nach oben

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Erschienen in:

04.03.2022 | Original article

Occlusal plane rotation and orthodontic decompensation: influence on the outcome of surgical correction of class III malocclusion

verfasst von: Assistant Professor Dr. Elif Dilara Seker, Assistant Professor Ezgi Sunal Akturk, Associate Professor Hanife Nuray Yilmaz, Professor Nazan Kucukkeles

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective multicenter study is to evaluate the influence of surgical manipulation of the upper occlusal plane (UOP) and orthodontic decompensation on the outcome of class III orthognathic surgery.

Methods

Incisor inclinations, occlusal plane inclination as well as skeletal and soft tissue changes were assessed in lateral cephalograms of 85 class III patients who had previously undergone orthognathic surgery. Fourteen linear and eight angular measurements were performed on each radiograph at the beginning of treatment (T0), before surgery (T1) and at the end of treatment (T2) using imaging software. After measurement of variables, Mann–Whitney U‑test, repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni multiple comparison test, and Spearman’s correlation analysis were performed.

Results

A statistically significant improvement was observed in both sagittal skeletal and soft tissue measurements (p < 0.05). Surgical change in UOP was significantly correlated with changes in overbite, upper lip strain and soft tissue B‑point change in the sagittal direction (p < 0.05). Overjet change was significantly correlated with changes in the soft tissue and all sagittal skeletal parameters except for SNA. Changes in the incisor inclinations was significantly correlated with changes in the sagittal skeletal parameters and lower facial height. Significant differences were also observed between the groups with induced clockwise or counterclockwise rotation of the mandible in terms of IMPA (long axis of LI to mandibular plane), overbite, upper lip strain and position of soft tissue B‑point (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Sufficient dental decompensation is crucial for controlling the sagittal as well as the vertical relationship during surgery. Counterclockwise rotation provides an increase in sagittal projection of the mandibular body at the soft tissue B‑point.

Perillo L, Vitale M, Masucci C, D’Apuzzo F, Cozza P, Franchi L (2016) Comparisons of two protocols for the early treatment of class III dentoskeletal disharmony. Eur J Orthod 38:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv010CrossRefPubMed

Lin J, Gu Y (2003) Preliminary investigation of nonsurgical treatment of severe skeletal class III malocclusion in the permanent dentition. Angle Orthod 73:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073〈0401:PIONTO〉2.0.CO;2PubMed

Ellis E III, McNamara J Jr (1984) Components of adult class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90109-5CrossRefPubMed

Troy BA, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig K, Johnston W (2009) Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:146.e1–146.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.012CrossRefPubMed

Satrom KD, Sinclair PM, Wolford LM (1991) The stability of double jaw surgery: a comparison of rigid versus wire fixation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 99:550–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81632-4CrossRefPubMed

Bailey LTJ, Dover AJ, Proffit WR (2007) Long-term soft tissue changes after orthodontic and surgical corrections of skeletal class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod 77:389–396. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219CrossRefPubMed

Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N (1992) A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101:556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70131-SCrossRefPubMed

Capelozza Filho L, Martins A, Mazzotini R, da Silva Filho O (1996) Effects of dental decompensation on the surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 11:165–180PubMed

Potts B, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig KW, Beck FM (2009) Dental and skeletal changes associated with class II surgical-orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:566.e1–566.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.020CrossRefPubMed

10.

Quast A, Santander P, Leding J, Klenke D, Moser N, Schliephake H et al (2021) Orthodontic incisor decompensation in orthognathic therapy—success and efficiency in three dimensions. Clin Oral Invest 25:4001–4010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03730-6CrossRef

11.

Tsai I‑M, Lin C‑H, Wang Y‑C (2012) Correction of skeletal class III malocclusion with clockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 141:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.038CrossRefPubMed

12.

Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley CM Jr et al (1999) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70234-9CrossRefPubMed

13.

Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim LH (2009) Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1‑phase nonextraction therapy of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.029CrossRefPubMed

14.

Franchi L, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Defraia E, Baccetti T (2011) Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the forsus fatigue resistant device in class II patients. Angle Orthod 81:678–683. https://doi.org/10.2319/102710-629.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Bland JM, Altman DG (2007) Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 17:571–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701329422CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, New York

17.

Parente E, Lacerda G, Silvares MG (2014) Surgical manipulation of the occlusal plane in class III deformities: 5 features to help planning. Open J Stomatol 4:238–242. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2014.45033CrossRef

18.

Kim D‑K, Baek S‑H (2013) Change in maxillary incisor inclination during surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion: comparison of extraction and nonextraction of the maxillary first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.014CrossRefPubMed

19.

Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM (1976) Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod 6:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1976)046

20.

Johnston C, Burden D, Kennedy D, Harradine N, Stevenson M (2006) Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:300–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.023CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ahn H‑W, Baek S‑H (2011) Skeletal anteroposterior discrepancy and vertical type effects on lower incisor preoperative decompensation and postoperative compensation in skeletal class III patients. Angle Orthod 81:64–74. https://doi.org/10.2319/031710-158.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Altug-Atac AT, Bolatoglu H, Memikoglu UT (2008) Facial soft tissue profile following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 78:50–57. https://doi.org/10.2319/122206-525.1CrossRefPubMed

23.

Koh CH, Chew MT (2004) Predictability of soft tissue profile changes following bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class III Chinese patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1505–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.022CrossRefPubMed

24.

Lin S‑S, Kerr WJS (1998) Soft and hard tissue changes in class III patients treated by bimaxillary surgery. Eur J Orthod 20:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.1.25CrossRefPubMed

25.

Sonego C, Bobrowski Â, Junior OC, Torriani M (2014) Aesthetic and functional implications following rotation of the maxillomandibular complex in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.07.738CrossRefPubMed

26.

Esteves LS, Ávila C, Medeiros PJ (2012) Changes in occlusal plane through orthognathic surgery. Dental Press J Orthod 17:160–173CrossRef

27.

McCollum AG, Reyneke JP, Wolford LM (1989) An alternative for the correction of the class II low mandibular plane angle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 67:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90344-7CrossRefPubMed

28.

Han JJ, Yang HJ, Lee S‑J, Hwang SJ (2014) Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:811–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.018CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Occlusal plane rotation and orthodontic decompensation: influence on the outcome of surgical correction of class III malocclusion
verfasst von: Assistant Professor Dr. Elif Dilara Seker
Assistant Professor Ezgi Sunal Akturk
Associate Professor Hanife Nuray Yilmaz
Professor Nazan Kucukkeles
Publikationsdatum: 04.03.2022
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00379-6

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Occlusal plane rotation and orthodontic decompensation: influence on the outcome of surgical correction of class III malocclusion