nach oben

Lasers in Medical Science

Erschienen in:

01.12.2024 | Original Article

Evaluation of the effect of high-intensity light-curing device on micro-leakage of pits and fissure sealants

verfasst von: Hasan Alzoubi, Malek Rajab, Nada Bshara, Mohammed Bashier Almonakel

Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Reducing treatment time is one of the most important trends in modern dentistry. This study aimed to compare the micro-leakage around the resin sealants when using both high and conventional intensity light-curing systems. The study sample consisted of 30 extracted human maxillary premolar teeth that were divided into two equal groups according to the light-curing system used: Group 1, High-Intensity Light-Curing System and Group 2, Conventional Light-Curing System. Light-curing by Woodpecker I-LED device with two intensities (high and conventional) has been used. All teeth were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling. Then, a methylene blue dye microleakage test was performed, and the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and studied under a stereo microscope. The mean of micro-leakage in the high-intensity group (1.33 ± 1.29) was less than in the conventional intensity group (1.63 ± 1.29) without any statistically significant differences (p = 0.320). The high-intensity light-curing system mode may be a good and acceptable alternative to conventional intensity light-curing system mode in polymerization of pits and fissure sealants.

Strużycka I (2014) The oral microbiome in dental caries. Pol J Microbiol 63(2):127. https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2014-018CrossRefPubMed

Ahovuo-Saloranta A et al (2017) Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12758

Hiiri A et al (2010) Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub3

Zeng Z et al (2013) Genome-wide association studies of pit-and-fissure-and smooth-surface caries in permanent dentition. J Dent Res 92(5):432–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345134819CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zeng Z et al (2014) Genome-wide association study of primary dentition pit-and-fissure and smooth surface caries. Caries Res 48(4):330–338. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356299CrossRefPubMed

Beiruti N et al (2006) Caries-preventive effect of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants over time: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 34(6):403–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00321.xCrossRefPubMed

Shimokawa CAK et al (2020) Effect of curing light and exposure time on the polymerization of bulk-fill resin-based composites in molar teeth. Oper Dent 45(3):E141–E155. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-126-LCrossRefPubMed

Malhotra N, Kundabala M (2010) Light-curing considerations for resin-based composite materials: a review. Part I CompendContinEduc Dent 31(7):498–505

Koran P, Kürschner R (2001) Effects of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. J Esthet Restor Dent 13(2):140–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00437.xCrossRef

10.

Armfield JM, Heaton L (2013) Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: a review. Aust Dent J 58(4):390–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12118CrossRefPubMed

11.

Cooley RL, McCourt JW (1990) Evaluation of by SEM, microleakage, and fluoride release. Pediatr Dent 12(1):39

12.

Condò R et al (2013) Sealants in dentistry: a systematic review of the literature. Oral and Implantology 6(3):67PubMed

13.

Sanders BJ, Feigal RJ, Avery DR (2010) Pit and fissure sealants and preventive resin restorations. Dentistry for the child and adolescent, 9th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 313–321

14.

Srinivasan V, Deery C, Nugent Z (2005) In-vitro microleakage of repaired fissure sealants: a randomized, controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent 15(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263x.2005.00609.xCrossRefPubMed

15.

Hadole PG, Daokar SS (2019) Light-curing unit (devices). Int J Orthod Rehabil 10(3):121. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijor.ijor_1_19CrossRef

16.

Townsend JA, Wells MH (2019) Behavior guidance of the pediatric dental patient, in Pediatric dentistry. Elsevier, pp 352–370.e2

17.

Pérez-Lajarín L et al (2003) Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study. J Dent Child 70(1):24–28

18.

Burrow M, Makinson O (1990) Pits and fissures: remnant organic debris after acid-etching. ASDC J Dent Child 57(5):348–351PubMed

19.

Hannig M et al (2004) Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents. J Dent 32(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.005CrossRefPubMed

20.

Baghalian A et al (2013) Microleakage of Er: YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials. Lasers Med Sci 28(6):1453–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1222-0CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mithiborwala S et al (2012) A comparison of the resin tag penetration of the total etch and the self-etch dentin bonding systems in the primary teeth: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 3(2):158. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.96818CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Kitasako Y et al (2000) The influence of storage solution on dentin bond durability of resin cement. Dent Mater 16(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00061-5CrossRefPubMed

23.

Titley K et al (1998) The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 43(4):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(97)00112-xCrossRefPubMed

24.

McCabe JF, Walls AW (2013) Applied dental materials. John Wiley & Sons

25.

Penugonda B et al (1992) Bonding Ni-Cr alloy to tooth structure with adhesive resin cements. J Esthet Restor Dent 4:26–29CrossRef

26.

Styner D et al (1992) Bonding composite to glass lonomer with adhesive resin cements. J Esthet Restor Dent 4:13–15CrossRef

27.

Pardi V et al (2006) In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Braz Dent J 17:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402006000100011CrossRefPubMed

28.

Jacobs MS, Windeler AS (1991) An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 65(3):436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90239-sCrossRefPubMed

29.

Baldissara P et al (1998) Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent 80(4):417–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70005-8CrossRefPubMed

30.

Gp H, JOSEPH T, JAYANTHI M (2004) Comparative evaluation of glass lonomer and resin based fissure sealant using noninvasive and invasive techniques-A SEM and microleakage study. J Indian Soc Pedo Prey Dent 22(2):56–62

31.

Kwon HB, Park KT (2006) SEM and microleakage evaluation of 3 flowable composites as sealants without using bonding agents. Pediatr Dent 28(1):48–53PubMed

32.

Joshi K et al (2013) Comparative evaluation of two different pit & fissure sealants and a restorative material to check their microleakage–an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 5(4):35PubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Nurlatifah A, Eriwati Y, Indrani D (2018) The effect of the curing time of an ultra-high intensity LED curing unit on diametral tensile strength of packable composite resin. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing

34.

Price RB (2017) Light curing in dentistry. Dental Clinics 61(4):751–778PubMed

35.

Sridhar LP et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants. J Clin Diagn Res 10(9):ZC01. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/19996.8413CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Bayrak G-D et al (2020) Assessment of shear bond strength and microleakage of fissure sealant following enamel deproteinization: an in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 12(3):e220. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Bahrololoomi Z, Soleymani A, Heydari Z (2011) In vitro comparison of microleakage of two materials used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 5(3):83. https://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2011.019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Evaluation of the effect of high-intensity light-curing device on micro-leakage of pits and fissure sealants
verfasst von: Hasan Alzoubi
Malek Rajab
Nada Bshara
Mohammed Bashier Almonakel
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2024
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03963-3

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of the effect of high-intensity light-curing device on micro-leakage of pits and fissure sealants

Abstract

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Evaluation of chlorophyll-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy on cancer cell lines

Evaluating the effect of glycerol on increasing the safety and efficiency of hyperthermic laser lipolysis

Effects of photobiomodulation therapy on the functional performance of healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Repercussion of inflammatory bowel disease on lung homeostasis: The role of photobiomodulation

Definition of refractory melasma and its treatment: a review

Laser ablation on vascular diseases: mechanisms and influencing factors