Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2024

12.02.2024 | Editorial

Incorporating the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT PRIMARY score into the selection criteria for prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance

verfasst von: Levent Kabasakal, Ruştu Turkay, Bulent Onal

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Active surveillance (AS) has become a preferred strategy to minimize overtreatment in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who do not present with severe lower urinary tract symptoms. Identifying candidates for AS and monitoring them effectively is crucial to mitigate the risk of undertreating localized disease. Currently, the selection of patients for AS is based on a combination of digital rectal examination (DRE) results, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason score from prostate biopsies, and the rate of tumor-positive biopsy cores. Some protocols also incorporate PSA density, the rate of cancer in biopsy cores, and multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to enhance predictive accuracy. Despite these measures, the absence of universally accepted selection standards leads to inconsistencies in identifying appropriate AS candidates. These inconsistencies may result in unnecessary curative treatments, such as radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for patients suitable for AS, or conversely, a missed opportunity for timely intervention in high-risk patients. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, Spevack L, Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E, Loblaw A; Collaborators. Transperineal prostate biopsies using local anesthesia: experience with 1,287 patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability. J Urol. 2019;201(6):1121–1126. Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, Spevack L, Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E, Loblaw A; Collaborators. Transperineal prostate biopsies using local anesthesia: experience with 1,287 patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability. J Urol. 2019;201(6):1121–1126.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barzell WE, Melamed MR, Cathcart P, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(3):762–7.CrossRefPubMed Barzell WE, Melamed MR, Cathcart P, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(3):762–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE, Perez N, Shinohara K, Carroll PR. Changes in cancer volume in serial biopsies of men on active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1825–9.CrossRefPubMed Porten SP, Whitson JM, Cowan JE, Perez N, Shinohara K, Carroll PR. Changes in cancer volume in serial biopsies of men on active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1825–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bokhorst LP, Alberts AR, Rannikko A, Valdagni R, Picles T, Kakehi Y, et al. Compliance rates with the prostate cancer research international active surveillance (PRIAS) protocol and disease reclassification in noncompliers. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):814–21.CrossRefPubMed Bokhorst LP, Alberts AR, Rannikko A, Valdagni R, Picles T, Kakehi Y, et al. Compliance rates with the prostate cancer research international active surveillance (PRIAS) protocol and disease reclassification in noncompliers. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):814–21.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Turkay R, Inci E, Yildiz O, Ozgur E, Taşci AI. Cognitive versus magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: which one is worthier to perform? Ultrasound Q. 2020;36(4):345–9.CrossRefPubMed Turkay R, Inci E, Yildiz O, Ozgur E, Taşci AI. Cognitive versus magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: which one is worthier to perform? Ultrasound Q. 2020;36(4):345–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei JT, Barocas D, Carlsson S, Coakley F, Eggener S, Etzioni R, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline part II: considerations for a prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2023;210(1):54–63.CrossRefPubMed Wei JT, Barocas D, Carlsson S, Coakley F, Eggener S, Etzioni R, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline part II: considerations for a prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2023;210(1):54–63.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. ISBN 978–94–92671–19–6. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. ISBN 978–94–92671–19–6.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirci E, Kabasakal L, Şahin OE, Akgün E, Güntekin MH, Doğanca T, et al. Can SUVmax values of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT scan predict the clinically significant prostate cancer? Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40(1):86–91.CrossRefPubMed Demirci E, Kabasakal L, Şahin OE, Akgün E, Güntekin MH, Doğanca T, et al. Can SUVmax values of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT scan predict the clinically significant prostate cancer? Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40(1):86–91.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts M, et al. The additive diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective multicentre study. Eur Urol. 2021;80(6):682–9.CrossRefPubMed Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts M, et al. The additive diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective multicentre study. Eur Urol. 2021;80(6):682–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett L, Papa N, Counter W, Calais J, Barbato F, Burger I, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of the PRIMARY score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis within a real-world database. J Nucl Med. 2024;65(1):94–9.CrossRefPubMed Emmett L, Papa N, Counter W, Calais J, Barbato F, Burger I, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of the PRIMARY score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis within a real-world database. J Nucl Med. 2024;65(1):94–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Kang F, Gao J, Jiao J, Quan Z, Ma S, et al. A prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-based approach for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer in Gleason grade group 1: a multicenter retrospective study. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(11):1750–7.CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Kang F, Gao J, Jiao J, Quan Z, Ma S, et al. A prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-based approach for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer in Gleason grade group 1: a multicenter retrospective study. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(11):1750–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Incorporating the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT PRIMARY score into the selection criteria for prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance
verfasst von
Levent Kabasakal
Ruştu Turkay
Bulent Onal
Publikationsdatum
12.02.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06642-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2024

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2024 Zur Ausgabe