lemić
Publikationsdatum: 05.05.2024
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Odontology
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00944-y

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of early bacterial adhesion on CAD/CAM dental materials: an in situ study

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter