nach oben

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

12.04.2024 | Original Scientific Article

Tensile bond strength between paediatric prefabricated zirconia crowns and primary maxillary incisors when using various types of luting cements: an in vitro study

verfasst von: P. Pengpue, V. Sirimaharaj, P. Chaijareenont, W. Chinadet

Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

There is limited evidence regarding the most appropriate type of luting cement for paediatric prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) in primary maxillary incisors. The retention of PZCs is dependent on the bond strength of luting cement between PZCs and primary maxillary incisors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tensile bond strengths between PZCs and primary maxillary incisors with different types of luting cements.

Methods

Thirty freshly extracted human primary maxillary incisors were prepared and randomly divided into three groups corresponding to three luting cements: bioactive cement, resin cement, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and then restored with PZCs. Tensile bond strengths were evaluated by a universal testing machine. The results were analysed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).

Results

The means of the tensile bond strengths were 1.43 ± 0.85 MPa, 0.91 ± 0.63 MPa, and 0.56 ± 0.39 MPa for the bioactive cement, resin cement, and RMGIC groups, respectively. A significant difference in tensile bond strength was observed between the bioactive cement and the RMGIC group (p < 0.05) but there was no significant difference in tensile bond strength between the resin cement group and the others.

Conclusion

Types of luting cement influenced the tensile bond strength between PZCs and primary maxillary incisors. The bioactive cement showed higher tensile bond strength than the resin cement and RMGIC.

Al-Haj Ali SN, Farah RI. In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19:387–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0369-1.CrossRefPubMed

Alrashdi M, Ardoin J, Liu AJ. Zirconia crowns for children: A systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;32:66–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12793.CrossRefPubMed

André CB, Aguiar TR, Ayres AP, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dry and moist dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27:389–95. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242013000500002.CrossRefPubMed

Azab MM, Moheb DM, El Shahawy OI, Rashed MAM. Influence of luting cement on the clinical outcomes of zirconia pediatric crowns. A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30:314–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12607.CrossRefPubMed

Baig MS, Fleming GJ. Conventional glass-ionomer materials: a review of the developments in glass powder, polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement. J Dent. 2015;43:897–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.004.CrossRefPubMed

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:268–74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50.CrossRefPubMed

Chopra S, Bansal P, Vilekar AM, Aatish S, Sultan M, Uppal RS. Evaluating the solubility of various dental cements in artificial saliva in different mediums at different time intervals: In-Vitro Study. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2021;7:4692–701.

Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, Lou J. Comparison of amount of primary tooth reduction required for anterior and posterior zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:42–6.PubMed

Cohn C. Zirconia-prefabricated crowns for pediatric patients with primary dentition: Technique and Cementation for Esthetic Outcomes. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016;37:554–8.PubMed

Davis Jr C. Retentive cement strengths with passive fit primary anterior esthetic crowns. VCU Scholars Compass. 2012. https://doi.org/10.25772/Y28Z-0114.

Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;2005(93):551–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.CrossRef

Gosnell ES, Thikkurissy S. Management of dental caries and esthetic issues in the pediatric patient. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013;41:619–29.PubMed

Hirayama A. Experimental analytical electron microscopic studies on the quantitative analysis of elemental concentrations in biological thin specimens and its application to dental science. Shikwa Gakuho. 1990;90:1019–36.PubMed

Holsinger DM, Wells MH, Scarbecz M, Donaldson M. Clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction with pediatric zirconia anterior crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:192–7.PubMed

Jing L, Chen JW, Roggenkamp C, Suprono MS. Effect of crown preparation height on retention of a prefabricated primary posterior zirconia crown. Pediatr Dent. 2019;41:229–33.PubMed

Kachhara S, ARiga P, Jain AR. Recommended cementation for monolithic zirconia crowns. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10:566–568.

Kessler A, Kapor S, Erdelt K, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Syrek A, Güth JF, Kühnisch J. Two-body wear and fracture behaviour of an experimental paediatric composite crown in comparison to zirconia and stainless steel crowns dependent on the cementation mode. Dent Mater. 2021;37:264–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.010.CrossRefPubMed

Kim SY, Shin Y, Kim Ik-H, Song JS. In Vitro Study on the Bond Strength Between 3D-Printed Resin and Resin Cement for Pediatric Crown Restoration. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2023;50:104–12. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2023.50.1.104

Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:301–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lad PP, Kamath M, Tarale K, Kusugal PB. Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: A review. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6:116–20.PubMedPubMedCentral

Lin B, Khatri A, Hong M. Comparison of Fracture Strengths among different Commonly Placed Anterior Esthetic Restorations for Primary Dentition: An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul 1;45:171–76.https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-45.3.5

Manicone PF, Iommetti PR, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007;35:819–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008.CrossRefPubMed

NuSmile®. BioCem Universal BioActive Cement. BioCem White Paper Booklet v2_EMAIL.pdf. Accessed December 25, 2021.

Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;2015(17):7–26. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33525.CrossRef

Pameijer CH. A review of luting agents. Int J Dent. 2012: 752861–61. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/752861.

Pires CW, Soldera EB, Bonzanini LIL, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Montagner AF, Rocha RO. Is adhesive bond strength similar in primary and permanent Teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20:87–97. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40296.CrossRefPubMed

Rosato L, Chen J-W, Roggenkamp C, Su J-M. Retentive strengths for prefabricated primary molar zirconia crowns using five different cements. TJPD. 2018;18:127–35. https://doi.org/10.6319/TJPD.201809_18(4).0001.CrossRef

Salami A, Walia T, Bashiri R. Comparison of parental satisfaction with three tooth-colored full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary incisors. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39:423–8. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.423.

Scaminaci Russo D, Cinelli F, Sarti C, Giachetti L. Adhesion to zirconia: A systematic review of current conditioning methods and bonding materials. Dent J (basel). 2019;7:74. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030074.CrossRefPubMed

Stepp P, Morrow BR, Wells M, Tipton DA, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of cements in prefabricated zirconia crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2018;40:136–9.PubMed

Subsomboon T, Yavirach P, Chaijareenont P. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of zirconia Y-TZP bonded with resin cement. CM Dent J. 2018;39:31–46.

Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: Updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:163–70.PubMed

Walczak K, Rues S, Wieckiewicz M, Range U, Schmitter M. Is mechanical retention for adhesive core build-up needed to restore a vital tooth with a monolithic zirconium crown? - An in vitro study. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2016;18:117–25.PubMed

Yanover L, Tickotsky N, Waggoner W, Kupietzky A, Moskovitz M. Zirconia crown performance in primary maxillary anterior teeth: a retrospective photographic and radiographic cohort study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22:417–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00571-5.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Tensile bond strength between paediatric prefabricated zirconia crowns and primary maxillary incisors when using various types of luting cements: an in vitro study
verfasst von: P. Pengpue
V. Sirimaharaj
P. Chaijareenont
W. Chinadet
Publikationsdatum: 12.04.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
Print ISSN: 1818-6300
Elektronische ISSN: 1996-9805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-024-00890-x

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Tensile bond strength between paediatric prefabricated zirconia crowns and primary maxillary incisors when using various types of luting cements: an in vitro study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter