Anzeige
Erschienen in:
23.09.2023 | Original Article
Virtual 3D femur model to assess femoral version: comparison to the 2D axial slice approach
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2023
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
Quantifying femoral version is crucial in diagnosing femoral version abnormalities and for accurate pre-surgical planning. There are numerous methods for measuring femoral version, however, reliability studies for most of these methods excluded children with hip deformities.
Objective
To propose a method of measuring femoral version based on a virtual 3D femur model, and systematically compare its reliability to the widely used Murphy’s 2D axial slice technique.
Materials and methods
We searched our imaging database to identify hip/femur CTs performed on children (<18 years old) with a clinical indication of femoral version measurement (September 2021—August 2022). Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, and inadequate image quality or field-of-view. Two blinded radiologists independently measured femoral version using the virtual 3D femur model and Murphy’s 2D axial slice method. To assess intrareader variability, we randomly selected 20% of the study sample for re-measurements by the two radiologists >2 weeks later. We analyzed the reliability and correlation of these techniques via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and deformity subgroup analysis.
Results
Our study sample consisted of 142 femurs from 71 patients (10.6±4.4 years, male=31). Intra- and inter-reader correlations for both techniques were excellent (ICC≥0.91). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the standard deviation (SD) of the absolute difference between the two radiologists for the Murphy method (mean 13.7°) was larger than that of the 3D femur model technique (mean 4.8°), indicating higher reader variability. In femurs with hip flexion deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 17°, compared to 6.5° for the 3D femur model technique. In femurs with apparent coxa valga deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 10.4°, compared to 5.2° for the 3D femur model technique.
Conclusion
The 3D femur model technique is more reliable than the Murphy's 2D axial slice technique in measuring femoral version, especially in children with hip flexion and apparent coxa valga deformities.