Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2023

Open Access 08.07.2023 | Otology

Self-reported dizziness, falls, and self-rated health in a rural population in Denmark

verfasst von: Casper Grønlund, Bjarki Ditlev Djurhuus, Ellen Astrid Holm, Preben Homøe

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 12/2023

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate associations between dizziness, hearing loss, medication, and self-perceived health in the region of Lolland-Falster in Denmark.

Methods

A cross-sectional population-based study using data from questionnaires and physical examinations between February 8th, 2016, and February 13th, 2020. Individuals aged 50 years or above in the region of Lolland-Falster were randomly invited to participate.

Results

Of 10,092 individuals (52% female), the mean age was 64.7 and 65.7 years for females and males, respectively. 20% reported dizziness during the past 30 days, and prevalence increased with age. 24% of dizzy females suffered from falls compared to 21% of males. 43% sought treatment for dizziness. Logistic regression revealed a higher odds ratio of dizziness in groups with poor self-perceived health (OR = 2.15, 95% CI [1.71, 2.72]) and very poor self-perceived health (OR = 3.62 [1.75, 7.93]) compared to moderate self-perceived health. A higher OR was found for seeking treatment for dizziness in the group that had experienced falls (OR = 3.21 [2.54, 4.07]). 40% reported hearing loss. Logistic regression revealed a higher OR for dizziness in the group with severe hearing loss (OR = 2.40 [1.77, 3.26]) and moderate hearing loss (OR = 1.63 [1.37, 1.94]) compared to no hearing loss.

Conclusion

One of five participants reported dizziness during the last month. Dizziness was negatively associated with self-perception of good health also after adjusting for comorbidities. Almost half of the dizzy participants sought treatment for dizziness and 21% experienced falls. Identification and treatment of dizziness are important to prevent falls from happening.

Clinical trial registration

Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Dizziness and vertigo are among the most common complaints in the healthcare system, affecting an estimated 15–35% of the population at some point in life [1]. Dizziness as a symptom is non-specific and may arise from several organ systems. Some of the most frequent reasons are vestibular, neurological, and cardiovascular disorders. Furthermore, dizziness often arises due to the side effects of medication.
In 2008, a national health interview survey found that 24.2 million adults in America (corresponding to 11.1% of the included individuals) had experienced dizziness during the past 12 months [2]. Among participants aged 65 and above, 19.6% reported a problem with dizziness or unsteadiness in the preceding 12 months [3], and women were more often affected than men (21% vs. 18%). These results have been confirmed by other similar studies [4, 5]. Concerning the quality of life and functional status, 37.3 million elderly individuals corresponding to 27.4% reported that balance problems prevented them from participating in activities such as social events, exercise, and driving [3]. This was also confirmed by a cohort study with 2751 participants reporting that adults affected by dizziness/vertigo generally had lower quality of life scores [6].
The Lolland-Falster Health Study (LOFUS) is a household-based population study based on people living in the two Danish islands of Lolland and Falster. Approximately 103,000 inhabitants live in this region, which is considered one of the most socio-economically disadvantaged areas in Denmark [7]. An analysis of the use of doctors, use of medication, and life expectancy, done in 2010 by the Workers Union, showed that the region has a higher occurrence of sickness and a lower average life expectancy than the rest of Denmark [8].
LOFUS was initiated to gain knowledge on determinants of health in a socio-economically disadvantaged and mainly rural area of Denmark using questionnaires, physical examinations, and biological samples hypothesizing that lifestyle, environment, and heritage together are risk factors for disease [7]. Other similar studies but in highly urbanized areas have been performed in Denmark [9].
In this report, we focus on dizziness, and hearing loss reported by the elderly participants in the LOFUS cohort. We would like to specify that we use dizziness as an umbrella term including vertigo and unsteadiness, as the Danish language does not distinguish between these. We hypothesize that these symptoms are frequent and are associated with poorer health perception and comorbidities. Also, we explore the use of doctors for these complaints.

Methods

Study design

From February 8th, 2016, to February 13th, 2020, 19,000 participants aged 0–96, participated in LOFUS. Participants answered questions concerning both ear-, nose-, and throat problems and socioeconomic status.

Invitation, booking procedure, and visit

Individuals aged 18 years or above in the region of Lolland-Falster were randomly invited to participate in the Health Study. Invited individuals who agreed to participate were booked for an appointment in one of three static sites. The visit included a dialogue concerning written informed consent, followed by a physical examination. Thereafter, participants received a confirmation letter including a link and password to a web-based questionnaire [7].

Eligibility criteria

The focus of the present study was dizziness. Dizziness was used as an umbrella term including vertigo and unsteadiness, as the Danish language does not distinguish between these. Inclusion criteria were age above 50 years and having answered the sub-questionnaire on dizziness. Exclusion criteria were incapacitated people with guardians, individuals without a permanent residence, inhabitants with address protection, and inhabitants unable to understand Danish or English [7].

Sample population

The sample population was drawn from the target population of around 103,000 inhabitants in the region of Lolland-Falster from the two municipalities Lolland or Guldborgsund [7].

Questionnaire-data

The questions are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Questions in the questionnaire
Questions
Have you experienced dizziness during the past 30 days?
If yes, have you suffered from falls in relation to your dizziness?
If yes, have you sought help from a medical doctor for your dizziness?
Do you suffer from hearing loss?
Do you use specific medicine? (Antihypertensives, diuretics, anticoagulants, heart medication)
Do you suffer from allergies documented by your general practitioner?
Do you suffer from hypertension documented by your general practitioner?
Do you suffer from atherosclerosis, documented by your general practitioner?
How would you rate your health (‘very poor’, ‘poor’, ‘moderate’, ‘good’, ‘excellent’)?

Physical measurements

Height, weight, creatinine, eGFR, sodium, potassium, hemoglobin, cholesterol value, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were obtained.

Sociodemographic data

Age in years, gender, marital status (married, separated/divorced, widowed, single), educational level (less than high school, high school, a bachelor’s degree, advanced degree, other), occupation (unemployed, out of the labor market, in labor, studying or training, work in the home, other), and the number of individuals in the household.

Statistical analyses

All data management and statistical analyses were performed using R, version 4.1.1. Logistic regressions were applied to test for bivariate associations. For ordinal data, we applied the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
A multivariate binary logistic regression model was fitted to explain binary variables from several quantitative and qualitative covariates. For the logistic regression, the participants answering ‘do not know’ to dizziness were removed. A Hosmer–Lemeshow test was then performed to check for the goodness of fit. Odds-ratio (OR) estimates, 95%-confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were derived from the logistic regression models.

Ethics and dissemination

Region Zealand’s Ethical Committee on Health Research has approved LOFUS (Reg: SJ-421). All data storage and management for this study were approved by the Regional Data Protection Agency of Zealand (REG-065–2021 & REG-24–2015), and the use of data was accepted by the LOFUS steering committee. LOFUS is registered on http://​www.​clinicaltrials.​gov (NCT02482896).

Results

In total, 11,057 individuals above 50 years of age attended the LOFUS study. Of the 11,057 individuals, 10,092 answered the questions regarding dizziness and were eligible for this study. 5279 (52%) were female, and 4813 (48%) were male. The mean age was 64.7 (range: 50.1 to 96.6), and 65.7 (range: 50.0 to 95.6) for females and males, respectively. Of the 10,092 individuals included in this study, almost 20% had experienced dizziness during the past 30 days. For baseline characteristics, see Table 2.
Table 2
The demographics of the participants
Variables
Male (N = 4813)
Female (N = 5279)
Overall [10, 092]
Sex (percentage)
47.7%
52.3%
100%
Age
 Mean (SD)
65.7 (8.96)
64.7 (8.88)
65.2 (8.93)
 Median [min, max]
65.6 [50.0, 95.6]
64.4 [50.0, 96.6]
64.9 [50.0, 96.6]
Age groups
 50–59 years old
1452 (30.2%)
1802 (34.1%)
3254 (32.2%)
 60–69 years old
1766 (36.7%)
1940 (36.7%)
3706 (36.7%)
 70–79 years old
1297 (26.9%)
1263 (23.9%)
2560 (25.4%)
 > 80 years old
298 (6.2%)
274 (5.2%)
572 (5.7%)
BMI
 Mean (SD)
28.0 (4.39)
27.1 (5.30)
27.5 (4.91)
 Median [Min, Max]
27.4 [16.5, 50.4]
26.1 [12.6, 54.0]
26.8 [12.6, 54.0]
 Missing
129 (2.7%)
98 (1.9%)
227 (2.2%)
Civil status
 Widow/widower
231 (4.8%)
564 (10.7%)
795 (7.9%)
 Married/Registered partnership
3646 (75.8%)
3696 (70.0%)
7342 (72.8%)
 Divorced/separated
377 (7.8%)
489 (9.3%)
866 (8.6%)
 Unmarried
523 (10.9%)
478 (9.1%)
1001 (9.9%)
Occupational position
 Old-age pensioner
2152 (44.7%)
2297 (43.5%)
4449 (44.1%)
 Other
89 (1.8%)
138 (2.6%)
227 (2.2%)
 Unemployed
53 (1.1%)
69 (1.3%)
122 (1.2%)
 Employee or self-employed
2128 (44.2%)
2072 (39.2%)
4200 (41.6%)
 Other forms of retirement
345 (7.2%)
592 (11.2%)
937 (9.3%)
 Long-term sickness
10 (0.2%)
9 (0.2%)
19 (0.2%)
 Student or apprentice
4 (0.1%)
10 (0.2%)
14 (0.1%)
 Missing
32 (0.7%)
92 (1.7%)
124 (1.2%)
Dizziness
 Dizzy
817 (17.0%)
1147 (21.7%)
1964 (19.5%)
 Not dizzy
3773 (78.4%)
3821 (72.4%)
7594 (75.2%)
 Do not know
223 (4.6%)
311 (5.9%)
534 (5.3%)

Gender effect

In total, 22% of the females reported dizziness compared with 17% of the males (Table 2). Dizziness was significantly more frequent in females than in males in all age groups. In the logistic regression model, a statistically significant difference in odds of dizziness between the female and male sex was found (OR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.34, 1.74]), see Table 3.
Table 3
Multivariate logistic regression with dizziness as response-variable
Variables
OR
95% CI
p value
Sex
 Male
Reference
 Female
1.52
1.34, 1.74
 < 0.001
Age-groups
 50–59 years old
1.20
1.02, 1.42
0.031
 60–69 years old
Reference
 70–79 years old
1.19
1.01, 1.41
0.034
 > 80 years old
1.67
1.30, 2.15
 < 0.001
Self-perceived health
 Very poor
3.62
1.75, 7.93
 < 0.001
 Poor
2.15
1.71, 2.72
 < 0.001
 Moderate
Reference
 Good
0.36
0.32, 0.40
 < 0.001
 Excellent
0.14
0.10, 0.18
 < 0.001
Hearing loss
 No hearing loss
Reference
 Mild hearing loss
1.33
1.15, 1.53
 < 0.001
 Moderate hearing loss
1.63
1.37, 1.94
 < 0.001
 Severe hearing loss
2.40
1.77, 3.26
 < 0.001
 Do not know
1.34
1.12, 1.59
0.001
Use of antihypertensives
 No antihypertensives
Reference
 Antihypertensives
1.15
1.01, 1.30
0.031
Occupational position
 Employee or self-employed
Reference
 Old-age pensioner
1.20
0.99, 1.44
0.060
 Other
1.34
0.94, 1.89
0.10
 Unemployed
1.49
0.93, 2.35
0.089
 Other forms of retirement
1.41
1.15, 1.73
 < 0.001
 Long-term sickness
3.00
1.05, 8.63
0.038
 Student or apprentice
4.16
1.20, 13.1
0.017
Anticoagulants
 Yes
1.64
1.41, 1.89
 < 0.001
 No
Reference
Hemoglobin
 
0.91
0.83, 0.99
0.026

Age effect

The prevalence of dizziness increased with increasing age, being approximately 1.75 times more frequent in > 80 years of age compared with 50–59 years of age. When divided into age groups, a statistically significant difference in odds of dizziness was found for the age range 70–79 years old (OR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.01, 1.41]) and > 80 years old (OR = 1.67, 95% CI [1.30, 2.15]).

Occupation

A univariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in dizziness between different categories of education (Table 4). When the occupational position was tested in the multivariate logistic regression, only “other forms of retirement”, “long-term sickness” and “student/apprentice” were statistically significant. However, the number of participants answering “student/apprentice” and “long-term sickness” were very small (Table 3).
Table 4
Univariate analysis of dizziness
Variables
Not dizzy (N = 7594)
Dizzy (N = 1964)
Count in total
Univariate analysis
OR [95% CI]
p value
Sex
 Male
3773 (49.7%)
817 (41.6%)
4590
1.39 [1.25, 1.53]
 < 0.001
 Female
3821 (50.3%)
1147 (58.4%)
4968
Reference
Age groups
 50–59 years old
2515 (33.1%)
586 (29.8%)
3101
1.04 [0.92, 1.17]
0.564
 60–69 years old
2871 (37.8%)
645 (32.8%)
3516
Reference
 70–79 years old
1856 (24.4%)
560 (28.5%)
2416
1.34 [1.18, 1.53]
 < 0.001
 > 80 years old
352 (4.64%)
173 (8.81%)
525
2.19 [1.79, 2.67]
 < 0.001
Self-perceived health
 Very poor
14 (0.185%)
28 (1.43%)
42
3.91 [2.05, 7.47]
 < 0.001
 Poor
188 (2.48%)
224 (11.4%)
412
2.33 [1.89, 2.88]
 < 0.001
 Moderate
1757 (23.2%)
898 (45.9%)
2655
Reference
 Good
4567 (60.3%)
748 (38.2%)
5315
0.32 [0.29, 0.36]
 < 0.001
 Excellent
1049 (13.8%)
60 (3.06%)
1109
0.11 [0.09, 0.15]
 < 0.001
Hearing loss
 None
3812 (50.4%)
767 (39.3%)
4579
Reference
 Mild
1812 (24.0%)
495 (25.4%)
2307
1.36 [1.20, 1.54]
 < 0.001
 Moderate
861 (11.4%)
326 (16.7%)
1187
1.88 [1.62, 2.18]
 < 0.001
 Severe
149 (1.97%)
101 (5.17%)
250
3.37 [2.59, 4.39]
 < 0.001
 Do not know
924 (12.2%)
263 (13.5%)
1187
1.41 [1.21, 1.66]
 < 0.001
Use of diuretics
 Diuretics
762 (10.3%)
356 (19.0%)
1118
2.04 [1.78, 2.34]
 < 0.001
 No diuretics
6609 (89.7%)
1513 (81.0%)
8122
Reference
Use of antihypertensives
 Yes
5028 (67.3%)
1041 (54.6%)
6069
1.71 [1.54, 1.89]
 < 0.001
 No
2445 (32.7%)
864 (45.4%)
3309
Reference
Occupational position
 Employee or self-employed
3409 (45.3%)
606 (31.6%)
4015
Reference
 Old-age pensioner
3237 (43.0%)
958 (50.0%)
4195
1.66 [1.49, 1.86]
 < 0.001
 Other
150 (1.99%)
60 (3.13%)
210
2.25 [1.65, 3.07]
 < 0.001
 Unemployed
85 (1.13%)
32 (1.67%)
117
2.12 [1.40, 3.21]
 < 0.001
 Other forms of retirement
634 (8.42%)
246 (12.8%)
880
2.18 [1.84, 2.59]
 < 0.001
 Long-term sickness
9 (0.119%)
9 (0.470%)
18
5.63 [2.22, 14.23]
 < 0.001
 Student or apprentice
8 (0.106%)
5 (0.261%)
13
3.52 [1.15, 10.78]
0.028
Anticoagulants
 Yes
   
2.36 [2.10, 2.65]
 < 0.001
 No
   
Reference
Hemoglobin
 Mean (SD)
8.82 (0.699)
8.69 (0.740)
 
0.78 [0.72, 0.83]
 < 0.001

Antihypertensive and diuretic medicine

Dizziness was significantly more frequent in participants being treated with diuretics or antihypertensive medications (Table 4). In the logistic regression model, the use of antihypertensive medication was statistically significant (OR = 1.15, 95% CI [1.01, 1.30]. As diuretic medicine was included in the category of antihypertensive medicine, the use of diuretic medicine was not tested separately in logistic regression.

Hearing loss

Of 1964 participants suffering from dizziness in the past 30 days, 40% also reported some degree of hearing loss (mild, moderate, or severe). Males reported more frequent hearing loss. The prevalence of hearing loss with dizziness is seen in Table 4. Logistic regression revealed a statistically significant increase in odds of dizziness between individuals with hearing loss and without hearing loss (mild hearing loss: OR = 1.33 [95% CI 1.15, 1.53], moderate hearing loss: OR = 1.63 [95% CI 1.37, 1.94], and severe hearing loss: OR = 2.40 [95% CI 1.77, 3.26]) when adjusting for covariates and suspected confounders such as age.

Self-perception of health

In logistic regression, a significant difference in odds of dizziness was seen between different degrees of self-perceived health. Poor self-perceived health and very poor self-perceived health revealed odds ratios of 2.15 (95% CI 1.71, 2.72), and 3.62 (95% CI 1.75, 7.93), respectively. Oppositely, good- and excellent self-perceived health revealed odds ratios of OR = 0.36, 95% CI (0.32, 0.40), and OR = 0.14, 95% CI (0.10, 0.18).

Experiencing falls and seeking treatment due to dizziness

Of the 1964 participants answering “yes” to dizziness during the past 30 days, 1951 participants answered the question about the occurrence of falls in relation to their dizziness (Table 5). 24% of the women suffering from dizziness in the past 30 days had experienced falls compared to 21% of men. An increase in the occurrence of falls was seen with increasing age in both sexes. In logistic regression, the best predictors of falls were very poor, poor, and good self-perceived health with an OR = 3.09, 95% CI (1.27–7.57), OR = 1.58, 95% CI (1.13, 2.21), and OR = 0.52, 95%- CI (0.4–0.67), respectively. Furthermore, increasing age also increased the odds ratio of falls, see Table 6.
Table 5
Characteristics of the dizzy and non-dizzy participants
 
Dizzy
Not dizzy
Do not know
Male (N = 817)
Female (N = 1147)
Male (N = 3773)
Female N = 3821)
Male (N = 223)
Female (N = 311)
Age-groups
 50–59 years
203 (24.8%)
383 (33.4%)
1190 (31.5%)
1325 (34.7%)
59 (26.5%)
94 (30.2%)
 60–69 years
270 (33.0%)
375 (32.7%)
1420 (37.6%)
1451 (38.0%)
76 (34.1%)
114 (36.7%)
 70–79 years
271 (33.2%)
289 (25.2%)
965 (25.6%)
891 (23.3%)
61 (27.4%)
83 (26.7%)
 > 80 years old
73 (8.9%)
100 (8.7%)
198 (5.2%)
154 (4.0%)
27 (12.1%)
20 (6.4%)
Self-perceived health
 Moderate
368 (45.0%)
530 (46.2%)
901 (23.9%)
856 (22.4%)
80 (35.9%)
132 (42.4%)
 Very poor
12 (1.5%)
16 (1.4%)
9 (0.2%)
5 (0.1%)
1 (0.4%)
1 (0.3%)
 Poor
98 (12.0%)
126 (11.0%)
89 (2.4%)
99 (2.6%)
21 (9.4%)
19 (6.1%)
 Good
306 (37.5%)
442 (38.5%)
2248 (59.6%)
2319 (60.7%)
108 (48.4%)
144 (46.3%)
 Excellent
28 (3.4%)
32 (2.8%)
514 (13.6%)
535 (14.0%)
13 (5.8%)
14 (4.5%)
 Missing
5 (0.6%)
1 (0.1%)
12 (0.3%)
7 (0.2%)
0 (0%)
1 (0.3%)
Hearing loss
 No hearing loss
241 (29.5%)
526 (45.9%)
1551 (41.1%)
2261 (59.2%)
54 (24.2%)
143 (46.0%)
 Mild hearing loss
252 (30.8%)
243 (21.2%)
1122 (29.7%)
690 (18.1%)
74 (33.2%)
54 (17.4%)
 Moderate hearing loss
187 (22.9%)
139 (12.1%)
600 (15.9%)
261 (6.8%)
35 (15.7%)
27 (8.7%)
 Severe hearing loss
52 (6.4%)
49 (4.3%)
97 (2.6%)
52 (1.4%)
20 (9.0%)
9 (2.9%)
 Do not know
80 (9.8%)
183 (16.0%)
386 (10.2%)
538 (14.1%)
39 (17.5%)
76 (24.4%)
 Missing
5 (0.6%)
7 (0.6%)
17 (0.5%)
19 (0.5%)
1 (0.4%)
2 (0.6%)
Treatment for dizziness
 Treatment
349 (42.7%)
494 (43.1%)
 
 No treatment
450 (55.1%)
621 (54.1%)
 Do not know
12 (1.5%)
27 (2.4%)
 Missing
6 (0.7%)
5 (0.4%)
Falls due to dizziness
 Falls
175 (21.4%)
275 (24.0%)
 
 No falls
613 (75.0%)
813 (70.9%)
 Do not know
24 (2.9%)
51 (4.4%)
 Missing
5 (0.6%)
8 (0.7%)
Table 6
Multivariate logistic regression with falls as response-variable
Variables
OR
95% CI
p value
Sex
 Male
Reference
 Female
1.20
0.93, 1.54
0.2
Age-groups
 50–59 years old
0.89
0.66, 1.21
0.5
 60–69 years old
Reference
 70–79 years old
1.41
1.06, 1.88
0.019
 > 80 years old
1.64
1.06, 2.48
0.023
Self-perceived health
 Very poor
3.09
1.27, 7.57
0.012
 Poor
1.58
1.13, 2.21
0.007
 Moderate
Reference
 Good
0.52
0.4, 0.67
 < 0.001
 Excellent
0.53
0.24, 1.05
0.087
Use of antihypertensives
 No antihypertensives
Reference
 Antihypertensives
1.11
0.88, 1.40
0.4
Hemoglobin
 
0.89
0.76, 1.05
0.2
A total of 1,953 participants suffering from dizziness during the past 30 days answered the question about seeking treatment for their dizziness. 43% of both females and males stated that they had sought treatment for their dizziness (Table 5). Seeking treatment for dizziness increased with increasing age for men, however, the biggest increase for females was seen in the age group of 60–70 years, where almost 50% sought treatment for their dizziness.
Logistic regression for “seeking treatment for dizziness” as an outcome showed that the occurrence of falls due to dizziness was the best predictor of seeking treatment for dizziness with an OR = 3.21, 95% CI (2.53, 4.08), please see Table 7. Furthermore, good or excellent self-perceived health decreased the odds of seeking treatment (good self-perceived health OR = 0.8, 95% CI (0.65–0.99), excellent self-perceived health OR = 0.44, 95% CI (0.24–0.85).
Table 7
Multivariate logistic regression with seeking treatment for dizziness as response-variable
Variables
OR
95% CI
p value
Sex
 Male
Reference
 Female
1.03
0.83, 1.28
0.8
Falls due to dizziness
 No falls
Reference
 Falls due to dizziness
3.21
2.53, 4.08
 < 0.001
Age-groups
 50–59 years old
Reference
 60–69 years old
1.35
1.05, 1.74
0.019
 70–79 years old
1.14
0.87, 1.49
0.3
 > 80 years old
1.27
0.86, 1.88
0.2
Self-perceived health
 Very poor
1.15
0.46, 2.96
0.8
 Poor
1.41
1.01, 1.95
0.041
 Moderate
Reference
 Good
0.8
0.65, 1.00
0.047
 Excellent
0.44
0.24, 0.85
0.016
Use of antihypertensives
 No antihypertensives
Reference
 Antihypertensives
1.12
0.92, 1.38
0.3
Hemoglobin
 
0.93
0.81, 1.08
0.3

Discussion

Dizziness is among the most common complaints in populations. Dizziness is associated with a significant degree of handicap, perception of low health, and occupational disability. Approximately one in five of the population in our study reported dizziness during the past month which is consistent with other studies reporting the monthly prevalence of dizziness [10, 11]. However, the mean age in our study was 65 years, which is not comparable to the mean age in other studies. In the United Kingdom, Yardley et al. found that 23% experienced dizziness during the past month (mean-age for females was 38.7) [10]. In Norway, Wiltink et al. found that 15.8% experienced dizziness during the past month in a population with a mean age of 48.8 [11].
The prevalence of dizziness increased with age, and there was a female predominance in our data. These findings are supported by several other studies [12, 13]. If a dizzy individual seeks treatment from a medical doctor, it may indicate that dizziness is severe and possibly influences the quality of life. This was the case in 43% of the participants in our study.
We demonstrated that a good predictor for seeking treatment for dizziness was the occurrence of falls in relation to dizziness. This was not unexpected. However, if many dizzy individuals only seek help after experiencing falls in relation to dizziness, it may be difficult to prevent falls. Various reasons could explain why individuals suffering from dizziness do not seek treatment from a medical doctor. One reason among others could be that the individual does not feel that the dizziness complaint is being taken seriously by their general practitioner or other health professionals. This could be due to the fact that many find it difficult to diagnose and treat dizziness but also that comorbidities often are present. Another reason could be relatives who think that it is normal to get dizzy with increasing age and therefore do not respond to the complaint. One might argue that an invitation for vestibular rehabilitation could help at least some of the patients as well as society by preventing fractures, especially hip fractures, and other events to happen.
We found that hearing loss and dizziness are often associated. This is probably mainly due to age-related factors like neurodegenerative processes in the elderly. The association is not surprising.
As regards subjective general health, we found that 13% experienced a “very poor” or “poor” subjective general health with a statistically significant difference between the dizzy and non-dizzy groups. This is congruent with data from Sweden where 18% reported “very poor” or “poor” health [14]. However, the data from Sweden reporting “very poor” or “poor” health might be a bit higher compared to our data because included patients were 79 years of age compared to our sample with a mean age of 65 years. Data from Brazil conclude the same: that self-perception of health was rated lower in dizzy- than in non-dizzy individuals [13].
As dizziness as a symptom is non-specific and may arise from several organ systems, it is not surprising that a correlation was found with general health, use of medication, and hearing loss. Consequently, the findings do not allow any specific conclusions on the contributing factors to dizziness and falls. Furthermore, the directionality of causalities may be in two or multiple ways.

Limitations and strengths

This is a cross-sectional questionnaire survey that only allows for possible associations but does not allow for causative explanations. In addition, participants who answered this questionnaire may be subject to bias by indication. A study investigating the degree of bias in LOFUS with logistic regression found that odds ratios for participation increased with income, education level, and employment status, among married individuals, Danish citizens, middle-aged individuals (aged 50–69 years), and female gender. Briefly, significantly higher participation of women and individuals of higher socioeconomic status was found, implying that people of lower socioeconomic status were underrepresented in LOFUS, in line with other cohort studies [15].
The strength is that the survey includes more than 10,000 participants in the age group for dizziness. Also, participants were not asked questions concerning possible associated items in the same section as dizziness. This makes it quite speculative that participants were skewed in their answers.

Conclusions

The prevalence of dizziness in citizens aged 50 years and above and participating in the Lolland-Falster Health Study was 20% which is in line with other similar studies. Citizens suffering from dizziness were negatively associated with self-perception of health also after adjusting for other comorbidities. 43% of dizzy patients sought treatment for their dizziness. 23% of the dizzy citizens experienced falls due to dizziness. The occurrence of falls was an indicator of seeking medical examination. Identification of dizziness, as well as treatment such as vestibular rehabilitation, is important to prevent falls from happening in the nearby future.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank statistician Anna Mejldal from OPEN for reviewing the data analysis.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors would like to disclose that we have no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt bestellen und 100 € sparen!

e.Med HNO

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med HNO erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes HNO, den Premium-Inhalten der HNO-Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten HNO-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N (2014) Impact of dizziness and obesity on the prevalence of falls and fall-related injuries. Laryngoscope 124(12):2797–2801CrossRefPubMed Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N (2014) Impact of dizziness and obesity on the prevalence of falls and fall-related injuries. Laryngoscope 124(12):2797–2801CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N (2012) Balance disorders in the elderly: epidemiology and functional impact. Laryngoscope 122(8):1858–1861CrossRefPubMed Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N (2012) Balance disorders in the elderly: epidemiology and functional impact. Laryngoscope 122(8):1858–1861CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsson Möller U, Midlöv P, Kristensson J, Ekdahl C, Berglund J, Jakobsson U (2013) Prevalence and predictors of falls and dizziness in people younger and older than 80 years of age–a longitudinal cohort study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 56(1):160–168CrossRefPubMed Olsson Möller U, Midlöv P, Kristensson J, Ekdahl C, Berglund J, Jakobsson U (2013) Prevalence and predictors of falls and dizziness in people younger and older than 80 years of age–a longitudinal cohort study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 56(1):160–168CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens KN, Lang IA, Guralnik JM, Melzer D (2008) Epidemiology of balance and dizziness in a national population: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing 37(3):300–305CrossRefPubMed Stevens KN, Lang IA, Guralnik JM, Melzer D (2008) Epidemiology of balance and dizziness in a national population: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing 37(3):300–305CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gopinath B, McMahon CM, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P (2009) Dizziness and vertigo in an older population: the Blue Mountains prospective cross-sectional study. Clin Otolaryngol 34(6):552–556CrossRefPubMed Gopinath B, McMahon CM, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P (2009) Dizziness and vertigo in an older population: the Blue Mountains prospective cross-sectional study. Clin Otolaryngol 34(6):552–556CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jepsen R, Egholm CL, Brodersen J, Simonsen E, Grarup J, Cyron A et al (2020) Lolland-Falster Health Study: study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study. Scand J Public Health 48(4):382–390CrossRefPubMed Jepsen R, Egholm CL, Brodersen J, Simonsen E, Grarup J, Cyron A et al (2020) Lolland-Falster Health Study: study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study. Scand J Public Health 48(4):382–390CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kårhus LL, Møllehave LT, Osler M, Jørgensen T, Linneberg A (2022) Population-based epidemiology: the Glostrup population studies 1964–2021. Scand J Public Health 50(7):1007–1011CrossRefPubMed Kårhus LL, Møllehave LT, Osler M, Jørgensen T, Linneberg A (2022) Population-based epidemiology: the Glostrup population studies 1964–2021. Scand J Public Health 50(7):1007–1011CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yardley L, Owen N, Nazareth I, Luxon L (1998) Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working age people. Br J Gen Pract 48(429):1131–1135PubMedPubMedCentral Yardley L, Owen N, Nazareth I, Luxon L (1998) Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working age people. Br J Gen Pract 48(429):1131–1135PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiltink J, Tschan R, Michal M, Subic-Wrana C, Eckhardt-Henn A, Dieterich M et al (2009) Dizziness: anxiety, health care utilization and health behavior–results from a representative German community survey. J Psychosom Res 66(5):417–424CrossRefPubMed Wiltink J, Tschan R, Michal M, Subic-Wrana C, Eckhardt-Henn A, Dieterich M et al (2009) Dizziness: anxiety, health care utilization and health behavior–results from a representative German community survey. J Psychosom Res 66(5):417–424CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Murdin L, Schilder AG (2015) Epidemiology of balance symptoms and disorders in the community: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 36(3):387–392CrossRefPubMed Murdin L, Schilder AG (2015) Epidemiology of balance symptoms and disorders in the community: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 36(3):387–392CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat de Moraes SA, Soares WJ, Rodrigues RA, Fett WC, Ferriolli E, Perracini MR (2011) Dizziness in community-dwelling older adults: a population-based study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 77(6):691–699CrossRefPubMed de Moraes SA, Soares WJ, Rodrigues RA, Fett WC, Ferriolli E, Perracini MR (2011) Dizziness in community-dwelling older adults: a population-based study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 77(6):691–699CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindell E, Kollén L, Johansson M, Karlsson T, Rydén L, Fässberg MM et al (2021) Dizziness and health-related quality of life among older adults in an urban population: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 19(1):231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lindell E, Kollén L, Johansson M, Karlsson T, Rydén L, Fässberg MM et al (2021) Dizziness and health-related quality of life among older adults in an urban population: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 19(1):231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jepsen R, Wingstrand A, Abild SL, Ellervik C, Simonsen E, Rasmussen K et al (2020) Socio-economic determinants of participation in the Lolland-Falster health study. J Public Health 28(6):657–664CrossRef Jepsen R, Wingstrand A, Abild SL, Ellervik C, Simonsen E, Rasmussen K et al (2020) Socio-economic determinants of participation in the Lolland-Falster health study. J Public Health 28(6):657–664CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Self-reported dizziness, falls, and self-rated health in a rural population in Denmark
verfasst von
Casper Grønlund
Bjarki Ditlev Djurhuus
Ellen Astrid Holm
Preben Homøe
Publikationsdatum
08.07.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08061-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Hörschwäche erhöht Demenzrisiko unabhängig von Beta-Amyloid

29.05.2024 Hörstörungen Nachrichten

Hört jemand im Alter schlecht, nimmt das Hirn- und Hippocampusvolumen besonders schnell ab, was auch mit einem beschleunigten kognitiven Abbau einhergeht. Und diese Prozesse scheinen sich unabhängig von der Amyloidablagerung zu ereignen.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.