Introduction
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is becoming an increasingly recognized etiology of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death [
1]. SCAD is characterized by a non-atherosclerotic, non-iatrogenic, and non-traumatic spontaneous tear in coronary arteries, which leads to a collapsed arterial lumen (true lumen) due to the formation of an intramural hematoma (IMH) (false lumen), resulting in compromised coronary blood flow and myocardial infarction (MI) [
2].
SCAD is responsible for 1–4% of ACS cases in the general population but is estimated to affect as many as 35% of women under 50 [
3]. It is one of the leading causes of pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction (PAMI) [
4]. Nevertheless, owing to its underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis with atherosclerotic ACS, its actual prevalence is higher than previously reported [
5]. Despite this, the etiology of SCAD remains uncertain. There is increasing interest in discovering the main risk factors and triggers behind its pathogenesis. The current knowledge of SCAD has mainly remained limited to single-center case reports and case series data, with only a handful of large-scale cohorts and no randomized clinical trials investigating its pathogenesis, management, and prognosis [
6‐
9]. Thus, exploring case reports and case series regarding SCAD could provide helpful information regarding disease characteristics and management. In addition, case reports and case series can provide insight into uncommon conditions that may be challenging for practitioners to diagnose and treat, offering guidance on how to manage these conditions.
Previous studies have suggested a minor role of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, except hypertension, in SCAD occurrence [
2]. Some factors that are believed to contribute to SCAD pathogenesis potentially include underlying arteriopathies (such as fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD)), female sex, pregnancy/other hormonal changes, systemic inflammatory conditions, and connective tissue disorders [
10]. One important predisposing factor includes psychophysical stress, and its role in SCAD has been introduced as a research priority and a key question by the American Heart Association [
2]. More than half of the patients afflicted with SCAD had experienced emotional (including the demise of a family member or marriage and workplace-related issues) or physical stress (including extreme aerobic or anaerobic physical activities, lifting heavy objects, intense Valsalva or coughing) preceding the presentation. The stress experienced by women was predominantly emotional, while that experienced by men was primarily physical [
2,
11].
In light of this information, despite the large existing cohorts of SCAD patients, we included only case series and case reports of SCAD patients because more detailed information is available in these types of studies. This systematic review aimed to exclusively evaluate the characteristics and management of patients experiencing SCAD following psychophysical stress.
Methods
Study design and search strategy
A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to January 7, 2023. The following keywords were used: “spontaneous coronary artery dissection” and “SCAD”. No restrictions on publication date or publication status were instituted. It is important to note that the search strategy did not include any terms related to stress because the majority of the articles that met the inclusion criteria described the stressful event rather than using the term ‘stress’.
Eligibility criteria
Two independent authors (P.R. and P.F.) evaluated studies for eligibility by screening titles and abstracts. Subsequently, the full texts of potentially eligible articles were evaluated according to the inclusion criteria. Disagreements were addressed by joint discussion and consensus of the two authors. Finally, all references of the included articles were comprehensively searched to find articles that might have been missed during the initial screening.
Case reports and case series were included if they described at least one patient who had experienced psychophysical stress preceding the onset of SCAD. In our study, psychophysical stress is defined broadly to encompass both rigorous physical activity and psychological events reported by the patient preceding the occurrence of SCAD. Specifically, any intense physical exertion or notable psychological event self-reported by the patient before the SCAD incident is considered indicative of psychophysical stress. In the case series, we only selected patients with psychophysical stress in the data analysis and excluded other reported patients. Patients presenting with pregnancy-associated SCAD (due to the unique and multifaceted stressors associated with pregnancy, which encompass both psychosocial and physiological aspects) or SCAD in the context of illicit drug use, as well as studies in languages other than English, without sufficient data, or with low quality (based on quality assessment method), were excluded.
Data were independently extracted by two authors (P.R. and P.F.). A third author verified the accuracy of data extraction and addressed any contradictions. Using Microsoft Excel 2019 version (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA), the following data categories were recorded: a) study-related characteristics (first author’s name, publication year, region of the study (according to the World Health Origination regions)), b) patient characteristics (age, sex, past medical history, habitual history), c) psychophysical stress-related characteristics (type, description, time interval with the SCAD occurrence), and d) SCAD-related characteristics (signs and symptoms, clinical diagnosis, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, dissected artery characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and follow-up events).
Quality appraisal
Two independent authors (P.R. and P.F.) assessed the quality of the case report/series. Disagreements were addressed by joint discussion and consensus by the two authors. The method proposed by Mohammad Hassan Murad et al. was used to assess the quality of case reports/series [
12]. The methodological quality of the case reports and case series was evaluated using six of the eight questions recommended in the referenced article (see Additional file
1). Scores of 5–6, 4, and 0–3 were considered “good,” “fair,” and “poor” studies in terms of quality, respectively. Articles with a score of less than four were excluded from our study.
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as mean ± SD and/or median with interquartile range. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate the relationships and differences among variables in the dataset. Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact tests were employed to assess associations among categorical variables. Comparisons between groups were performed using appropriate statistical tests such as the Independent Samples t-test for normally distributed variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables. The significance level for all performed tests was p value< 0.05.
Discussion
In this systematic review, we studied SCAD patients in whom emotional or physical stress was known as a possible trigger of SCAD. Here, we aimed to compare our findings with the overall data about SCAD from previous studies.
It is hypothesized that a combination of predisposing factors leads to higher susceptibility to having a SCAD event following a trigger. Female sex, pregnancy, physical or emotional stress, and FMD are among the known risk factors proposed by a large number of studies and are more likely to have underlying roles in its pathophysiology. The suggested hypothesis proposes that during physical or emotional stress a sudden catecholamine surge can cause an increase in arterial shear stress and lead to a stress tear of the vasa vasorum [
11]. However, this mechanism has not been fully investigated. A similar mechanism has been proposed in other stress-related cardiovascular conditions such as Takotsubo syndrome [
11,
108]. Endothelial dysfunction, the initial stage of atherosclerosis, is independently linked to cardiovascular events. Even individuals with few traditional risk factors but with peripheral endothelial dysfunction are at higher risk. Studies have shown mental stress impacts endothelial function, leading to oxidative stress and inflammation, which increase cardiovascular risk [
109]. This suggests that the endothelium plays a critical role in translating the physiological effects of mental stress into measurable cardiovascular risk. Additionally, study of Martin et al. [
110] showed that individuals with a history of apical ballooning syndrome exhibit abnormal microvascular function when stressed, leading to excessive blood vessel constriction and impaired dilation afterward. Further study revealed impaired responses to acetylcholine in the coronary arteries during mental stress, while responses to nitroglycerin remain intact, indicating endothelial dysfunction [
111].
SCAD tends to predominantly affect young or middle-aged women, most often in the peripartum period [
2]; surprisingly, in our study, 41.9% of reported stress-related SCAD occurred in men. This discrepancy might be potentially due to the exclusion of pregnancy-associated SCAD in our methods. In our study, the mean age of female patients was significantly higher than that of males likely due in part to excluding women in the peripartum period in the study methodology. However, a study has also reported this age difference [
112]. Consistent with the results of other studies [
112,
113], we found that SCAD patients whose attacks were precipitated by emotional stress were predominantly women, while physical stressors were reported more frequently in men. The study of Jaskanwal et al. [
114] examined a large group of patients with chest pain and nonobstructive CAD. It found that individuals with anxiety disorders, especially women, were more likely to have coronary endothelial dysfunction. This association persisted even after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and medication use. The findings suggest that anxiety disorders may contribute to the development of coronary endothelial dysfunction, particularly in women [
114]. We witnessed that the presence of coronary artery disease risk factors was consistent with other studies [
11,
112,
113,
115‐
118], wherein hypertension was the most common cardiovascular risk factor reported, and other classic risk factors for MI were not common.
Presently, SCAD patients are routinely screened for FMD due to a strong association, with FMD predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) [
2,
119]. In the study of Fahmy et al., approximately one-half of the male patients with SCAD had concomitant FMD [
112], whereas in our study, all of the FMD cases were women. Takotsubo syndrome and SCAD share key characteristics, prompting questions about a common pathophysiology [
120]. Moreover, some articles have proposed a chicken or egg causality between SCAD and Takotsubo syndrome [
120]. Recent research indicates that individuals diagnosed with Takotsubo syndrome tend to be older and have a higher prevalence of specific cardiovascular risk factors when compared to those with SCAD. Additionally, Takotsubo syndrome patients, despite their older age and greater cardiovascular risk factors, exhibit lower occurrences of depressive disorder or emotional triggers than SCAD patients [
121,
122]. Remarkably individuals with Takotsubo syndrome have a poorer prognosis in terms of in-hospital, mid-term, and long-term outcomes, with higher noncardiac mortality rates compared to SCAD patients [
121,
122]. However, it is worth noting that in propensity score-matched cohorts of middle-aged women, SCAD diagnosis resulted in worse long-term outcomes compared to Takotsubo syndrome, primarily due to an elevated risk of cardiac-related rehospitalization [
123]. Accordingly, in our study, four patients with stress-related SCAD had concomitant Takotsubo syndrome, and one was initially misdiagnosed with Takotsubo syndrome.
Regarding the clinical manifestations, some studies have reported non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) as the most common presentation of SCAD [
124,
125], but ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been more prevalent in SCAD patients in other studies [
112,
126]. Similarly, in our selected cases, ST elevation was the most common ECG finding. Additionally, some patients had arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, cardiac tamponade, and cardiac arrest. These presentations were also reported in previous studies [
127].
Coronary angiography has remains the diagnostic gold standard for SCAD [
128], yet instances of misdiagnosis (12.4% in this study) emphasize its limitations. Intracoronary imaging (IVUS or OCT) in SCAD poses potential risks, complicating the decision on their application in diagnosis or treatment alongside PCI [
129,
130]. Intracoronary imaging can be helpful for diagnostic confirmation of doubtful cases, especially type 3 SCAD [
130]. In our study, seven patients had multivessel SCAD. Although one study stated that clinical outcomes and long-term follow-up were similar between single-vessel and multivessel SCAD, the stroke rate was significantly higher in patients with multivessel SCAD [
131]. Overall, LAD is reported as the most frequently involved artery in SCAD [
8,
125], which was also true in our study. Saw et al. reported type 2 SCAD as the most prevalent angiographic appearance of SCAD [
125]. Similarly, the most common type of SCAD in stress-related cases was type 2, accounting for 64.7% of the cases in whom the SCAD type was reported.
Medical management versus revascularization in SCAD patients depends on hemodynamic stability and their thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade found on angiography [
132]. Prior meta-analyses indicated that conservative management of SCAD had similar outcomes comparing to the invasive management [
133,
134], but in our study, less than one-half of the patients received medical management. It is worth noting that PCI in SCAD patients is technically challenging, given that it can lead to a propagation of dissection and cutoff of coronary flow, putting patients at a higher risk for ischemia and myocardial damage. Despite large cohorts in which SCAD patients are more managed conservatively [
119], we witnessed conservative and revascularization strategies used in approximately equal numbers of patients. Therefore, this raises the question of whether this is either a bias of smaller case reports/series or whether patients with a predisposing psychosocial trigger have a slightly more severe phenotype at presentation. Studies have revealed that performing PCI in SCAD patients is challenging, and its success rate is lower than that of PCI in atherosclerotic disease [
9,
127].
The incidence of early post discharge readmission following MI and SCAD is considerable. Most readmissions are because of cardiac causes [
135]. Recurrence in SCAD occurs more frequently than recurrence in atherosclerotic MI [
8,
136]. In our study, 16 patients experienced recurrent SCAD during a median follow-up of 2 months. This observation is consistent with prior literature [
137], highlighting the importance of rigorous follow-up in the early post-SCAD period. In a large cohort of SCAD patients with low vascularization rates and high medical management, the recurrence rate was low [
119]. However, in our selected SCAD cases, 18 out of 22 recurrences were in individuals who received medical therapy. This discrepancy might be due to the small size of the study population, different demographics, or probably better aggressive treatment results. Investigating the reasons behind this and finding susceptible patients is of utmost importance to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality and prevent unnecessary interventions and hospitalizations. In a meta-analysis by Gerald et al. [
138], hypertension and FMD were major stressors for recurrence. In our series, stress-related SCAD recurrences were associated with neither arterial hypertension nor FMD. Additionally, Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, ADPKD, and Loeys–Dietz syndrome were present in patients with SCAD recurrence.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.