nach oben

Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology

Erschienen in:

27.03.2024

FLIP in Clinical Practice: When Is It Helpful?

verfasst von: Elena C. Pezzino, MD, Daniel R. Arndorfer, MD, Dustin A. Carlson, MD, MSCI

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry is as an important tool in the diagnosis and management of esophageal disorders.

Recent Findings

Using high-resolution impedance planimetry, FLIP assesses esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and esophageal body distensibility as well as the contractile response to distension (secondary peristalsis) at the time of sedated endoscopy. These features can be incorporated to classify esophageal motility, which often parallels high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the Chicago Classification (CCv4.0). The role of FLIP Panometry has been evaluated in multiple clinical scenarios, such as clarifying inconclusive HRM, excluding primary esophageal motility disorders, and guiding management for esophageal diseases.

Summary

FLIP Panometry has proven to be a diagnostic tool that can complement, or in some cases be an alternative to, HRM in the evaluation of esophageal dysmotility. The strongest recommended benefit of FLIP in current clinical practice is with clarifying equivocal HRM, such as EGJOO or inconclusive achalasia. There are also promising results demonstrating the role for FLIP in excluding primary motility disorders during an initial endoscopy, as well as for the use of FLIP for evaluating treatment and outcomes in achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). With continued expanding use of FLIP across multiple centers and clinical scenarios, additional evolution of the role for FLIP is anticipated as well.

Cho SY, Choung RS, Saito YA, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR 3rd, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for dysphagia: a USA community study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):212–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12467.CrossRefPubMed

Eslick GD, Talley NJ. Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life–a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27(10):971–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03664.x.CrossRefPubMed

Kidambi T, Toto E, Ho N, Taft T, Hirano I. Temporal trends in the relative prevalence of dysphagia etiologies from 1999–2009. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(32):4335–41. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4335.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mainie I, Tutuian R, Patel A, Castell DO. Regional esophageal dysfunction in scleroderma and achalasia using multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(1):210–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9845-x.CrossRefPubMed

Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x.

Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Prakash Gyawali C, Roman S, et al. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0(©). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14058.

Gyawali CP, Carlson DA, Chen JW, Patel A, Wong RJ, Yadlapati RH. ACG clinical guidelines: clinical use of esophageal physiologic testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(9):1412–28. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McMahon BP, Rao SS, Gregersen H, Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Drewes AM, et al. Distensibility testing of the esophagus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1232:331–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06069.x.CrossRefPubMed

Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ. Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(2):272–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.069.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Lin Z, Hirano I, Gonsalves N, Listernick Z, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motility utilizing the functional lumen imaging probe. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1726–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Carlson DA, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Sternbach J, Donnan EN, Friesen L, et al. The functional lumen imaging probe detects esophageal contractility not observed with manometry in patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(7):1742–51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.005.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Donnan EN, Pandolfino JE. EndoFLIP in the esophagus: assessing sphincter function, wall stiffness, and motility to guide treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2020;49(3):427–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2020.04.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Donnan EN, Pandolfino JE. Applying the functional luminal imaging probe to esophageal disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22(3):10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-0749-7.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Hirano I, Pandolfino JE, Boeckxstaens GE. Functional lumen imaging probe for the management of esophageal disorders: expert review from the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the AGA Institute. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(3):325–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Carlson DA, Kou W, Lin Z, Hinchcliff M, Thakrar A, Falmagne S, et al. Normal values of esophageal distensibility and distension-induced contractility measured by functional luminal imaging probe panometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):674-81.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.042.CrossRefPubMed

16.•

Carlson DA, Baumann AJ, Donnan EN, Krause A, Kou W, Pandolfino JE. Evaluating esophageal motility beyond primary peristalsis: assessing esophagogastric junction opening mechanics and secondary peristalsis in patients with normal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(10):e14116. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14116. Symptomatic patients with normal HRM can have abnormal FLIP Panometry and highlights the role of secondary peristalsis in dysphagia.

17.

Savarino E, di Pietro M, Bredenoord AJ, Carlson DA, Clarke JO, Khan A, et al. Use of the functional lumen imaging probe in clinical esophagology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(11):1786–96. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000773.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.•

Carlson DA, Gyawali CP, Khan A, Yadlapati R, Chen J, Chokshi RV, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by FLIP panometry: a study of 722 subjects with manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(12):2357–66. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001532. Validated FLIP panometry motility classifications and role in identifying primary esophageal motility disorders.

19.

Carlson DA. Functional lumen imaging probe: the FLIP side of esophageal disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2016;32(4):310–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/mog.0000000000000272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Carlson DA, Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Triggs JR, Falmagne S, Prescott J, et al. Esophageal motility classification can be established at the time of endoscopy: a study evaluating real-time functional luminal imaging probe panometry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(6):915-23.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.06.039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.•

Carlson DA, Baumann AJ, Prescott JE, Donnan EN, Yadlapati R, Khan A, et al. Validation of secondary peristalsis classification using FLIP panometry in 741 subjects undergoing manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022;34(1):e14192. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14192. Validated FLIP panometry motility classifications and secondary peristalsis in esophageal motility disorders.

22.

Carlson DA, Kou W, Pandolfino JE. The rhythm and rate of distension-induced esophageal contractility: a physiomarker of esophageal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(5):e13794. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13794.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Carlson DA, Prescott JE, Baumann AJ, Schauer JM, Krause A, Donnan EN, et al. Validation of clinically relevant thresholds of esophagogastric junction obstruction using FLIP panometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(6):e1250–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.040.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Wakim El-Khoury J, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Godo B, Farina DA, Kou W, et al. Relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in response to reduced volume distension during FLIP panometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023;35(11):e14663. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14663.CrossRefPubMed

25.•

Carlson DA, Schauer JM, Kou W, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Functional lumen imaging probe panometry helps identify clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction per Chicago Classification v4.0. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001980. Use of FLIP to clarify EGJOO on HRM.

26.

Chen JW, Khan A, Chokshi RV, Clarke JO, Fass R, Garza JM, et al. Interrater reliability of functional lumen imaging probe panometry and high-resolution manometry for the assessment of esophageal motility disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(8):1334–43. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002285.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Miller JD, Kemple BP, Evans JK, Clayton SB. A comparison of functional luminal imaging probe with high-resolution manometry, timed barium esophagram, and pH impedance testing to evaluate functional luminal imaging probe’s diagnostic capabilities. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0000000000001966.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Schoeman MN, Holloway RH. Secondary oesophageal peristalsis in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia. Gut. 1994;35(11):1523–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.11.1523.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Schoeman MN, Holloway RH. Integrity and characteristics of secondary oesophageal peristalsis in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut. 1995;36(4):499–504. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.36.4.499.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Carlson DA, Prescott JE, Germond E, Brenner D, Carns M, Correia CS, et al. Heterogeneity of primary and secondary peristalsis in systemic sclerosis: a new model of “scleroderma esophagus.” Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022;34(7):e14284. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14284.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Koop AH, Kahrilas PJ, Schauer J, Pandolfino JE, Carlson DA. The impact of primary peristalsis, contractile reserve, and secondary peristalsis on esophageal clearance measured by timed barium esophagogram. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023;35(10):e14638. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14638.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Triggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, Kou W, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Functional luminal imaging probe panometry identifies achalasia-type esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(10):2209–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.037.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Bredenoord AJ, Babaei A, Carlson D, Omari T, Akiyama J, Yadlapati R, et al. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(9):e14193. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14193.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Carlson DA, Crowell MD, Kimmel JN, Patel A, Gyawali CP, Hinchcliff M, et al. Loss of peristaltic reserve, determined by multiple rapid swallows, is the most frequent esophageal motility abnormality in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(10):1502–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Ponds FA, Bredenoord AJ, Kessing BF, Smout AJ. Esophagogastric junction distensibility identifies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12908.

36.•

Carlson DA, Kou W, Rooney KP, Baumann AJ, Donnan E, Triggs JR, et al. Achalasia subtypes can be identified with functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry using a supervised machine learning process. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(3):e13932. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13932. Identifying role of FLIP in clarifying inconclusive achalasia and identifying subtypes.

37.•

Baumann AJ, Donnan EN, Triggs JR, Kou W, Prescott J, Decorrevont A, et al. Normal functional luminal imaging probe panometry findings associate with lack of major esophageal motility disorder on high-resolution manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(2):259–68.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.040. Using FLIP Panometry to exclude primary esophageal motility disorders.

38.

Shah ED, Yadlapati R, Chan WW. Optimizing the management algorithm for esophageal dysphagia after index endoscopy: cost-effectiveness and cost-minimization analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002521.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Teitelbaum EN, Boris L, Arafat FO, Nicodème F, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Comparison of esophagogastric junction distensibility changes during POEM and Heller myotomy using intraoperative FLIP. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4547–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3121-2.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Su B, Callahan ZM, Novak S, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB. Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) to evaluate myotomy and predict outcomes after surgery for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(4):964–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04513-w.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Hirano I, Boris L, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility measurements during Heller myotomy and POEM for achalasia predict postoperative symptomatic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):522–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3733-1.CrossRefPubMed

42.•

Holmstrom AL, Campagna RAJ, Cirera A, Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE, Teitelbaum EN, et al. Intraoperative use of FLIP is associated with clinical success following POEM for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):3090–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07739-6. Use of FLIP panometry in POEM for achalasia.

43.

Pandolfino JE, de Ruigh A, Nicodème F, Xiao Y, Boris L, Kahrilas PJ. Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction assessed with the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP™) in achalasia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(6):496–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Rohof WO, Hirsch DP, Kessing BF, Boeckxstaens GE. Efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia depends on the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(2):328–35. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.048.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Jain AS, Carlson DA, Triggs J, Tye M, Kou W, Campagna R, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility on functional lumen imaging probe topography predicts treatment response in achalasia-anatomy matters! Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(9):1455–63. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ. ACG Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(1):27–56. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Tack J, Pandolfino JE. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):277–88. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.047.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Lottrup C, McMahon BP, Ejstrud P, Ostapiuk MA, Funch-Jensen P, Drewes AM. Esophagogastric junction distensibility in hiatus hernia. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(5):463–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12344.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Simlote A, Vespa E, Teitelbaum E, Hungness E, et al. Identifying hiatal hernia with impedance planimetry during esophageal distension testing. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023;35(2):e14470. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14470.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Carlson DA, Kathpalia P, Craft J, Tye M, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, et al. The relationship between esophageal acid exposure and the esophageal response to volumetric distention. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13240.

51.

Tucker E, Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Telakis E, Knowles K, et al. Measurement of esophago-gastric junction cross-sectional area and distensibility by an endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe for the diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(11):904–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12218.CrossRefPubMed

52.

VanDruff VN, Amundson JR, Joseph S, Che S, Kuchta K, Zimmermann CJ, et al. Impedance planimetry and panometry (EndoFLIP™) can replace manometry in preoperative anti-reflux surgery assessment. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(1):339–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10419-w.CrossRefPubMed

53.•

Su B, Dunst C, Gould J, Jobe B, Severson P, Newhams K, et al. Experience-based expert consensus on the intra-operative usage of the Endoflip impedance planimetry system. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):2731–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07704-3. Role of FLIP panometry in antireflux surgery.

54.

Wu H, Ungerleider S, Attaar M, Wong HJ, Kuchta K, Denham W, et al. Tailored fundoplication for GERD with impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™). Foregut. 2022;2(3):242–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161221094841.CrossRef

55.

Turner B, Helm M, Hetzel E, Gould JC. Is that “floppy” fundoplication tight enough? Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1823–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06947-z.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Su B, Novak S, Callahan ZM, Kuchta K, Carbray J, Ujiki MB. Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1761–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06925-5.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Wu H, Attaar M, Wong HJ, Campbell M, Kuchta K, Denham EW 3rd, et al. Impedance planimetry (Endoflip) and ideal distensibility ranges for optimal outcomes after Nissen and Toupet fundoplication. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;235(3):420–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000000273.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Wu H, Attaar M, Wong HJ, Campbell M, Kuchta K, Denham W, et al. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) reveals changes in gastroesophageal junction compliance during fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(9):6801–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08966-1.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Dellon ES, Liacouras CA, Molina-Infante J, Furuta GT, Spergel JM, Zevit N, et al. Updated international consensus diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: proceedings of the AGREE Conference. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(4):1022-33.e10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.009.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Kwiatek MA, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ, Rothe J, Luger D, Pandolfino JE. Mechanical properties of the esophagus in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(1):82–90. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.037.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Hirano I, Moy N, Heckman MG, Thomas CS, Gonsalves N, Achem SR. Endoscopic assessment of the oesophageal features of eosinophilic oesophagitis: validation of a novel classification and grading system. Gut. 2013;62(4):489–95. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301817.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Roman S, Hirano I, Kwiatek MA, Gonsalves N, Chen J, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Manometric features of eosinophilic esophagitis in esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(3):208–14, e111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01633.x.

63.

Ferreira CT, Goldani HA. Contribution of endoscopy in the management of eosinophilic esophagitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;4(8):347–55. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v4.i8.347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Nicodème F, Hirano I, Chen J, Robinson K, Lin Z, Xiao Y, et al. Esophageal distensibility as a measure of disease severity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(9):1101-7.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Carlson DA, Hirano I, Zalewski A, Gonsalves N, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE. Improvement in esophageal distensibility in response to medical and diet therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017;8(10):e119. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Dellon ES, Kim HP, Sperry SL, Rybnicek DA, Woosley JT, Shaheen NJ. A phenotypic analysis shows that eosinophilic esophagitis is a progressive fibrostenotic disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(4):577-85.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.027.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Atkins D, Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Spergel JM. Eosinophilic esophagitis phenotypes: ready for prime time? Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017;28(4):312–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12715.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.•

Carlson DA, Hirano I, Gonsalves N, Kahrilas PJ, Araujo IK, Yang M, et al. A physiomechanical model of esophageal function in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2023;165(3):552–63.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.05.031. Using FLIP panometry to identifying subtypes of EoE.

69.•

Carlson DA, Shehata C, Gonsalves N, Hirano I, Peterson S, Prescott J, et al. Esophageal dysmotility is associated with disease severity in eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(8):1719–28.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.002. FLIP panometry clinical application in EoE.

70.

Araujo IK, Shehata C, Hirano I, Gonsalves N, Kahrilas PJ, Tetreault MP, et al. The severity of reduced esophageal distensibility parallels eosinophilic esophagitis disease duration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.04.027.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Hoffmann NV, Keeley K, Wechsler JB. Esophageal distensibility defines fibrostenotic severity in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(5):1188-97.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.044.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: FLIP in Clinical Practice: When Is It Helpful?
verfasst von: Elena C. Pezzino, MD
Daniel R. Arndorfer, MD
Dustin A. Carlson, MD, MSCI
Publikationsdatum: 27.03.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1092-8472
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-309X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-024-00442-8

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

FLIP in Clinical Practice: When Is It Helpful?

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

Update Innere Medizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Non-invasive Testing in Gastric Diseases

The Diagnostic Approach of Benign Esophageal Tumors: A Narrative Review

Barrett’s Esophagus: Who and How Do We Screen?

Robotic Surgeries in Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Disease

Tools for Bedsite Pain Assessments in Chronic Pancreatitis

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

Update Innere Medizin