nach oben

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.12.2024 | Review

Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review

verfasst von: Rasha T. Kakati, Samer Naffouje, Philip M. Spanheimer, Fadi S. Dahdaleh

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal malignancy with a minority of patients eligible for curative-intent surgical intervention. Pancreatic resections are technically demanding operations associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs), which include laparoscopic and robotic approaches, may enhance postoperative outcomes by lessening physiological impact of open surgery. A limited number of randomized-controlled trials as well as numerous retrospective reports have focused on MIPR outcomes and role in management of a variety of tumors, including PDAC. Today, MIPRs are generally considered acceptable alternatives to open surgery as a trend towards improved short-term metrics is observed. However, several questions remain regarding the oncological adequacy of MIPR’s as long-term experience is less extensive compared to open techniques. This review aims to summarize existing evidence on MIPRs with a focus on PDAC.

Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN, Jeekel H, Klinkenbijl JH, Bakkevold KE, Takada T, Amano H, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Neoptolemos JP, Pancreatic Cancer Meta-Analysis G (2008) Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 143(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2007.17CrossRefPubMed

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590CrossRefPubMed

Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Raoul JL, Chone L, Francois E, Artru P, Biagi JJ, Lecomte T, Assenat E, Faroux R, Ychou M, Volet J, Sauvanet A, Breysacher G, Di Fiore F, Cripps C, Kavan P, Texereau P, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Khemissa-Akouz F, Legoux JL, Juzyna B, Gourgou S, O’Callaghan CJ, Jouffroy-Zeller C, Rat P, Malka D, Castan F, Bachet JB, Canadian Cancer Trials G, the Unicancer GIPG (2018) FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 379(25):2395–2406. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1809775CrossRefPubMed

Schwarz JL, Hogg ME (2021) Current state of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. J Surg Oncol 123(6):1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26412CrossRefPubMed

Zhang M, Fang R, Mou Y, Chen R, Xu X, Zhang R, Yan J, Jin W, Ajoodhea H (2015) LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution. BMC Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0411-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sanchez-Velazquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, Park JS, Hwang HK, Napoli N, Javed AA, Inoue Y, Beghdadi N, Kalisvaart M, Vigia E, Walsh CD, Lovasik B, Busquets J, Scandavini C, Robin F, Yoshitomi H, Mackay TM, Busch OR, Hartog H, Heinrich S, Gleisner A, Perinel J, Passeri M, Lluis N, Raptis DA, Tschuor C, Oberkofler CE, DeOliveira ML, Petrowsky H, Martinie J, Asbun H, Adham M, Schulick R, Lang H, Koerkamp BG, Besselink MG, Han HS, Miyazaki M, Ferrone CR, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Sulpice L, Boudjema K, Del Chiaro M, Fabregat J, Kooby DA, Allen P, Lavu H, Yeo CJ, Barroso E, Roberts K, Muiesan P, Sauvanet A, Saiura A, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Boggi U, Yoon DS, Bassi C, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2019) Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery: a novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. Ann Surg 270(2):211–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003223CrossRefPubMed

van Hilst J, de Graaf N, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG (2021) The landmark series: minimally invasive pancreatic resection. Ann Surg Oncol 28(3):1447. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09335-3CrossRefPubMed

Poves I, Burdio F, Morato O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L, Visa L, Grande L (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268(5):731–739. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002893CrossRefPubMed

de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Bosscha K, Dijkgraaf MG, Gerhards MF, Groot Koerkamp B, Hagendoorn J, de Hingh IH, Karsten TM, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Tran TCK, Busch OR, Festen S, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer G (2018) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 19(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2423-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26(9):2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2207-6CrossRefPubMed

11.

Jin J, Shi Y, Chen M, Qian J, Qin K, Wang Z, Chen W, Jin W, Lu F, Li Z, Wu Z, Jian L, Han B, Liang X, Sun C, Mou Y, Yin X, Huang H, Chen H, Gemenetzis G, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B (2021) Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials 22(1):954. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05939-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, Van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Karsten TM, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, Busch OR, Festen S, Besselink MG (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:199CrossRefPubMed

13.

Khachfe HH, Nassour I, Hammad AY, Hodges JC, AlMasri S, Liu H, deSilva A, Kraftician J, Lee KK, Pitt HA, Zureikat AH, Paniccia A (2022) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: increased adoption and improved outcomes - is laparoscopy still justified? Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005687CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, Augustine MM, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Choti MA, Mansour JC, Xie XJ, Polanco PM, Minter RM (2018) Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched study from a national cohort of patients. Ann Surg 268(1):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002259CrossRefPubMed

15.

Emmen A, Gorgec B, Zwart MJW, Daams F, Erdmann J, Festen S, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM, van Hilst J, Kazemier G, Lof S, Sussenbach SI, Tanis PJ, Zonderhuis BM, Busch OR, Swijnenburg RJ, Besselink MG, for HPBA (2022) Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09735-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Garland ME, Gonzalez JE, Polanco Santana JC, Kent TS (2022) Current trends in pancreatoduodenectomy: a NSQIP study. J Am Coll Surg 235(5):S48. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XCS.0000896068.79597.a0CrossRef

17.

Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642443CrossRefPubMed

18.

Wang M, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Li J, Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng W, Chen X, Zhao W, Li J, Tan Z, Huang H, Li D, Zhu F, Qin T, Ma J, Yu G, Zhou B, Zheng S, Tang Y, Han W, Meng L, Ke J, Feng F, Chen B, Yin X, Chen W, Ma H, Xu J, Liu Y, Lin R, Dong Y, Yu Y, Liu J, Zhang H, Qin R, Minimally Invasive Treatment Group in the Pancreatic Disease Branch of China’s International E, Promotion Association for M, Healthcare (2021) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(6):438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6CrossRefPubMed

19.

Feng Q, Liao W, Xin Z, Jin H, Du J, Cai Y, Liao M, Yuan K, Zeng Y (2021) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus conventional open approach for patients with pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 11:749140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.749140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Feng Q, Liao W, Xin Z, Jin H, Du J, Cai Y, Liao M, Yuan K, Zeng Y (2021) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Front Oncol 11:749140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.749140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Kantor O, Talamonti MS, Sharpe S, Lutfi W, Winchester DJ, Roggin KK, Bentrem DJ, Prinz RA, Baker MS (2017) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma provides short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term overall survival rates similar to those for open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 213(3):512–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.030CrossRefPubMed

22.

Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(4):633–638. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000937CrossRefPubMed

23.

Naffouje SA, Kamarajah SK, Denbo JW, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS (2022) surgical approach does not affect return to intended oncologic therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a propensity-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 29(12):7793–7803. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12347-wCrossRefPubMed

24.

Magge D, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME (2018) Laparoscopic and robotic resection for pancreatic cancer. In: Beger HG, Warshaw AL, Hruban RH, Büchler MW, Lerch MM, Neoptolemos JP et al (eds) The pancreas. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, p 804CrossRef

25.

Torphy RJ, Friedman C, Halpern A, Chapman BC, Ahrendt SS, McCarter MM, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Gleisner A (2019) Comparing short-term and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy across low and high volume centers. Ann Surg 270(6):1147–1155. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002810CrossRefPubMed

26.

Eguia E, Kuo PC, Sweigert PJ, Nelson MH, Aranha GV, Abood G, Godellas C, Baker MS (2019) The laparoscopic approach to pancreatoduodenectomy is cost neutral in very high-volume centers. Surgery 166(6):1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.004CrossRefPubMed

27.

Hoehn RS, Nassour I, Adam MA, Winters S, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH (2021) National trends in robotic pancreas surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 25(4):983–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04591-wCrossRefPubMed

28.

de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Boerma D, Bonsing BA, Daams F, van Dam RM, Dijkgraaf MG, van Eijck CH, Festen S, Gerhards MF, Koerkamp BG, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, Kazemier G, Klaase J, de Kleine RH, van Laarhoven CJ, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Roos D, Scheepers JJ, van der Schelling GP, Steenvoorde P, Vriens MR, Wijsman JH, Gouma DJ, Busch OR, Hilal MA, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer G (2016) Impact of a nationwide training program in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (LAELAPS). Ann Surg 264(5):754–762. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001888CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hogg ME, Besselink MG, Clavien PA, Fingerhut A, Jeyarajah DR, Kooby DA, Moser AJ, Pitt HA, Varban OA, Vollmer CM, Zeh HJ, Hansen P, Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection Organizing C (2017) Training in minimally invasive pancreatic resections: a paradigm shift away from “See one, Do one, Teach one.” HPB Oxford) 19(3):234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.016CrossRefPubMed

30.

de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Topal B, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Karsten TM, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, Marsman HA, van Rijssen LB, Steen MW, Busch OR, Festen S, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer G (2019) Outcomes of a multicenter training program in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2). Ann Surg 269(2):344–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002563CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ramirez Barriga M, Rojas A, Roggin KK, Talamonti MS, Hogg ME (2022) Development of a two-week dedicated robotic surgery curriculum for general surgery residents. J Surg Educ 79(4):861–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.02.015CrossRefPubMed

32.

Schmidt CR, Harris BR, Musgrove KA, Rao P, Marsh JW, Thomay AA, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Boone BA (2021) Formal robotic training diminishes the learning curve for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: implications for new programs in complex robotic surgery. J Surg Oncol 123(2):375–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26284CrossRefPubMed

33.

Kornaropoulos M, Moris D, Beal EW, Makris MC, Mitrousias A, Petrou A, Felekouras E, Michalinos A, Vailas M, Schizas D, Papalampros A (2017) Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 31(11):4382–4392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5523-zCrossRefPubMed

34.

Williams MD, Bhama AR, Naffouje S, Kamarajah SK, Becerra AZ, Zhang Y, Pappas SG, Dahdaleh FS (2022) Effect of operative time on outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05504-9CrossRefPubMed

35.

Nassour I, Choti MA, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Wang SC, Polanco PM (2018) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 32(6):2907–2913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6002-2CrossRefPubMed

36.

Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150(5):416–422. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17CrossRefPubMed

37.

Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y, Gillespie TW, Weber SM, Abbott DE, Ahmad SA, Maithel SK, Hogg ME, Zenati M, Cho CS, Salem A, Xia B, Steve J, Nguyen TK, Keshava HB, Chalikonda S, Walsh RM, Talamonti MS, Stocker SJ, Bentrem DJ, Lumpkin S, Kim HJ, Zeh HJ 3rd, Kooby DA (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264(4):640–649. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001869CrossRefPubMed

38.

Vining CC, Kuchta K, Berger Y, Paterakos P, Schuitevoerder D, Roggin KK, Talamonti MS, Hogg ME (2021) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases the risk of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula: a propensity score matched NSQIP analysis. HPB (Oxford) 23(3):367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.004CrossRefPubMed

39.

Fu Y, Qiu J, Yu Y, Wu D, Zhang T (2022) Meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in all patients and pancreatic cancer patients. Front Surg 9:989065. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.989065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Cai J, Ramanathan R, Zenati MS, Al Abbas A, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2020) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas: a propensity-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 24(5):1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04274-1CrossRefPubMed

41.

van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, Irfan A, Schmocker RK, Sereni E, Kinny-Koster B, Wright M, Groot VP, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Makary M, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, He J (2021) Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched analysis to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 25(7):1795–1804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04869-zCrossRefPubMed

42.

Jung JP, Zenati MS, Dhir M, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Simmons RL, Hogg ME (2018) Use of video review to investigate technical factors that may be associated with delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 153(10):918–927. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Nassour I, Winters SB, Hoehn R, Tohme S, Adam MA, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH (2020) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 122(2):234–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25958CrossRefPubMed

44.

Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F, Iacopi S, Lombardo C, Bernardini J, Amorese G, Cacciato Insilla A, Funel N, Campani D, Cappelli C, Caramella D, Boggi U (2019) A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer based on margin status. Surg Endosc 33(1):234–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6301-2CrossRefPubMed

45.

Weng Y, Jiang Y, Fu N, Jin J, Shi Y, Huo Z, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B (2021) Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 35(7):3437–3448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07791-2CrossRefPubMed

46.

Girgis MD, Zenati MS, King JC, Hamad A, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME (2021) Oncologic outcomes after robotic pancreatic resections are not inferior to open surgery. Ann Surg 274(3):e262–e268. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003615CrossRefPubMed

47.

Baimas-George M, Watson M, Murphy KJ, Iannitti D, Baker E, Ocuin L, Vrochides D, Martinie JB (2020) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study. Surg Endosc 34(8):3644–3649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07564-xCrossRefPubMed

48.

ClinicalTrials.gov. Observation of perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observation of perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov.

49.

Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Bourdeau T, Jacob K, Thomas J, Przetocki V, Luberice K, Sucandy I (2021) Cost analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery program. J Am Coll Surg 232(4):461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.062CrossRefPubMed

50.

Williams MD, Bhama AR, Naffouje S, Kamarajah SK, Becerra AZ, Zhang Y, Pappas SG, Dahdaleh FS (2023) Effect of operative time on outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 27(1):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05504-9CrossRefPubMed

51.

Vining CC, Kuchta K, Schuitevoerder D, Paterakos P, Berger Y, Roggin KK, Talamonti MS, Hogg ME (2020) Risk factors for complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP analysis with propensity score matching. J Surg Oncol 122(2):183. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25942CrossRefPubMed

52.

Brennan MF, Moccia RD, Klimstra D (1996) Management of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Ann Surg 223(5):506–511. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199605000-00006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Soreide K, Olsen F, Nymo LS, Kleive D, Lassen K (2019) A nationwide cohort study of resection rates and short-term outcomes in open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 21(6):669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.10.006CrossRefPubMed

54.

de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F, van Dam R, Dejong C, van Duyn E, Dijkgraaf M, van Eijck C, Festen S, Gerhards M, Groot Koerkamp B, de Hingh I, Kazemier G, Klaase J, de Kleine R, van Laarhoven C, Luyer M, Patijn G, Steenvoorde P, Suker M, Abu Hilal M, Busch O, Besselink M, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer G (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(1):2–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979CrossRefPubMed

55.

Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, Toscano F, Pacilio CA, Bogoni S, D’Ambra M, Pagano N, Di Marco MC, Minni F (2015) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19(4):770–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2721-zCrossRefPubMed

56.

van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Ateeb Z, Balzano G, Berrevoet F, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, Del Chiaro M, Chikhladze S, Cipriani F, van Dam R, Damoli I, van Dieren S, Dokmak S, Edwin B, van Eijck C, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Farges O, Fernandez-Cruz L, Forgione A, Frigerio I, Fuks D, Gavazzi F, Gayet B, Giardino A, Groot Koerkamp B, Hackert T, Hassenpflug M, Kabir I, Keck T, Khatkov I, Kusar M, Lombardo C, Marchegiani G, Marshall R, Menon KV, Montorsi M, Orville M, de Pastena M, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Primrose J, Pugliese R, Ricci C, Roberts K, Rosok B, Sahakyan MA, Sanchez-Cabus S, Sandstrom P, Scovel L, Solaini L, Soonawalla Z, Souche FR, Sutcliffe RP, Tiberio GA, Tomazic A, Troisi R, Wellner U, White S, Wittel UA, Zerbi A, Bassi C, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic S (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-european propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 269(1):10–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561CrossRefPubMed

57.

Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, D’Angelica MI, Balduzzi A, Bassi C, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, Callery MP, Del Chiaro M, Coimbra FJ, Conrad C, Cook A, Coppola A, Dervenis C, Dokmak S, Edil BH, Edwin B, Giulianotti PC, Han HS, Hansen PD, van der Heijde N, van Hilst J, Hester CA, Hogg ME, Jarufe N, Jeyarajah DR, Keck T, Kim SC, Khatkov IE, Kokudo N, Kooby DA, Korrel M, de Leon FJ, Lluis N, Lof S, Machado MA, Demartines N, Martinie JB, Merchant NB, Molenaar IQ, Moravek C, Mou YP, Nakamura M, Nealon WH, Palanivelu C, Pessaux P, Pitt HA, Polanco PM, Primrose JN, Rawashdeh A, Sanford DE, Senthilnathan P, Shrikhande SV, Stauffer JA, Takaori K, Talamonti MS, Tang CN, Vollmer CM, Wakabayashi G, Walsh RM, Wang SE, Zinner MJ, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Zwart MJ, Conlon KC, Kendrick ML, Zeh HJ, Hilal MA, Besselink MG (2020) The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 271(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590CrossRefPubMed

58.

Cuschieri A (1994) Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39(3):178–184PubMed

59.

Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255(6):1048–1059. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318251ee09CrossRefPubMed

60.

Bjornsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T, Sandstrom P (2020) Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 107(10):1281–1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11554CrossRefPubMed

61.

Korrel M, Vissers FL, van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Dijkgraaf MG, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Busch OR, Luyer MD, Sandstrom P, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, Bjornsson B, International Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection Trialists G (2021) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 23(3):323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.022CrossRefPubMed

62.

Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Davidson BR, van Laarhoven CJ (2016) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD011391. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2CrossRefPubMed

63.

Maggino L, Liu JB, Ecker BL, Pitt HA, Vollmer CM Jr (2018) Impact of operative time on outcomes after pancreatic resection: a risk-adjusted analysis using the american college of surgeons NSQIP database. J Am Coll Surg 226(5):844–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.004CrossRefPubMed

64.

de Rooij T, Besselink MG, Shamali A, Butturini G, Busch OR, Edwin B, Troisi R, Fernandez-Cruz L, Dagher I, Bassi C, Abu HM, group Dt (2016) Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer. HPB (Oxford) 18(2):170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2015.08.005CrossRefPubMed

65.

Chen K, Pan Y, Huang CJ, Chen QL, Zhang RC, Zhang MZ, Wang GY, Wang XF, Mou YP, Yan JF (2021) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Cancer 21(1):382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08117-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt MC, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW, Sellers JB, Merchant NB, Scoggins CR, Martin RCG, Kim HJ, Ahmad S, Cho CS, Parikh AA, Chu CK, Hamilton NA, Doyle CJ, Pinchot S, Hayman A, McClaine R, Nakeeb A, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lillemoe KD (2010) A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210(5):779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.033CrossRefPubMed

67.

Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR, Augustine MM, Yopp AC, Mansour JC, Minter RM, Choti MA, Polanco PM (2017) Conversion of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: predictors and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 24(12):3725–3731. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6062-5CrossRefPubMed

68.

Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study. Surg Endosc 26(6):1670–1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2090-6CrossRefPubMed

69.

Xourafas D, Ashley SW, Clancy TE (2017) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of 1815 patients from the ACS-NSQIP procedure-targeted pancreatectomy database. J Gastrointest Surg 21(9):1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3463-5CrossRefPubMed

70.

Li P, Zhang H, Chen L, Liu T, Dai M (2023) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 75(1):7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01413-3CrossRefPubMed

71.

Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, Choudry HA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 17(7):580–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12412CrossRefPubMed

72.

Zhao W, Liu C, Li S, Geng D, Feng Y, Sun M (2018) Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 27(3):468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2018.06.001CrossRefPubMed

73.

van Hilst J, Korrel M, de Rooij T, Lof S, Busch OR, Groot Koerkamp B, Kooby DA, van Dieren S, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, group Ds (2019) Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 45(5):719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.003CrossRefPubMed

74.

Chopra A, Nassour I, Zureikat A, Paniccia A (2021) Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Updates Surg 73(3):947–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00927-yCrossRefPubMed

75.

Nakata K, Nakamura M (2021) The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 5(4):467–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12446CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Niu X, Yu B, Yao L, Tian J, Guo T, Ma S, Cai H (2019) Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 42(1):32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.08.011CrossRefPubMed

77.

Huang B, Feng L, Zhao J (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions. Surg Endosc 30(9):4078–4085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4723-7CrossRefPubMed

78.

Stafford AT, Walsh RM (2015) Robotic surgery of the pancreas: the current state of the art. J Surg Oncol 112(3):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23952CrossRefPubMed

79.

Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Gao YX, Zhao GD (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. J Surg Oncol 116(4):461–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24676CrossRefPubMed

80.

Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP (2015) Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution’s experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. J Am Coll Surg 220(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.004CrossRefPubMed

81.

Zhou JY, Xin C, Mou YP, Xu XW, Zhang MZ, Zhou YC, Lu C, Chen RG (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0151189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Mosca F (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 29(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3670-zCrossRefPubMed

83.

Wang X, Li Y, Cai Y, Liu X, Peng B (2017) Laparoscopic total pancreatectomy: case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(3):e5869. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005869CrossRefPubMed

84.

Scholten L, Klompmaker S, Van Hilst J, Annecchiarico MM, Balzano G, Casadei R, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Ferrari G, Kerem M, Khatkov IE, Lombardo C, Manzoni A, Mazzola M, Napoli N, Rosso EE, Tyutyunnik P, Wellner UF, Fuks D, Burdio F, Keck T, Hilal MA, Besselink MG, Boggi U (2023) Outcomes after minimally invasive versus open total pancreatectomy: a pan-european propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 277(2):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005075CrossRefPubMed

85.

Cai Y, Gao P, Peng B (2020) A novel surgical approach for en-bloc resection laparoscopic total pancreatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(28):e20948. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020948CrossRefPubMed

86.

Boggi U, Palladino S, Massimetti G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Amorese G, Mosca F (2015) Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1425–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3819-9CrossRefPubMed

87.

Zureikat AH, Nguyen T, Boone BA, Wijkstrom M, Hogg ME, Humar A, Zeh H (2015) Robotic total pancreatectomy with or without autologous islet cell transplantation: replication of an open technique through a minimal access approach. Surg Endosc 29(1):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3656-xCrossRefPubMed

88.

Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Bianco FM, Ayloo SM (2011) Early experience with robotic total pancreatectomy. Pancreas 40(2):311–313. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181f7e303CrossRefPubMed

89.

Malafa MP (2015) Defining borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: emerging consensus for an old challenge. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13(5):501–504. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0068CrossRefPubMed

90.

Pedrazzoli S (2022) Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer: Currently debated topics on morbidity, mortality, and lymphadenectomy. Surg Oncol 45:101858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101858CrossRefPubMed

91.

Is There a Role for Laparoscopic and/or Robotic Techniques for Borderline Resectable Tumors? , bookTitle Multimodality Management of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.

92.

Kung JWC, Parks RW (2022) Vascular resections in minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic cancer. Laparosc Endosc Robotic Surg 5(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2021.09.003CrossRef

93.

Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, Al Abbas AI, Boone BA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ 3rd (2021) 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg 273(5):966–972. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003550CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review
verfasst von: Rasha T. Kakati
Samer Naffouje
Philip M. Spanheimer
Fadi S. Dahdaleh
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2024
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01825-w

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Impact of low pneumoperitoneum on renal function and acute kidney injury biomarkers during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): a randomised clinical trial

Risk of pseudoaneurysm and bleeding complications after partial nephrectomy: comparison of tumor enucleation to standard margin technique

Revolutionizing urology: the advancements and applications of robotic platforms

Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review

The da Vinci robotic surgery system for the management of endometrial cancer: a single-center experience

Outcomes in robotic-assisted compared to laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery in a newly established colorectal tertiary center: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Update Chirurgie