Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London
P1 GERONTE Project: Development of a Framework to support implementation of Complex InterventiOns using Technology (CIo-uT): An Action Research study as part of multisite Randomised Controlled Trial
Bridget O’ Sullivan1, Anthony Staines1, Paul Davis1, Regina Connolly1, Trudy Corrigan1, Ciara White1, Shane O’ Hanlon1,2
1Dublin City University, Ireland; 2St. Vincents University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence: Bridget O’ Sullivan (bridget.osullivan@dcu.ie)
P2 Co-design of an implementation plan for a digital holistic assessment and decision support framework for people with dementia care in care homes
Juliet Gillam1, Catherine Evans 1,2, Nathan Davies3
1King’s College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative care, Policy & Rehabilitation, UK; 2Brighton General Hospital, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK; 3Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Juliet Gillam (juliet.h.gillam@kcl.ac.uk)
O3 Maximizing knowledge from systematic reviews of complex interventions
Kristin J Konnyu1, Jeremy M Grimshaw2, Noah M Ivers3, Thomas Trikalinos1
1Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health Providence, Rhode Island, USA; 2Centre for Practice-Changing Research (CPCR), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada; 3Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (WIHV), Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
Correspondence: Kristin J Konnyu (kristin_konnyu@brown.edu)
O4 Using behaviour change theory to assess intervention effectiveness in audit and feedback trials: A method for classifying and analysing interventions
Vivi Antonopoulou1, Carly Meyer1, Jacob Crawshaw2, Fabiana Lorencatto1, Justin Presseau3, Kristin Konnyu 5, Jesmin Antony4, Michelle Simeoni4, Susan Michie1, Jeremy Grimshaw3 & Noah Ivers4
1Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London, UK; 2Centre for Evidence-Based Implementation (CEBI), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Canada; 3Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada; 4Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (WIHV), Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada; 5Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Correspondence: Vivi Antonopoulou (v.antonopoulou@ucl.ac.uk)
P5 Implementation and dissemination of home and community-based interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic scoping review
Eden M Zhu1, Martina Buljac-Samardžić1, Kees Ahaus1, Nick Sevdalis2, Robbert Huijsman1
1School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, South Holland, 3062 PA, The Netherlands; 2Centre for Implementation Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Eden M Zhu (Zhu@eshpm.eur.nl)
P6 A co-creation approach to implementing eHealth applications in care organizations: lessons learned from multiple cases
Michel Oey1, Saskia Robben1, Margriet Pol1, Sanne Muiser2, Paulien Melis2, Somaya Ben Allouch1
1Digital Life, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Waag Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Saskia Robben (s.m.b.robben@hva.nl)
P7 The implementation and evaluation of a child weight e-learning toolkit (HealthyWEY) for maternity, health visiting and children’s centre workforces
James Harrison1, Julie Abayomi2, Shaima Hassan3,4, Lawrence Foweather1, Clare Maxwell5, Deborah McCann1, Sarah Garbett1, Maria Nugent6, Daisy Bradbury7, Hannah Timpson8, Lorna Porcellato8, Marian Judd9, Anna Chisholm10, Nabil Isaac11, Beth Wolfenden6, Amy Greenhalgh6, Paula M Watson1
1Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; 2Department of Allied Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, UK; 3Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK; 4NIHR Applied Research Collaboration NWC, Liverpool, UK; 5School of Nursing and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, UK; 6Blackburn with Darwen Council, Blackburn with Darwen, UK; 7Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, UK; 8Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, UK; 9HCRG Care Group Services Limited, Salisbury, UK; 10Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, UK; 11Cornerstone Practice and Health Care, Blackburn with Darwen, UK
Correspondence: James Harrison (J.E.Harrison@2022.ljmu.ac.uk)
P8 Associations between clinical and implementation outcomes of two psychoeducational programmes for type 1 diabetes in an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 clinical trial
Tayana Soukup1†, Samantha Cross1†, Kia-Chong Chua1, Louise Hull1, Andy Healey1, Dulmini Kariyawasam2, Augustin Brooks3, Simon Heller4, Stephanie Amiel5, Kimberley Goldsmith1, Nick Sevdalis1, Ioannis Bakolis1, People with Diabetes Group1
1Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London; 2 Diabetes Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust; 3Diabetes Department, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; 4 Diabetes Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; 5 Diabetes Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Correspondence: Tayana Soukup (tayana.soukup@kcl.ac.uk)
O9 A standardised method for the economic evaluation of implementation programmes: evaluating national programmes to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term births
Carlos Sillero-Rejon1,2, Hugh McLeod1,2, Brent C. Opmeer1, William Hollingworth1,2, Karen Luyt3,4
1National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust. Whitefriars Level 9, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS12NT, UK; 2Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol. Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK; 3Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol. 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK; 4St. Michael’s Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust. Southwell Street, Bristol, BS2 8EG, UK
Correspondence: Carlos Sillero-Rejon (carlos.sillerorejon@bristol.ac.uk)
O10
Withdrawn
O11 Barriers and facilitators to achieving co-production in care home settings: findings from a scoping review
Fran Hallam1,2, Katie Robinson1, 2, Meri Westlake1, 2, Pip Logan2, 3, Stephen Timmons4
1Research and Innovation, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; 2Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; 3Nottingham CityCare Partnership, UK; 4Centre for Health Innovation, Leadership and Learning, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham
Correspondence: Fran Hallam (frances.hallam@nottingham.ac.uk)
NIHR INVOLVE principle | Barriers | Facilitators |
---|---|---|
Sharing power
| • Burden of supporting resident involvement on care staff • Gatekeeping • Ethical procedures • Delineating roles in the research process | • Creating opportunities to challenge dominant views • Reflexivity of project leads and researchers |
Including all perspectives and skills
| • Not enough involvement of key stakeholders • Pressures on care home staff and healthcare professionals • Care home resident characteristics • Limited depth of discussion • Difficulties with stretching perspectives | • Care home staff’s willingness to participate • Stimulating experiences • Flexible approach |
Respecting and valuing knowledge
| • Lack of self-confidence • Balancing different forms of knowledge | • Involvement across design stages • Recognising and utilising different forms of knowledge |
Reciprocity
| • Potential harms of participation | • Providing learning opportunities • Providing support • Clarifying expectations |
Building and maintaining relationships
| • Relationships with management • Differences between stakeholders • Optimising links with wider stakeholders • Practical challenges | • Project leaders and knowledge brokers • Building and utilising existing collaborative partnerships • Connection through creative approaches • Regular meetings and dialogue • Establishing ways of working • Sustaining relationship through participatory approach |
Other: Practical considerations
| • Feasibility of scaling co-production | • Logistical arrangements |
O12 Application of Normalisation Process Theory in the national scaling of early intervention for eating disorders
Katie L. Richards1,2, Karina L. Allen1,3, & Ulrike Schmidt1,3
1Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK; 2Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, UK; 3Eating Disorder Outpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Correspondence: Katie L. Richards (katie.1.richards@kcl.ac.uk)
O13 Use of routine healthcare data in randomised implementation trials: a methodological systematic review
Charis X. Xie1, Lixin Sun2, Elizabeth Ingram3, Anna De Simoni1, Sandra Eldridge1, Hilary Pinnock4, Clare Relton1
1Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UK; 2School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; 3Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, England, UK; 4Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Correspondence: Charis X. Xie (charis.xie@qmul.ac.uk)
O14 Evaluation of the scale up of remote monitoring in rheumatology outpatients across three NHS trusts in London, UK
Helen Sheldon1, Kathryn Watson2, Rachel Olive2, Elena Pallari1, Camille Aznar1, Nikita Arumalla3, Olga Boiko2, Melanie Martin3, Len Demetriou2, Emily Jane Smith3, Emma-Jayne Adams4, Mary Ann Palmer4, Nick Sevdalis2, Andrew Walker1, Toby Garrood3
1Health Innovation Network, London, SE1 9BB, UK; 2Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 3Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, UK; 4Lived experience study team members
Correspondence: Helen Sheldon (Helen.Sheldon3@nhs.net)
P15 Implementing patient-centered information tool to increase awareness and utilization of weight-loss surgery among obese Black men in the US
Katia Noyes1,2, Ajay A. Myneni2, Heather Orom3, Ranjit Singh4, Aaron Hoffman2
1Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA; 2Department of Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA; 3Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA; 4Department of Family Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
Correspondence: Katia Noyes (enoyes@buffalo.edu)
P16 Integrating mental and physical healthcare: Evaluating the implementation of two novel interventions, Physical Health Clinic and Consultant Connect in a UK mental health NHS Trust
Theo Boardman-Pretty1, George Gillett1, Ray McGrath1,7, Julie Williams2, Karen Ang1,7, Isabel McMullen1, Prashanth Reddy3, Fiona Gaughran4, Ioannis Bakolis5, Jorge Arias de la Torre5, Andy Healey6, Natalia Stepan7, Zarnie Khadjesari8, Euan Sadler9, Nick Sevdalis2 on behalf of the IMPHS study group
1South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Centre for Implementation Science, King’s College London, London, UK; 3King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK; 4Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, UK; 5Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King’s College London, London, UK; 6Kings Health Economics, King's College London, London, UK; 7Mind and Body Programme, King’s Health Partners, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK; 8Behavioural and Implementation Science (BIS) research group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; 9Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Correspondence: Theo Boardman-Pretty (Theo.Boardman-Pretty@slam.nhs.uk)
P17 Development of the Implementation Science Research Project Appraisal Criteria (ImpResPAC) tool
Chloe Sweetnam1, Lucy Goulding2, Rachel Davis2, Zarnie Khadjesari2,3, Annette Boaz4, Andy Healey2,5, Nick Sevdalis2, Ioannis Bakolis2,6, Louise Hull2
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Neurology Department, New York, USA; 2Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, London, UK; 3School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK; 4London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 5King’s Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; 6Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Chloe Sweetnam (chloe.sweetnam@mssm.edu)
P18 An Evaluation of Physical Healthcare within Adult Community Mental Health Teams at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM)
Gracie Tredget1, Julie Williams2, Ray McGrath1, Karen Ang1, Fiona Gaughran3, Jorge Aria de la Torre4, Ioannis Bakolis4, Andy Healey5, Zarnie Khadjesari6, Euan Sadler7, Natalia Stepan8 and Nick Sevdalis2
1South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Centre for Implementation Science, King’s College London, London, UK; 3Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, UK; 4Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King’s College London, London, UK; 5Kings Health Economics, King's College London, London, UK; 6Behavioural and Implementation Science (BIS) research group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; 7Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; 8 Mind and Body Programme, King’s Health Partners, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK
Correspondence: Gracie Tredget (gracie.tredget@slam.nhs.uk)
P19 Tailoring strategies to support the implementation of Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE), a structured patient education programme for people with Type 1 diabetes
Fiona Riordan1, Claire Kerins1, Margaret Humphreys2, Sean Dinneen3, Luke Wolfenden4, Sheena M. McHugh1
1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; 2Department of Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland; 3Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, Galway University Hospital, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland; 4School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Correspondence: Fiona Riordan (Fiona.riordan@ucc.ie)
P20
Withdrawn
P21 Expert consensus on multilevel implementation hypotheses to promote uptake of youth care guidelines: A Delphi study
Evelien Dubbeldeman, Rianne van der Kleij, Evelyn Brakema, Matty Crone
1Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Evelien Dubbeldeman (e.m.dubbeldeman@lumc.nl)
P22 Implementation strategies for an Australian school-based mental health prevention program: Realist evaluation
Rachel Baffsky1,2, Rebecca Ivers1, Patricia Cullen1, Michelle Torok1
1University School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington NSW, Australia; 2Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Road, Randwick NSW, Australia
Correspondence: Rachel Baffsky (r.baffsky@unsw.edu.au)
P23 Specifying and reporting implementation strategies used in the implementation of matrix support in mental health care in a medium-sized Brazilian city
Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel1; Ana Laura Salomé Lourencetti2; Maria Giovana Borges Saidel2; Rosana Teresa Onocko Campos1
1Department of Collective Health, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas-SP, Brazil; 2School of Nursing, State University of Campinas, Campinas-SP, Brazil
Correspondence: Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel (treichelcarlos@gmail.com)
P24 Implementing telemedicine at scale in Denmark: Barriers and facilitators at the political-administrative level of the implementation process
Stina Bollerup1,2, Lotte Groth Jensen1, Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen1,2
1DEFACTUM – Public Health & Health Services Research, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark; 2Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark
Correspondence: Stina Bollerup (stibol@rm.dk)
P25 Evaluating the implementation of Tommy’s Clinical Decision Tool, a device for reducing inequity in maternity care
Jenny Carter, Jane Sandall, on behalf of Tommy’s National Centre for Maternity Improvement
Department of Women and Children’s Health, Facility of Life Sciences and Population Health, King’s College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Jenny Carter (jenny.carter@kcl.ac.uk)
P26 Implementing brief and low-intensity psychological interventions for children and young people: A rapid realist review
Anna Roach1, Sophie Cullinan2, Roz Shafran1, Isobel Heyman1, Sophie Bennett1
1University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK; 2 Institute of Education, University College London's Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London, UK
Correspondence: Anna Roach (anna.roach.21@ucl.ac.uk)
P27 Pragmatic and formative evaluation of the pilot implementation of UCLPartners’ Proactive Care Frameworks across multiple primary care sites in England
Alexandra Ziemann1,2, Zuhur Balayah1, Charitini Stavropoulou1,3, Katie Rose Sanfilippo1, Harry Scarbrough1,4, Matt Kearney5
1Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research, City, University of London, London, UK; 2 Department of Social & Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK; 3 School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK; 4Bayes Business School, City, University of London, London, UK; 5 UCLPartners, London, UK
Correspondence: Alexandra Ziemann (alexandra.ziemann@city.ac.uk)
O28 Evaluating Implementation Fidelity to a nurse-led model “INTERCARE”: A Mixed-Methods Study
Raphaëlle A. Guerbaai1, Sabina DeGeest1,2, Michael Simon1; Lori L. Popejoy3; Nathalie I. H. Wellens4,5, Kris Denhaerynck1,2, Franziska Zúñiga1
1Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 2Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 3University of Missouri, Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, United States of America; 4Directorate General of Health, Department of Public Health and Social Affairs of the Canton of Vaud, 1014 Lausanne, Switzerland; 5La Source School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland
Correspondence: Raphaëlle A. Guerbaai (RAPHAELLEASHLEY.GUERBAAI@UNIBAS.CH)
P29 Implementing guideline-based care in people with knee osteoarthritis: Development and evaluation of a patient education and self-management booklet in Tamil language
Devadhason Malarvizhi1, Dakshinamurthy Anandhu1, Jothi Suresh1, Devadhas Mercy Joy1, Thickvijayan S Veeragoudhaman1, Pakirisamy Maheshwari2, Cynthia S Srikesavan3
1SRM College of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu, India; 2Padmashree Institute of Physiotherapy, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; 3Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Devadhason Malarvizhi (malarvid@srmist.edu.in)
O30 De-implement, Adapt, Reinvest and Evaluate; introducing the DARE Framework to deliver higher value healthcare
Jack J Bell1, Tracey Brighton1, Tamlyn Rautenberg2,3, Nina Meloncelli2
1Allied Health, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside 4032, Australia; 2Allied Health, Metro North Health, Herston, 4006, Australia; 3Centre for Applied Health Economics (CAHE), Griffith University, Nathan, 4111, Australia
Correspondence: Jack J Bell (jack.bell@health.qld.gov.au)
P31 Exploration of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ventilator bundle: a descriptive qualitative study with health care professionals, Nepal
Dejina Thapa1, Ting Liu1, Chen Yang1, Subhash Prasad Acharya2 and Sek Ying Chair1
1The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, The People’s Republic of China; 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
Correspondence: Dejina Thapa (dejinathapa@link.cuhk.edu.hk)
O32 Using rapid qualitive inquiry for implementation support in a multinational study on infection prevention and control in neonatal intensive care
Emanuela Nyantakyi1, Marie-Therese Schultes1, Julia Bielicki2,3, Tuuli Metsvaht4, Lauren Clack1,5, & the NeoIPC consortium
1Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8006, Switzerland; 2Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's University of London, London, SW170RE, United Kingdom; 3 Paediatric Research Centre UKBB, University Children’s Hospital Basel, Basel, 4056, Switzerland; 4 Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, 50406, Estonia; 5 Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Correspondence: Emanuela Nyantakyi (emanuela.nyantakyi@uzh.ch)
P33 Implementing organised colorectal cancer screening programs in a decentralised political system - the case of Switzerland
Bianca Albers1, Reto Auer2, Emanuela Nyantakyi1, Ekaterina Plys3, Clara Podmore3, Franziska Riegel1, Marie-Therese Schultes1, Kevin Selby3, Joel Walder1, Lauren Clack1
1Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 2Institute of primary health care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 3Center for primary care and public health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
Correspondence: Bianca Albers (bianca.albers@uzh.ch)
O34 Using a modified Delphi process to develop a programme theory and inform programme transformation
Christina Kien, Viktoria Titscher
Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University of Continuing Education, Krems, 3500, Austria
Correspondence: Christina Kien (christina.kien@donau-uni.ac.at)
O35 A facilitation intervention to increase uptake of an adverse drug event prevention intervention: ActionADE
Erica Lau1,2, Serena Small1,2, Kate Butcher1,3, Ellen Balka1,4, Corinne Hohl1,2,5
1Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 3 Vancouver General Hospital Pharmacy Department, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 4 School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada; 5 Vancouver General Hospital Emergency Department, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Correspondence: Erica Lau (erica.lau@ubc.ca)
P36 Development and implementation of educational prescribing resources to mental health pharmacists to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness
Annabel Lane1, Sofia Dewji1, Karen Ang1,2, Siobhan Gee1,2,4, Raymond McGrath1,2, Rina Patel4, Nick Sevdalis3, Julie Williams3 on behalf of the IMPHS study group
1South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Mind and Body Programme, King’s Health Partners, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK; 3Centre for Implementation Science, King’s College London, London, UK; 4King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Correspondence: Annabel Lane (Annabel.lane@slam.nhs.uk)
P37 Beyond input-output: Applying dynamic systems theory to the complexity of implementing mental health interventions in non-western cultures
Adele Pacini1,2 Prithvi Shrestha3
1School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; 2The Gatehouse Charity, Bury St Edmunds, UK; 3School of Languages and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Languages, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Correspondence: Adele Pacini (a.pacini@open.ac.uk)
O38 Challenges to implementing person-centred outcome measures into routine paediatric palliative care
Hannah M Scott1, Lucy Coombes1,2, Debbie Braybrook1, Daney Harðardóttir1, Anna Roach1, Katherine Bristowe1, Clare Ellis-Smith1, Richard Harding1, on behalf of C-POS
1Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, London, UK; 2Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Correspondence: Hannah M Scott (hannah.m.scott@kcl.ac.uk)
P39 “Mindfulness for parents who care” or “Mindfulness for parent carers”? Re-framing a mindfulness course to align with parent carer’s identity as a parent before a carer increases uptake: A formative evaluation
Gemma Hawkins1,2, Annabel Stickland2, Adele Pacini1,2
1School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; 2The Gatehouse Charity, Bury St Edmunds, UK
Correspondence: Gemma Hawkins (gfharris@gmail.com)
P40 Implementation of home practice support strategies for older adults attending an online mindfulness based cognitive therapy course: An adaptive intervention protocol
Adele Pacini1,2, Annabel Stickland2, Krystal Iniguez2, Gina Di Malta1
1School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; 2The Gatehouse Charity, Bury St Edmunds, UK
Correspondence: Adele Pacini (a.pacini@open.ac.uk)
O41 Development of implementation strategies to overcome barriers when implementing a combined lifestyle intervention for community-dwelling older people in community-care settings
Patricia J van der Laag1, Berber G Dorhout2,3, Aaron A Heeren1, Di-Janne JA Barten2,4, Cindy Veenhof2,4, Lisette Schoonhoven1,5
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Nursing Science, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 3Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands; 4Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK
Correspondence: Patricia J van der Laag (P.j.vanderlaag-3@umcutrecht.nl)
O42 Experiences and perceptions of evidence use among senior health service stakeholders: A qualitative study
Susan Calnan, Sheena McHugh
School of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland
Correspondence: Susan Calnan (susan.calnan@ucc.ie)
O43 Understanding How Approaches to Implementation Support Have Evolved Over Time to Advance Improved and Equitable Outcomes in Human Service Systems
Allison Metz1, Todd Jensen1, Amanda Farley1, Annette Boaz2
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Correspondence: Allison Metz (allison.metz@unc.edu)
O44 Competencies for supporting evidence use: The role of trusting relationships in implementation
Allison Metz1, Todd Jensen1, Amanda Farley1, Annette Boaz2
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Correspondence: Allison Metz (allison.metz@unc.edu)
O45 Developing an initial programme theory of prehospital feedback in an ambulance service setting: A mixed-methods study
Caitlin Wilson1,2, Dr Gillian Janes3, Prof Rebecca Lawton4, Dr Jonathan Benn1,4
1School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 2North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Bolton, Lancashire, UKK; 3Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UKK; 4Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
Correspondence: Caitlin Wilson (hc15c2w@leeds.ac.uk)
P46 2 Young Lives: a pilot hybrid type 2 trial of a mentoring scheme for pregnant adolescent girls in Sierra Leone
Cristina Fernandez Turienzo1†, Mangenda Kamara2†, Lucy November1†, Prince T Williams3, Philmenon Kamara3, Suzanne Thomas2, Venetia Goodhart2, Alex Ridout1, Betty Sam2; Paul T Seed1, Jane Sandall1††, Andrew H Shennan1††, on behalf of NIHR CRIBS Group
1Welbodi Partnership, Freetown, Sierra Leone; 2Department of Women and Children’s Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, United Kingdom; 3Lifeline Nemeniah Projects, Freetown, Sierra Leone
Correspondence: Cristina Fernandez Turienzo (cristina.fernandez_turienzo@kcl.ac.uk)
-
2YLs started as part of NIHR CRIBS on Sept 2021
-
Research staff recruited & trained
-
Project materials developed, ethics approvals obtained, online database developed.
-
Local PhD studentship awarded
-
Cluster randomisation and community engagement activities in cluster sites completed
-
Recruitment and training of mentors ongoing.
-
Mentoring intervention to start in June 2022
-
An overview of the plans for the implementation evaluation will be presented.
O47 Implementation strategies to increase smoking cessation treatment provision in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies
Bernadett E Tildy1,2, Ann McNeill1,2, Parvati R Perman-Howe1,2, Leonie S Brose1,2
1Addictions Department, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom; 2Shaping Public hEalth poliCies To Reduce ineqUalities and harm (SPECTRUM) Consortium, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Bernadett E Tildy (bernadett.tildy@kcl.ac.uk)
P48 Result Of a feasibility hybrid II randomised controlled trial of volunteer ‘Health Champions’ supporting people with serious mental illness manage their physical health
Julie Williams1, Ray McGrath2,5, Karen Ang3,5, Isobel Mdudu2, Fiona Gaughran2, Ubong Akpan2, Errol Green2, Ioannis Bakolis3, Jorge Arias de la Torre3, Andy Healey4, Mariana Pinto da Costa2, Natalia Stepan5, Zarnie Khadjesari6, Euan Sadler7, Nick Sevdalis1 on behalf of the IMPHS study group
1Centre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK; 2South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ; 3Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London, SE5 8AF, UK; 4King's Health Economics, King's College London, SE5 8AF, UK; 5King's Health Partners Mind and Body Programme, London, SE1 9NT, UK; 6Behavioural and Implementation Science (BIS) Research Group, University of East Anglia, UK; 7Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK
Correspondence: Julie Williams (julie.williams@kcl.ac.uk)
O49 Evidence gap map on contextual analysis in implementation science
Juliane Mielke1, Thekla Brunkert1,2, Franziska Zúñiga1, Michael Simon1, Leah L. Zullig3,4, Sabina De Geest1,5
1Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 2University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland 3Center for Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) Durham, NC, USA; 4Department of Population Health Sciences, school of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; 5Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Correspondence: Juliane Mielke (juliane.mielke@unibas.ch)
O50
Withdrawn
P51 Limiting and facilitating contextual factors impacting efforts to address gender norms underpinning female child marriage: a comparative case study of the implementation of the national strategy to end child marriage in Nigeria (2016-2021) and the national plan of action to end child marriage (2018-2030) in Bangladesh
Kelechi Udoh
Department for Health, 1 West, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Kelechi Udoh (khu20@bath.ac.uk)
P52
Withdrawn
O53 The Stanford Lightning Report: A pragmatic methodological approach for rapid qualitative synthesis
Cati Brown-Johnson, Nadia Safaeinili, Dani Zionts, Laura M. Holdsworth, Jonathan G. Shaw, Steven M. Asch, Megan Mahoney, Marcy Winget
Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94619, USA
Correspondence: Cati Brown-Johnson (catibj@stanford.edu)
P54
Withdrawn
P55 What interventions should we implement in England’s mental-health services? The Mental-Health Implementation Network (MHIN) mixed-methods approach to rapid prioritisation
Shalini Ahuja, Lawrence Phillips, Christine McDonald, Caroline Smartt, Andrée le May, John Gabbay, Tina Coldham, Sarah Rae, Laura Fischer, Nick Sevdalis, Annette Boaz, Sarah Robinson, Fiona Gaughran, Zoe Lelliott, Peter Jones, Graham Thornicroft, Jayati-Das Munshi, Colin Drummond, Jesus Perez, Peter Littlejohns
NIHR ARC National Mental Health Implementation Network, Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London
Correspondence: Shalini Ahuja (shalini.ahuja@kcl.ac.uk)
P56 NIHR GHRG: CRIBS (Capacity. Research. Innovation. Building maternity Systems). Implementation of simple, scalable innovations & research capacity building to improve maternal health in Sierra Leone
Cristina Fernandez Turienzo1, Alexandra Ridout1 , Mangenda Kamara2, Lucy November2, Prince T Williams3, Frances Moses4, Venetia Goodhart2, Suzanne Thomas2, Simren Herm-Singh2; Katy Kuhrt1, Betty Sam4; Paul T Seed1, Kate Brahman1, Jane Sandall1, Sahr Gevao5, Andrew H Shennan1, on behalf of NIHR CRIBS Group
1Department of Women and Children’s Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, UK; 2Welbodi Partnership, Sierra Leone; 3Lifeline Nemeniah Projects, Sierra Leone; 4Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Sierra Leone; 5University of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone
Correspondence: Cristina Fernandez Turienzo (cristina.fernandez_turienzo@kcl.ac.uk)
-
A stepped-wedge, hybrid implementation-effectiveness randomised controlled trial to evaluate the implementation and real-world scale up of the CRADLE device and training across rural Sierra Leone, with the aim of providing a blueprint for scale-up worldwide.
-
A randomised cluster pilot trial to assess the feasibility and implementation of a locally designed and community based intervention providing mentoring from pregnancy through to one-year post-birth for adolescent girls (addressing the social factors of stigma, abandonment and poor maternal health outcomes)
-
An evaluation of shock index as a predictor of adverse outcomes secondary to haemorrhage and sepsis in pregnant women (compared to conventional vital signs monitoring)
-
A validation of a point-of-care creatinine device to detect acute kidney injury in pregnancy, a preventable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.
-
Build research capacity and expertise by supporting local PHD students, MPH students and early career researchers.