Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2024

19.12.2023 | Original Article

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer by [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a potential tool for selecting patients for active surveillance

verfasst von: Kaan Akcay, Ali Kibar, Onur Erdem Sahin, Muhammet Demirbilek, Gamze Beydagi, Sertac Asa, Fuad Aghazada, Turkay Toklu, Nalan Alan Selcuk, Bulent Onal, Levent Kabasakal

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

In our study, our aim was to investigate the role of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET /CT imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (ISUP GG 2 and higher) in patients initially diagnosed with ISUP GG 1 and 2 after prostate biopsy.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 147 patient records in whom [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging was performed preoperatively. All patients were initially diagnosed with ISUP GG 1 and 2 PCa by biopsy. Final pathology reports were obtained after radical prostatectomy. The [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT images were evaluated to determine the PRIMARY score. Patients’ mpMRI-PIRADS scores were also recorded when available and analyzed in correlation with the pathology results.

Results

For the 114 patients scored using PRIMARY, 19 out of 37 patients with scores of 1 and 2 (51%) were diagnosed with csPCa. Of the 77 patients with PRIMARY scores between 3 and 5, 64 (83%) had csPCa. Notably, every patient with a PRIMARY score of 5 had csPCa. PRIMARY scoring had a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 58%, with a positive predictive value of 83%. A moderate correlation was observed between PRIMARY scores and ISUP GG (Rho = 0.54, p < 0.001). In contrast, the PIRADS score displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 25% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 68%. No substantial correlation was found between PIRADS and ISUP GG. Statistical analysis revealed a significant correlation between PRIMARY and ISUP GG (p < 0.001), but not between PIRADS and ISUP GG (p = 0.281). Comparatively, PRIMARY scoring was significantly more reliable than PIRADS scoring in identifying csPCa.

Conclusion

[68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging is promising for distinguishing high-risk prostate cancer patients from those apt for active surveillance, potentially aiding in the identification of csPCa.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Mansson M, Tammela TLJ, Zappa M, Nelen V, et al. A 16-yr follow-up of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76(1):43–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Mansson M, Tammela TLJ, Zappa M, Nelen V, et al. A 16-yr follow-up of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76(1):43–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van Den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243–62.CrossRefPubMed Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van Den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243–62.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Leenders G, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ, Evans AJ, Kristiansen G, Kweldam CF, et al. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP GG) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(8):e87–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Leenders G, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ, Evans AJ, Kristiansen G, Kweldam CF, et al. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP GG) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(8):e87–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Suardi N, Briganti A, Gallina A, et al. Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2010;105(11):1548–52.CrossRefPubMed Suardi N, Briganti A, Gallina A, et al. Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2010;105(11):1548–52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Djavan B, Kadesky K, Klopukh B, Marberger M, Roehrborn CG. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 1998;33(3):261–70.CrossRefPubMed Djavan B, Kadesky K, Klopukh B, Marberger M, Roehrborn CG. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 1998;33(3):261–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirci E, Kabasakal L, Şahin OE, Akgün E, Güntekin MH, Doğancaa T, et al. Can SUVmax values of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT scan predict the clinically significant prostate cancer? Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40(1):86–91.CrossRefPubMed Demirci E, Kabasakal L, Şahin OE, Akgün E, Güntekin MH, Doğancaa T, et al. Can SUVmax values of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT scan predict the clinically significant prostate cancer? Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40(1):86–91.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, Bosaily AES, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815–22.CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, Bosaily AES, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815–22.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Borofsky S, George AK, Gaur S, Bernardo M, Greer MD, Mertan FV, et al. What are we missing? False-negative cancers at multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology. 2018;286(1):186–95.CrossRefPubMed Borofsky S, George AK, Gaur S, Bernardo M, Greer MD, Mertan FV, et al. What are we missing? False-negative cancers at multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology. 2018;286(1):186–95.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4(4):CDO12663. Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4(4):CDO12663.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gultekin MH, Demirci E, Turegun FA, et al. The role of 68GA-PSMA PET/CT scan in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radical prostatectomy. Urol J. 2020;18(1):58–65.PubMed Gultekin MH, Demirci E, Turegun FA, et al. The role of 68GA-PSMA PET/CT scan in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radical prostatectomy. Urol J. 2020;18(1):58–65.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kabasakal L, Demirci E, Nematyazar J, Akyel R, Razavi B, Ocak M. The role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in restaging of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38(2):149–55.CrossRefPubMed Kabasakal L, Demirci E, Nematyazar J, Akyel R, Razavi B, Ocak M. The role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in restaging of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38(2):149–55.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fendler WP, Eiber M, Behesthi M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, et al. PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(5):1456–86.CrossRef Fendler WP, Eiber M, Behesthi M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, et al. PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(5):1456–86.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hupe MC, Philippi C, Roth D, Kümpers C, Ribbat-İdel J, Becker F, et al. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on biopsies is an independent risk stratifier of prostate cancer patients at time of initial diagnosis. Front Oncol. 2018;20(8):623.CrossRef Hupe MC, Philippi C, Roth D, Kümpers C, Ribbat-İdel J, Becker F, et al. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on biopsies is an independent risk stratifier of prostate cancer patients at time of initial diagnosis. Front Oncol. 2018;20(8):623.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):941–9.CrossRefPubMed Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):941–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Raveenthiran S, Yaxley WJ, Franklin T, Coughlin G, Roberts M, Gianduzzo T, et al. Findings in 1,123 men with preoperative (68)Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging compared to totally embedded radical prostatectomy histopathology: implications for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2022;207(3):573–80.CrossRefPubMed Raveenthiran S, Yaxley WJ, Franklin T, Coughlin G, Roberts M, Gianduzzo T, et al. Findings in 1,123 men with preoperative (68)Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging compared to totally embedded radical prostatectomy histopathology: implications for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2022;207(3):573–80.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett L, Papa N, Buteau J, Ho B, Liu V, Roberts M, et al. The PRIMARY score: using intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT patterns to optimize prostate cancer diagnosis. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(11):1644–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Emmett L, Papa N, Buteau J, Ho B, Liu V, Roberts M, et al. The PRIMARY score: using intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT patterns to optimize prostate cancer diagnosis. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(11):1644–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Koole M, Armstrong I, Krizsan AK, Stromvall A, Visvikis D, Sattler B, et al. EANM guidelines for PET-CT and PET-MR routine quality control. Z Med Phys. 2023;33(1):103–13.CrossRefPubMed Koole M, Armstrong I, Krizsan AK, Stromvall A, Visvikis D, Sattler B, et al. EANM guidelines for PET-CT and PET-MR routine quality control. Z Med Phys. 2023;33(1):103–13.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalapara AA, Ballok ZE, Ramdave S, O’Sullivan R, Ryan A, Konety B, et al. Combined utility of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in predicting prostate biopsy pathology. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022;5(3):314–20.CrossRefPubMed Kalapara AA, Ballok ZE, Ramdave S, O’Sullivan R, Ryan A, Konety B, et al. Combined utility of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in predicting prostate biopsy pathology. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022;5(3):314–20.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng C, Liu J, Yi X, Yin H, Qiu D, Zhang J, et al. Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer using a novel 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and multiparametric MRI-based model. Transl Androl Urol. 2023;12(7):1115–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheng C, Liu J, Yi X, Yin H, Qiu D, Zhang J, et al. Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer using a novel 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and multiparametric MRI-based model. Transl Androl Urol. 2023;12(7):1115–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pepe P, Roscigno M, Pepe L, Panella P, Tamburo M, Marletta G, et al. (2022) Could 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT evaluation reduce the number of scheduled prostate biopsies in men enrolled in active surveillance protocols? J Clin Med 11(12):3473. Pepe P, Roscigno M, Pepe L, Panella P, Tamburo M, Marletta G, et al. (2022) Could 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT evaluation reduce the number of scheduled prostate biopsies in men enrolled in active surveillance protocols? J Clin Med 11(12):3473.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Q, Hong X, Xu L, Jia R. A nomogram for accurately predicting the pathological upgrading of prostate cancer, based on 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Prostate. 2022;82(11):1077–87.CrossRefPubMed Hu Q, Hong X, Xu L, Jia R. A nomogram for accurately predicting the pathological upgrading of prostate cancer, based on 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Prostate. 2022;82(11):1077–87.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, et al. The additive diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective multicentre study. Eur Urol. 2021;80(6):682–9.CrossRefPubMed Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, et al. The additive diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective multicentre study. Eur Urol. 2021;80(6):682–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Meissner VH, Rauscher I, Schwamborn K, et al. Radical prostatectomy without prior biopsy following multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography. Eur Urol. 2022;82(2):156–60.CrossRefPubMed Meissner VH, Rauscher I, Schwamborn K, et al. Radical prostatectomy without prior biopsy following multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography. Eur Urol. 2022;82(2):156–60.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Willemse PPM, Davis NF, Grivas N, et al. Systematic review of active surveillance for clinically localised prostate cancer to develop recommendations regarding inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, biopsy characteristics at inclusion and monitoring, and surveillance repeat biopsy strategy. Eur Urol. 2022;81(4):337–46.CrossRefPubMed Willemse PPM, Davis NF, Grivas N, et al. Systematic review of active surveillance for clinically localised prostate cancer to develop recommendations regarding inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, biopsy characteristics at inclusion and monitoring, and surveillance repeat biopsy strategy. Eur Urol. 2022;81(4):337–46.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, et al. Transperineal prostate biopsies using local anesthesia: experience with 1,287 patients. prostate cancer detection rate, complications and patient tolerability. J Urol. 2019;201(6):1121–6.CrossRefPubMed Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, et al. Transperineal prostate biopsies using local anesthesia: experience with 1,287 patients. prostate cancer detection rate, complications and patient tolerability. J Urol. 2019;201(6):1121–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Barzell WE, Melamed MR, Cathcart P, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(3):762–7.CrossRefPubMed Barzell WE, Melamed MR, Cathcart P, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(3):762–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE, Perez N, Shinohara K, Carroll PR. Changes in cancer volume in serial biopsies of men on active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1825–9.CrossRefPubMed Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE, Perez N, Shinohara K, Carroll PR. Changes in cancer volume in serial biopsies of men on active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1825–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bokhorst LP, Alberts AR, Rannikko A, Valdagni R, Picles T, Kakehi Y, et al. Compliance rates with the prostate cancer research international active surveillance (PRIAS) protocol and disease reclassification in noncompliers. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):814–21.CrossRefPubMed Bokhorst LP, Alberts AR, Rannikko A, Valdagni R, Picles T, Kakehi Y, et al. Compliance rates with the prostate cancer research international active surveillance (PRIAS) protocol and disease reclassification in noncompliers. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):814–21.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, et al. What Is the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer at biopsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017;72(2):250–66.CrossRefPubMed Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, et al. What Is the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer at biopsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017;72(2):250–66.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Panebianco V, Barchetti G, Simone G, Del Monte M, Ciardi A, Grompone MD, et al. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: What’s next? Eur Urol. 2018;74(1):48–54.CrossRefPubMed Panebianco V, Barchetti G, Simone G, Del Monte M, Ciardi A, Grompone MD, et al. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: What’s next? Eur Urol. 2018;74(1):48–54.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Cucchiara V, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Positive predictive value of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(45):697–713.CrossRefPubMed Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Cucchiara V, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Positive predictive value of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(45):697–713.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer by [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a potential tool for selecting patients for active surveillance
verfasst von
Kaan Akcay
Ali Kibar
Onur Erdem Sahin
Muhammet Demirbilek
Gamze Beydagi
Sertac Asa
Fuad Aghazada
Turkay Toklu
Nalan Alan Selcuk
Bulent Onal
Levent Kabasakal
Publikationsdatum
19.12.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06556-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2024

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2024 Zur Ausgabe