nach oben

wissen kompakt

Erschienen in:

01.11.2015 | CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung

Befestigungsmaterialien in der restaurativen Zahnheilkunde

verfasst von: Dr. W. Bömicke, M. Sc.

Erschienen in: wissen kompakt | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Dentale Zemente sind Biomaterialien, die in der restaurativen Zahnmedizin dazu verwendet werden Zahnersatz permanent oder semipermanent zu verankern. Der folgende Beitrag gibt eine Übersicht über die gängigen Befestigungsmaterialien und enthält Hinweise zu deren Eigenschaften und Anwendung. Insbesondere Kunststoffzemente gewinnen im Zuge einer defektorientieren Zahnheilkunde zunehmend an Bedeutung. Damit sie erfolgreich eingesetzt werden können, sind – sowohl zahn- als auch restaurationsseitig – umfangreiche Konditionierungsmaßnahmen und die Wahl eines geeigneten Adhäsivsystems nötig. Bei Implantatrekonstruktionen stehen Zementreste im Verdacht, Entzündungen in der periimplantären Mukosa auszulösen. Deren Vermeidung wird ein hoher Stellenwert bei der Verwendung zementierter Restaurationen beigemessen.

Pashley EL, Tao L, Pashley DH (1988) The sealing properties of temporary filling materials. J Prosthet Dent 60:292–297PubMedCrossRef

Paul SJ, Scharer P (1997) Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 24:8–14PubMedCrossRef

Grasso CA, Caluori DM, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E (2002) In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 88:437–441PubMedCrossRef

Donovan T, Simonsen RJ, Guertin G, Tucker RV (2004) Retrospective clinical evaluation of 1,314 cast gold restorations in service from 1 to 52 years. J Esthet Restor Dent 16:194–204PubMedCrossRef

Iwaku M, Takatsu T, Fusayama T (1980) Comparison of three luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 43:423–425PubMedCrossRef

Pameijer CH, Stanley HR, Ecker G (1991) Biocompatibility of a glass ionomer luting agent. 2. Crown cementation. Am J Dent 4:134–141PubMed

Craig RG, Powers JM (1993) Restorative dental materials. Mosby, St. Louis

el-Mowafy OM, Fenton AH, Forrester N, Milenkovic M (1996) Retention of metal ceramic crowns cemented with resin cements: effects of preparation taper and height. J Prosthet Dent 76:524–529PubMedCrossRef

Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Gardner FM, Pashley DH (2000) Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 83:459–465PubMedCrossRef

10.

Patil PG, Parkhedkar RD, Patil SP, Bhowmik HS (2012) Comparative evaluation of effect of polymerizable and non-polymerizable desensitizing agents on crown-retentive-strength of zinc-phosphate, glass-ionomer and compomer cements. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 20:102–110PubMed

11.

Johnson GH, Hazelton LR, Bales DJ, Lepe X (2004) The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent 91:428–435PubMedCrossRef

12.

Roediger M, Gersdorff N, Huels A, Rinke S (2010) Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: four-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 23:141–148PubMed

13.

Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P (2011) Survival of two post systems – five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 42:843–850. (Berlin, Germany: 1985)PubMed

14.

Menani LR, Ribeiro RF, Antunes RP (2008) Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 99:141–147PubMedCrossRef

15.

Smith DC (1968) A new dental cement. Br Dent J 124:381–384PubMed

16.

Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW, Shen C, Rawls HR (2012) Phillips’ science of dental materials. Elsevier/Saunders, St. Louis

17.

Saito C, Sakai Y, Node H, Fusayama T (1976) Adhesion of polycarâylate cements to dental casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 35:543–548PubMedCrossRef

18.

Hersek NE, Canay S (1996) In vivo solubility of three types of luting cement. Quintessence Int 27:211–216. (Berlin, Germany: 1985)PubMed

19.

Osborne JW, Wolff MS (1991) The effect of powder/liquid ratio on the in vivo solubility of polycarboxylate cement. J Prosthet Dent 66:49–51PubMedCrossRef

20.

Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML (1991) Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements. Oper Dent 16:231–238PubMed

21.

O’Brien WJ (2008) Dental materials and their selection. Quintessence Publishing Company, Chicago

22.

Oilo G (1991) Luting cements: a review and comparison. Int Dent J 41:81–88PubMed

23.

Wilson AD, McLean JW (1988) Glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Publishing Company, Berlin

24.

Wilson A, Kent B (1971) The glass‐ionomer cement, a new translucent dental filling material. J App Chem Biotechnol 21:313–313CrossRef

25.

Li ZC, White SN (1999) Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 81:597–609PubMedCrossRef

26.

Matsuya S, Maeda T, Ohta M (1996) IR and NMR analyses of hardening and maturation of glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 75:1920–1927PubMedCrossRef

27.

White SN, Yu Z (1993) Compressive and diametral tensile strengths of current adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 69:568–572PubMedCrossRef

28.

Gemalmaz D, Pameijer CH, Latta M, Kuybulu F, Alcan T (2012) In vivo disintegration of four different luting agents. Int J Dent 2012:831508PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

29.

Um CM, Oilo G (1992) The effect of early water contact on glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 23:209–214. (Berlin, Germany: 1985)PubMed

30.

Hewlett ER, Mount GJ (2003) Glass ionomers in contemporary restorative dentistry – a clinical update. J Calif Dent Assoc 31:483–492PubMed

31.

Rodrigues Garcia RC, De Goes MF, Del Bel Cury AA (1995) Influence of protecting agents on the solubility of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 8:294–296PubMed

32.

Smith DC, Ruse ND (1986) Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 112:654–657. (1939)PubMedCrossRef

33.

Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller H-G, Strub JR (1996) Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement. J Prosthet Dent 75:159–162PubMedCrossRef

34.

Johnson GH, Powell LV, DeRouen TA (1993) Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 124:38–46PubMedCrossRef

35.

Bebermeyer RD, Berg JH (1994) Comparison of patient-perceived postcementation sensitivity with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. Quintessence Int 25:209–214. (Berlin, Germany: 1985)PubMed

36.

Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Vreven J (2001) Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites. J Oral Rehab 28:26–32CrossRef

37.

Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK (2002) Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 27:259–265PubMed

38.

Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G (1991) Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J 15:253–258PubMed

39.

Gehrt M, Wolfart S, Rafai N, Reich S, Edelhoff D (2013) Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service. Clin Oral Investig 17:275–284PubMedCrossRef

40.

Hill EE, Lott J (2011) A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Aust Dent J 56(Suppl 1):67–76PubMedCrossRef

41.

Craig RG, Powers JM (2006) Restorative dental materials. Mosby, St. Louis

42.

Tjan AH, Li T (1992) Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 67:478–483PubMedCrossRef

43.

Cho E, Kopel H, White SN (1995) Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 26:351–358. (Berlin, Germany: 1985)PubMed

44.

Aranha AM, Giro EM, Souza PP, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA (2006) Effect of curing regime on the cytotoxicity of resin-modified glass-ionomer lining cements applied to an odontoblast-cell line. Dent Mater 22:864–869PubMedCrossRef

45.

Lan WH, Lan WC, Wang TM, Lee YL, Tseng WY, Lin CP et al (2003) Cytotoxicity of conventional and modified glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent 28:251–259PubMed

46.

Costa CA, Giro EM, do Nascimento AB, Teixeira HM, Hebling J (2003) Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities. Dent Mater 19:739–746PubMedCrossRef

47.

Murray PE, About I, Franquin JC, Remusat M, Smith AJ (2001) Restorative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 132:482–491. (1939)PubMedCrossRef

48.

Cheetham JJ, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF (2014) A comparison of resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite polymerisation shrinkage stress in a wet environment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:33–41PubMedCrossRef

49.

Ferracane JL (2006) Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 22:211–222PubMedCrossRef

50.

Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Lee MS, Tu LS, DeLong R (2011) Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth. Dent Mater 27:126–133PubMedCrossRef

51.

Leevailoj C, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Moore BK (1998) In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 80:699–707PubMedCrossRef

52.

Christensen R, Christensen G (1996) Resin reinforced glass ionomer (RRGI) cements, all-ceramic crown fracture. Clin Res Assoc Newsl 20:3

53.

Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR (1999) Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 81:135–141PubMedCrossRef

54.

White SN, Yu Z, Tom JF, Sangsurasak S (1994) In vivo microleakage of luting cements for cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 71:333–338PubMedCrossRef

55.

Piwowarczyk A, Lauer H-C, Sorensen JA (2005) Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater 21:445–453PubMedCrossRef

56.

Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ (2011) Self-adhesive resin cements – chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehab 38:295–314CrossRef

57.

Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296–308PubMedCrossRef

58.

Ozer F, Blatz MB (2013) Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 34:12–14. (quiz 20, 30 Jamesburg, NJ: 1995)PubMed

59.

Vaz RR, Hipolito VD, D’Alpino PH, Goes MF (2012) Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthodont 21:101–111PubMedCrossRef

60.

Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T et al (2007) Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 23:71–80PubMedCrossRef

61.

Can Say E, Ozel E, Yurdaguven H, Soyman M (2014) Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions. Clin Oral Investig 18:1427–1433PubMedCrossRef

62.

De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963–971PubMedCrossRef

63.

Peumans M, Voet M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B (2013) Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 17:739–750PubMedCrossRef

64.

Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G (2014) Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement. Clin Oral Investig 18:1975–1984PubMedCrossRef

65.

Taschner M, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Pelka M, Breschi L, Petschelt A et al (2012) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. Dent Mater 28:535–540PubMedCrossRef

66.

Piwowarczyk A, Schick K, Lauer HC (2012) Metal-ceramic crowns cemented with two luting agents: short-term results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 16:917–922PubMedCrossRef

67.

Behr M, Rosentritt M, Wimmer J, Lang R, Kolbeck C, Burgers R et al (2009) Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: a prospective clinical trial begun 2003. Dent Mater 25:601–604PubMedCrossRef

68.

Sorrentino R, De Simone G, Tete S, Russo S, Zarone F (2012) Five-year prospective clinical study of posterior three-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 16:977–985PubMedCrossRef

69.

Denner N, Heydecke G, Gerds T, Strub JR (2007) Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for an adhesive resin cement containing 4-META and a conventional glass-lonomer cement. Int J Prosthodont 20:73–78PubMed

70.

Blatz MB, Mante FK, Saleh N, Atlas AM, Mannan S, Ozer F (2013) Postoperative tooth sensitivity with a new self-adhesive resin cement – a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 17:793–798PubMedCrossRef

71.

Shetty RM, Bhat S, Mehta D, Srivatsa G, Shetty YB (2012) Comparative analysis of postcementation hypersensitivity with glass ionomer cement and a resin cement: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 13:327–331PubMed

72.

Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA (1999) Biocompatibility of an adhesive system applied to exposed human dental pulp. J Endod 25:676–682PubMedCrossRef

73.

Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA (1999) Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities. J Dent 27:557–564PubMedCrossRef

74.

Schedle A, Ortengren U, Eidler N, Gabauer M, Hensten A (2007) Do adverse effects of dental materials exist? What are the consequences, and how can they be diagnosed and treated? Clin Oral Implants Res 18(Suppl 3):232–256PubMedCrossRef

75.

Torstenson B (1995) Pulpal reaction to a dental adhesive in deep human cavities. Endod Dent Traumatol 11:172–176PubMedCrossRef

76.

Arrais CA, Rueggeberg FA, Waller JL, de Goes MF, Giannini M (2008) Effect of curing mode on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems. J Dent 36:418–426PubMedCrossRef

77.

Bergmann P, Noack MJ, Roulet JF (1991) Marginal adaptation with glass-ceramic inlays adhesively luted with glycerine gel. Quintessence Int 22:739–744. (Berlin, Germany: 1985)PubMed

78.

Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 17:542–556PubMedCrossRef

79.

Audenino G, Giannella G, Morello GM, Ceccarelli M, Carossa S, Bassi F (2006) Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: ten-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 19:22–23PubMed

80.

Guess PC, Schultheis S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR (2013) Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. J Prosthet Dent 110:264–273PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

81.

Zitzmann NU, Rohner U, Weiger R, Krastl G (2009) When to choose which retention element to use for removable dental prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 22:161–167PubMed

82.

Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M (2006) Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent 95:117–123PubMedCrossRef

83.

Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB (2008) The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Oper Dent 33:526–533PubMedCrossRef

84.

Stappert CF, Abe P, Kurths V, Gerds T, Strub JR (2008) Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps. J Adhes Dent 10:41–48PubMed

85.

Schmitter M, Lippenberger S, Rues S, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P (2010) Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration. Int Endodont J 43:436–442CrossRef

86.

Schmitter M, Posavec T, Mueller D, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Rues S (2013) Failure load of teeth restored by use of alumina copings: influence of residual tooth structure and cementation. Dent Mater J 32:537–543PubMedCrossRef

87.

Crocker WP (1992) The cementation of porcelain jacket crowns with adhesive resins. Br Dent J 172:64–67PubMedCrossRef

88.

Behr M, Kolbeck C, Lang R, Hahnel S, Dirschl L, Handel G (2009) Clinical performance of cements as luting agents for telescopic double crown-retained removable partial and complete overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 22:479–487PubMed

89.

Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY (2003) Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 90:31–41PubMedCrossRef

90.

Shimoe S, Tanoue N, Yanagida H, Atsuta M, Koizumi H, Matsumura H (2004) Comparative strength of metal-ceramic and metal-composite bonds after extended thermocycling. J Oral Rehab 31:689–694CrossRef

91.

Robin C, Scherrer SS, Wiskott HW, de Rijk WG, Belser UC (2002) Weibull parameters of composite resin bond strengths to porcelain and noble alloy using the Rocatec system. Dent Mater 18:389–395PubMedCrossRef

92.

Fonseca RG, Martins SB, de Oliveira Abi-Rached F, Dos Santos Cruz CA (2012) Effect of different airborne-particle abrasion/bonding agent combinations on the bond strength of a resin cement to a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 108:316–323PubMedCrossRef

93.

Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF (2014) Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 30:e147–e162PubMedCrossRef

94.

Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R (2011) Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 27:71–82PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

95.

Ozcan M, Bernasconi M (2015) Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 17:7–26PubMed

96.

Attia A, Kern M (2011) Effect of cleaning methods after reduced-pressure air abrasion on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 13:561–567PubMed

97.

Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Ulker M (2009) Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:251–260PubMedCrossRef

98.

Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A (2009) Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 25:442–451PubMedCrossRef

99.

Wilson TG Jr (2009) The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 80:1388–1392PubMedCrossRef

100.

Korsch M, Robra BP, Walther W (2015) Cement-associated signs of inflammation: retrospective analysis of the effect of excess cement on peri-implant tissue. Int J Prosthodont 28:11–18PubMedCrossRef

101.

Korsch M, Walther W (2014) Peri-implantitis associated with type of cement: a retrospective analysis of different types of cement and their clinical correlation to the peri-implant tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res: 2014 Sep 2. doi: 10.1111/cid.12265. [Epub ahead of print]

102.

Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Maslova N, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Linkevicius T (2015) Clinical factors influencing removal of the cement excess in implant-supported restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17(4):771–778PubMedCrossRef

103.

Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A (2013) The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:71–76PubMedCrossRef

104.

Begum Z, Sonika R, Pratik C (2014) Effect of different cementation techniques on retained excess cement and uniaxial retention of the implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:1333–1337PubMed

105.

Chee WW, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A (2013) Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method. J Prosthet Dent 109:216–221PubMedCrossRef

106.

Jugdev J, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Lynch E (2014) The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:784–790PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Befestigungsmaterialien in der restaurativen Zahnheilkunde
verfasst von: Dr. W. Bömicke, M. Sc.
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: wissen kompakt / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1863-2637
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-3816
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-015-0014-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Vollkeramische Restaurationen

Die Qual der Wahl

Membranen und Membrantechniken

Faserverstärkte Komposite

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter