nach oben

Erschienen in:

30.09.2022 | Original Article

Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review

verfasst von: Katrine Mølgaard Johannsen, João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig, Brian Hansen, Ann Wenzel, Rubens Spin-Neto

Erschienen in: Oral Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Dental materials, including orthodontic appliances and implants, are commonly mentioned as a possible source of artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of the present study was to undertake a systematic review of the relevant literature on MR image artefacts due to dental materials, limited to orthodontic appliances and implant-supported dental prosthesis, on both technical and diagnostic levels.

Methods

The MEDLINE (PubMed) bibliographic database was searched up to September 2020. The search was limited to studies published in English, using the search string: (MRI or magnetic resonance) and (artefact or artifact) and (dental or ortho or implant or restoration or restorative). The studies were assessed independently by three reviewers, focusing on the following parameters: MRI sequences, tested materials, assessed parameters, efficacy level and outcome.

Results

The search strategy yielded 31 studies, which were included in this systematic review. These studies showed that metallic dental materials, commonly present in orthodontic appliances and implant-supported dental prosthesis led to diverse types/severities of artefacts in MR images. Fifteen studies were in vivo, based on human subjects. The studies differed substantially in terms of tested materials, assessed parameters, and outcome measurements.

Conclusions

Metallic dental materials cause artefacts of diverse types and severities in MR images of the head and neck region. However, the diagnostic relevance of the investigated artefacts for the diverse MRI applications is yet to be studied.

Assaf AT, Zrnc TA, Remus CC, Schonfeld M, Habermann CR, Riecke B, Friedrich RE, Fiehler J, Heiland M, Sedlacik J. Evaluation of four different optimized magnetic-resonance-imaging sequences for visualization of dental and maxillo-mandibular structures at 3 T. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(7):1356–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.026.CrossRefPubMed

Idiyatullin D, Garwood M, Gaalaas L, Nixdorf DR. Role of MRI for detecting micro cracks in teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(7):20160150. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Marchant TE, Joshi KD. Comprehensive Monte Carlo study of patient doses from cone-beam CT imaging in radiotherapy. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37(1):13–30. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/37/1/13.CrossRefPubMed

Klinke T, Daboul A, Maron J, Gredes T, Puls R, Jaghsi A, Biffar R. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials. PLoS ONE. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shafiei F, Honda E, Takahashi H, Sasaki T. Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. J Dent Res. 2003;82(8):602–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200806.CrossRefPubMed

Chockattu SJ, Suryakant DB, Thakur S. Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature. Restor Dent Endod. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hubalkova H, La Serna P, Linetskiy I, Dostalova T. Dental alloys and magnetic resonance imaging. Int Dent J. 2006;56(3):135–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595x.2006.tb00085.x.CrossRefPubMed

Beau A, Bossard D, Gebeile-Chauty S. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(1):105–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju020.CrossRefPubMed

Stonier G, Hardee P. MRI safety: MRI and fixed orthodontic appliances. Br Dent J. 2018;225(8):684. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.935.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Geibel MA, Gelissen B, Bracher AK, Rasche V. Artifact properties of dental ceramic and titanium implants in MRI. Rofo. 2019;191(5):433–41. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0755-2374.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(6):717–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.032.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140103.x.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic-imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991;11(2):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9101100203.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fache JS, Price C, Hawbolt EB, Li DK. MR imaging artifacts produced by dental materials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1987;8(5):837–40.PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Hinshaw DB Jr, Holshouser BA, Engstrom HI, Tjan AH, Christiansen EL, Catelli WF. Dental material artifacts on MR images. Radiology. 1988;166(3):777–9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.166.3.3340777.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sadowsky PL, Bernreuter W, Lakshminarayanan AV, Kenney P. Orthodontic appliances and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and temporomandibular joint. Angle Orthod. 1988;58(1):9–20. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1988)058.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Hubalkova H, Hora K, Seidl Z, Krasensky J. Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2002;10(3):125–30.PubMed

18.

Harris TM, Faridrad MR, Dickson JA. The benefits of aesthetic orthodontic brackets in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning. J Orthod. 2006;33(2):90–4. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531205225021465.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Sasaki Y, Akutagawa M, Emoto T, Tegawa Y, Kinouchi Y. Theoretical study of evaluation method for MRI metal artifact. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2013.6609690.CrossRef

20.

Abbaszadeh K, Heffez LB, Mafee MF. Effect of interference of metallic objects on interpretation of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in the maxillofacial region. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89(6):759–65. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.105942.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, Fiebach J, Dickhaus H, Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA. 2005;18(2):103–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-005-0101-0.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Starcukova J, Starcuk Z Jr, Hubalkova H, Linetskiy I. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts. Dent Mater. 2008;24(6):715–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.07.002.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Imai H, Tanaka Y, Nomura N, Tsutsumi Y, Doi H, Kanno Z, Ohno K, Ono T, Hanawa T. Three-dimensional quantification of susceptibility artifacts from various metals in magnetic resonance images. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(9):8433–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.017.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Tymofiyeva O, Vaegler S, Rottner K, Boldt J, Hopfgartner AJ, Proff PC, Richter EJ, Jakob PM. Influence of dental materials on dental MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(6):20120271. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Zho SY, Kim MO, Lee KW, Kim DH. Artifact reduction from metallic dental materials in T1-weighted spin-echo imaging at 3.0 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(2):471–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23785.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Blankenstein F, Truong BT, Thomas A, Thieme N, Zachriat C. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging. J Orofac Orthop. 2015;76(1):14–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0258-0.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Duttenhoefer F, Mertens ME, Vizkelety J, Gremse F, Stadelmann VA, Sauerbier S. Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(10):1195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12430.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Shalish M, Dykstein N, Friedlander-Barenboim S, Ben-David E, Gomori JM, Chaushu S. Influence of common fixed retainers on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147(5):604–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.022.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Wylezinska M, Pinkstone M, Hay N, Scott AD, Birch MJ, Miquel ME. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(6):610–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju103.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Murakami S, Verdonschot RG, Kataoka M, Kakimoto N, Shimamoto H, Kreiborg S. A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(8):20160094. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160094.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Smeets R, Schollchen M, Gauer T, Aarabi G, Assaf AT, Rendenbach C, Beck-Broichsitter B, Semmusch J, Sedlacik J, Heiland M, Fiehler J, Siemonsen S. Artefacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(2):20160267. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Hilgenfeld T, Prager M, Schwindling FS, Nittka M, Rammelsberg P, Bendszus M, Heiland S, Juerchott A. MSVAT-SPACE-STIR and SEMAC-STIR for reduction of metallic artifacts in 3T head and neck MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(7):1322–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5678.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Demirturk Kocasarac H, Ustaoglu G, Bayrak S, Katkar R, Geha H, Deahl ST 2nd, Mealey BL, Danaci M, Noujeim M. Evaluation of artifacts generated by titanium, zirconium, and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants on MRI, CT, and CBCT images: a phantom study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127(6):535–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.01.074.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Lee MY, Song KH, Lee JW, Choe BY, Suh TS. Metal artifacts with dental implants: evaluation using a dedicated CT/MR oral phantom with registration of the CT and MR images. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36227-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Nielsen JS, Van Leemput K, Edmund JM. MR-based CT metal artifact reduction for head-and-neck photon, electron, and proton radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2019;46(10):4314–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13729.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Tran LTX, Sakamoto J, Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Tomisato H, Kurabayashi T. Quantitative evaluation of artefact reduction from metallic dental materials in short tau inversion recovery imaging: efficacy of syngo WARP at 3.0 tesla. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(7):20190036. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190036.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Gorgulu S, Ayyildiz S, Kamburoglu K, Gokce S, Ozen T. Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(2):20130356. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Demirturk Kocasarac H, Kursun-Cakmak ES, Ustaoglu G, Bayrak S, Orhan K, Noujeim M. Assessment of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio in 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of zirconium, titanium, and titanium-zirconium alloy implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020;129(1):80–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.08.020.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Hilgenfeld T, Prager M, Heil A, Schwindling FS, Nittka M, Grodzki D, Rammelsberg P, Bendszus M, Heiland S. PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(12):5104–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4901-1.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Hilgenfeld T, Prager M, Schwindling FS, Heil A, Kuchenbecker S, Rammelsberg P, Bendszus M, Heiland S. Artefacts of implant-supported single crowns: impact of material composition on artefact volume on dental MRI. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(3):301–8.PubMed

41.

Costa AL, Appenzeller S, Yasuda CL, Pereira FR, Zanardi VA, Cendes F. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14(6):E278–82.PubMed

42.

Gunzinger JM, Delso G, Boss A, Porto M, Davison H, von Schulthess GK, Huellner M, Stolzmann P, Veit-Haibach P, Burger IA. Metal artifact reduction in patients with dental implants using multispectral three-dimensional data acquisition for hybrid PET/MRI. EJNMMI Phys. 2014;1(1):102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-014-0102-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Hong HR, Jin S, Koo HJ, Roh JL, Kim JS, Cho KJ, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. Clinical values of (18) F-FDG PET/CT in oral cavity cancer with dental artifacts on CT or MRI. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(6):696–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23691.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Probst M, Richter V, Weitz J, Kirschke JS, Ganter C, Troeltzsch M, Nittka M, Cornelius CP, Zimmer C, Probst FA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve with special regard to metal artifact reduction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(4):558–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.009.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Ozawa E, Honda EI, Parakonthun KN, Ohmori H, Shimazaki K, Kurabayashi T, Ono T. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies. Prog Orthod. 2018;19(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0204-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Miao X, Wu Y, Liu D, Jiang H, Woods D, Stern MT, Blair NIS, Airan RD, Bettegowda C, Rosch KS, Qin Q, van Zijl PCM, Pillai JJ, Hua J. Whole-brain functional and diffusion tensor MRI in human participants with metallic orthodontic braces. Radiology. 2020;294(1):149–57. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190070.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Okano Y, Yamashiro M, Kaneda T, Kasai K. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95(2):255–63. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.37.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Eelison JM, Leggitt VL, Thomson M, Oyoyo UND. Wycliffe: Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):563–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.038.CrossRef

49.

Kajima Y, Takaichi A, Tsutsumi Y, Hanawa T, Wakabayashi N, Kawasaki A. Influence of magnetic susceptibility and volume on MRI artifacts produced by low magnetic susceptibility Zr-14Nb alloy and dental alloys. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(2):256–61. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-426.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Jung BA, Weigel M. Spin echo magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(4):805–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24068.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Mathew CA, Maller S. Maheshwaran: Interactions between magnetic resonance imaging and dental material. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S113–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Hasegawa M, Miyata K, Abe Y, Ishigami T. Radiofrequency heating of metallic dental devices during 3.0 T MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(5):20120234. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review
verfasst von: Katrine Mølgaard Johannsen
João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig
Brian Hansen
Ann Wenzel
Rubens Spin-Neto
Publikationsdatum: 30.09.2022
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Oral Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00652-9

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review