nach oben

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Erschienen in:

Open Access 03.03.2023 | Original Article

Bonded lingual retainer adhesives and discoloration

An in vitro study

verfasst von: Ass. Prof. Sabahat Yazıcıoğlu, Dt. Hasan Karadeniz

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Sonderheft 3/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This in vitro study was conducted to compare the discoloration of a flowable self-adhesive composite, a highly filled composite adhesive, and a liquid polish applied highly filled composite adhesive for bonded lingual retainers.

Methods

Thirty composite discs were fabricated and divided into three groups: group 1, flowable self-adhesive (GC Ortho Connect™ Flow [GCO], GC Orthodontics, Tokyo, Japan); group 2, highly filled composite adhesive (Transbond™ LR [TLR], 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); and group 3, highly filled composite adhesive with liquid polish (TLR and BisCover LV™ [TLRB], BISCO Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA). L*a*b* values were measured by spectrophotometer prior to (T0) and following (T1) immersion in coffee. T1 − T0 differences were calculated as ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b*, and ∆E*ab values. The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to determine whether the data were normally distributed. The values that did not fit the normal distribution were evaluated with the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Dunn’s test was used for multiple comparisons. The level of significance was p < 0.05.

Results

The difference between the TLR and TLRB groups was statistically significant for ∆E*ab (P = 0.007). ∆E*ab value of TLR group was greater than ∆E*ab value of TLRB group. The differences between the GCO and TLR groups (p = 0.001) and the TLR and TLRB groups (p = 0.010) were statistically significant for ∆a*. ∆a* values of GCO and TLRB groups were greater than ∆a* value of TLR group. The difference between the TLR and TLRB groups was statistically significant (p = 0.003) for ∆b*. ∆b* value of TLR group was greater than ∆b* value of TLRB group.

Conclusions

Using a Transbond LR polished with BisCover LV or only GC Ortho Connect Flow for lingual retainer bonding reduces coffee-induced discoloration.

Kučera J, Littlewood SJ, Marek I (2021) Fixed retention: pitfalls and complications. Br Dent J 230:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2892-4CrossRefPubMed

Güler AÜ, Güler E, Yücel AÇ, Ertaş E (2009) Effects of polishing procedures on color stability of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci 17:108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Attar N (2007) The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 8:27–35CrossRefPubMed

Iliadi A, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N, Katsaros C, Pandis N (2015) Failure of fixed orthodontic retainers: a systematic review. J Dent 43:876–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.002CrossRefPubMed

Tabrizi S, Salemis E, Usumez S (2010) Flowable composites for bonding orthodontic retainers. Angle Orthod 80:195–200. https://doi.org/10.2319/033007-155.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Reicheneder C, Behr M (2008) Discolouration of orthodontic adhesives caused by food dyes and ultraviolet light. Eur J Orthod 30:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm058CrossRefPubMed

Eliades T, Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Bradley TG (2001) Comparison of enamel colour changes associated with orthodontic bonding using two different adhesives. Eur J Orthod 23:85–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.1.85CrossRefPubMed

Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M (2005) Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 33:389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.018CrossRefPubMed

Dede DÖ, Şahin O, Koroğlu A, Yilmaz B (2016) Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 116:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.024CrossRefPubMed

10.

Sayinsu K, Isik F, Sezen S, Aydemir B (2007) Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets bonded with a protective liquid polish and a light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1:391–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.049CrossRef

11.

Bae JH, Park JH, Im SS, Song DY (2014) Coffee and health. Integr Med Res 3:189–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2014.08.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Faggion CM Jr (2012) Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J Evid Based Dent Pract 12:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001CrossRefPubMed

13.

Arai Y, Kurokawa H, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Saegusa M, Yokoyama M, Miyazaki M (2021) Evaluation of structural coloration of experimental flowable resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 33:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12674CrossRefPubMed

14.

Tuncer D, Karaman E, Firat E (2013) Does the temperature of beverages affect the surface roughness, hardness, and color stability of a composite resin? Eur J Dent 7:165–171. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.110161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Halacoglu DM, Yamanel K, Basaran S, Tuncer D, Celik C (2016) Effects of staining and bleaching on a nanohybrid composite with or without surface sealant. Eur J Dent 10:361–365. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.184148CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Buyukyilmaz S, Ruyter IE (1994) Color stability of denture base polymers. Int J Prosthodont 7:372–382PubMed

17.

Ergücü Z, Türkün L, Aladag A (2008) Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 33:413–420. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-107CrossRefPubMed

18.

Üsümez S, Büyükyilmaz T, Karaman AI (2003) Effects of fast halogen and plasma arc curing lights on the surface hardness of orthodontic adhesives for lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:641–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00201-4CrossRefPubMed

19.

Moon W, Hyun HK, Chung SH (2022) Mechanical evaluation of dental trauma splints fabricated using recently-developed photo-polymerizable composites. Dent Mater J 41:37–44. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-095CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mundim FM, Garcia LFR, Pires-de-Souza FCP (2010) Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci 18:249–254. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572010000300009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

ElEmbaby AE, Mouneir Slais M, Alawami A, Alabbad M, Alsowyan M, Hanna N, Bahgat H (2021) Spectrophotometric analysis of different flowable restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 22:111–116CrossRefPubMed

22.

Um CM, Ruyter IE (1991) Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int 22:377–386PubMed

23.

Eliades T, Gioka C, Heim M, Eliades G, Makou M (2004) Color stability of orthodontic adhesive resins. Angle Orthod 74:391–393. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219PubMed

24.

Pedroso LB, Barreto LFC, Miotti LL, Nicoloso GF, Durand LB (2016) Effect of a surface sealant on the color stability of composite resins after immersion in staining solution. Gen Dent 64:22–225

25.

Gönülol N, Yilmaz F (2012) The effects of fifinishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005CrossRef

26.

GC Ortho Connect Flow brochure 99-90E3-1300 REV01-09.2019

27.

Catelan A, Briso ALF, Sundfeld RH, Goiato MC, dos Henrique Santos P (2011) Color stability of sealed composite resin restorative materials after ultraviolet artificial aging and immersion in staining solutions. J Prosthet Dent 4:236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60038-3CrossRef

28.

Johnston WM, Kao EC (1989) Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 68:819–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV (2010) Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins—an in vitro study. J Dent 2:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.020CrossRef

30.

Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG (2007) Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 97:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012CrossRefPubMed

31.

Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Razvan Ghinea R (2019) Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: a comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent 31:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12465CrossRefPubMed

32.

Yu B, Lee YK (2008) Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites. J Dent 36:840–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.003CrossRefPubMed

33.

Choi A, Yoo KH, Yoon SY, Park BS, Kim IR, Kim YII (2021) Anti-Microbial and remineralizing properties of self-adhesive orthodontic resin containing mesoporous bioactive glass. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133550CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C (2004) The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 135:587–594. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0246CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kim JI, Lee YK (2007) Changes in color and color parameters of dental resin composites after polymerization. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 80:541–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30628CrossRef

36.

Pedrosa MS, Nogueira FN, Baldo VO, Medeiros IS (2021) Changes in color and contrast ratio of resin composites after curing and storage in water. S Dent J 33:1160–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.02.002CrossRef

37.

Camargo FM, Bona AD, Moraes RR, Souza CRC, Schneider LF (2015) Influence of viscosity and amine content on C==C conversion and color stability of experimental composites. Dent Mater 5:e109–e115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.009CrossRef

Titel: Bonded lingual retainer adhesives and discoloration
An in vitro study
verfasst von: Ass. Prof. Sabahat Yazıcıoğlu
Dt. Hasan Karadeniz
Publikationsdatum: 03.03.2023
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe Sonderheft 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00453-7

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Bonded lingual retainer adhesives and discoloration

An in vitro study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 3/2023

Effects of functional orthopedic treatment on mandibular trabecular bone in class II patients using fractal analysis

Comparative assessment of frictional forces between differently designed esthetic brackets during simulated canine retraction

Effects of maxillary expansion and protraction on pharyngeal airway dimensions in relation to changes in head posture and hyoid position

Bond strength, degree of conversion, and microorganism adhesion using different bracket-to-enamel bonding protocols

Multiheaded mandibular condyles

Effect of light-emitting photobiomodulation therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter