Introduction
Numerous cell types and signal substances play a role in orthodontic tooth movement. Based on the force exerted, tensile and compressive zones can be distinguished from each other in the periodontal ligament. At tensile zones, there is increased bone formation, whereas alveolar bone is resorbed at compression zones [
22]. The cells use different mechanisms to detect mechanical strain. Both the cytoskeleton [
25] and membrane-bound molecules such as integrins [
30,
48], connexins [
16,
44] and ion channels [
17,
32] can be activated by pressure, triggering downstream effects. This includes the synthesis of two key proteins of bone resorption, receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) [
38]. Osteoclast-dependent bone resorption is the limiting factor of tooth movement [
10]. During orthodontic tooth movement, RANKL is produced by periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF), mesenchymal stem cells, lymphocytes, osteoblasts, and osteocytes and promotes the differentiation of osteoclasts from osteoclast progenitor cells by binding to the RANK receptor on osteoclast progenitor cells [
14,
33,
45‐
47]. OPG is a RANKL decoy receptor, as OPG prevents binding of RANKL to RANK [
38]. Accompanying tooth movement, a sterile inflammation takes place in the periodontal ligament [
10]. Pressure loading induces the synthesis and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1B) and IL6 in the early phase of tooth movement [
14,
26,
39]. Thus, bone remodeling and a sterile inflammatory response characterize orthodontic tooth movement.
Among others, heat shock proteins (HSPs) can influence these processes. Several HSPs have already been linked with orthodontic tooth movement [
3,
23,
24,
37]. During bone formation at tension areas, HSPs act as molecular chaperones, which assist the maturation of bone morphogenetic proteins [
24]. HSPs are involved in several processes, including protein transport, protein folding, and the assembly and disassembly of protein structures [
50].
They support protein refolding and become active in misfolding, where they either refold the misfolded proteins or release them for degradation [
50]. HSPs also play a significant role in immunomodulatory signaling pathways in response to stress and are therefore also considered important biomarkers [
50]. Some HSPs are involved in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL1ß and IL6. HSPs are classified according to their molecular size. This results in seven families: HSP110, HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, HSP40 and small HSPs, which have an approximate size of 15–30 kDa. HSP27 thus belongs to the small HSPs. Wolf et al. found that HSP70 in PDLF has an effect not only on osteoclast differentiation, but also on proliferation, wound healing, and apoptosis [
42]. Recently, HSP27 was shown to inhibit the inflammatory response in intestinal epithelial cells via the NF-κB signaling pathway [
49]. HSP27 is associated with protein folding, cell migration, cell metabolism, cell differentiation, cell growth, signal transduction and apoptosis [
15]. HSP27 is expressed by most cells, although the amount expressed varies greatly depending on the cell type. Synthesis of HSP27 is induced by heat, stress, estrogens, and nerve injury [
15]. Posttranslational modifications can strongly influence the functions of HSP27. It can act as a chaperone, stabilizing denatured or aggregated proteins and folding them back to their original form [
12,
19]. Phosphorylation, which is triggered by oxidative stress [
28], abolishes oligomerization, resulting in increased chaperone activity of monomers [
2,
11]. The localization of HSP27 is not limited to the cytosol, but has also been detected in the nucleus [
1]. In addition, HSP27 also has an anti-apoptotic effect [
4,
5]. This has a promoting effect on cancer progression and metastasis. In this regard, HSP27 overexpression not only leads to increased invasiveness, but also to resistance to chemotherapeutic treatments [
8,
27,
29]. Despite years of research and numerous findings, the functions of HSP27 have not been fully elucidated.
Increased expression and phosphorylation of HSP27 was detected in the periodontal ligament already 10 min after force application in a mouse model [
23,
37]. Therefore, our aim was to verify whether HSP27 exhibits an anti-inflammatory effect also in PDLF and thus could be a potential target to influence orthodontic treatments. Furthermore, the functional diversity of heat shock proteins suggests other previously unknown roles in cell homeostasis. Therefore, a possible influence on collagen synthesis as well as mediators of bone formation and degradation was also investigated.
Materials and methods
Cultivation of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts
Primary human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) were isolated from periodontal tissue remnants of extracted caries-free teeth, which were extracted for medical reasons, and grown in complete medium RPMI1640 (61870-010, Gibco™, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% bovine calf serum (FBS; P30-3302; PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany), 1% L‑glutamine (SH30034. 01, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA), 100 µM ascorbic acid (A8960, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 1% antibiotics/antimycotic (A5955, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) under cell culture conditions. The fifth to seventh passage of a pool of PDLF from six different patients (3 females; 3 males; age: 17–27 years), which had been previously characterized [
31], were used for experiments.
Determination of cell number using the crystal violet assay
The supernatant was removed and adherent cells were washed with 500 μl PBS (14190-094, Gibco™, Carlsbad, CA, USA), then 200 μl crystal violet solution consisting of 2.5 g crystal violet (T123.3, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany); 0.85 g NaCl (3957, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany); 20 ml 37% formaldehyde (M4003, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 150 ml ethanol (32205, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added in a total volume of 500 ml per well of a 24-well plate. After 15 min at 37 °C, the plate was washed three times with tap water and lightly tapped out onto a paper towel. The wells were dried at 37 °C for 45 min. After this time, 300 μl of a 33% acetic acid solution (3738.1, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) were added per well and measured at a wavelength of 595 nm using an ELISA reader (Multiscan Go, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Determination of cytotoxicity using the lactate dehydrogenase assay
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release was determined with LDH assay (04744926001; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to manufacturer’s instruction. After an incubation period of 30 min in the dark, stop solution was added to each well. Thereafter, measurements were made at wavelengths of 490 and 690 nm (reference) using Multiscan Go (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
RNA Solv® Reagent (250 µl, R6830-01, VWR international, Radnor, PA, USA) was added directly to the cell culture plates. After a short incubation on ice to destroy the cells, the supernatant was transferred to microreaction tubes followed by the addition of 100 μl chloroform. Samples were mixed for 30 s and then incubated on ice for 15 min. This was followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. The clear aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube with 500 μl cold isopropanol (20,842,330; VWR international, Radnor, PA, USA). After inverting, the samples were stored at −80 °C overnight. The following day, samples were centrifuged for 30 min at 4 °C at 13,000 rpm. The pellet was washed twice with 500 μl 80% ethanol (32205, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After drying, the pellet was solved in 15 μl RNAse-free water (T143, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and concentration of recovered RNA was measured by nano-photometer (Implen, Munich, Germany). To be transcribe RNA into cDNA equal concentrations of RNA were mixed with 2 µl of M‑MLV 5x buffer (M531, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 0.5 µl of OligodT primer (SO123, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.5 µl of Random Hexamer primer (SO142, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 10 mM dNTPs (L785. 1/2, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.5 µl RNAse inhibitor (EO0381, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 0.5 µl reverse transcriptase (M170B, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in a total volume of 10 µl per sample. The PCR program involved heating the lid to 110 °C, then holding the temperature in the block constant at 37 °C for 1 h, and finally heating to 95 °C for 2 min.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
The aim of the polymerase chain reaction is to exponentially amplify the synthesized cDNA. For this purpose, 1.5 μl cDNA of each sample was mixed with 8.5 μl of the previously prepared primer mix in duplicate into a 96-well plate (712282, Biozym Scientific, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany), covered with an adhesive optical film (712350, Biozym Scientific, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) and briefly centrifuged. The primer mix consisted of 0.25 μl each of forward and reverse primer (Table
1), 3 μl RNAse-free water (T143.5, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), and 5 μl Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (M3003E, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) for each sample. Plates were placed in the thermal cycler (Mastercylcer® Realplex
2, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and the appropriate program was started. This involved first heating the plates to 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C, and 8 s at 72 °C. The reference genes
PPIB/RPL22 [
13] were used to standardize the target genes. Relative gene expression was determined using the formula 2
−∆∆Cq [
20].
Table 1
Alphabetical list of reference and target gene primers used for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Tab. 1
Alphabetische Liste der für die RT-qPCR („real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction“) verwendeten Referenz- und Zielgen-Primer
COL1A2 | Collagen-1-α‑2 | AGAAACACGTCTGGCTAGGAG | GCATGAAGGCAAGTTGGGTAG |
IL1B | Interleukin-1β | ATGACCTGAGCACCTTCTTTCCCT | GCATCGTGCACATAAGCCTCGTTA |
IL6 | Interleukin‑6 | TGGCAGAAAACAACCTGAACC | CCTCAAACTCCAAAAGACCAGTG |
PPIB | Peptidyl-Prolyl-cis-trans-Isomerase B | TTCCATCGTGTAATCAAGGACTTC | GCTCACCGTAGATGCTCTTTC |
RPL22 | Ribosomal 60S-Protein L22 | TGATTGCACCCACCCTGTAG | GGTTCCCAGCTTTTCCGTTC |
Western blot analysis
Protein purification was performed with CelLytic™ M (C2978, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with proteinase/phosphatase inhibitor (78440, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Concentration of proteins was determined using Roti-Quant (K015.3, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). Same amounts of proteins were mixed with 6 × sample buffer (3.75 ml Tris/HCl pH 6.8 (T1503, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 3 ml glycerol (818709, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1.2 g 10% SDS (8029.1, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.06 g bromophenol blue (108122, Supelco®, St. Louis, MO, USA) ad with water to 10 ml; 0.1 g DTT (dithiothreitol; R0861, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) per ml) and heated to 70 °C for 7 min. Proteins were separated on 12% polyacrylamide gels at 80 V for the first 30 min, followed by 120 V for 90 min. Separated proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (T830.1, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 90 V for 90 min. To prevent nonspecific binding of antibodies to the membrane, the membrane was placed at room temperature for at least 1 h in 5% milk (T145.3, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in TBS‑T. This was followed by incubation with the diluted primary antibodies (HSP27 1:3000 (AF1580, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA); pHSP27 1:500 (AF2314, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), PTGS2 1:2500 (PA5-1817, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), RANKL 1:2000 (TA306362, OriGene, Rockville, MD, USA); ACTIN 1:1000 (E1C602, ABIN274248, Antibody-online, Aachen, Germany)). Incubation was performed at 4 °C overnight. The next day, the membrane was washed three times with TBS‑T for 5 min each at room temperature and then incubated with the secondary antibody (1:5000, 611-1302, Rockland Immunochemicals, Pottstown, PA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. After this time, the membrane was washed again three times with TBS‑T for 5 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the membrane was coated with Luminata Forte Western HRP Substrate (WBLUF0100, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and signals were detected with the documentation system VWR Genoplex (VWR international, Radnor, PA, USA). Densitometric analysis was performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA). To test for further protein expression, the membrane was incubated three times for 10 min with TBS‑T followed by 20 min in Re-Blot Plus Mild (2502, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). This was followed by two more washes with TBS‑T for 10 min. After 1 h in 5% milk in TBS‑T, the membrane could be incubated with another antibody overnight at 4 °C.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
The commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit TNFRSF11B (EHTNFRSF11B, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to quantify osteoprotegerin (OPG) at the protein level. Initially, PDLF cell culture supernatants were completely thawed, diluted 1:10 with the corresponding buffer of the ELISA kit and further proceeded according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Photometric measurement was performed using Multiscan Go (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 450 and 550 nm (reference).
Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase staining
To prepare the TRAP (tartrate resistant acid phosphatase) staining solution, 2 mg of phosphate disodium salt (N-5000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was first dissolved in 200 μl of H2Odd. Acetate buffer was prepared by mixing 35.2 ml 0.2 M sodium acetate solution, 14.8 ml 0.2 M acetic acid solution and 50 ml H2Od. TRAP buffer pH 5.0 was then freshly prepared with 10 ml of acetate buffer, 2 ml of 0.3 M sodium tartrate, 200 μl naphthol AS-MX phosphate (10 mg/mL; N5000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 20 μl Triton X‑100 (T8787, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 7.78 ml H2Odd. TRAP buffer was preheated at 37 °C and then 0.3 mg/ml Fast Red Violet LB Stain (F-3381, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were dissolved in TRAP buffer. The TRAP staining solution was preheated at 37 °C until use. Cells were washed with prewarmed PBS (14190-094, Gibco™, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and fixed with 10% glutaraldehyde (G-5882, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C for 15 min. After washing the cells twice with PBS, TRAP staining solution was added and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. Then TRAP staining solution was removed and stained cells were washed with PBS. TRAP-positive cells (red) were counted using an Olympus IX50 microscope (Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the program GraphPadPrism 9.2. Prior to statistical analysis, all absolute data values were divided by the respective arithmetic mean of the control group without mechanical loading to obtain normalized data values relative to these controls. Data are presented as single point diagrams with each symbol representing one data point. In addition, the horizontal lines in the graphs show the mean values and the vertical lines the standard error of the mean. Normal distribution of the data was examined with the Shapiro–Wilk test and homogeneity of the groups was determined with the Brown–Forsythe test. Depending on the normal distribution and homogeneity of the data, the following tests were performed: analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Holm–Šídák post hoc tests, Welch-corrected ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 post hoc tests, with two groups to be compared: Mann–Whitney U test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Discussion
Muraoka et al. reported increased HSP27 expression and phosphorylation in the periodontal ligament of mice after force application [
23]. This effect was already observed 10 min after the load application and reached a peak after nine hours. This was comparable to our results as we observed a maximum of HSP27 phosphorylation after six hours. In contrast to the results of Muraoka et al., we observed no changes in HSP27 expression. Phosphorylation of HSP27 affected collagen, IL6 and PTGS2 expression as well as the RANKL/OPG ratio resulting in the induction of an increased number of TRAP
+ cells after compressive force treatment.
Remodeling of the extracellular matrix is crucial for orthodontic tooth movement. We observed decreased
COL1A2 mRNA levels after transfection with pHSP27
+. Hirano et al. and Deng et al. reported that HSP27 overexpression increased collagen synthesis in fibroblasts [
9] or in alveolar type II epithelial cells [
6]. Also, HSP70 and HSP47 were associated with collagen secretion in PDLF during mechanical loading [
24].
IL6 is the classic proinflammatory cytokine associated with bone resorption [
43]. Constitutively phosphorylated HSP27 led to a decrease in
IL6 gene expression by PDLF. This observation is consistent with the results of Zhang et al. in intestinal epithelial cells [
49]. Sur et al. also identified an involvement of HSP27 in the NF-κB signaling pathway in keratinocytes. They described an increased production of inflammatory mediators as a consequence downregulation of HSP27 [
36]. Accordingly, a decrease in
IL6 expression could be due to increased levels of phosphorylated HSP27. The increased RANKL/OPG ratio seems to be in apparent contradiction to the lowered expression of
IL6. Marciniak et al. (2019) investigated the role of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) during mechanical loading by inhibiting HSP70 [
21]. They used a compressive force of 2 g/cm
2 and observed increased
IL6 and
IL8 gene expression after compression. Inhibition of HSP70 and simultaneous pressure application resulted in an even higher gene expression of
IL6 and
IL8, suggesting a protective function of HSP70 [
21]. Wolf et al. investigated the effect of heat pretreatment on PDLF [
41]. PDLF were subjected to an elevated temperature of 43 °C before force application. This treatment significantly reduced protein secretion of IL6 and IL8. Therefore, heat shock proteins are considered a promising therapeutic option to minimize undesirable side effects during orthodontic treatments [
41]. For the experiments, PDLF were transfected with HSP27
+, which is characterized by having aspartate instead of the three serine residues. Aspartate, like the phosphate ion, carries a negative charge. Thus, this plasmid corresponds to permanent phosphorylation and acquires phospho-mimetic properties [
35]. In its native form, HSP27 is also present in a dephosphorylated state and can only form large oligomers and perform its chaperone function in this way [
15]. Phosphorylation of HSP27 causes oligomers to dissociate [
34]. These results may imply that there is some protective function against the generation of proinflammatory factors when HSP27 is not phosphorylated and thus is in the form of oligomers. This allows HSP27 to perform its chaperone function.
Compression with 6 g/cm
2 for 6 h led to an increase in the RANKL/OPG ratio, which was due to a reduction in OPG secretion and increased PTSG2 protein expression. PTGS2 is critically involved in prostaglandin synthesis [
7,
40]. PGE2 has been shown to promote RANKL production and inhibit OPG expression in osteoblasts [
18]. Since inflammatory mediators promote RANKL production and inhibit OPG synthesis, one would expect a reduction in this ratio. However, as described at the beginning, RANKL and OPG synthesis depend on numerous cellular factors in addition to inflammatory mediators. These include the cytoskeleton [
25], integrins [
30,
48], connexins [
16,
44], and ion channels [
17,
32]. Thus, it could be that HSP27 interferes with another, as yet unknown, signaling pathway, thereby influencing the RANKL/OPG ratio in favor of RANKL. However, further research is needed to test this conjecture. Overall, HSP27 could be a promising target in orthodontic treatments.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.