Skip to main content

25.11.2019 | Genetics in Gastroenterology Practice (B Katona, Section Editor)

Genetic testing for hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes: Interpreting results in today's practice

verfasst von: Jacquelyn M. Powers, MS LCGC, Jessica E. Ebrahimzadeh, MS LCGC, Bryson W. Katona, MD PhD

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of review

Advances in genomics have led to the discovery of multiple predisposition genes linked to increased risk for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. The goal of this review is to assist physicians and allied health care professionals in understanding the current paradigm shift in clinical genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer predisposition syndromes; with a focus on multigene panel testing (MGPT) and test results interpretation. Additionally, this review introduces direct-to-consumer and at-home genetic testing. Both delivery models are increasing in popularity and clinicians will be expected to address results from patients who utilize these approaches.

Recent findings

Technological advancement and reduced costs have transformed the genetic testing approach from single syndrome genetic testing to broad-based MGPT. MGPT has the benefit of aiding in efficient genetic diagnosis; however, clinicians should be knowledgeable of possible results including variants of uncertain significance, secondary findings, and pathogenic variants within high- and low-to-moderate risk genes, as well as genes for which risks are ill-defined.

Summary

The landscape of clinical cancer genetics continues to evolve rapidly. Timely updates are critical to ensure the medical community is familiar with current considerations and ongoing challenges regarding genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer susceptibility.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Valle L, de Voer RM, Goldberg Y, Sjursen W, Forsti A, Ruiz-Ponte C, et al. Update on genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer and polyposis. Mol Asp Med. 2019;69:10–26.CrossRef Valle L, de Voer RM, Goldberg Y, Sjursen W, Forsti A, Ruiz-Ponte C, et al. Update on genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer and polyposis. Mol Asp Med. 2019;69:10–26.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorans M, Dow E, Macrae FA, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. Update on hereditary colorectal cancer: improving the clinical utility of multigene panel testing. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17(2):e293–305.CrossRef Lorans M, Dow E, Macrae FA, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. Update on hereditary colorectal cancer: improving the clinical utility of multigene panel testing. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17(2):e293–305.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar S, Long JM, Ginsberg GG, Katona BW. The role of endoscopy in the management of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(23):2878–86.CrossRef Kumar S, Long JM, Ginsberg GG, Katona BW. The role of endoscopy in the management of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(23):2878–86.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoffel E, Mukherjee B, Raymond VM, Tayob N, Kastrinos F, Sparr J, et al. Calculation of risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer among patients with Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(5):1621–7.CrossRef Stoffel E, Mukherjee B, Raymond VM, Tayob N, Kastrinos F, Sparr J, et al. Calculation of risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer among patients with Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(5):1621–7.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Møller P, Seppälä TT, Bernstein I, Holinski-Feder E, Sala P, Gareth Evans D, et al. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: a report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2018;67(7):1306–16.CrossRef Møller P, Seppälä TT, Bernstein I, Holinski-Feder E, Sala P, Gareth Evans D, et al. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: a report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2018;67(7):1306–16.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2019. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2019.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Katona BW, Yurgelun MB, Garber JE, Offit K, Domchek SM, Robson ME, et al. A counseling framework for moderate-penetrance colorectal cancer susceptibility genes. Gen Med. 2018;20(11):1324–7 This report introduces a counseling framework for common low-moderate penetrance CRC risk genes that can be identified on MGPT. •• Katona BW, Yurgelun MB, Garber JE, Offit K, Domchek SM, Robson ME, et al. A counseling framework for moderate-penetrance colorectal cancer susceptibility genes. Gen Med. 2018;20(11):1324–7 This report introduces a counseling framework for common low-moderate penetrance CRC risk genes that can be identified on MGPT.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Butterworth AS, Higgins JP, Pharoah P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(2):216–27.CrossRef Butterworth AS, Higgins JP, Pharoah P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(2):216–27.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Locker GY, Lynch HT. Genetic factors and colorectal cancer in Ashkenazi Jews. Familial Cancer. 2004;3(3):215–21.CrossRef Locker GY, Lynch HT. Genetic factors and colorectal cancer in Ashkenazi Jews. Familial Cancer. 2004;3(3):215–21.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boursi B, Sella T, Liberman E, Shapira S, David M, Kazanov D, et al. The APC p.I1307K polymorphism is a significant risk factor for CRC in average risk Ashkenazi Jews. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(17):3680–5.CrossRef Boursi B, Sella T, Liberman E, Shapira S, David M, Kazanov D, et al. The APC p.I1307K polymorphism is a significant risk factor for CRC in average risk Ashkenazi Jews. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(17):3680–5.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA. Association between monoallelic MUTYH mutation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-regression analysis. Familial Cancer. 2011;10(1):1–9.CrossRef Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA. Association between monoallelic MUTYH mutation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-regression analysis. Familial Cancer. 2011;10(1):1–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma X, Zhang B, Zheng W. Genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence. Gut. 2014;63(2):326–36.CrossRef Ma X, Zhang B, Zheng W. Genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence. Gut. 2014;63(2):326–36.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Version 2.2019. Genetic/Familial High Risk Assessment: Colorectal. 2019. NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Version 2.2019. Genetic/Familial High Risk Assessment: Colorectal. 2019.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Domchek S. Multiplex genetic testing: reconsidering utility and informed consent in the era of next-generation sequencing. Genet Med. 2015;17(2):97–8.CrossRef Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Domchek S. Multiplex genetic testing: reconsidering utility and informed consent in the era of next-generation sequencing. Genet Med. 2015;17(2):97–8.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B, Domchek SM, Ford JM, Hampel HL, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(31):3660–7.CrossRef Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B, Domchek SM, Ford JM, Hampel HL, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(31):3660–7.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat • Farmer MB, Bonadies DC, Mahon SM, Baker MJ, Ghate SM, Munro C, et al. Adverse events in genetic testing: the fourth case series. Cancer J. 2019;25(4):231–6 The most recent published case series documenting inappropriate genetic test ordering, use, and interpretation.CrossRef • Farmer MB, Bonadies DC, Mahon SM, Baker MJ, Ghate SM, Munro C, et al. Adverse events in genetic testing: the fourth case series. Cancer J. 2019;25(4):231–6 The most recent published case series documenting inappropriate genetic test ordering, use, and interpretation.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat NSGC. National Society of Genetic Counselors: at-home genetic testing position statement. 2019. NSGC. National Society of Genetic Counselors: at-home genetic testing position statement. 2019.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat • Tandy-Connor S, Guiltinan J, Krempely K, LaDuca H, Reineke P, Gutierrez S, et al. False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care. Genet Med. 2018;20(12):1515–21 This is the first report to examine the accuracy and concordance of DTC results obtained via raw genotyping data at a CLIA approved commercial genetic laboratory.CrossRef • Tandy-Connor S, Guiltinan J, Krempely K, LaDuca H, Reineke P, Gutierrez S, et al. False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care. Genet Med. 2018;20(12):1515–21 This is the first report to examine the accuracy and concordance of DTC results obtained via raw genotyping data at a CLIA approved commercial genetic laboratory.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Guerrini CJ, Wagner JK, Nelson SC, Javitt GH, McGuire AL. Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. Genet Med. 2019. Guerrini CJ, Wagner JK, Nelson SC, Javitt GH, McGuire AL. Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. Genet Med. 2019.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.CrossRef Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Amendola LM, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, McLaughlin HM, Akkari Y, Amaral MD, et al. Performance of ACMG-AMP variant-interpretation guidelines among nine laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(6):1067–76.CrossRef Amendola LM, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, McLaughlin HM, Akkari Y, Amaral MD, et al. Performance of ACMG-AMP variant-interpretation guidelines among nine laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(6):1067–76.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Balmaña J, Digiovanni L, Gaddam P, Walsh MF, Joseph V, Stadler ZK, et al. Conflicting interpretation of genetic variants and cancer risk by commercial laboratories as assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing. J Clin Oncol : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(34):4071–8 This report highlights the remaining discordance of variant classification among CLIA approved commercial genetic testing laboratory and outlines how differences in variant interpretation may impact medical management.CrossRef •• Balmaña J, Digiovanni L, Gaddam P, Walsh MF, Joseph V, Stadler ZK, et al. Conflicting interpretation of genetic variants and cancer risk by commercial laboratories as assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing. J Clin Oncol : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(34):4071–8 This report highlights the remaining discordance of variant classification among CLIA approved commercial genetic testing laboratory and outlines how differences in variant interpretation may impact medical management.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D980–5.CrossRef Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D980–5.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharaf RN, Myer P, Stave CD, Diamond LC, Ladabaum U. Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(9):1093–100.CrossRef Sharaf RN, Myer P, Stave CD, Diamond LC, Ladabaum U. Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(9):1093–100.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts MC, Dotson WD, DeVore CS, Bednar EM, Bowen DJ, Ganiats TG, et al. Delivery Of cascade screening for hereditary conditions: a scoping review of the literature. Health aff (Millwood). 2018;37(5):801–8.CrossRef Roberts MC, Dotson WD, DeVore CS, Bednar EM, Bowen DJ, Ganiats TG, et al. Delivery Of cascade screening for hereditary conditions: a scoping review of the literature. Health aff (Millwood). 2018;37(5):801–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yurgelun MB, Allen B, Kaldate RR, Bowles KR, Judkins T, Kaushik P, et al. Identification of a variety of mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(3):604–13.e20.CrossRef Yurgelun MB, Allen B, Kaldate RR, Bowles KR, Judkins T, Kaushik P, et al. Identification of a variety of mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(3):604–13.e20.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Aarnio M, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen HJ. Surveillance improves survival of colorectal cancer in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Detect Prev. 2000;24(2):137–42.PubMed Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Aarnio M, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen HJ. Surveillance improves survival of colorectal cancer in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Detect Prev. 2000;24(2):137–42.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Domchek SM, Bradbury A, Garber JE, Offit K, Robson ME. Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net? J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(10):1267–70.CrossRef Domchek SM, Bradbury A, Garber JE, Offit K, Robson ME. Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net? J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(10):1267–70.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mundt E, Chen D. Lowering the rate of variants of uncertain significance on Myriad’s myRisk® hereditary cancer panel. 2016. Mundt E, Chen D. Lowering the rate of variants of uncertain significance on Myriad’s myRisk® hereditary cancer panel. 2016.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat LaDuca H, Polley EC, Yussuf A, Hoang L, Gutierrez S, Hart SN, et al. A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients. Gen Med. 2019. LaDuca H, Polley EC, Yussuf A, Hoang L, Gutierrez S, Hart SN, et al. A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients. Gen Med. 2019.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricker C, Culver JO, Lowstuter K, Sturgeon D, Sturgeon JD, Chanock CR, et al. Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016;209(4):130–7.CrossRef Ricker C, Culver JO, Lowstuter K, Sturgeon D, Sturgeon JD, Chanock CR, et al. Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016;209(4):130–7.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mersch J, Brown N, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Mundt E, Cox HC, Brown K, et al. Prevalence of variant reclassification following hereditary cancer genetic testing. JAMA. 2018;320(12):1266–74.CrossRef Mersch J, Brown N, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Mundt E, Cox HC, Brown K, et al. Prevalence of variant reclassification following hereditary cancer genetic testing. JAMA. 2018;320(12):1266–74.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Yohe S, Thyagarajan B. Review of clinical next-generation sequencing. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(11):1544–57.CrossRef Yohe S, Thyagarajan B. Review of clinical next-generation sequencing. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(11):1544–57.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat NSGC. National Society of Genetic Counselors: genetic testing of minors for adult-onset conditions position statement. Accepted April 12, 2018. NSGC. National Society of Genetic Counselors: genetic testing of minors for adult-onset conditions position statement. Accepted April 12, 2018.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballester V, Cruz-Correa M. How and when to consider genetic testing for colon cancer? Gastroenterology. 2018;155(4):955–9.CrossRef Ballester V, Cruz-Correa M. How and when to consider genetic testing for colon cancer? Gastroenterology. 2018;155(4):955–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Genetic testing for hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes: Interpreting results in today's practice
verfasst von
Jacquelyn M. Powers, MS LCGC
Jessica E. Ebrahimzadeh, MS LCGC
Bryson W. Katona, MD PhD
Publikationsdatum
25.11.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology
Print ISSN: 1092-8472
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-309X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-019-00253-2

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.