nach oben

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Erschienen in:

21.02.2022 | Original Article

Effectiveness of surface treatment on bond strength of ceramic brackets to two types of CAD/CAM-prepared nanohybrid composites

verfasst von: Shaymaa Elsaka, Ali Hassan, Amr Elnaghy

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Sonderheft 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of two different adhesive-coated orthodontic ceramic brackets to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) nanohybrid composite.

Methods

A total of 120 specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm) were prepared from each type of CAD/CAM block (Grandio [GR], VOCO Cuxhaven, Germany; Lava Ultimate [LU], 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). For each type of CAD/CAM block, the plates were divided into four groups based on the applied surface treatment: hydrofluoric acid (HF), grinding bur (GB), silica coating with CoJet system (CS), and titanium tetrafluoride (TiF₄) 2 wt/v%. Maxillary central incisors of adhesive-coated ceramic orthodontic brackets (APC Flash-free Clarity Advanced Ceramic, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were bonded using Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). Shear bond strength was conducted, and the modes of failure were assessed utilizing the adhesive remnant index. Surface roughness and topography of treated CAD/CAM were evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test. The Weibull analysis was conducted on shear bond strength data.

Results

Surface treatment with 2% TiF₄ wt/v revealed significantly higher bond strength (GR, 14.51 ± 2.57 MPa; LU, 11.19 ± 2.17 MPa) than other groups for both types of CAD/CAM restorative materials (p < 0.05). Adhesive failures were the predominant mode of failure. Surface treatment with CS revealed higher surface roughness than other groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Surface treatment with 2% TiF₄ wt/v enhanced the adhesion between orthodontic ceramic brackets to GR and LU CAD/CAM composite restorative materials. GR CAD/CAM nanohybrid composite had higher bond strength than LU to ceramic orthodontic brackets.

Zhang ZC, Qian YF, Yang YM, Feng QP, Shen G (2016) Bond strength of metal brackets bonded to a silica-based ceramic with light-cured adhesive: influence of various surface treatment methods. J Orofac Orthop 77:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0044-2CrossRefPubMed

Di Guida LA, Benetti P, Corazza PH, Della Bona A (2019) The critical bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to dental glass-ceramics. Clin Oral Investig 23:4345–4353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02881-5CrossRefPubMed

Abu Alhaija ES, Abu AlReesh IA, AlWahadni AM (2010) Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod 32:274–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp098CrossRefPubMed

Zarif Najafi H, Oshagh M, Torkan S, Yousefipour B, Salehi R (2014) Evaluation of the effect of four surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of metal bracket to porcelain surface. Photomed Laser Surg 32:694–699. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3782CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Abdelnaby YL (2011) Effects of cyclic loading on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a porcelain surface using different conditioning protocols. Angle Orthod 81:1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.2319/030211-151.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Falkensammer F, Freudenthaler J, Pseiner B, Bantleon HP (2012) Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion. Eur J Orthod 34:498–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr034CrossRefPubMed

Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, Brix O, Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF (2012) CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations for the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int 43:457–467PubMed

Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N (2015) Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 19:299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1269-3CrossRefPubMed

Goracci C, Özcan M, Franchi L, Di Bello G, Louca C, Vichi A (2019) Bracket bonding to polymethylmethacrylate-based materials for computer-aided design/manufacture of temporary restorations: influence of mechanical treatment and chemical treatment with universal adhesives. Korean J Orthod 49:404–412. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.6.404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Alt V, Hannig M, Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M (2011) Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 27:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012CrossRefPubMed

11.

Göncü Başaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2011) Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design—computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand 69:144–150. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.545034CrossRefPubMed

12.

Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH (2012) Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 16:1669–1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0670-4CrossRefPubMed

13.

Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hämmerle C (2013) Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 109:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60309-1CrossRefPubMed

14.

Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Özcan M, Hämmerle CH (2012) Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 31:377–383. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-238CrossRefPubMed

15.

Reymus M, Roos M, Eichberger M, Edelhoff D, Hickel R, Stawarczyk B (2019) Bonding to new CAD/CAM resin composites: influence of air abrasion and conditioning agents as pretreatment strategy. Clin Oral Investig 23:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2461-7CrossRefPubMed

16.

Buyuk SK, Kucukekenci AS (2018) Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials. Angle Orthod 88:221–226. https://doi.org/10.2319/070917-455.1CrossRefPubMed

17.

Elsaka SE (2016) Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. Odontology 104:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-014-0188-8CrossRefPubMed

18.

Saraç YS, Külünk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Saraç D, Türk T (2011) Effects of surface-conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials. Eur J Orthod 33:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq132CrossRefPubMed

19.

Piascik JR, Wolter SD, Stoner BR (2011) Development of a novel surface modification for improved bonding to zirconia. Dent Mater 27:e99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.005CrossRefPubMed

20.

Gonzalez-Serrano C, Phark JH, Fuentes MV, Albaladejo A, Sanchez-Monescillo A, Duarte S Jr, Ceballos L (2021) Effect of a single-component ceramic conditioner on shear bond strength of precoated brackets to different CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig 25:1953–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03504-0CrossRefPubMed

21.

Magalhaes AC, Comar LP, Rios D, Delbem AC, Buzalaf MA (2008) Effect of a 4 % titanium tetrafluoride (TiF₄) varnish on demineralisation and remineralisation of bovine enamel in vitro. J Dent 36:158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.001CrossRefPubMed

22.

Magalhaes AC, Romanelli AC, Rios D, Comar LP, Navarro RS, Grizzo LT, Aranha AC, Buzalaf MA (2011) Effect of a single application of TiF₄ and NaF varnishes and solutions combined with Nd:YAG laser irradiation on enamel erosion in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg 29:537–544. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2886CrossRefPubMed

23.

Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM (2020) Effect of surface treatment and aging on bond strength of composite cement to novel CAD/CAM nanohybrid composite. J Adhes Dent 22:195–204. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44284CrossRefPubMed

24.

Klosa K, Boesch I, Kern M (2013) Long-term bond of glass ceramic and resin cement: evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative etching agent for lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent 15:377–383. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a29381CrossRefPubMed

25.

Cömlekoğlu ME, Dündar M, Güngör MA, Sen BH, Artunç C (2009) Preliminary evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative ceramic etchant to hydrofluoric acid. J Adhes Dent 11:447–453. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18138CrossRefPubMed

26.

Pfeilschifter M, Preis V, Behr M, Rosentritt M (2018) Edge strength of CAD/CAM materials. J Dent 74:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.004CrossRefPubMed

27.

Alp G, Subasi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B (2018) Effect of different resin cements and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of ceramic-glass polymer materials. J Prosthet Dent 120:454–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.016CrossRefPubMed

28.

Elsaka SE (2014) Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 16:531–540. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33198CrossRefPubMed

29.

Özarslan MM, Üstün Ö, Buyukkaplan US, Barutcigil Ç, Türker N, Barutcigil K (2018) Assessment the bond strength of ceramic brackets to CAD/CAM nanoceramic composite and interpenetrating network composite after different surface treatments. Biomed Res Int 2018:1871598. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1871598CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A (2011) A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eur J Orthod 34:610–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr044CrossRefPubMed

31.

Proença MAM, Carvalho EM, Silva e Silva A, Ribeiro GAC, Ferreira PVC, Carvalho CN, Bauer J (2020) Orthodontic resin containing bioactive glass: preparation, physicochemical characterization, antimicrobial activity, bioactivity and bonding to enamel. Int J Adhes Adhes 99:102575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102575CrossRef

32.

Gal J‑Y, Fovet Y, Adib-Yadzi M (2001) About a synthetic saliva for in vitro studies. Talanta 53:1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00618-4CrossRefPubMed

33.

Goto S, Hasegawa Y, Miyagawa Y, Endo T (2020) Effects of contact compressive force on bracket bond strength and adhesive thickness : study using orthodontic resins with different viscosities. J Orofac Orthop 81:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00202-9CrossRefPubMed

34.

Årtun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85:333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8CrossRefPubMed

35.

Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM (2019) Bonding durability of titanium tetrafluoride treated glass fiber post with resin cement. Dent Mater J 38:189–195. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-054CrossRefPubMed

36.

Elsaka SE (2018) Effectiveness of titanium tetrafluoride on the bond strength of composite cement to titanium. J Adhes Dent 20:143–149. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40297CrossRefPubMed

37.

van Rijkom H, Ruben J, Vieira A, Huysmans MC, Truin GJ, Mulder J (2003) Erosion-inhibiting effect of sodium fluoride and titanium tetrafluoride treatment in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 111:253–257. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00031.xCrossRefPubMed

38.

Reynolds IR (1975) A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 2:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666CrossRef

39.

Basalamah A, Maher A, Whba AH, Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Montasser MA (2021) Effects of fluorosed enamel on orthodontic bracket bonding : an in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00342-xCrossRefPubMed

40.

Özcan M (2002) The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 87:469–472. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124365CrossRefPubMed

41.

Peumans M, Valjakova EB, De Munck J, Mishevska CB, Van Meerbeek B (2016) Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to different CAD/CAM materials. J Adhes Dent 18:289–302. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a36155CrossRefPubMed

42.

Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T (1996) Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70124-5CrossRefPubMed

43.

Shimizu K, Imai H, Hirashima H, Tsukuma K (1999) Low-temperature synthesis of anatase thin films on glass and organic substrates by direct deposition from aqueous solutions. Thin Solid Films 30:220–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00084-XCrossRef

44.

Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G (1994) Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement. J Prosthet Dent 72:85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90216-xCrossRefPubMed

45.

Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoğlu E, Arun T (2009) Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod 31:402–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn118CrossRefPubMed

46.

Bielen V, Inokoshi M, Munck JD, Zhang F, Vanmeensel K, Minakuchi S, Vleugels J, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B (2015) Bonding effectiveness to differently sandblasted dental zirconia. J Adhes Dent 17:235–242. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a34401CrossRefPubMed

47.

Büyükyilmaz T, Tangugsorn V, Ogaard B, Arends J, Ruben J, Rølla G (1994) The effect of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF₄) application around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105:293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70124-5CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Effectiveness of surface treatment on bond strength of ceramic brackets to two types of CAD/CAM-prepared nanohybrid composites
verfasst von: Shaymaa Elsaka
Ali Hassan
Amr Elnaghy
Publikationsdatum: 21.02.2022
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe Sonderheft 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00377-8

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Effectiveness of surface treatment on bond strength of ceramic brackets to two types of CAD/CAM-prepared nanohybrid composites

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 2/2023

In vitro study of structural and mechanical properties of latex and non-latex intermaxillary orthodontic elastics

Effects of miniscrew-facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement

Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances

Ramal inclination in the frontal plane after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III facial asymmetry

Impact of phosphorylation of heat shock protein 27 on the expression profile of periodontal ligament fibroblasts during mechanical strain

Effect of using different component combinations for orthodontic bracket bonding with self-etch primers

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter