Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 12/2023

Open Access 29.09.2023 | Original Article

Use of ionizing radiation in a Norwegian cohort of children with congenital heart disease: imaging frequency and radiation dose for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) study

verfasst von: Susmita Afroz, Bjørn H. Østerås, Utheya S. Thevathas, Gaute Dohlen, Caroline Stokke, Trude E. Robsahm, Hilde M. Olerud

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2023

Abstract

Background

The European-funded Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) project is a multicenter cohort study assessing the long-term effects of ionizing radiation in patients with congenital heart disease. Knowledge is lacking regarding the use of ionizing radiation from sources other than cardiac catheterization in this cohort.

Objective

This study aims to assess imaging frequency and radiation dose (excluding cardiac catheterization) to patients from a single center participating in the Norwegian HARMONIC project.

Materials and methods

Between 2000 and 2020, we recruited 3,609 patients treated for congenital heart disease (age < 18 years), with 33,768 examinations categorized by modality and body region. Data were retrieved from the radiology information system. Effective doses were estimated using International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 conversion factors, and the analysis was stratified into six age categories: newborn; 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and late adolescence.

Results

The examination distribution was as follows: 91.0% conventional radiography, 4.0% computed tomography (CT), 3.6% diagnostic fluoroscopy, 1.2% nuclear medicine, and 0.3% noncardiac intervention. In the newborn to 15 years age categories, 4–12% had ≥ ten conventional radiography studies, 1–8% underwent CT, and 0.3–2.5% received nuclear medicine examinations. The median effective dose ranged from 0.008–0.02 mSv and from 0.76–3.47 mSv for thoracic conventional radiography and thoracic CT, respectively. The total effective dose burden from thoracic conventional radiography ranged between 28–65% of the dose burden from thoracic CT in various age categories (40% for all ages combined). The median effective dose for nuclear medicine lung perfusion was 0.6–0.86 mSv and for gastrointestinal fluoroscopy 0.17–0.27 mSv. Because of their low frequency, these procedures contributed less to the total effective dose than thoracic radiography.

Conclusion

This study shows that CT made the largest contribution to the radiation dose from imaging (excluding cardiac intervention). However, although the dose per conventional radiograph was low, the large number of examinations resulted in a substantial total effective dose. Therefore, it is important to consider the frequency of conventional radiography while calculating cumulative dose for individuals. The findings of this study will help the HARMONIC project to improve risk assessment by minimizing the uncertainty associated with cumulative dose calculations.

Graphical Abstract

Begleitmaterial
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

Supplementary material is available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00247-023-05774-8.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most prevalent type of major birth defect, occurring in approximately 0.8% of live births worldwide [1]. Many individuals with CHD undergo life-saving cardiac catheterization procedures that result in substantial exposure to ionizing radiation, with frequent cumulative organ doses greater than 1,000 mGy [2, 3]. The radiation dose to the lungs and heart generally ranges from 5–20 mGy, occasionally exceeding 100 mGy [47]. In addition, many reports raise concern that the frequency of computed tomography (CT) examinations for patients with CHD is increasing [8, 9]. This could lead to an increased radiation dose, even though the dose per CT examination is decreasing, especially in the cardiac region due to faster scans and the possibility of imaging the entire heart in a single heartbeat [10, 11]. With the increasing long-term survival of these patients, there is growing concern about the potential late health effects of radiation exposure [12], particularly since children are more susceptible to radiation effects and damage than adults [12, 13].
The estimation of risks associated with ionizing radiation is largely based on models derived from atomic bomb survivors, nuclear workers, groups of individuals treated using radiotherapy, or occupational exposure [14, 15]. In recent years, a few pediatric cohorts have been used to study the long-term health effects of radiation exposure from pediatric CT and cardiac fluoroscopy, indicating increased cancer risk and mortality [1620].
As children with CHD are exposed to substantial amounts of ionizing radiation, they are a suitable group for studies on the later health effects of radiation. Recently, these patients have become the focus of the European Union-funded multicenter Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) study (https://​harmonicproject.​eu/​) (2019–2024). The HARMONIC project’s objective is to develop a European cohort of children with CHD for long-term follow-up. The project aims to provide estimates of radiation exposure and associated risks of radiation-induced health effects [14]. The dosimetric approach involves thorough individual assessments of radiation doses from cardiac catheterization procedures. However, these children are exposed to other sources of medical ionizing radiation, both related and unrelated to their CHD. These additional exposures need to be considered in the epidemiological analysis of late effects of radiation; otherwise, patients’ risk from the procedures related to CHD may be overestimated. Published data on examination frequency and doses are limited [13, 2123]. Therefore, both age-specific and cohort-specific information regarding additional examinations is required. Such an overview would also be beneficial for clinicians and hospitals when evaluating the cost and benefit of patient imaging follow-up and to increase awareness of the cumulative radiation dose and dose contribution from different modalities.
The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and radiation dose contribution of conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, nuclear medicine (NM), and noncardiac intervention among Norwegian patients with CHD, stratified by age. The major contributors by modality and examination region were compared to identify the major sources of radiation exposure. These data will provide input to the multicenter HARMONIC project and facilitate further risk assessment related to radiation exposure.

Materials and methods

Norwegian cohort and data source

This retrospective study was approved by the Norwegian regional committees for medical and health research ethics (REK) and institutional data protection officer (PVO). As part of the HARMONIC project, we are establishing a Norwegian national cohort of patients with CHD based on the criteria set by HARMONIC [14]. This includes patients who have undergone at least one cardiac catheterization procedure before the age of 18 years, which may be interventional or diagnostic. Patient records were obtained from the local patient registers at the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital. The cohort represents national data, as Oslo University Hospital plays a national role in pediatric cardiology. From 1990 to 2020, the cohort included 4,086 patients.
The flowchart (Fig. 1) shows the inclusion of patients and examinations in this study. Of the current Norwegian HARMONIC cohort of 4,086 patients, 3,609 were under the age of 18 years between 2000 and 2021. In this study, examinations were included up to the end of 2021, but the inclusion of new patients was stopped in 2020. This cut-off point was chosen as it covers all examinations recorded in the radiology information system (RIS) from 2000 to 2021.
We retrieved data on 33,768 examinations (conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, NM, and noncardiac intervention) from the RIS, including age at examination, sex, examination name and date, dose area product (DAP), dose length product (DLP), and fluoroscopy time. The available records of the machine models and manufacturers are provided in Supplementary Material 1. A total of 9,673 (out of 30,692) conventional radiography, 892 (out of 1,235) diagnostic fluoroscopy, and 59 (out of 100) noncardiac interventional examinations reporting DAP, 713 (out of 1,330) CT examinations reporting DLP, and all 412 NM examinations using population-weighted administered activity were used for dose calculation. There is no obvious time pattern for the missing data.

Categorization of radiological procedures

The examination frequency and probability were counted for each modality: conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, NM, and noncardiac intervention. Examination type and body region were classified according to the European Commission DOSE DATAMED methodology (RP154, RP180), except for NM, as radioactivity is injected [24, 25].

Comparison of doses by modality

To compare doses from different modalities, we used published conversion factors to estimate the effective dose for pediatric patients, all based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 60 recommendation [26]. For conventional radiography, diagnostic fluoroscopy, and noncardiac intervention, the conversion factors were based on the DAP [27], whereas for CT, they were based on DLP [28]. For NM, we used the weight chart by age for Norwegian children from the study conducted by Júlíusson et al. [29] and calculated the administered activity following the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) dosage card version 5.7.2016 [30]. Conversion factors between the administered activity and effective dose for NM examinations were obtained from ICRP Publication 128 [31]. To assess the total radiation exposure for this cohort, we estimated the total effective dose given to all patients in each of the age categories over the study period (2000–2020), based on the median effective dose per examination and the respective examination frequency of various types and modalities. It should be noted that, within HARMONIC, the estimation of organ doses from cardiac catheterization procedures will be performed as described by Harbron et al. [14]. Therefore, they were not included in this study.

Data analysis

The analyses were performed across six age categories according to the HARMONIC study protocol—newborn (0–3 months), 1 year (4–30 months), 5 years (31–90 months), 10 years (91–150 months), 15 years (151–210 months), and late adolescence (211–216 months)—based on the patient’s age at the time of examination. Data analyses were conducted using Stata version 17 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX) [32]. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the radiation exposure data. The probability of a patient undergoing an examination using a given modality was calculated across different age categories. The probability is presented here as the proportion of the total number of patients.

Results

Frequency and probability by modality

The number of patients and examinations stratified by modality and age is shown in Table 1. Of the 3,609 patients, 2,662 (73.8%) were imaged using one or more of the following procedures: conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, NM, or noncardiac intervention. The remaining patients were examined using ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, or not at all. The most used modality was conventional radiography (about 91% of examinations), while CT (about 3.9%) and diagnostic fluoroscopy (3.4%) were also used. NM (1.2%) and noncardiac intervention (0.3%) were used less frequently. The examination frequency by modality varied across age categories, with conventional radiography and diagnostic fluoroscopy being used more frequently for young patients and decreasing with age, whereas CT, NM, and noncardiac intervention showed no clear trend.
Table 1
Examination frequency stratified by age and modality for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) cohort of Norwegian patients with congenital heart disease
Age categorya
Number of patients examinedb (%)
Total number of examinations
Conventional radiography
CT
Diagnostic fluoroscopy
NM
Noncardiac intervention
0–3 m (newborn)
(n =1,773)
561 (31.6%)
4,785
178
157
20
16
4–30 m (1 year)
(n =2,111)
1,240 (58.7%)
9,539
293
410
86
29
31–90 m (5 years)
(n =2,782)
1,195 (43%)
6,894
248
323
103
22
91–150 m (10 years)
(n =3,100)
830 (26.8%)
4,715
292
204
119
7
151–210 m (15 years)
(n =2,954)
884 (29.9%)
4,492
297
137
74
24
211–216 m (late adolescents)
(n =2,473)
163 (6.6%)
267
22
4
10
1
 
Total
30,692
1,330
1,235
412
99
aSome patients may fall into multiple age categories if procedures were performed at different ages. bPatients who had at least one conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, NM, or noncardiac intervention
CT computed tomography, m months, NM nuclear medicine
Many patients underwent multiple examinations using the same modality within the same age category (Table 2). A substantial proportion of patients (20–45% across age categories up to 210 months) received 1–9 conventional radiography examinations. Over 10% of children in both the newborn and the 4–30 months category had ten or more such examinations; this frequency was reduced for older patients. For CT, 5–7.5% of patients had at least one CT, with 1.8–3% having multiple in each age category (up to 210 months). For diagnostic fluoroscopy, approximately 3–9% of patients had an examination in each age category, with most occurring at 4–30 months (about 4% of patients had multiple procedures) and 31–90 months (about 2% had multiple procedures). NM examinations were approximately 1–2.5% of patients (in each age category up to 210 months). Noncardiac intervention was performed on less than 1% of patients in each age category.
Table 2
Probability distribution of examinations by modality in six age categories for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) cohort of Norwegian patients with congenital heart disease
Age category
Number of examinations
Proportion of patients
Conventional radiography
CT
Diagnostic fluoroscopy
NM
Noncardiac intervention
0–3 m (newborn)
(n =1,773)
0
69.1
92.4
96.0
99.0
99.2
1
5.4
5.8
1.8
0.9
0.8
2–9
15.4
1.8
2.1
0.1
0.1
 ≥ 10
10.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
4–30 m (1 year)
(n =2,111)
0
41.9
92.3
91.0
97.5
99.1
1
7.9
4.6
4.8
1.4
0.6
2–9
38.0
3.1
4.1
1.1
0.3
 ≥ 10
12.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
31–90 m (5 years)
(n =2,782)
0
58.1
94.6
94.0
97.6
99.4
1
8.2
3.7
3.9
1.6
0.5
2–9
27.6
1.7
1.9
0.8
0.1
 ≥ 10
6.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
91–150 m (10 years)
(n =3,100)
0
74.1
94.9
96.7
97.6
99.8
1
6.7
3.0
1.9
1.5
0.2
2–9
15.1
2.0
1.3
0.8
0.0
 ≥ 10
4.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
151–210 m (15 years)
(n =2,954)
0
71.3
93.6
97.1
98.1
99.5
1
7.4
4.6
2.0
1.4
0.3
2–9
17.4
1.8
0.9
0.5
0.2
 ≥ 10
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
211–216 m (late adolescents)
(n =2,473)
0
93.9
99.2
99.8
99.7
99.96
1
4.1
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.04
2–9
1.9
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
 ≥ 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CT computed tomography, m months, NM nuclear medicine

Frequent examination types

The most frequent examinations for conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, and NM are shown in Table 3. Approximately 90.1% of the 30,692 conventional radiography examinations (on 2,639 [73.1%] patients) were anteroposterior and lateral thorax (52%), anteroposterior thorax (45%), spine for scoliosis (2%), and abdominal radiographs (1%). Nearly 52.5% of the 1,330 CT examinations (on 580 [16.1%] patients) were performed on the thorax (58%), head (35%), and abdomen (7%). A patient receiving a head CT usually had more than two examinations, while those that had a thoracic CT received an average of 1.7 examinations. Of the 1,235 diagnostic fluoroscopy examinations (on 485 [13.4%] patients), 31.1% were performed on the chest/thorax and esophagus. Of the 412 NM examinations (on 214 [5.9%] patients), 58.3% were lung perfusion and myocardial perfusion studies.
Table 3
Most frequent examinations for each modality in the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) cohort of Norwegian patients with congenital heart disease
Examination modality
Most frequent examinations
Number of examinations
Number of patients
Conventional radiography
AP and lateral thorax
14,421
2,393
AP thorax
12,416
958
Scoliosis
507
102
Abdomen
299
172
CT
Thorax
403
234
Head
244
117
Abdomen
51
40
Diagnostic fluoroscopy
Chest/thorax
214
152
Esophagus
170
92
NM
Lung perfusion
181
105
Myocardial perfusion
59
38
Noncardiac intervention
NA
-
-
AP anteroposterior, CT computed tomography, NA not available, NM nuclear medicine
The probability distributions of the four most common radiological examinations (radiographs of the thorax, CT thorax, fluoroscopy thorax, and NM lung perfusion) by age category are presented in Table 4. Notably, patients in the 4‒30 months and 31‒90 months categories had a higher likelihood of having three or more thoracic radiographs compared to those in the other age categories.
Table 4
Probability distribution of the four most common examination types from different modalities in six age categories for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) cohort of Norwegian patients with congenital heart disease
Age category
Number of examinations
Proportion of patients
X-ray thorax
CT thorax
Fluoroscopy thorax
NM lung perfusion
0–3 m (newborn)
(n =1,773)
0
82.5
97.9
99.8
99.8
1
8.4
1.9
0.2
0.2
2
4.8
0.2
0.1
0.1
 ≥ 3–11
4.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
4–30 m (1 year)
(n =2,111)
0
49.9
96.1
97.8
98.7
1
7.6
2.6
1.7
1.0
2
13.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
 ≥ 3–26
28.7
0.7
0.1
0.0
31–90 m (5 years)
(n =2,782)
0
63.5
97.8
97.7
98.6
1
7.3
1.5
1.8
1.1
2
9.5
0.4
0.4
0.2
 ≥ 3–45
19.7
0.3
0.1
0.1
91–150 m (10 years)
(n =3,100)
0
78.1
98.5
99.2
98.8
1
6.2
1.0
0.5
0.8
2
4.0
0.4
0.2
0.2
 ≥ 3–38
11.7
0.2
0.1
0.2
151–210 m (15 years)
(n =2,954)
0
75.1
98.3
99.5
99.3
1
7.3
1.4
0.5
0.4
2
5.4
0.3
0.0
0.2
 ≥ 3–23
12.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
211–216 m (late adolescents)
(n =2,473)
0
95.2
99.8
99.96
99.96
1
3.4
0.2
0.04
0.0
2
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.04
 ≥ 3–12
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
CT computed tomography, m months, NM nuclear medicine

Effective dose by modality, body region and age category

Most examinations were conducted on the thoracic region. The DAP or DLP and the effective dose per examination for thoracic conventional radiography, thoracic CT, and gastrointestinal fluoroscopy are displayed in Table 5. The effective dose was highest for CT scans across all age categories.
Table 5
Median and interquartile range of dose area product, dose length product and effective dose values in conventional radiography, computed tomography and diagnostic fluoroscopy performed mostly of the thoracic region for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) cohort of Norwegian patients with congenital heart disease
Modality
Body Region
Age category
Number of examinations
Number of examinations with DAP/DLP
Median (IQR) DAP (Gycm2)
Median (IQR) DLP (mGycm)
Median (IQR) effective dose (mSv)
Conventional radiography
Thorax
0–3 m (newborn)
4,615
428
0.01 (0.004–0.01)
 
0.012 (0.01–0.02)
4–30 m (1 year)
9,322
2,376
0.01 (0.01–0.02)
 
0.008 (0.005–0.01)
31–90 m (5 years)
6,567
2,780
0.02 (0.01–0.04)
 
0.008 (0.004–0.02)
91–150 m (10 years)
4,216
1,910
0.05 (0.03–0.07)
 
0.013 (0.01–0.02)
151–210 m (15 years)
3,840
1,323
0.08 (0.06–0.12)
 
0.013 (0.01–0.02)
211–216 m (late adolescents)
177
19
0.13 (0.1–0.17)
 
0.020 (0.02–0.03)
CT
Thorax
0–3 m (newborn)
58
27
 
61.04 (43.1–65.65)
2.38 (1.68–2.56)
4–30 m (1 year)
138
51
 
54.00 (23–88.65)
1.40 (0.59–2.30)
31–90 m (5 years)
104
48
 
42.30 (25.81–69.73)
0.76 (0.46–1.26)
91–150 m (10 years)
94
44
 
72.14 (36.36–126.65)
0.94 (0.47–1.65)
151–210 m (15 years)
75
41
 
169.65 (58–248.15)
2.38 (0.81–3.47)
211–216 m (late adolescents)
6
2
 
247.50 (154–341)
3.47 (2.16–4.77)
Diagnostic fluoroscopy
Gastrointestinal tract (neck + chest + abdomen)
0–3 m (newborn)
91
74
0.15 (0.07–0.27)
 
0.27 (0.12–0.48)
4–30 m (1 year)
197
121
0.30 (0.15–0.50)
 
0.23 (0.11–0.38)
31–90 m (5 years)
83
63
0.44 (0.19–0.78)
 
0.22 (0.09–0.38)
91–150 m (10 years)
32
25
0.54 (0.18–0.99)
 
0.18 (0.06–0.33)
151–210 m (15 years)
23
15
0.77 (0.28–1.24)
 
0.17 (0.06–0.27)
211–216 m (late adolescents)
0
0
-
 
-
CT computed tomography, DAP dose area product, DLP dose length product, IQR interquartile range, m months
The DAP, DLP, and effective dose per examination for conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, and noncardiac intervention stratified by body region (except noncardiac intervention) and age category are available in Supplementary Material 2. Median DAP and effective dose values were consistent across age for conventional radiography, except for the trunk region, where DAP was higher for patients between ten years and late adolescence than for younger patients. The median effective dose from head CT was largest for newborns (2.59 mSv) and decreased to 0.38 mSv for late adolescents. For diagnostic fluoroscopy, the effective dose values did not differ substantially between the gastrointestinal (0.17–0.27 mSv) and urogenital tracts (0.10–0.22 mSv). However, all angiography (excluding the heart) resulted in greater DAP and fluoroscopy time values than other fluoroscopy examinations, across all age categories. Because of the small number of examinations, noncardiac interventions were grouped together, regardless of body region. The DAP values for noncardiac interventions increased with age, likely due to increased weight with age.
The effective dose from NM examinations depends on radiopharmaceutical and age; the latter is also used to estimate injected activity from age-specific population weight. The highest effective dose was estimated at 9–15 mSv for lung ventilation using 99mTc-labeled technegas, whereas the lowest dose was estimated for renography using 99mTc-labeled mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG3), assuming normal renal function (Table 6).
Table 6
Estimation of dose from most frequent nuclear medicine examinations for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) cohort of Norwegian patients with congenital heart disease
Examination
Age category
Radio-pharmaceutical
Weight range (kg)
Administered activity range (MBq)
Conversion factor-effective dose/administered activity (mSv/MBq)a
Effective dose range (mSv)
Lung perfusion
0–3 m (newborn)
99mTc-labeled MAA
3.7–6.5
10
NA
-
4–30 m (1 year)
6.5–12.6
10–17.6
0.063
0.63–1.11
31–90 m (5 years)
12.6–24.4
17.6–31.9
0.034
0.60–1.09
91–150 m (10 years)
24.4–42
31.9–51.2
0.023
0.74–1.18
151–210 m (15 years)
42–69.1
51.2–78.4
0.016
0.82–1.25
211–216 m (late adolescents)
 > 69.1
 ≥ 78.4
0.011
 ≥ 0.86
Lung ventilation
0–3 m (newborn)
99mTc-labeled technegas
3.7–6.5
100
NA
-
4–30 m (1 year)
6.5–12.6
100–153.9
0.087
8.70–13.39
31–90 m (5 years)
12.6–24.4
153.9–279.8
0.047
7.23–13.15
91–150 m (10 years)
24.4–42
279.8–447.9
0.031
8.67–13.88
151–210 m (15 years)
42–69.1
447.9–686
0.022
9.85–15.09
211–216 m (late adolescents)
 > 69.1
 ≥ 686
0.015
 ≥ 10.29
Myocardial scintigraphy, Stress
0–3 m (newborn)
99mTc-labeled sestamibi/tetrofosmin2
3.7–6.5
84–143.6
NA
-
4–30 m (1 year)
6.5–12.6
143.6–263.8
0.045b
6.46–11.86
31–90 m (5 years)
12.6–24.4
263.8–479.6
0.023b
6.06–11.03
91–150 m (10 years)
24.4–42
479.6–767.8
0.016b
7.67–12.28
151–210 m (15 years)
42–69.1
767.8–1176
0.01b
7.67–11.76
211–216 m (late adolescents)
 > 69.1
 ≥ 1176
0.0079b
 ≥ 9.29
Myocardial scintigraphy, Rest
0–3 m (newborn)
99mTc-labeled sestamibi/tetrofosmin2
3.7–6.5
80
NA
-
4–30 m (1 year)
6.5–12.6
80–87.92
0.053b
4.24–4.66
31–90 m (5 years)
12.6–24.4
87.92–159.88
0.028b
2.46–4.48
91–150 m (10 years)
24.4–42
159.88–255.92
0.018b
2.88–4.61
151–210 m (15 years)
42–69.1
255.92–392
0.012b
3.07–4.70
211–216 m (late adolescents)
 > 69.1
 ≥ 392
0.009b
 ≥ 3.53
Renography standard
0–3 m (newborn)
99mTc-labeled MAG3 (normal renal function, no accounting for emptying of bladder within 0.5–1 h post administration)
3.7–6.5
15–17.5
NA
-
4–30 m (1 year)
6.5–12.6
17.5–25.9
0.022
0.38–0.57
31–90 m (5 years)
12.6–24.4
25.9–37.8
0.012
0.31–0.45
91–150 m (10 years)
24.4–42
37.8–52.5
0.012
0.45–0.63
151–210 m (15 years)
42–69.1
52.5–68.7
0.009
0.47–0.62
211–216 m (late adolescents)
 > 69.1
 ≥ 68.7
0.007
 ≥ 0.48
Renal scintigraphy
0–3 m (newborn)
99mTc-labeled DMSA
3.7–6.5
18.5
NA
-
4–30 m (1 year)
6.5–12.6
18.5–21.3
0.037
0.68–0.79
31–90 m (5 years)
12.6–24.4
21.3–38.8
0.021
0.45–0.82
91–150 m (10 years)
24.4–42
38.8–62.1
0.015
0.58–0.93
151–210 m (15 years)
42–69.1
62.1–95.2
0.011
0.68–1.05
211–216 m (late adolescents)
 > 69.1
 ≥ 95.2
0.0088
 ≥ 0.84
aConversion factors from administered activity to effective dose [27]. bConversion factors are for sestamibi
99mTc technetium-99 m, DMSA dimercaptosuccinic acid, m months, MAA macroaggregated albumin, NA not available, sestamibi methoxy isobutyl isonitrile, TMAG3 mercaptoacetyl triglycine
Although conventional radiography of the thorax had a very low radiation dose per examination (about 0.008–0.02 mSv), it still contributed the second largest total effective dose after thoracic CT (about 0.75–3.5 mSv per examination) (Fig. 2): 50–70 mSv for conventional radiography vs. 79–194 mSv for CT within each age category. Thus, the total dose burden from conventional radiography ranged between 28–65% of the dose burden from thoracic CT in various age categories. For all ages combined, the dose contribution from thoracic conventional radiography was about 40% of that from thoracic CT.
Gastrointestinal tract fluoroscopy resulted in doses ranging from 0.17–0.27 mSv per examination. However, because the number of procedures was much lower than for conventional radiography, the total effective dose was approximately half for the two youngest categories and even lower for the older categories. Similarly, for NM lung perfusion, the effective dose per examination ranged from 0.6–0.86 mSv. However, the total effective dose from NM was lower than that for conventional radiography, for all age categories.

Discussion

This study reports the frequency and dose contribution of conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, NM, and noncardiac intervention among Norwegian children and adolescents with CHD. Conventional radiography was the most frequent, accounting for 91% of all examinations. The dose contribution per examination from conventional radiography was low; however, the high number of examinations led to a considerable contribution to the total effective dose across all age groups. For thoracic examinations, it was found that thoracic CT had the highest dose per examination and total effective dose among all modalities. Because of frequent use, thoracic conventional radiography resulted in a total effective dose of about 40% of the contribution from thoracic CT. Since they were used less frequently, NM lung perfusion and gastrointestinal tract fluoroscopy contributed less to the total effective dose compared with thoracic conventional radiography. The thorax was the most frequent target for imaging, likely because of its association with cardiac disease. However, a high number of conventional radiography examinations were performed for scoliosis, and many CT examinations were performed on the head. NM examinations were performed less frequently with lung perfusion as the main examination.
As this was a group of patients with cardiac disorders, most examinations (about 85% of conventional radiography, 35% of CT scans, and around 58% of NM examinations) were performed on the thoracic region (Table 3). Several studies have highlighted the increasing trend and improved usefulness of CT in CHD diagnosis [9, 3336]. In our study cohort, the use of CT was relatively limited, ranging from 5–7.5% across different age categories (Table 2). Among those patients who underwent CT, the average number of CT scans was approximately two (Table 3).
According to previous studies, CT is the imaging modality that contributes the most to radiation dose [13, 21]. Numerous studies have identified conventional radiography as having the highest number of examinations but making a relatively minor contribution to radiation dose [37, 38]. Vilar-Palop et al. reviewed the radiation dose from conventional radiography, CT, and diagnostic fluoroscopy for age groups similar to those in this current study [39]. They reported effective doses per thoracic conventional radiography ranging from 0.05–0.07 mSv and thoracic CT examination from 2.8–6.8 mSv. Additionally, they reported effective dose ranging from 0.7–5.8 mSv for gastrointestinal tract fluoroscopy examinations. In our study, the effective dose ranged from 0.008–0.02 mSv for thoracic conventional radiography, 0.76–3.47 mSv for thoracic CT, and 0.17–0.27 mSv for gastrointestinal tract fluoroscopy across different age categories (Fig. 2). Overall, the dose per examination in our study was generally lower than that in earlier studies [24, 27, 37, 3945]. This could be attributed to a longer observation period (2000–2021), with several technological shifts that included improved dose control features, such as improved automatic exposure control technology, improved image processing and image reconstruction, and more sensitive detectors.
Previous studies have reported median effective doses for cardiac catheterization (both diagnostics and interventional), ranging from approximately 3–8 mSv [3, 4, 4650]. In our study, the dose from thoracic conventional radiography was approximately 0.2% of the reported cardiac catheterization dose. Thoracic CT doses were approximately 25–45% of the reported effective doses from cardiac catheterization. Single NM procedures resulted in about 10–20% of the reported cardiac catheterization dose. It is worth noting that the dose from conventional radiography might seem negligible compared to cardiac catheterization procedures, but it may cause a substantial dose burden to patients if performed frequently.
A considerable number of conventional radiography examinations have been performed on the trunk region, mainly for scoliosis, in the 15 year age group. Several studies have documented an association between CHD and scoliosis [5156]. Trunk examinations encompass the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis; thus, the average conversion factor for these three regions can be used to calculate the effective dose for trunk examinations. Despite a much lower number of conventional radiography examinations on the trunk compared to the thorax at 15 years, the total effective dose burden is almost equivalent. Therefore, trunk examinations should be considered an important contribution to the cumulative dose in this cohort.
The frequency of head CT examinations in our population is noteworthy. Studies have found that cerebral infarction and brain abscess are highly associated with cyanotic CHD, and these conditions are often detected using head/brain CT scans [5760]. A case report by Zhang and Feng [61] showed an intracranial aneurysm resulting from complicated coarctation of the aorta, which was detected in a head CT scan. In addition, after a seizure episode following cardiac surgery, an initial head CT scan is often performed to ensure appropriate treatment [62].
Our cohort underwent several lung perfusion scintigraphy examinations. This finding is consistent with studies that have established a link between CHD and lung perfusion abnormalities [6365]. Lung perfusion scintigraphy is the preferred method for the quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion in most patients with CHD [6365].
We conducted this study as a part of HARMONIC delivery on the frequency and probability distribution of examinations performed on Norwegian patients with CHD. HARMONIC’s uncertainty estimate requires the probability of undergoing an ionizing radiation examination (provided in this work) as an input to obtain a more precise assessment of medical exposure beyond cardiac catheterization. In addition, the frequency distribution and dose magnitude will be of interest to clinicians, to inform them about the dose burden associated with different procedures. This provides knowledge of the potential risks associated with different imaging methods, aiding informed decisions on justification for each patient. This awareness might encourage proactive radiation optimization, such as using low-dose modalities, using non-ionizing radiation methods when suitable or reducing the number of acquisitions (such as performing one-view conventional radiography, if two views are not needed). Ultimately, this heightened awareness can enhance safety and personalization in medical practice, ensuring that imaging benefits outweigh the risks for pediatric patients.
There are limitations to this study. The most important is the possibility that some patients may have undergone examinations at hospitals other than Oslo University Hospital, which could have led to an underestimation of the radiation dose. Although Oslo University Hospital has the national responsibility for pediatric cardiology, examinations related to other conditions may have been performed at other hospitals. Furthermore, to estimate the effective dose from DAP and DLP, we used age-specific conversion factors based on the ICRP Publication 60 recommendations. These conversion factors are relatively crude and subject to considerable uncertainty, which could have affected the accuracy of our dose estimates, even though the effective doses provided in this study are only for comparison. However, the lack of conversion factors for some examinations makes it difficult to compare dose contributions from them. The effective dose for NM examinations uses population weight assumptions for the estimations of administrated activity, leading to higher error and inaccurate individual representation. In addition, the 2016 EANM dosage card may not reflect the actual dosage scheme of the historical study period.

Conclusion

This study reports the frequency and radiation dose contribution of conventional radiography, CT, diagnostic fluoroscopy, NM, and noncardiac intervention among Norwegian patients with CHD and shows that CT was the biggest contributor to the radiation dose from imaging (excluding cardiac intervention). However, although the dose per conventional radiograph was low, the large number of examinations resulted in a total effective dose of approximately 40% of the CT. Therefore, it is important to consider the frequency of conventional radiography in addition to CT when considering patient exposure in this group. The findings of this study will help the HARMONIC project improve risk assessment by minimizing the uncertainty associated with cumulative dose calculations.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their sincere gratitude to Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Head of the Medical Radiation Group at the Radiation Programme, ISGlobal, and the coordinator of the European-funded HARMONIC project, for her valuable insights and feedback. Special appreciation is also due to Dabin Jérémie, Scientific Collaborator at SCK-CEN, who serves as the Work Package-4 Dosimetry Leader and collaborates as a member of Work Package-3 Interventional Cardiology for the HARMONIC project.

Declarations

Ethics approval for retrospective studies

The project was approved by regional committees for medical and health research ethics in Norway in April 2019 (2019/335). A data protection impact assessment (DPIA) was approved by the data protection officer in November 2020. Since then, the project has developed with changes regarding staff and methods. Therefore, a revised project protocol was approved in March 2023. Accordingly, a revised DPIA is to be approved. All data management and analyses were conducted on data with no individual person identification. All results are distributed on a group level, without any possibilities for individual identification. All data management and analyses were conducted on data with no individual person identified. The identification key is stored and governed by the Cancer Registry of Norway/Oslo University Hospital.
Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

None
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt bestellen und 100 € sparen!

e.Med Pädiatrie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Pädiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Pädiatrie, den Premium-Inhalten der pädiatrischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Pädiatrie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Radiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Anhänge

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouma BJ, Mulder BJM (2017) Changing landscape of congenital heart disease. Circ Res 120:908–922PubMedCrossRef Bouma BJ, Mulder BJM (2017) Changing landscape of congenital heart disease. Circ Res 120:908–922PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones TP, Brennan PC, Ryan E (2017) Cumulative effective and individual organ dose levels in paediatric patients undergoing multiple catheterisations for congenital heart disease. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 176:252–257PubMed Jones TP, Brennan PC, Ryan E (2017) Cumulative effective and individual organ dose levels in paediatric patients undergoing multiple catheterisations for congenital heart disease. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 176:252–257PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Harbron RW, Pearce MS, Salotti JA et al (2015) Radiation doses from fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterization procedures in children and young adults in the United Kingdom: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol 88:20140852PubMedCrossRef Harbron RW, Pearce MS, Salotti JA et al (2015) Radiation doses from fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterization procedures in children and young adults in the United Kingdom: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol 88:20140852PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yakoumakis EN, Gialousis GI, Papadopoulou D et al (2009) Estimation of children’s radiation dose from cardiac catheterisations, performed for the diagnosis or the treatment of a congenital heart disease using TLD dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulation. J Radiol Prot 29:251PubMedCrossRef Yakoumakis EN, Gialousis GI, Papadopoulou D et al (2009) Estimation of children’s radiation dose from cardiac catheterisations, performed for the diagnosis or the treatment of a congenital heart disease using TLD dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulation. J Radiol Prot 29:251PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Karambatsakidou A, Steiner K, Fransson A, Poludniowski G (2020) Age-specific and gender-specific radiation risks in paediatric angiography and interventional cardiology: conversion coefficients and risk reference values. Br J Radiol 93:20190869PubMedCrossRef Karambatsakidou A, Steiner K, Fransson A, Poludniowski G (2020) Age-specific and gender-specific radiation risks in paediatric angiography and interventional cardiology: conversion coefficients and risk reference values. Br J Radiol 93:20190869PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ubeda C, Salazar L, Retana VC et al (2019) Organ doses in paediatric interventional cardiology. First values for patients in Costa Rica. Radiat Phys Chem 162:48–53CrossRef Ubeda C, Salazar L, Retana VC et al (2019) Organ doses in paediatric interventional cardiology. First values for patients in Costa Rica. Radiat Phys Chem 162:48–53CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Journy N, Dreuil S, Rage E et al (2018) Projected future cancer risks in children treated with fluoroscopy-guided cardiac catheterization procedures. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 11:e006765PubMedCrossRef Journy N, Dreuil S, Rage E et al (2018) Projected future cancer risks in children treated with fluoroscopy-guided cardiac catheterization procedures. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 11:e006765PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Han BK, Rigsby CK, Hlavacek A et al (2015) Computed tomography imaging in patients with congenital heart disease part I: rationale and utility. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT): endorsed by the Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:475–492PubMedCrossRef Han BK, Rigsby CK, Hlavacek A et al (2015) Computed tomography imaging in patients with congenital heart disease part I: rationale and utility. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT): endorsed by the Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:475–492PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang JCT, Lin MT, Jaw FS et al (2015) Trends in the utilization of computed tomography and cardiac catheterization among children with congenital heart disease. J Formos Med Assoc 114:1061–1068PubMedCrossRef Yang JCT, Lin MT, Jaw FS et al (2015) Trends in the utilization of computed tomography and cardiac catheterization among children with congenital heart disease. J Formos Med Assoc 114:1061–1068PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedgire S, Ghoshhajra B, Kalra M (2017) Dose optimization in cardiac CT. Phys Medica 41:97–103CrossRef Hedgire S, Ghoshhajra B, Kalra M (2017) Dose optimization in cardiac CT. Phys Medica 41:97–103CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schicchi N, Fogante M, Esposto Pirani P et al (2019) Third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT in pediatric congenital heart disease patients: state-of-the-art. Radiol Med 124:1238–1252PubMedCrossRef Schicchi N, Fogante M, Esposto Pirani P et al (2019) Third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT in pediatric congenital heart disease patients: state-of-the-art. Radiol Med 124:1238–1252PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill KD, Frush DP, Han BK et al (2017) Radiation safety in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: a scientific position statement on multimodality dose optimization from the image gently alliance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:797–818PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hill KD, Frush DP, Han BK et al (2017) Radiation safety in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: a scientific position statement on multimodality dose optimization from the image gently alliance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:797–818PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ait-Ali L, Andreassi MG, Foffa I et al (2010) Cumulative patient effective dose and acute radiation-induced chromosomal DNA damage in children with congenital heart disease. Heart 96:269–274PubMedCrossRef Ait-Ali L, Andreassi MG, Foffa I et al (2010) Cumulative patient effective dose and acute radiation-induced chromosomal DNA damage in children with congenital heart disease. Heart 96:269–274PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Harbron RW, Thierry-Chef I, Pearce MS et al (2020) The HARMONIC project: study design for assessment of cancer risks following cardiac fluoroscopy in childhood. J Radiol Prot 40:1074 Harbron RW, Thierry-Chef I, Pearce MS et al (2020) The HARMONIC project: study design for assessment of cancer risks following cardiac fluoroscopy in childhood. J Radiol Prot 40:1074
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Phase BV (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. The British Institute of Radiology, Washington, DC Phase BV (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. The British Institute of Radiology, Washington, DC
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Harbron RW, Chapple CL, O’Sullivan JJ et al (2018) Cancer incidence among children and young adults who have undergone x-ray guided cardiac catheterization procedures. Eur J Epidemiol 33:393–401PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harbron RW, Chapple CL, O’Sullivan JJ et al (2018) Cancer incidence among children and young adults who have undergone x-ray guided cardiac catheterization procedures. Eur J Epidemiol 33:393–401PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat McLaughlin JR, Kreiger N, Sloan MP et al (1993) An historical cohort study of cardiac catheterization during childhood and the risk of cancer. Int J Epidemiol 22:584–591PubMedCrossRef McLaughlin JR, Kreiger N, Sloan MP et al (1993) An historical cohort study of cardiac catheterization during childhood and the risk of cancer. Int J Epidemiol 22:584–591PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Spengler RF, Cook DH, Clarke EA et al (1983) Cancer mortality following cardiac catheterization: a preliminary follow-up study on 4,891 irradiated children. Pediatrics 71:235–239PubMedCrossRef Spengler RF, Cook DH, Clarke EA et al (1983) Cancer mortality following cardiac catheterization: a preliminary follow-up study on 4,891 irradiated children. Pediatrics 71:235–239PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stern H, Seidenbusch M, Hapfelmeier A et al (2020) Increased cancer incidence following up to 15 years after cardiac catheterization in infants under one year between 1980 and 1998—a single center Observational study. J Clin Med 9:315PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stern H, Seidenbusch M, Hapfelmeier A et al (2020) Increased cancer incidence following up to 15 years after cardiac catheterization in infants under one year between 1980 and 1998—a single center Observational study. J Clin Med 9:315PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS et al (2014) Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation 130:161–167PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS et al (2014) Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation 130:161–167PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Brambilla M, De Mauri A, Lizio D et al (2014) Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medical imaging in paediatric patients with non-oncologic chronic illnesses. A systematic review. Phys Med 30:403–412PubMedCrossRef Brambilla M, De Mauri A, Lizio D et al (2014) Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medical imaging in paediatric patients with non-oncologic chronic illnesses. A systematic review. Phys Med 30:403–412PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh MA, Noga M, Rutledge J (2015) Cumulative radiation exposure in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 36:289–294PubMedCrossRef Walsh MA, Noga M, Rutledge J (2015) Cumulative radiation exposure in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 36:289–294PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2008) European guidance on estimating population doses from medical X-ray procedures. Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire European Commission (2008) European guidance on estimating population doses from medical X-ray procedures. Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire
25.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy (2015) Medical radiation exposure of the European population. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy (2015) Medical radiation exposure of the European population. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
26.
Zurück zum Zitat ICRP (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication 60. ICRP 21:1-3 ICRP (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication 60. ICRP 21:1-3
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wall, B & Haylock, R & Jansen et al (2011) Radiation risks from medical X-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient. Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire Wall, B & Haylock, R & Jansen et al (2011) Radiation risks from medical X-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient. Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentin J (2007) Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Elsevier, New York Valentin J (2007) Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Elsevier, New York
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Júlíusson PB, Roelants M, Nordal E et al (2013) Growth references for 0–19 year-old Norwegian children for length/height, weight, body mass index and head circumference. Ann Hum Biol 40:220–227PubMedCrossRef Júlíusson PB, Roelants M, Nordal E et al (2013) Growth references for 0–19 year-old Norwegian children for length/height, weight, body mass index and head circumference. Ann Hum Biol 40:220–227PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat European Association of Nuclear Medicine (2016) EANM dosage card. EANM Executive office, Vienna, Austria European Association of Nuclear Medicine (2016) EANM dosage card. EANM Executive office, Vienna, Austria
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattsson S, Johansson L, Leide Svegborn S et al (2015) ICRP Publication 128: radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: a compendium of current information related to frequently used substances. Ann ICRP 44:7–321PubMedCrossRef Mattsson S, Johansson L, Leide Svegborn S et al (2015) ICRP Publication 128: radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: a compendium of current information related to frequently used substances. Ann ICRP 44:7–321PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat StataCorp LLC (2021) Stata statistical software: release 17. StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX StataCorp LLC (2021) Stata statistical software: release 17. StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian L, Wang L, Qin Y, Cai J (2020) Low-dose computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in children: a meta-analysis. Curr Med Imaging 16:1085–1094PubMedCrossRef Tian L, Wang L, Qin Y, Cai J (2020) Low-dose computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in children: a meta-analysis. Curr Med Imaging 16:1085–1094PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rapp JB, White AM, Otero HJ, Biko DM (2022) Computed tomography of the airways and lungs in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 52:2529–2537PubMedCrossRef Rapp JB, White AM, Otero HJ, Biko DM (2022) Computed tomography of the airways and lungs in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 52:2529–2537PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Goo HW (2010) State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 11:4–18PubMedCrossRef Goo HW (2010) State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 11:4–18PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni A, Hsu HH, Ou P, Kutty S (2016) Computed tomography in congenital heart disease: clinical applications and technical considerations. Echocardiogr Mt Kisco N 33:629–640CrossRef Kulkarni A, Hsu HH, Ou P, Kutty S (2016) Computed tomography in congenital heart disease: clinical applications and technical considerations. Echocardiogr Mt Kisco N 33:629–640CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Şorop I, Mossang D, Iacob MR et al (2008) Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania. J Radiol Prot 28:563–571PubMedCrossRef Şorop I, Mossang D, Iacob MR et al (2008) Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania. J Radiol Prot 28:563–571PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Compagnone G, Angelini P, Domenichelli S (2012) Radiation doses to the population of the Emilia-Romagna region from medical exposures. Radiol Med 117:312–321PubMedCrossRef Compagnone G, Angelini P, Domenichelli S (2012) Radiation doses to the population of the Emilia-Romagna region from medical exposures. Radiol Med 117:312–321PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Vilar-Palop J, Vilar J, Hernández-Aguado I et al (2016) Updated effective doses in radiology. J Radiol Prot 36:975PubMedCrossRef Vilar-Palop J, Vilar J, Hernández-Aguado I et al (2016) Updated effective doses in radiology. J Radiol Prot 36:975PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Huda W, Vance A (2007) Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:540–546PubMedCrossRef Huda W, Vance A (2007) Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:540–546PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Brady Z, Ramanauskas F, Cain TM, Johnston PN (2012) Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation. Br J Radiol 85:1488–1498PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brady Z, Ramanauskas F, Cain TM, Johnston PN (2012) Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation. Br J Radiol 85:1488–1498PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahey FH, Goodkind AB, Plyku D et al (2017) Dose estimation in pediatric nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 47:118–125PubMedCrossRef Fahey FH, Goodkind AB, Plyku D et al (2017) Dose estimation in pediatric nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 47:118–125PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Bibbo G (2018) Effective doses and standardised risk factors from paediatric diagnostic medical radiation exposures: information for radiation risk communication. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 62:43–50PubMedCrossRef Bibbo G (2018) Effective doses and standardised risk factors from paediatric diagnostic medical radiation exposures: information for radiation risk communication. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 62:43–50PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Earl VJ, Baker LJ, Perdomo AA (2022) Effective doses and associated age-related risks for common paediatric diagnostic nuclear medicine and PET procedures at a large Australian paediatric hospital. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 66:7–13PubMedCrossRef Earl VJ, Baker LJ, Perdomo AA (2022) Effective doses and associated age-related risks for common paediatric diagnostic nuclear medicine and PET procedures at a large Australian paediatric hospital. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 66:7–13PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi GG, Iball GR, Darby MJ, Thomson JD (2011) Cardiac computed tomography and conventional angiography in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac disease in children: recent trends and radiation doses. Cardiol Young 21:616–622PubMedCrossRef Gherardi GG, Iball GR, Darby MJ, Thomson JD (2011) Cardiac computed tomography and conventional angiography in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac disease in children: recent trends and radiation doses. Cardiol Young 21:616–622PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Karambatsakidou A, Sahlgren B, Hansson B (2009) Effective dose conversion factors in paediatric interventional cardiology. Br J Radiol 82:748–755PubMedCrossRef Karambatsakidou A, Sahlgren B, Hansson B (2009) Effective dose conversion factors in paediatric interventional cardiology. Br J Radiol 82:748–755PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X et al (2014) Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 35:870–878PubMedCrossRef Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X et al (2014) Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 35:870–878PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Dragusin O, Gewillig M, Desmet W et al (2008) Radiation dose survey in a paediatric cardiac catheterisation laboratory equipped with flat-panel detectors. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:91–95PubMedCrossRef Dragusin O, Gewillig M, Desmet W et al (2008) Radiation dose survey in a paediatric cardiac catheterisation laboratory equipped with flat-panel detectors. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:91–95PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Beels L, Bacher K, De Wolf D et al (2009) H. γ-H2AX foci as a biomarker for patient X-ray exposure in pediatric cardiac catheterization: are we underestimating radiation risks? Circulation 20:1903–1909CrossRef Beels L, Bacher K, De Wolf D et al (2009) H. γ-H2AX foci as a biomarker for patient X-ray exposure in pediatric cardiac catheterization: are we underestimating radiation risks? Circulation 20:1903–1909CrossRef
51.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright WD, Niebauer JJ (1956) Congenital heart disease and scoliosis. JBJS 38:1131CrossRef Wright WD, Niebauer JJ (1956) Congenital heart disease and scoliosis. JBJS 38:1131CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz-Iban MA, Burgos J, Aguado HJ et al (2005) Scoliosis after median sternotomy in children With congenital heart disease. Spine 30:E214PubMedCrossRef Ruiz-Iban MA, Burgos J, Aguado HJ et al (2005) Scoliosis after median sternotomy in children With congenital heart disease. Spine 30:E214PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawakami N, Mimatsu K, Deguchi M et al (1995) Scoliosis and congenital heart disease. Spine 20:1252–1255PubMedCrossRef Kawakami N, Mimatsu K, Deguchi M et al (1995) Scoliosis and congenital heart disease. Spine 20:1252–1255PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Roth A, Rosenthal A, Hall JE, Mizel M (1973) Scoliosis and congenital heart disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 93:95CrossRef Roth A, Rosenthal A, Hall JE, Mizel M (1973) Scoliosis and congenital heart disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 93:95CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan CE, White RI, Fischer KC et al (1972) The scoliosis of congenital heart disease. Am Heart J 84:463–469PubMedCrossRef Jordan CE, White RI, Fischer KC et al (1972) The scoliosis of congenital heart disease. Am Heart J 84:463–469PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen AS, Idorn L, Thomsen C et al (2015) Prevalence of cerebral and pulmonary thrombosis in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Heart 101:1540–1546PubMedCrossRef Jensen AS, Idorn L, Thomsen C et al (2015) Prevalence of cerebral and pulmonary thrombosis in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Heart 101:1540–1546PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi M, Taksande A, Meshram R (2020) Intracranial brain abscess in a child with cyanotic congenital heart disease. J Evol Med Dent Sci 9:3767–3769CrossRef Joshi M, Taksande A, Meshram R (2020) Intracranial brain abscess in a child with cyanotic congenital heart disease. J Evol Med Dent Sci 9:3767–3769CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurlan R, Griggs RC (1983) Cyanotic congenital heart disease with suspected stroke: should all patients receive antibiotics? Arch Neurol 40:209–212PubMedCrossRef Kurlan R, Griggs RC (1983) Cyanotic congenital heart disease with suspected stroke: should all patients receive antibiotics? Arch Neurol 40:209–212PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Utama AS, Parenrengi MA (2022) Giant brain abscess in a pediatric patient with congenital heart disease: a case report. J Health Sci Med Res 40:695–699 Utama AS, Parenrengi MA (2022) Giant brain abscess in a pediatric patient with congenital heart disease: a case report. J Health Sci Med Res 40:695–699
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Feng L (2018) Coarctation of the aorta complicated with intracranial aneurysm: a case report and literature review. World Neurosurg 112:25–30PubMedCrossRef Zhang H, Feng L (2018) Coarctation of the aorta complicated with intracranial aneurysm: a case report and literature review. World Neurosurg 112:25–30PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW et al (2012) Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management. Circulation 126:1143–1172PubMedCrossRef Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW et al (2012) Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management. Circulation 126:1143–1172PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamir A, Melloul M, Berant M et al (1992) Lung perfusion scans in patients with congenital heart defects. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:383–388PubMedCrossRef Tamir A, Melloul M, Berant M et al (1992) Lung perfusion scans in patients with congenital heart defects. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:383–388PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Boothroyd AE, McDonald EA, Carty H (1996) Lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with congenital heart disease: sensitivity and important pitfalls. Nucl Med Commun 17:33–39PubMedCrossRef Boothroyd AE, McDonald EA, Carty H (1996) Lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with congenital heart disease: sensitivity and important pitfalls. Nucl Med Commun 17:33–39PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Use of ionizing radiation in a Norwegian cohort of children with congenital heart disease: imaging frequency and radiation dose for the Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) study
verfasst von
Susmita Afroz
Bjørn H. Østerås
Utheya S. Thevathas
Gaute Dohlen
Caroline Stokke
Trude E. Robsahm
Hilde M. Olerud
Publikationsdatum
29.09.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05774-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

Pediatric Radiology 12/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.