Introduction
In preterm infants born during the rapid fetal growth stage, the intrauterine growth rate is not reached after birth [
1]. Parenteral and enteral nutritional support for newborns is based on continuous nutrition guidelines [
2‐
4], and the risk of postnatal growth failure (PGF) in preterm infants remains high [
5,
6]. Moreover, PGF is associated with subsequent poor neurodevelopment outcomes [
7]. Therefore, the prevention of PGF in preterm infants remains a challenge for physicians.
Nutrient intakes during preterm infant hospitalization have long been thought to be an important factor affecting postnatal growth; however, implementing a standardized parenteral nutrition program for very low birth weight infants significantly improved postnatal growth [
8]. According to a New York State perinatal quality collaborative report, enteral feeding practices vary, and extrauterine growth retardation (EUGR) is more prevalent in preterm infants [
9]. To optimize the growth of preterm infants, Roggero et al. [
10] suggested three phases of nutrition intervention: parenteral nutrition (PN), gradually interrupted parenteral nutrition (transition phase, TP) and complete enteral nutrition (EN). Previous studies on preterm infant nutrition tended to emphasize early or late parenteral and enteral nutrition [
11,
12], while less attention was paid to the impact of nutrient intakes in the TP from PN to EN on preterm infants.
Miller et al. [
13] proved that the poor growth of preterm infants in TP from PN to EN can predict the growth failure of preterm infants at discharge. Growth failure of preterm infants at discharge is not significantly related to the PN-only phase's poor growth. Since then, the concept of TP has attracted much attention [
14‐
22].
Optimizing postnatal growth has always been the goal clinicians try to achieve [
23,
24]. The relationship between nutrient intake in the TP and growth is undoubtedly a noteworthy highlight in the three nutrition phases that preterm infants undergo. The purpose of this review was to assess the relationship between nutrient intakes in the TP and preterm infant growth to help clinicians improve nutrition management in this setting.
Materials and methods
A systematic review of the literature on the relationship between nutrient intakes in the TP and postnatal growth of preterm infants was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [
25].
Literature searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and Chinese Science and Technique Journal Database (VIP). From the earliest inception of each database through February 28, 2022, all articles in any language were eligible for inclusion. A combination of MeSH terms and other equivalent terms were applied together with truncated search terms and Boolean operators to achieve broader coverage, resulting in the search detail as follows: ("infant, low birth weight" OR "Low-Birth-Weight" OR "low birth weights" OR "infant, premature" OR "premature" OR "preterm") AND ("partial parenteral" OR "transition" OR "transfer" OR "transitional" OR "weaned" OR "weaning") AND ("nutrition" OR "nutritional" OR "energy" OR "protein" OR "amino acid").
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Original articles on nutrient intake during the TP from PN to EN and the growth of preterm infants / low birth weight infants were eligible for this review. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) population: preterm infants or infants of low birth weight. Preterm infants include very preterm infants or extremely preterm infants. Low birth weight infants include very low birth weight infants or extremely low birth weight infants; (2) exposure: nutrient intakes recommended by local nutrition guidelines; (3) outcome: the growth indicators should have been reported at the end of the TP or discharge such as weight percentage for post-menstrual age, weight z-score, or growth velocity; (4) the definitions of the TP and growth indicators were described. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) conference papers, animal experiments, reviews, and case reports; (2) incomplete data; (3) studies with the same participants but different purposes.
Study selection and data extraction
Two independent researchers conducted the screening of the title and abstracts and the subsequent full-text assessment. Disagreements were resolved through discussion by the third researcher. Data extraction was performed separately by two researchers. Two researchers extracted the following data from included studies: 1) the authors' first name, publication year, study design, sample size, and study population; 2) description related to the TP (definition, start time, end time, and duration of the TP); 3) nutrient intakes in the TP (energy and protein); 4) growth indicators at the end of the TP and discharge (weight percentage for post-menstrual age and growth velocity). A third researcher verified the accuracy of the data extracted from each study.
Quality assessment
The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of case–control studies [
26], which included eight items in three modules. Study population selection, comparability, and exposure. The scores on the scale ranged from one to nine. A score of seven or more stars indicated a good quality study; six stars indicated fair quality, and five or fewer stars indicated poor quality [
27].
Data were grouped according to outcome indicators within exposure categories. The exposure in these categories was summarized. All the collected data were displayed in tables, where possible, and synthesized narratively. The lack of similarity between exposures and variations in outcome assessment and reporting precluded a meta-analysis.
Discussion
All studies divided the nutritional phases into the PN-only phase, TP, and full EN phase, highlighting that more attention should be paid to the TP. All studies evaluated TP nutrient intake (energy, protein, or amino acid metabolism). Although findings across studies were heterogeneous (whether there is a significant difference in cumulative energy intake), in general, cumulative protein (PN + EN) intake in the TP was significantly lower in very preterm infants with and without EUGR / inadequate weight growth velocity, especially the enteral protein intake in the early TP [
19,
20]. Unfortunately, except for one study that found that a low Cit concentration can predict EUGR, no other study has used regression analysis to determine the association between energy or protein intake in the TP and EUGR/ inadequate weight growth velocity with adjusting for confounding variables such as birth weight Z-score. However, poor growth (weight at the end of the TP < 10th percentile for post-menstrual age) in the TP was predictive of EUGR when adjusted for gestational age, birth weight, and severity of illness, compared to the poor growth in the PN-only phase [
13].
Several previous studies investigated the relationship between nutrition and postnatal growth of preterm infants during hospitalization [
24,
28‐
32]. Studies on nutritional practice are primarily based on early postnatal nutrition. Higher protein and energy intake in the first few weeks after birth results in better weight gain and brain development [
31,
32]. The current review found that preterm infants often have interruptions of PN during the first two or four weeks after birth. Similarly, another TP study found that using a nutrition phase approach to evaluate nutritional support could reveal the timing and magnitude of nutritional deficits [
15]. Nutritional deficiency interventions are categorized according to age-driven applications based only on the PN or EN phases without considering the key TP. Furthermore, it does not reveal nutritional deficiencies but approaches or exceeds the amount recommended by the guide. In contrast, another study involving the TP indicates a considerable lack of macronutrients and energy in the TP, negatively affecting postnatal growth [
8,
15]. Instead of the PN and EN phases, the TP is considered to predict EUGR at discharge [
13]. Miller et al. [
14] proved that poor growth in the TP is related to both protein and energy deficiency. Strengthening nutritional management in the TP may improve the extrauterine growth of preterm infants.
The systematic review found the heterogeneity of growth indicators in TP. The two included studies used EUGR (weight < 10th percentile) [
13,
20], and the other study used growth velocity, thus defining postnatal growth failure (growth velocity less than 15 g/kg/d) [
19]. However, because the reduction in growth velocity was not the same as attaining a certain percentile, the definition of postnatal growth failure in preterm infants remained ambiguous [
33]. Furthermore, there was considerable disagreement about which classification was used to define the EUGR of preterm infants and whether growth velocity less than 15 g/kg/d was used to define growth failure [
33‐
37]. The current challenge in evaluating the growth of preterm infants in the TP is to select a growth indicator that can not only reasonably evaluate the growth of preterm infants but is also suitable for a wide range of preterm infants. Landau-Crangle et al. [
38] proposed the necessity of monitoring the individualized growth trajectory of preterm infants after birth. They believed that calculating the growth velocity could provide an evidence-based starting point for growth monitoring and the nutritional evaluation of preterm infants. However, in a comparative study that selects the change of weight z-score or a Patel exponential model to evaluate the growth of preterm infants, it is considered that the change in weight z-score takes into account gestational age and sex, making it suitable for analyzing a population of preterm infants with a wide range of gestational ages [
39]. To reduce the risk of bias due to confounding factors, the two included studies excluded small gestational-age infants from the very preterm infants less than 32 weeks [
13,
20]. Small for gestational age or suitable for gestational age infants might have different postnatal growth outcomes [
40]. To facilitate the establishment of nutritional guidelines in the TP, clinicians must choose a reasonable evaluation indicator in combination with individual characteristics to objectively assess the nutritional status of preterm infants [
41].
The TP is the reduction of PN and the transition to EN. For the three studies included in this systematic review, the starting point of the TP was relatively uniform, which is the reduction of parenteral nutrition or the volume of enteral feeding up to 30 ml/kg/d, both after minimal enteral feeding; however, the endpoint of the TP is still controversial. Brennan et al. [
15,
16] and Alur et al. [
18] considered that the endpoint of the TP was that the volume of enteral feeding reached 120 ml/kg/d and determined that the TP was the key period of massive nutrient deficiency. According to Miller et al. [
13] and Liotto et al. [
19], the quantitative definition of TP is that enteral feeding volume gradually increases to adequate enteral feeding (160 ml/kg/d) after minimal enteral feeding. However, in practice, when the actual enteral feeding volume of preterm infants reaches 100–120 ml/kg/d, PN can be considered to be stopped because, at this time, enteral feeding provides sufficient protein intake, that is, 3.5 g/kg/d [
4,
16,
22]. Therefore, the TP can be defined quantitatively as 30 ml/kg/d ≤ enteral feeding volume ≤ 120 ml/kg/d.
Brennan et al. [
15,
16] suggested that the TP is divided into the early period, dominated by PN (enteral feeding volume < 80 ml/kg/d, main parenteral nutrition intakes), and the late period dominated by EN (enteral feeding volume ≥ 80 ml/kg/d, main enteral nutrition intakes). During early TP, a lower Cit concentration was positively correlated with the compromised protein and energy deficits in EN [
20]. To further investigate the nutrition and growth of preterm infants, the TP is divided into early and late periods.
The three phases ( PN, transition from PN to EN, and full EN) are not gradual for preterm infants. These three phases may be experienced repeatedly by some preterm infants due to intolerance to food or diseases. It is necessary to adjust TP for preterm infants according to local conditions.
To the author’s knowledge, this is the first comprehensive assessment of nutrition in the TP and growth of preterm infants. Generally, preterm infants with EUGR or inadequate weight growth velocity consumed less protein in the early postnatal period. Therefore, under the background that there are currently no nutritional management guidelines for TP, strengthening the EN intake in the early TP [
17], increasing human milk fortifier when the volume of human milk reaches 50–80 ml/kg/d [
42], and standardizing the composition of PN in the TP [
16,
19] could achieve optimal nutrient intake. It has also been reported that early progressive enteral feeding with human milk is well tolerated by preterm infants, which may improve growth in the hospital [
43]. Additionally, the duration of TP varied among the studies included in this systematic review. According to another study comparing the nutritional status of preterm infants in Chinese and American hospitals, Chinese preterm infants had significantly longer PNs than American preterm infants [
44]. However, there were no comparative data on the duration of the TP. There is a need to conduct relevant research on the TP of preterm infants, identify nutrition gaps in different regions, and investigate whether preterm infants' TP duration affects their growth.
There are some limitations to our study. Firstly, the studies included in this systematic review had small sample sizes and were all single-center, observational studies. Further large-scale, prospective, and intervention studies are needed to guide the nutritional management of preterm infants during hospitalization. Second, a meta-analysis of the data was not feasible due to the heterogeneity between studies, the different nutrition strategies, and the inconsistent definitions of the TP. Therefore, this review only provides a narrative summary of the results. The third limitation of this systematic review is that it only conducted bivariate analyses between nutrition and PGF in the included studies. The current findings do not fully consider the presence of infants with SGA, the development of comorbidity, or the type of enteral feeding. More multivariate analysis of transitional nutrition and growth outcome is needed to determine the independent risk factors of growth failure. Finally, in the studies involving nutritional intake in the late TP included in this review [
19,
20], it is still controversial whether the energy and protein intake in the late TP is related to PGF. There are no specific indicators to evaluate protein-energy status in the current research, such as BUN, prealbumin, and albumin. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct extensive sample studies to clarify the relationship between nutrition intake in the late TP and growth outcome. Considering these limitations, the results should be interpreted accordingly.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.