nach oben

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Erschienen in:

30.04.2022 | Original Article

Effects of functional orthopedic treatment on mandibular trabecular bone in class II patients using fractal analysis

verfasst von: Asst. Prof. Dr. Esra Bolat Gümüş, DDS PhD, Res. Asst. Esra Yavuz, DDS, Res. Asst. Cansu Tufekci, DDS

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Sonderheft 3/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of functional orthopedic treatment on mandibular bone structure using fractal dimension (FD) analysis of panoramic radiographs.

Methods

The study material consisted of the pre- and posttreatment digital panoramic radiographs of 80 patients (mean age 10.1 ± 2.01 years; 45 girls, 35 boys) with class II malocclusion who were treated with the monoblock or twin block appliances. The following regions of interest (ROI) were selected: ROI1, condylar process; ROI2, angulus mandibulae; ROI3, corpus mandibulae; and ROI4, mental foramen. Pre- and posttreatment FD values were compared for each ROI.

Results

FD values of the mandibular condyle did not change with the functional orthodontic treatment. FD values of the mandibular corpus region had the highest pretreatment values and significantly decreased with treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Functional orthopedic treatment altered the trabeculation of the mandibular bone, but it is speculated that the changes in the occlusal forces seemed to be of primary significance for this effect.

Geraets WG, Van Der Stelt PF (2000) Fractal properties of bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29(3):144–153. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600524CrossRefPubMed

Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G (2011) Fractals in dentistry. J Dent 39(4):273–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.010CrossRefPubMed

Demirbaş AK, Ergün S, Güneri P, Aktener BO, Boyacıoğlu H (2008) Mandibular bone changes in sickle cell anemia: fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106(1):e41–e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.007CrossRefPubMed

Yasar F, Akgunlu F (2005) Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34(5):261–267. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/85149245CrossRefPubMed

Bollen AM, Taguchi A, Hujoel PP, Hollender LG (2001) Fractal dimension on dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30(5):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600630CrossRefPubMed

Ergün S, Saraçoglu A, Güneri P, Ozpınar B (2009) Application of fractal analysis in hyperparathyroidism. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38(5):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/24986192CrossRefPubMed

Southard TE, Southard KA, Jakobsen JR, Hillis SL, Najim CA (1996) Fractal dimension in radiographic analysis of alveolar process bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82(5):569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80205-8CrossRefPubMed

Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Hildebolt CF (1997) The effect of image variations on fractal dimension calculations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84(1):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90303-6CrossRefPubMed

Huang CC, Chen JC, Chang YC, Jeng JH, Chen CM (2013) A fractal dimensional approach to successful evaluation of apical healing. Int Endod J 46(6):523–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12020CrossRefPubMed

10.

Updike SX, Nowzari H (2008) Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes. J Periodontal Res 43(6):658–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.01056.xCrossRefPubMed

11.

Sansare K, Singh D, Karjodkar F (2012) Changes in the fractal dimension on pre-and post-implant panoramic radiographs. Oral Radiol 28(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-011-0075-8CrossRef

12.

Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ (2017) Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 123(3):382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.11.005CrossRefPubMed

13.

Yasar F, Akgunlu F (2006) The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/97652136CrossRefPubMed

14.

Coşgunarslan A, Canger EM, Soydan Çabuk D, Kış HC (2020) The evaluation of the mandibular bone structure changes related to lactation with fractal analysis. Oral Radiol 36(3):238–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00400-6CrossRefPubMed

15.

Gulec M, Tassoker M, Ozcan S, Orhan K (2020) Evaluation of the mandibular trabecular bone in patients with bruxism using fractal analysis. Oral Radiol 37(1):36–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00422-5CrossRefPubMed

16.

Gelgor IE, Karaman AI, Ercan E (2007) Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central anatolia. Eur J Dent 1:125–131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Mossey PA (1999) The heritability of malocclusion: part 2. The influence of genetics in malocclusion. Br J Orthod 26(3):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/26.3.195CrossRefPubMed

18.

Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT (2007) Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1‑phase and 2‑phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132(4):481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.046CrossRefPubMed

19.

Rakosi TR, Graber TM, Petrovic AG (1985) Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. Mosby, St Louis

20.

Ahmad S, Kamble RH, Shrivastav S, Sharma N, Patil R, Goyal A (2015) Assesment of bony trabecular patternchanges seen in growing skeletal Class II malocclusion treated with twin block therapy. Int J Cur Res Rev 7(21):59–65

21.

Wagle N, Do NN, Yu J, Borke JL (2005) Fractal analysis of the PDL-bone interface and implications for orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127(6):655–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.022CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kang HJ, Jeong SW, Jo BH, Kim YD, Kim SS (2012) Observation of trabecular changes of the mandible after orthognathic surgery using fractal analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(2):96–100. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2012.38.2.96CrossRef

23.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149CrossRefPubMed

24.

White SC, Rudolph DJ (1999) Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88(5):628–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70097-1CrossRefPubMed

25.

McNamara JA Jr, Bryan FA (1987) Long-term mandibular adaptations to protrusive function: an experimental study in Macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92(2):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90364-7CrossRefPubMed

26.

Hirzel HC, Grewe JM (1974) Activators: a practical approach. Am J Orthod 66(5):557–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90114-6CrossRefPubMed

27.

Tulley WJ (1972) The scope and limitations of treatment with the activator. Am J Orthod 61(6):562–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90107-8CrossRefPubMed

28.

Shrout MK, Farley BA, Patt SM, Potter BJ, Hildebolt CF, Pilgram TK et al (1999) The effect of region of interest variations on morphologic operations data and gray-level values extracted from digitized dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88(5):636–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70098-3CrossRefPubMed

29.

Weibel ER (1991) Fractal geometry: a design principle for living organisms. Am J Physiol 261(6 Pt 1):L361–L369. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.1991.261.6.l361CrossRefPubMed

30.

Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Hazelrig JB (1992) Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone: a possible diagnostic indicator of osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 74(1):98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90222-cCrossRefPubMed

31.

Aktuna Belgin C, Serindere G (2020) Evaluation of trabecular bone changes in patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis: a periapical radiography study. J Periodontol 91(7):933–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.19-0452CrossRefPubMed

32.

Tümer N, Gültan AS (1999) Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116(4):460–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70233-7CrossRefPubMed

33.

Amer ME, Heo MS, Brooks SL, Benavides E (2012) Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses. Imaging Sci Dent 42(1):5–12. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

McNamara JA Jr, Carlson DS (1979) Quantitative analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptations to protrusive function. Am J Orthod 76(6):593–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90206-9CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kwak KH, Kim SS, Kim YI, Kim YD (2016) Quantitative evaluation of midpalatal suture maturation via fractal analysis. Korean J Orthod 46(5):323–330. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.5.323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Effects of functional orthopedic treatment on mandibular trabecular bone in class II patients using fractal analysis
verfasst von: Asst. Prof. Dr. Esra Bolat Gümüş, DDS PhD
Res. Asst. Esra Yavuz, DDS
Res. Asst. Cansu Tufekci, DDS
Publikationsdatum: 30.04.2022
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe Sonderheft 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00397-4

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Effects of functional orthopedic treatment on mandibular trabecular bone in class II patients using fractal analysis