Introduction
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by the absence of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and is highly metastatic and lethal [
1,
2]. Although substantial efforts have gone into identifying treatments for TNBC in recent decades, the median survival time of TNBC patients is still less than 15 months largely due to the absence of effective drugs in the clinic [
3,
4]. Since its discovery, TNBC has been a challenge in the cancer treatment field [
3‐
5], warranting the discovery of novel, potent therapeutics against TNBC.
TNBC has multiple genetic and epigenetic abnormalities. It was recently reported that 411 genes were overexpressed in TNBC tumor tissue compared to normal breast tissue and that multiple tumorigenic and metastatic signaling pathways were aberrantly activated [
6,
7]. TNBC cells possess high migratory and invasive abilities and easily disseminate from the primary tumor site to multiple distant organs, such as lung, bone, liver, and brain, resulting in organ dysfunction and patient death [
8‐
10].
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) seems to play a pivotal role in TNBC initiation, metastasis, and drug resistance [
9,
11,
12]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that aberrant overexpression of EMT-inducing genes, such as
Twist1, Snail1, Snail2, Zeb1, Zeb2, N-cadherin, and the master stemness gene
Notch1, triggers cell de-differentiation and cancer stem cell genesis [
8,
9,
11]. Particularly, concurrent overexpression of the oncogenic genes
Twist1, Snail1, and
Notch1 strongly induces EMT and enhances stemness, thereby inducing cancer and metastasis [
9,
11‐
14].
Twist1 is a master EMT-inducing gene and plays a critical role in cancer metastasis in various malignant tumors [
7].
Twist1 overexpression promotes TNBC metastasis and is associated with poor prognosis of TNBC patients [
13,
15]. Accordingly, Twist1 has been a target for the development of therapeutics against TNBC [
16‐
19]. Several small molecules, such as thymoquinone [
16] and tamoxifen [
17], reduce
Twist1 expression in cell and animal models and inhibit TNBC cell migration and invasion in vitro; however, these agents exert only moderate efficacy and have not yet entered clinical trials. Therefore, potent Twist1-targeted therapeutics remain to be explored.
Notch1 is an essential gene for cancer stem cell genesis and is a hallmark of TNBC [
20‐
23]. Overexpression of
Notch1 is closely associated with a poor prognosis in TNBC patients [
24]. Accordingly, Notch1 suppression is a potential strategy for cancer therapy [
25‐
29]. However, Notch1-targeted drugs against TNBC have not advanced to clinical trials due to low anti-cancer efficacy in preclinical studies [
23]. Thus, there is a critical need for effective Notch1-targeted therapeutics for TNBC. Since multiple oncogenic genes and signal pathways contribute to the progression of TNBC, targeting a single
Notch 1 gene appears to run short of ways in dealing with the situation of TNBC progression, suggesting that concurrently targeting multiple tumorigenic genes and signaling pathways are sensible strategy for TNBC therapy.
TNBC cells gain high tumorigenic and metastatic capabilities via gene mutation and also exhibit aberrant gene overexpression. Because multiple oncogenic genes are simultaneously overexpressed in TBNC [
6‐
9], targeting a single gene is typically insufficient to treat the disease. Therefore, we hypothesized that concurrently targeting multiple oncogenic genes, such as
Twist1 and
Notch1, may increase anti-TNBC efficacy, and we explored active components with potential anti-TNBC effects from the traditional Chinese medicinal herbs. Our results showed that triptonide (MW:358 Da), a small molecule from the traditional Chinese medicinal herb
Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F [
30,
31], exerted potent anti-TNBC effects.
It was recently reported that triptonide exerts strong inhibitory effects on acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and pancreatic cancer via reducing cancer cell stemness and oncogenic signaling pathways, and suppressing cancer cell tumorigenesis and vasculogenic mimicry [
32‐
38]. More recently, Gao et al. reported that triptonide inhibits TNBC cell tumorigenesis via downregulation of several cancer stem cell-associated genes, up-regulation of Snail1 expression, and induction of a Snail1-associated feedback mechanism for triptonide resistance [
39]. Of note, it is well known that Smail1 is aberrantly overexpressed in various types of malignant tumors including TNBC [
40‐
43], overexpression of Snail triggers EMT [
42,
44‐
47], carcinogenesis [
48‐
51], and drug resistance [
52,
53], and is closely associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients [
40,
43,
46,
47,
50,
51]. Accordingly, inhibition of Snail1 in cancer has become a new strategy for developing cancer therapeutics [
52‐
54]. Therefore, the effect of triptonide on Snail expression in TNBC cells remains to be verified, and the mechanisms underlying triptonide-mediated anti-TNBC need to be elucidated.
In the current investigation, we found that triptonide potently suppressed TNBC cell migration, invasion, and angiogenesis in vitro and effectively suppressed tumor growth and metastasis in xenografted mice. This effect was mediated by triptonide-induced Twist1 and Notch1 protein degradation, which consequently inhibited downstream NF-κB signaling, suppressing the expression of angiogenic and metastatic genes VE-cadherin, VEGFR2, and N-cadherin. Of note, triptonide does not increase Snail1 expression in TNBC cell lines we tested. Our findings provide a new strategy for concurrently inhibition of multiple oncogenic genes and tumorigenic signaling pathways in TNBC and offer a novel drug candidate against metastatic TNBC.
Methods
Materials
Triptonide was from Chengdu Must Biotech Ltd. with a purity > 98%. MG132, cycloheximide, and chloroquine diphosphate were from MCE (Shanghai, China). Revert Aid TM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit was from Fermentas Life Sciences (Walsham, Massachusetts). Rabbit monoclonal antibody to Notch1 and other signaling proteins were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Mouse and Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to Twist1 were from ABCAM (Cambridge, UK). Breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and BT-549 were from ATCC (Rockefeller, Maryland).
Cell culture
TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and BT-549 were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (complete medium). The cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO
2 as we described previously [
32].
Tumor xenograft mice and triptonide treatment
The tumor xenograft mice were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Soochow University as previously reported [
35,
38]. In brief, 10
7 MDA-MB-231 cells were injected into the breast of NOD-SCID female mice (18–22 g) and the mice were randomly divided into two groups (triptonide treatment group and control group, 5 mice/group). After 10 days when the tumors grew up, triptonide in saline at a dose of 3 mg/kg or saline as a control was intraperitoneally injected daily for 95 days. Tumor size was measured and tumor volume was calculated according to the formula: tumor volume = 0.55 × length × width
2. After 95 days of triptonide treatment, the mice were sacrificed. The lungs and other important organs were isolated, weighed, washed with PBS, fixed with formaldehyde, sectioned, and analyzed by hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were first seeded onto glass cover slips for 24 h, then treated with triptonide at the concentrations of 0–10 nM for 72 h. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated with primary antibody against Twist1 at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies, counterstained with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and subjected to be imaged under confocal microscopy [
36].
Immunohistochemical staining
The lung tumor tissues from xenografted mice were sectioned, and the slides were stained with anti-Twist1 primary antibody at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature, and stained with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution. The slides were imaged using Leica microscope.
Cell growth analysis
MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were incubated with triptonide at the concentrations of 0–320 nM for 70 h; 10 μL MTT solution was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The dual fluorescence wavelength absorbance at 560 and 590 nm was measured using SpectraMax M5 reader, respectively. The IC50, defined as the drug concentration at which cell growth was inhibited by 50%, was assessed by SPSS 16.0.
MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with triptonide at the concentrations of 0–10 nM for 72 h; the viable cells were harvested, and counted. The 5000 viable cells together with 0.5% low melting agarose were seeded into the 35 mm dishes and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO
2 for 10 days in the absence of triptonide; the number of colonies was counted under a Zoom-Stereo microscope SZX16 as we previously described [
55].
Cell migration assay
MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were seeded in six-well plates and incubated for 24 h, and then, the cell monolayer was wounded by a plastic tip. The wounded monolayer was then incubated with triptonide at the concentrations of 0–10 nM for 24 h. The migrated tumor cells were stained with Wright-Giemsa solution, imaged under a microscopy using five randomly chosen fields for each well, and statistically analyzed.
Cell invasion assay
The MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded into the upper chambers of trans-well plate pre-coated with 12.5% Matrigel at a density of 2.0 × 10
5 cells/mL and incubated without or with triptonide at the concentrations of 0–10 nM. After 24 h, the invaded cells in the lower chamber were fixed, stained with Wright-Giemsa solution, and photographed as we described before [
56].
MDA-MB-231 cells were pre-treated with triptonide at the concentrations of 0–10 nM for 72 h and the viable 2 × 104 cells in 0.5 ml DMEM complete medium were transferred to each well of a 24-well plate containing 0.3 mL Matrigel matrix. After incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 8 h, the tubes were fixed and stained with Wright-Giemsa solution, and photographed by OLYMPUS FSX-100 microscope.
RT-PCR and real-time quantitative PCR
Total RNA was extracted from triptonide-treated cells, and reversely transcribed into cDNA using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. RT-PCR and real-time quantitative PCR (QT-PCR) were performed with SYBRGreen protocol as we previously described [
57]. The primers of RT-PCR and QT-PCR are listed in the Additional file
1: Tables S1 and S2, respectively.
Western blotting
Proteins from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were extracted using the M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Kit. Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto each lane and resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with tris–glycine running buffer, and the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with HRP-coupled secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagents and exposed to X-ray film as we reported before [
38].
Statistical analysis
All results represent the mean ± S.E. Differences between the groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 7.02. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Student's t test, and the significance of differences was indicated as *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.
Discussion
The initiation and metastasis of TNBC are driven by the overexpression of numerous oncogenic genes and aberrant activation of multiple tumorigenic signaling pathways [
6‐
10]. Despite decades of research, druggable targets for TNBC have been difficult to identify [
3,
5,
12,
58], which has hindered the development of effective therapeutics for the disease. In the current study, we explored the ability of an active compound to inhibit TNBC cell tumorigenesis and dissemination in vitro and in vivo. Triptonide triggered the degradation of the Twist1 and Notch1 oncoproteins and inhibited NF-κB signaling and expression of
VE-cadherin,
VEGFR2, and
N-cadherin in TNBC, resulting in potent suppression of TNBC cell tumorigenesis and metastasis. These data suggest that concurrent degradation of the oncoproteins Twist1 and Notch1 and subsequent inhibition of downstream metastatic genes and signaling pathways reverse the aggressive and metastatic phenotypes of TNBC. Our findings provide a new strategy for effectively inhibiting TNBC metastasis and offer a new drug candidate for TNBC treatment.
Twist1 functions as a transcription factor to drive the transcription of numerous oncogenic genes, and the overexpression of Twist1 triggers EMT and cancer metastasis [
12,
13,
15,
59]. The reduction of Twist1 expression by thymoquinone [
16] and tamoxifen [
17] significantly inhibits TNBC tumor growth and metastasis and reverses drug resistance in an in vitro tumor cell model and in mice [
16‐
19]. However, the efficacy of these anti-TNBC agents is generally moderate with no effective TNBC therapeutics in the clinic. In this investigation, we found that 10 nM triptonide nearly eliminates Twist1 protein expression in TNBC cells, which is more potent than other agents reported in the literature [
16‐
19]. Our data indicate that triptonide is a novel, potent Twist1 protein inhibitor, warranting further development of Twist1-targeted drugs for the treatment of TNBC and other types of cancer with aberrant overexpression of Twist1.
Notch1 is a cell surface receptor that plays a pivotal role in supporting tumor cell stemness, EMT, and metastasis [
10,
14]. Overexpression of
Notch1 and the activation of the Notch1 signaling pathway are associated with poor prognosis in TNBC patients [
24]. However, the efficacy of Notch1-based therapeutics against TNBC has been only moderate and Notch1-targeted drugs are absent in the clinic. In the current study, we found that 10 nM triptonide triggered significant Notch1 degradation in TNBC cells, suggesting that triptonide is a novel and potent Notch1 inhibitor. Whether triptonide directly binds to Twist1 and Notch1 proteins in TNBC and other cancer cells remains to be determined.
Notch1 lies upstream of the transcription factor NF-κB [
60], which promotes the expression of numerous angiogenic and metastatic genes [
61,
62]. In this study, triptonide significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of NF-κB in TNBC cells, thereby suppressing the expression of numerous oncogenic genes and inhibiting tumorigenesis and cancer metastasis.
Angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry play critical roles in tumor growth and cancer metastasis. Several anti-angiogenic drugs, such as Avastin and Sunitinib, have been used in cancer therapy; unfortunately, current anti-angiogenic drugs fail to cure TNBC patients and may actually promote TNBC invasion and metastasis by triggering tumor cell-mediated vasculogenic mimicry [
63]. To date, effective drugs that suppress tumor vasculogenic mimicry are absent in the clinic. Triptonide potently suppressed the ability of TNBC cells to form tube-like structures, which is consistent with our recent report that triptonide strongly inhibits vasculogenic mimicry mediated by pancreatic cancer cells [
34]. Our mechanistic studies revealed that triptonide suppresses expression of the angiogenic
VE-cadherin and
VEGFR2 genes, thereby reducing TNBC angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry. Our findings provide a new approach for targeting TNBC angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry.
As mentioned above, Gao et al. reported that triptonide diminishes TNBC tumor growth via inhibiting expression of several stemness genes, but promoting Snail1 overexpression and induces a Snail-associated feedback mechanism of triptonide-resistance in a single in vitro-produced triptonide-resistant HCC1806 cell line [
39]; however, whether triptonide affects Snail1 expression in TNBC cell lines without in vitro artificial induction of triptonide-resistance has not been addressed in the paper [
39]. In the current investigation, our data showed that the levels of Snail mRNA and protein in the TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 were not significantly affected by triptonide. These data suggest that the effect of triptonide on Snail1 expression may be limited only in the in vitro produced triptonide-resistant HCC1806 cell line, but is uncommon in TNBC cell lines. Of note, overexpression of the transcription factor Snail drives overexpression of various oncogenic and metastatic genes, activates multiple tumorigenic signaling pathways, and promotes EMT, tumorigenesis, cancer metastasis, and drug resistance [
44‐
53]. Therefore, up-regulation of Snail1 should not be good idea for cancer therapy; instead, suppression of Snail1 should be a sensible strategy for treatment of malignant tumors.
Triptonide exerts anti-cancer effects through down-regulation of various oncogenic genes, including β-catenin, cMyc, Notch1, LXRα, SREBF1 [
32‐
38,
64], particularly, triptonide directly binds to its receptor LXRα, reduces LXRα protein stability in pancreatic cancer cells, and exerts potent anti-cancer effect [
32‐
38,
64]. In the current investigation, we found that triptonide triggers degradation of Twist1 and Notch1 oncoproteins in TNBC cells. Our study reveals a new mechanism of triptonide-mediated tumor suppression.
Triptonide exerts strong anti-cancer effects [
32‐
36,
38,
64] with low toxicity in mice [
31,
65], making it an attractive small molecule for TNBC drug development. Furthermore, the combination of triptonide with currently available chemotherapeutics, immunotherapies, and radiotherapy may help shape the future landscape of TNBC treatment.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.