nach oben

Erschienen in:

11.09.2023

How Could Taxes on Sugary Drinks and Foods Help Reduce the Burden Of Type 2 Diabetes?

verfasst von: Alan Reyes-García, Isabel Junquera-Badilla, Carolina Batis, M. Arantxa Colchero, J. Jaime Miranda, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez, Ana Basto-Abreu

Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports | Ausgabe 10/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Taxes on sugary drinks and foods have emerged as a key strategy to counteract the alarming levels of diabetes worldwide. Added sugar consumption from industrialized foods and beverages has been strongly linked to type 2 diabetes. This review provides a synthesis of evidence on how taxes on sugary products can influence the onset of type 2 diabetes, describing the importance of the different mechanisms through which the consumption of these products is reduced, leading to changes in weight and potentially a decrease in the incidence of type 2 diabetes.

Recent Findings

Observational studies have shown significant reductions in purchases, energy intake, and body weight after the implementation of taxes on sugary drinks or foods. Simulation studies based on the association between energy intake and type 2 diabetes estimated the potential long-term health and economic effects, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, suggesting that the implementation of sugary food and beverage taxes may have a meaningful impact on reducing type 2 diabetes and complications.

Summary

Public health response to diabetes requires multi-faceted approaches from health and non-health actors to drive healthier societies. Population-wide strategies, such as added sugar taxes, highlight the potential benefits of financial incentives to address behaviors and protective factors to significantly change an individual’s health trajectory and reduce the onset of type 2 diabetes worldwide, both in terms of economy and public health.

Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:1084–102. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.058362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Luger M, Lafontan M, Bes-Rastrollo M, Winzer E, Yumuk V, Farpour-Lambert N. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review from 2013 to 2015 and a comparison with previous studies. Obes Facts. 2017;10:674–93. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Te Morenga LA, Howatson AJ, Jones RM, Mann J. Dietary sugars and cardiometabolic risk: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the effects on blood pressure and lipids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:65–79. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.081521.CrossRef

Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després J-P, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010;121:1356–64. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Umaña SFS, Arias AG, Mendoza SS, Rodriguez CAC, Granados JPÁ. Sugar consumption and major cardiovascular events: systematic review. Revista Colombiana De Endocrinología, Diabetes & Metabolismo. 2022;9(4). https://doi.org/10.53853/encr.9.4.681

World Health Organization. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization; 2015. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028

Global Dietary Database. Tufts University. Added Sugar. 2018. Available: https://www.globaldietarydatabase.org/data-download. Accessed 15 March 2023.

8.•

Miranda JJ, Thow A-M, Cárdenas MK, Corvalán C, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Kaufman JS. Nutrition-related health taxes: setting expectations. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10:93–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00325-9. This commentary provides important context on the different challenges involved in establishing health-related taxes, from defining the outcomes to which they will be targeted, consideration of the environment for their implementation and the different strategies by which they will be evaluated. Considering a multidisciplinary approach to achieve the optimal impact in the populations where they are implemented.

Sugar, Tobacco, and Alcohol Taxes (STAX) Group. Sugar, tobacco, and alcohol taxes to achieve the SDGs. Lancet (London, England). 2018;391:2400–2401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31219-4

10.

Scarborough P, Briggs A, Mytton O, Rayner M. The Institute of Fiscal Studies’ verdict on a sugary drink tax. Lancet. 2016;387:1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00680-2.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Chater N, Loewenstein G. The i-frame and the s-frame: how focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4046264.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Powell LM, Chriqui JF, Khan T, Wada R, Chaloupka FJ. Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes. Obes Rev. 2013;14:110–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12002.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Colchero MA, Molina M, Guerrero-López CM. After Mexico implemented a tax, purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages decreased and water increased: difference by place of residence, household composition, and income level. J Nutr. 2017;147:1552–7. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.117.251892.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Taillie LS, Induni M, Miles DR, et al. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. Plos Med. 2017;14:e1002283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Zheng M, Allman-Farinelli M, Heitmann BL, Rangan A. Substitution of sugar-sweetened beverages with other beverage alternatives: a review of long-term health outcomes. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:767–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.01.006.CrossRefPubMed

16.

World Health Organization. WHO manual on sugar-sweetened beverage taxation policies to promote healthy diets. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240056299

17.

Colchero MA, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin BM, Ng SW. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff. 2017;36:564–71. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231.CrossRef

18.

ECORYS. Food taxes and their impact on competitiveness in the agri-food sector: final report. European Commission; 2014. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/5827/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native#:~:text=Overall%2C%20this%20study%20on%20the,fat%20levels%20of%20the%20product.

19.

H. Congreso de la Union. Ley del Impuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicios. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación; 2013. Available: https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LIEPS.pdf

20.•

Andreyeva T, Marple K, Marinello S, Moore TE, Powell LM. Outcomes following taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2215276. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276. This study is an important representation of expected results and considerations after a tax on unhealthy foods was implemented. The results shows that pass-through rate once taxes were implemented was 82%, which suggests partial implementation. However, taxes have the potential to promote lower sales of SSBs.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Colchero MA, Salgado JC, Unar-Munguía M, Hernández-Ávila M, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;19:129–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2015.08.007.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Fernández Sánchez-Escalonilla S, Fernández-Escobar C, Royo-Bordonada MÁ. Public support for the imposition of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages and the determinants of such support in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073758

23.

Sarda B, Debras C, Chazelas E, Péneau S, Le Bodo Y, Hercberg S, et al. Public perception of the tax on sweetened beverages in France. Public Health Nutr. 2022;25:3240–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022001665.CrossRefPubMed

24.•

Alvarado M, Penney TL, Unwin N, Murphy MM, Adams J. Evidence of a health risk “signalling effect” following the introduction of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Food Policy. 2021;102:102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102104. This study provides important background on how the implementation and adequate promotion of health-related governmental strategies in societies can raise public awareness about the health impact of unhealthy food consumption at the population level.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Barigozzi F, Villeneuve B. The signaling effect of tax policy. J Public Econ Theory. 2006;8:611–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00281.x.CrossRef

26.

Donaldson E. Advocating for Sugar-sweetened Beverage Taxation: A Case Study of Mexico. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2015. Available: https://www.jhsph.edu/departments/health-behavior-and-society/_pdf/Advocating_For_Sugar_Sweetened_Beverage_Taxation.pdf

27.

Álvarez-Sánchez C, Contento I, Jiménez-Aguilar A, Koch P, Gray HL, Guerra LA, et al. Does the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax have a signaling effect? ENSANUT 2016. Plos One. 2018;13:e0199337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199337.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Stacey N, Mudara C, Ng SW, van Walbeek C, Hofman K, Edoka I. Sugar-based beverage taxes and beverage prices: evidence from South Africa’s Health Promotion Levy. Soc Sci Med. 2019;238:112465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112465.CrossRefPubMed

29.

H. Congreso de la Union. ACUERDO por el que se actualizan las cuotas que se especifican en materia del impuesto especial sobre producción y servicios. Mexico: Diario Oficial de la Federación; 2014. Available: https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5376873&fecha=22/12/2014

30.

Euromonitor. Soft drinks in Mexico. Euromonitor International. November 2022. Available: https://www.euromonitor.com/soft-drinks-in-mexico/report

31.

Allcott H, Lockwood B, Taubinsky D. Regressive sin taxes, with an application to the optimal soda tax. National Bur Econ Res; 2019. working paper No. 25841. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25841

32.•

World Health Organization. Implementing fiscal and pricing policies to promote healthy diets: a review of contextual factors. World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240035027. This document is an important framework for considering the tax implementation aimed at improving public health. Considering the importance of the local context, including the economic and political environment, in implementing these fiscal policies, identifying taxes on unhealthy foods not only as cost-effective tool, but also as an intervention that promotes health equity, with political and social acceptability.

33.

World Cancer Research Fund International. Building momentum: lessons on implementing a robust sugar sweetened beverage tax. World Cancer Research Fund International; 2018. Available: https://www.wcrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/PPA-Building-Momentum-Report-WEB.pdf

34.

Pan American Health Organization. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages as a public health strategy: the experience of Mexico. PAHO; 2015. Available: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/18391

35.

Guerrero-López CM, Molina M, Colchero MA. Employment changes associated with the introduction of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and nonessential energy-dense food in Mexico. Prev Med. 2017;105S:S43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.001.

36.

Véliz C, Maslen H, Essman M, Taillie LS, Savulescu J. Sugar, Taxes, & Choice. Hastings Center Rep. 2019;49(6):22–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1067

37.

Falbe J. The ethics of excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages. Physiol Behav. 2020;225:113105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Ramanauskas B. Why sugar taxes are a bad idea. In: Tax Payers’ Alliance [web site]. 6 Apr 2019. Available: https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/why_sugar_taxes_are_a_bad_idea#:~:text=Placing%20a%20levy%20on%20everyday,sugary%20drinks%20than%20richer%20ones.

39.

The American Consumer Institute. Center for Citizen Research. Sugar taxes are ineffective, evidence shows. In: The American Consumer Institute. [web site]. The American Consumer Institute; 24 Jun 2019. Available: https://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2019/06/sugar-taxes-are-ineffective-evidence-shows/

40.

Dorfman L, Cheyne A, Friedman LC, Wadud A, Gottlieb M. Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: how do they compare? Plos Med. 2012;9:e1001241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Pomeranz JL. Implications of the supplemental nutrition assistance program tax exemption on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:2191–3. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302850.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Dong D, Stewart H. Food taxes and their impacts on food spending. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Econ Res Serv; 2021. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.313477

43.

Colchero MA, Salgado JC, Unar-Munguía M, Molina M, Ng S, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Changes in prices after an excise tax to sweetened sugar beverages was implemented in Mexico: evidence from urban areas. Plos One. 2015;10:e0144408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144408.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Colchero MA, Zavala JA, Batis C, Shamah-Levy T, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Cambios en los precios de bebidas y alimentos con impuesto en áreas rurales y semirrurales de México. Salud Pública Méx. 2017;59:137–46. https://doi.org/10.21149/7994.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Petit P, Mansour M, Wingender MP. How to apply excise taxes to fight obesity. International Monetary Fund; 2021. Available: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Fiscal-Affairs-Department-How-To-Notes/Issues/2021/12/10/How-to-Apply-Excise-Taxes-to-Fight-Obesity-461733

46.

World Health Organization. Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases: technical meeting report, 5–6 May 2015, Geneva, Switzerland. 2016. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250131/9789241511247-eng.pdf

47.

Krieger J, Magee K, Hennings T, Schoof J, Madsen KA. How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States. Prev Med Rep. 2021;23:101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101388.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Zafar MI, Mills KE, Zheng J, Peng MM, Ye X, Chen LL. Low glycaemic index diets as an intervention for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:290–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12791.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Perin L, Camboim IG, Lehnen AM. Low glycaemic index and glycaemic load diets in adults with excess weight: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022;35:1124–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.13029.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Rothberg AE, Herman WH, Wu C, IglayReger HB, Horowitz JF, Burant CF, et al. Weight loss improves β-cell function in people with severe obesity and impaired fasting glucose: a window of opportunity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:e1621–30. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz189.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Neuenschwander M, Ballon A, Weber KS, Norat T, Aune D, Schwingshackl L, et al. Role of diet in type 2 diabetes incidence: umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective observational studies. BMJ. 2019;366:l2368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Greenwood DC, Threapleton DE, Evans CEL, Cleghorn CL, Nykjaer C, Woodhead C, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, carbohydrates, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:4166–71. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0325.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Livesey G, Taylor R, Livesey HF, Buyken AE, Jenkins DJA, Augustin LSA, et al. Dietary glycemic index and load and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and updated meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies. Nutrients. 2019;11(6):1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11061280

54.

Thomas D, Elliott EJ. Low glycaemic index, or low glycaemic load, diets for diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009:CD006296. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006296.pub2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Lingvay I, Sumithran P, Cohen RV, le Roux CW. Obesity management as a primary treatment goal for type 2 diabetes: time to reframe the conversation. Lancet. 2022;399:394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01919-X.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Clamp LD, Hume DJ, Lambert EV, Kroff J. Enhanced insulin sensitivity in successful, long-term weight loss maintainers compared with matched controls with no weight loss history. Nutr Diabetes. 2017;7:e282. https://doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2017.31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Magkos F, Fraterrigo G, Yoshino J, Luecking C, Kirbach K, Kelly SC, et al. Effects of moderate and subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity. Cell Metab. 2016;23:591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.02.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Taylor R, Al-Mrabeh A, Zhyzhneuskaya S, Peters C, Barnes AC, Aribisala BS, et al. Remission of human type 2 diabetes requires decrease in liver and pancreas fat content but is dependent upon capacity for β cell recovery. Cell Metab. 2018;28:547-556.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.07.003.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Roden M, Shulman GI. The integrative biology of type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2019;576:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1797-8.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Teng AM, Jones AC, Mizdrak A, Signal L, Genç M, Wilson N. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:1187–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12868.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Nakhimovsky SS, Feigl AB, Avila C, O’Sullivan G, Macgregor-Skinner E, Spranca M. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce overweight and obesity in middle-income countries: a systematic review. Plos One. 2016;11(9):e0163358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Batis C, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Taillie LS. First-year evaluation of Mexico’s tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: an observational study. Plos Med. 2016;13:e1002057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002057.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Taillie LS, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Batis C. Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico’s 8% nonessential food tax. Prev Med. 2017;105S:S37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.009.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Ng SW, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Colchero MA. Did high sugar-sweetened beverage purchasers respond differently to the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico? Public Health Nutr. 2019;22:750–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001800321X.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Sánchez-Romero LM, Canto-Osorio F, González-Morales R, Colchero MA, Ng S-W, Ramírez-Palacios P, et al. Association between tax on sugar sweetened beverages and soft drink consumption in adults in Mexico: open cohort longitudinal analysis of Health Workers Cohort Study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1311. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Batis C, Castellanos-Gutierrez A, Sanchez-Pimienta TG, Reyes García A, Colchero A, Basto-Abreu A, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Rivera JA. Comparison of Dietary Intake Before vs After Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods in Mexico, 2012 to 2018. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(7):e2325191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25191.

67.

Cabrera Escobar MA, Veerman JL, Tollman SM, et al. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1072. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1072.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Han E, Powell LM. Effect of food prices on the prevalence of obesity among young adults. Public Health. 2011;125:129–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2010.11.014.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Rogers NT, Cummins S, Forde H, Jones CP, Mytton O, Rutter H, et al. Associations between trajectories of obesity prevalence in English primary school children and the UK soft drinks industry levy: An interrupted time series analysis of surveillance data. PLoS Med. 2023;20:e1004160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Gracner T, Marquez-Padilla F, Hernandez-Cortes D. Changes in weight-related outcomes among adolescents following consumer price increases of taxed sugar-sweetened beverages. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176:150–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5044.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Singh GM, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Lim S, Ezzati M, Mozaffarian D, et al. Estimated global, regional, and national disease burdens related to sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in 2010. Circulation. 2015;132:639–66. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

World Health Organization. Taxes on sugary drinks: why do it?. Sugary drinks – a major contributor to obesity and diabetes. WHO. 2017 Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260253/WHO-NMH-PND-16.5Rev.1-eng.pdf

73.

Liu S, Veugelers PJ, Liu C, Ohinmaa A. The cost effectiveness of taxation of sugary foods and beverages: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022;20:185–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00685-x.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Braverman-Bronstein A, Camacho-García-Formentí D, Zepeda-Tello R, Cudhea F, Singh GM, Mozaffarian D, et al. Mortality attributable to sugar sweetened beverages consumption in Mexico: an update. Int J Obes. 2020;44:1341–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0506-x.CrossRef

75.

Basto-Abreu A, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Vidaña-Pérez D, Colchero MA, Hernández-F M, Hernández-Ávila M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax in Mexico. Health Aff. 2019;38:1824–31. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05469.CrossRef

76.

Seiglie JA, Nambiar D, Beran D, Miranda JJ. To tackle diabetes, science and health systems must take into account social context. Nat Med. 2021;27:193–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01231-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam E, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, et al. Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes–a randomized social experiment. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1509–19. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1103216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

78.•

Anza-Ramirez C, Lazo M, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Avila-Palencia I, Bilal U, Hernández-Vásquez A, et al. The urban built environment and adult BMI, obesity, and diabetes in Latin American cities. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35648-w. This study is an important representation of how built environment plays an important role in the development of obesity and chronic diseases. Provides results about how population-wide interventions can positively impact in the reduction of obesity prevalence and chronic disease burden.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Stuckler D, Siegel K, De Vogli R, Basu S. Chapter 2. Sick individuals, sick populations: the societal determinants of chronic diseases. In: Stuckler D & Siegel, editor. Sick Societies: Responding to the global challenge of chronic disease. Oxford University Press; 2011. pp. 26–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574407.003.0027

80.

Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:427–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.3.427. (discussion 433–4).CrossRefPubMed

81.

Frieden TR. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:590–5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.185652.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Stuckler D, Siegel K, Duffany KO, Kishore S, Stevens D, Basu S. Comprehensive strategies to reduce the burden of chronic diseases: ◆ what are the best ways to reduce the burden of chronic disease? In: Stuckler D & Siegel, editors. Sick Societies: responding to the global challenge of chronic disease. Oxford University Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574407.003.0057

83.

Kontis V, Cobb LK, Mathers CD, Frieden TR, Ezzati M, Danaei G. Three public health interventions could save 94 million lives in 25 years global impact assessment analysis. Circulation. 2019;140:715–25. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

84.

Bernabe-Ortiz A, Sal y Rosas VG, Ponce-Lucero V, Cárdenas MK, Carrillo-Larco RM, Diez-Canseco F, et al. Effect of salt substitution on community-wide blood pressure and hypertension incidence. Nat Med. 2020;26:374–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0754-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

85.

Miranda J. Community-based salt substitution programme lowers blood pressure. ESC Congress-World Congress of Cardiology 2019 ; 2019 Sep 2; European Society of Cardiology. Paris, France. Available: https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/community-based-salt-substitution-programme-lowers-blood-pressure

86.

Johnson RC, Schoeni RF. Early-life origins of adult disease: national longitudinal population-based study of the United States. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2317–24. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300252.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

87.

Wang G, Walker SO, Hong X, Bartell TR, Wang X. Epigenetics and early life origins of chronic noncommunicable diseases. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.019.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Pongutta S, Suphanchaimat R, Patcharanarumol W, Tangcharoensathien V. Lessons from the Thai Health Promotion Foundation. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97:213–20. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.220277.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Yoshida Y, Simoes EJ. Sugar-sweetened beverage, obesity, and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents: policies, taxation, and programs. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1004-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

90.

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC)—Americas Working Group. Trends in cardiometabolic risk factors in the Americas between 1980 and 2014: a pooled analysis of population-based surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(1):e123–e133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30484-X.

91.

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Effects of diabetes definition on global surveillance of diabetes prevalence and diagnosis: a pooled analysis of 96 population-based studies with 331,288 participants. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(8):624–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00129-1.

92.

Bragge P, Waddell A, Kellner P, Delafosse V, Marten R, Nordström A, et al. Characteristics of successful government-led interventions to support healthier populations: a starting portfolio of positive outlier examples. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(5):e011683. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011683.

Titel: How Could Taxes on Sugary Drinks and Foods Help Reduce the Burden Of Type 2 Diabetes?
verfasst von: Alan Reyes-García
Isabel Junquera-Badilla
Carolina Batis
M. Arantxa Colchero
J. Jaime Miranda
Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez
Ana Basto-Abreu
Publikationsdatum: 11.09.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports / Ausgabe 10/2023
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Elektronische ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01519-x

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

How Could Taxes on Sugary Drinks and Foods Help Reduce the Burden Of Type 2 Diabetes?