KCCQ total symptom score, clinical outcome measures, and adverse events associated with omecamtiv mecarbil for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
verfasst von:
Ramzi Ibrahim, Abdulbaril Olagunju, Kristina Terrani, Chelsea Takamatsu, George Khludenev, Preethi William
Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a direct myosin activator that augments left ventricular systolic function. This review compares OM to placebo by evaluating its effect on clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Methods and results
A literature search of multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating OM versus placebo was undertaken. Six RCTs comprising 9596 patients were included. Use of OM was associated with a reduced risk of stroke (RR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.52–0.92). There was no significant mean difference (MD) change in the KCCQ total symptom score (MD: 1.82, 95% CI − 1.33 to 4.97), all-cause death (RR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.93–1.07), hospital readmissions (RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.90–1.03), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.05; 95% CI 0.83–1.33), cardiovascular death (RR: 1.01; 95% CI 0.92–1.10), heart failure (HF) events (RR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.89–1.02), or a composite of cardiovascular death or HF events (RR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–1.02). In addition, OM was associated with an increased risk of dizziness (RR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.04–1.50) and hypotension (RR: 1.17; 95% CI 1.01–1.36). Other adverse events including ventricular tachyarrhythmias, (RR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.82–1.11), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation/flutter (RR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.46–1.18), dyspnea (RR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.86–1.18), and acute renal injury (RR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.60–1.27) were not significant.
Conclusion
OM is generally well tolerated. We identified a reduced risk of stroke with use of OM. However, there was no improvement in other clinical outcomes or quality of life.
Study protocol was registered in PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022348423).
Graphical abstract
×
Anzeige
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
KCCQ total symptom score, clinical outcome measures, and adverse events associated with omecamtiv mecarbil for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
verfasst von
Ramzi Ibrahim Abdulbaril Olagunju Kristina Terrani Chelsea Takamatsu George Khludenev Preethi William
Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.
Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.
Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.
Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.
Update Kardiologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.