Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 6/2023

25.06.2022

Radiographic predictors of failure of simple manual traction of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a single-center experience

verfasst von: Umut Celikyurt, Burak Acar, Akin Torun, Muzeyyen Karakullukcu, Ozgur Cakir, Ozgur Baris, Ahmet Vural, Aysen Agacdiken

Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Extraction of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads could be a difficult procedure due to fibrous tissue around the lead and anatomical variations. In this report, we present our experience in the radiographic predictors of failure of simple manual traction (SMT) in patients with dual-coil ICD requiring lead extraction (LE).

Methods

Between January 2017 and February 2021, 103 leads were removed in 65 consecutive patients; 65 (63.1%) were dual-coil ICD leads, 22 (21.4%) were atrial, and 16 (15.5%) were coronary sinus leads. Patient-based and procedural data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Clinical and procedural characteristics were compared and radiographic predictors of failure of SMT of ICD leads were assessed. Projected anteroposterior (AP) lead tortuosity was measured and lead slack score was estimated on chest X-ray (CXR).

Results

Simple manual traction failed in 27 (42%) of the ICD leads. Ottawa slack score (odds ratio [OR] 2.368, 95% CI [1.261–4.447]; P = 0.007), AP lead tortuosity > 1.10 (OR 7.477, 95% CI [1.718–35.542]; P = 0.007), and number of previous interventions (OR 6.016, 95% CI [1.184–30.557]; P < 0.030) were found to be independently related to the failure of SMT. Receiver–operator characteristic curve analysis yielded an AP lead tortuosity cutoff value of > 1.10 for predicting the failure of SMT. The area under the curve was 0.744; the 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.617 to 0.871 (P = 0.001), with a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 73%.

Conclusion

Simple manual traction success in our study varied based on radiographic lead-related parameters. Before planning the procedure, increased AP lead tortuosity in vasculature and higher lead slack score can be easily determined on CXR and may be associated with more fibrous adherences, the complexity of the LE, and failure of SMT.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yap SC, Bhagwandien RE, Theuns DAMJ, Yasar YE, de Heide J, Hoogendijk MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction using a liberal combined superior and femoral approach. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;62:239–48.CrossRefPubMed Yap SC, Bhagwandien RE, Theuns DAMJ, Yasar YE, de Heide J, Hoogendijk MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction using a liberal combined superior and femoral approach. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;62:239–48.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracke F, Meijer A, Van Gelder B. Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: patient and lead characteristics in relation to the requirement of extraction tools. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25:1037–40.CrossRefPubMed Bracke F, Meijer A, Van Gelder B. Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: patient and lead characteristics in relation to the requirement of extraction tools. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25:1037–40.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Segreti L, Di Cori A, Soldati E, Zucchelli G, Viani S, Paperini L, et al. Major predictors of fibrous adherences in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1201–2196.CrossRef Segreti L, Di Cori A, Soldati E, Zucchelli G, Viani S, Paperini L, et al. Major predictors of fibrous adherences in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1201–2196.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bontempi L, Vassanelli F, Cerini M, D’Aloia A, Vizzardi E, Gargaro A, et al. Predicting the difficulty of a lead extraction procedure: the LED index. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014;15:668–73.CrossRefPubMed Bontempi L, Vassanelli F, Cerini M, D’Aloia A, Vizzardi E, Gargaro A, et al. Predicting the difficulty of a lead extraction procedure: the LED index. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014;15:668–73.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Biefer HR, Hürlimann D, Grünenfelder J, Salzberg SP, Steffel J, Falk V, Starck CT. Generator pocket adhesions of cardiac leads: classification and correlation with transvenous lead extraction results. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:1111–6.CrossRefPubMed Biefer HR, Hürlimann D, Grünenfelder J, Salzberg SP, Steffel J, Falk V, Starck CT. Generator pocket adhesions of cardiac leads: classification and correlation with transvenous lead extraction results. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:1111–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Afzal MR, Daoud EG, Matre N, Shoben A, Burnside M, Gilliam C, et al. RIsk Stratification prior to lead Extraction and impact on major intraprocedural complications (RISE protocol). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:2453–9.CrossRefPubMed Afzal MR, Daoud EG, Matre N, Shoben A, Burnside M, Gilliam C, et al. RIsk Stratification prior to lead Extraction and impact on major intraprocedural complications (RISE protocol). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:2453–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, et al. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(12):e503–51.CrossRefPubMed Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, et al. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(12):e503–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Krahn AD, Morissette J, Lahm R, Haddad T, Baxter WW, McVenes R, et al. Radiographic predictors of lead conductor fracture. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1070–7.CrossRefPubMed Krahn AD, Morissette J, Lahm R, Haddad T, Baxter WW, McVenes R, et al. Radiographic predictors of lead conductor fracture. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1070–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha AC, Vezi BZ, Keren A, Alanazi H, Gollob MH, Green MS, et al. Predictors of fracture risk of a small caliber implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33:437–43.CrossRefPubMed Ha AC, Vezi BZ, Keren A, Alanazi H, Gollob MH, Green MS, et al. Predictors of fracture risk of a small caliber implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33:437–43.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaser AD, Aziz Z, Besser SA, Jones CI, Jameria Z, Kannan A, et al. Characterization of lead adherence using intravascular ultrasound to assess difficulty of transvenous lead extraction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13: e007726.CrossRefPubMed Beaser AD, Aziz Z, Besser SA, Jones CI, Jameria Z, Kannan A, et al. Characterization of lead adherence using intravascular ultrasound to assess difficulty of transvenous lead extraction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13: e007726.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehieli WL, Boll DT, Marin D, Lewis R, Piccini JP, Hurwitz LM. Use of preprocedural MDCT for cardiac implantable electric device lead extraction: frequency of findings that change management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:770–6.CrossRefPubMed Ehieli WL, Boll DT, Marin D, Lewis R, Piccini JP, Hurwitz LM. Use of preprocedural MDCT for cardiac implantable electric device lead extraction: frequency of findings that change management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:770–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Greenfield RA, Hranitzky PM, Hegland DD, Schroder JN, et al. Preprocedural ECG-gated computed tomography for prevention of complications during lead extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:1297–305.CrossRefPubMed Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Greenfield RA, Hranitzky PM, Hegland DD, Schroder JN, et al. Preprocedural ECG-gated computed tomography for prevention of complications during lead extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:1297–305.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones SO 4th, Eckart RE, Albert CM, Epstein LM. Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: outcomes and changing indications. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:520–5.CrossRefPubMed Jones SO 4th, Eckart RE, Albert CM, Epstein LM. Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: outcomes and changing indications. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:520–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal SK, Kamireddy S, Nemec J, Voigt A, Saba S. Predictors of complications of endovascular chronic lead extractions from pacemakers and defibrillators: a single-operator experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20:171–5.CrossRefPubMed Agarwal SK, Kamireddy S, Nemec J, Voigt A, Saba S. Predictors of complications of endovascular chronic lead extractions from pacemakers and defibrillators: a single-operator experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20:171–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzone P, Tsiachris D, Marzi A, Ciconte G, Paglino G, Sora N, et al. Predictors of advanced lead extraction based on a systematic stepwise approach: results from a high volume center. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:837–44.CrossRefPubMed Mazzone P, Tsiachris D, Marzi A, Ciconte G, Paglino G, Sora N, et al. Predictors of advanced lead extraction based on a systematic stepwise approach: results from a high volume center. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:837–44.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sood N, Martin DT, Lampert R, Curtis JP, Parzynski C, Clancy J. Incidence and predictors of perioperative complications with transvenous lead extractions: real-world experience with National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11: e004768.CrossRefPubMed Sood N, Martin DT, Lampert R, Curtis JP, Parzynski C, Clancy J. Incidence and predictors of perioperative complications with transvenous lead extractions: real-world experience with National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11: e004768.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein LM, Love CJ, Wilkoff BL, Chung MK, Hackler JW, Bongiorni MG, et al. Superior vena cava defibrillator coils make transvenous lead extraction more challenging and riskier. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:987–9.CrossRefPubMed Epstein LM, Love CJ, Wilkoff BL, Chung MK, Hackler JW, Bongiorni MG, et al. Superior vena cava defibrillator coils make transvenous lead extraction more challenging and riskier. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:987–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bie MK, Fouad DA, Borleffs CJ, van Rees JB, Thijssen J, Trines SA, et al. Trans-venous lead removal without the use of extraction sheaths, results of >250 removal procedures. Europace. 2012;14:112–6.CrossRefPubMed de Bie MK, Fouad DA, Borleffs CJ, van Rees JB, Thijssen J, Trines SA, et al. Trans-venous lead removal without the use of extraction sheaths, results of >250 removal procedures. Europace. 2012;14:112–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pokorney SD, Parzynski CS, Daubert JP, Hegland DD, Varosy PD, Curtis JP, et al. Temporal trends in and factors associated with use of single- versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: data from the NCDR ICD registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:612–9.CrossRefPubMed Pokorney SD, Parzynski CS, Daubert JP, Hegland DD, Varosy PD, Curtis JP, et al. Temporal trends in and factors associated with use of single- versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: data from the NCDR ICD registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:612–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu JC, Saxon LA, Jones PW, Wehrenberg S, Marcus GM. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: insights from the ALTITUDE Study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(8):1770–5.CrossRefPubMed Hsu JC, Saxon LA, Jones PW, Wehrenberg S, Marcus GM. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: insights from the ALTITUDE Study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(8):1770–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Radiographic predictors of failure of simple manual traction of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a single-center experience
verfasst von
Umut Celikyurt
Burak Acar
Akin Torun
Muzeyyen Karakullukcu
Ozgur Cakir
Ozgur Baris
Ahmet Vural
Aysen Agacdiken
Publikationsdatum
25.06.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01289-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 6/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.